Contralateral breast dose from partial breast brachytherapy

Determination of the optimal time for planning SAVI brachytherapy for APBI

INTRODUCTION

Accelerated partial breast irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy treats early-stage carcinoma. Strut-adjusted volume implant applicators are inserted into the cavity post-lumpectomy. For an unstable applicator, changes in distance are seen each day between struts. If an applicator is asymmetrical with no strut movement on subsequent days, then it is stable. If an asymmetrical applicator continues to change strut distances, it is unstable. Waiting for applicator stabilization improves treatment reproducibility but increases infection risk. There is currently no consensus on stability, with ranges from 24 hours (h) to 72 h. Therefore, this study aims to determine when stability is achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 242 female breast cancer patients (2014-2022). CT was performed the same day as applicator insertion (Day 0) and repeated each treatment day. If applicators were initially asymmetrical, the distance between adjacent struts was measured, and the percentage change between the next and previous treatment day was calculated to determine how many applicators stabilized. Less than 5% change indicated stability.

RESULTS

On Day 0, 208 out of 242 patients (86%) had stable and symmetrical applicators that maintained stability each treatment day, and 34 out of 242 patients (14%) had applicators with asymmetrical struts. Within 24 h post-insertion, 229 out of 242 (95%) patients had stabilized applicators that maintained stability on subsequent treatment days.

CONCLUSION

Narrows previously suggested stability (24-72 h) to 24 h, leading to improved treatment efficiency and decreased infection risk as less time is needed to achieve applicator stability.

External-Beam-Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Reduces Organ-at-Risk Doses Compared to Whole-Breast Irradiation after Breast-Conserving Surgery

In order to evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in external-beam-accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) compared to standard whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. Between 2011 and 2021, 170 patients with early breast cancer received APBI within a prospective institutional single-arm trial. The prescribed dose to the planning treatment volume was 38 Gy in 10 fractions on 10 consecutive working days. OAR doses for the contralateral breast, the ipsilateral, contralateral, and whole lung, the whole heart, left ventricle (LV), and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and for the spinal cord and the skin were assessed and compared to a control group with real-world data from 116 patients who underwent WBI. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS-ID: DRKS00004417. Compared to WBI, APBI led to reduced OAR doses for the contralateral breast (0.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9 Gy, p = 0.000), the ipsilateral (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 9.2 ± 2.5 Gy, p = 0.000) and whole mean lung dose (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.5 Gy, p = 0.000), the mean heart dose (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.4 Gy, p = 0.007), the LV V23 (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6%, p < 0.001), the mean LAD dose (2.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.8 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001), the maximum spinal cord dose (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 5.7 Gy, p = 0.016), and the maximum skin dose (39.6 ± 1.8 vs. 49.1 ± 5.8 Gy, p = 0.000). APBI should be recommended to suitable patients to minimize the risk of secondary tumor induction and the incidence of consecutive major cardiac events.

Efficiency of using the day-of-implant CT for planning of SAVI APBI

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to develop an optimized, efficient workflow for using the day-of-implant (DOI) CT for treatment planning of accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy using the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) device.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 62 consecutive SAVI patients, a DOI CT was acquired and used for treatment planning. A "verification" CT was acquired 24-72 h after implant and immediately before the first fraction, then registered to the DOI CT. If the DOI CT-based plan was no longer optimal, a replan was performed. An array of metrics describing the geometry of the device and its relative position in the patient from the DOI CTs for these patients was collected. These metrics from the DOI CT were evaluated to determine what features could predict for the need to replan before the first treatment fraction. Logistical regression analysis including χ² tests was used to determine if different factors correlated with replanning.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 62 patients (35%) required replanning. Only the presence of splayed struts, where splay was toward the skin, and the use of a nine strut ("8-1") SAVI were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with replanning. Within these individual populations, no additional factors showed a significant statistical correlation for requiring replanning.

CONCLUSIONS

For strut-based accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy, it was feasible to treat with a plan based on the DOI CT for a majority (65%) of patients. Some factors correlate to needing replanning; recognizing these could be used to optimize treatment workflow for certain patients, increasing clinical efficiency while enhancing the quality of patient care.