1
|
Webster M, Dona Lemus OM, Zheng D, Wancura JN, Tanny S, Sakthivel G, Constine L. Case study with dosimetric analysis: Total body irradiation to a patient with a left ventricular assist device. Clin Case Rep 2024; 12:e8868. [PMID: 38756618 PMCID: PMC11096280 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Key Clinical Message A patient presented with cardiogenic shock, requiring the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and acute myeloblastic leukemia. This necessitated total body irradiation (TBI) while balancing dose reduction to the LVAD components to avoid potential radiation damage. Here we outline our treatment approach and dose estimates to the LVAD. Abstract This case report discusses the delivery of TBI to a patient with an LVAD. This treatment required radiation-dose determinations and consequential reductions for the heart, LVAD, and an external controller connected to the LVAD. The patient was treated using a traditional 16MV anterior posterior (AP)/posterior anterior (PA) technique at a source-to-surface-distance of 515 cm for 400 cGy in two fractions. A 3 cm thick Cerrobend block was placed on the beam spoiler to reduce dose to the heart and LVAD to 150 cGy. The external controller was placed in a 1 cm thick acrylic box to reduce neutron dose and positioned as far from the treatment fields as achievable. In vivo measurements were made using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) placed inside the box at distances of 2 cm, 8.5 cm, and 14 cm from the field edge, and on the patient along the central axis and centered behind the LVAD block. Further ion chamber measurements were made using a solid water phantom to more accurately estimate the dose delivered to the LVAD. Neutron dose measurements were also conducted. The total estimated dose to the controller ranged from 135.3 cGy to 91.5 cGy. The LVAD block reduced the surface dose to the patient to 271.6 cGy (68.1%). The block transmission factors of the 3 cm Cerrobend block measured in the phantom were 45% at 1 cm depth and decreased asymptotically to around 30% at 3 cm depth. Applying these transmission factors to the in vivo measurements yielded a dose of 120 cGy to the implanted device. The neutron dose the LVAD region is estimated around 0.46 cGy. Physical limitations of the controller made it impossible to completely avoid dose. Shielding is recommended. The block had limited dose reduction to the surface, due to secondary particles, but appropriately reduced the dose at 3 cm and beyond. More research on LVADs dose limits would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Webster
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Olga M. Dona Lemus
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Joshua N. Wancura
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Sean Tanny
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Gukan Sakthivel
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Louis Constine
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoeben BAW, Pazos M, Seravalli E, Bosman ME, Losert C, Albert MH, Boterberg T, Ospovat I, Mico Milla S, Demiroz Abakay C, Engellau J, Jóhannesson V, Kos G, Supiot S, Llagostera C, Bierings M, Scarzello G, Seiersen K, Smith E, Ocanto A, Ferrer C, Bentzen SM, Kobyzeva DA, Loginova AA, Janssens GO. ESTRO ACROP and SIOPE recommendations for myeloablative Total Body Irradiation in children. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:119-133. [PMID: 35661674 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Myeloablative Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is an important modality in conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). TBI practices are heterogeneous and institution-specific. Since TBI is associated with multiple late adverse effects, recommendations may help to standardize practices and improve the outcome versus toxicity ratio for children. MATERIAL AND METHODS The European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) Radiotherapy TBI Working Group together with ESTRO experts conducted a literature search and evaluation regarding myeloablative TBI techniques and toxicities in children. Findings were discussed in bimonthly virtual meetings and consensus recommendations were established. RESULTS Myeloablative TBI in HSCT conditioning is mostly performed for high-risk ALL patients or patients with recurring hematologic malignancies. TBI is discouraged in children <3-4 years old because of increased toxicity risk. Publications regarding TBI are mostly retrospective studies with level III-IV evidence. Preferential TBI dose in children is 12-14.4 Gy in 1.6-2 Gy fractions b.i.d. Dose reduction should be considered for the lungs to <8 Gy, for the kidneys to ≤10 Gy, and for the lenses to <12 Gy, for dose rates ≥6 cGy/min. Highly conformal techniques i.e. TomoTherapy and VMAT TBI or Total Marrow (and/or Lymphoid) Irradiation as implemented in several centers, improve dose homogeneity and organ sparing, and should be evaluated in studies. CONCLUSIONS These ESTRO ACROP SIOPE recommendations provide expert consensus for conventional and highly conformal myeloablative TBI in children, as well as a supporting literature overview of TBI techniques and toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A W Hoeben
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Bosman
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph Losert
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Michael H Albert
- Dept. of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Inna Ospovat
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Soraya Mico Milla
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Candan Demiroz Abakay
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Gregor Kos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St. Herblain, France
| | - Camille Llagostera
- Dept. of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St. Herblain, France
| | - Marc Bierings
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scarzello
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Ed Smith
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Dept. of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Daria A Kobyzeva
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna A Loginova
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naessig M, Hernandez S, Astorga NR, McCulloch J, Saenz D, Myers P, Rasmussen K, Stathakis S, Ha CS, Papanikolaou N, Ford J, Kirby N. A customizable aluminum compensator system for total body irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:36-44. [PMID: 34432944 PMCID: PMC8504611 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop a simplified aluminum compensator system for total body irradiation (TBI) that is easy to assemble and modify in a short period of time for customized patient treatments. Methods The compensator is composed of a combination of 0.3 cm thick aluminum bars, two aluminum T‐tracks, spacers, and metal bolts. The system is mounted onto a plexiglass block tray. The design consists of 11 fixed sectors spanning from the patient's head to feet. The outermost sectors utilize 7.6 cm wide aluminum bars, while the remaining sectors use 2.5 cm wide aluminum bars. There is a magnification factor of 5 from the compensator to the patient treatment plane. Each bar of aluminum is interconnected at each adjacent sector with a tongue and groove arrangement and fastened to the T‐track using a metal washer, bolt, and nut. Inter‐bar leakage of the compensator was tested using a water tank and diode. End‐to‐end measurements were performed with an ion chamber in a solid water phantom and also with a RANDO phantom using internal and external optically stimulated luminescent detectors (OSLDs). In‐vivo patient measurements from the first 20 patients treated with this aluminum compensator were compared to those from 20 patients treated with our previously used lead compensator system. Results The compensator assembly time was reduced to 20–30 min compared to the 2–4 h it would take with the previous lead design. All end‐to‐end measurements were within 10% of that expected. The median absolute in‐vivo error for the aluminum compensator was 3.7%, with 93.8% of measurements being within 10% of that expected. The median error for the lead compensator system was 5.3%, with 85.1% being within 10% of that expected. Conclusion This design has become the standard compensator at our clinic. It allows for quick assembly and customization along with meeting the Task Group 29 recommendations for dose uniformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison Naessig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Soleil Hernandez
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Nestor Rodrigo Astorga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - James McCulloch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel Saenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Pamela Myers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Karl Rasmussen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Sotirios Stathakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Chul S Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Niko Papanikolaou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - John Ford
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Kirby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evaluation of the surface dose for total body irradiation (TBI) technique with parallel-opposed anterior posterior geometry. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
Total body irradiation (TBI) is an external radiotherapy technique in which the whole body including the superficial regions is required to receive the therapeutic dose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the received surface dose during TBI technique.
Methods and materials:
The anterior/posterior (AP/PA) TBI was implemented with 18-MV photon beam at 312-cm treatment distance for human-like phantom. The GAFCHROMIC-EBT3 films were used for superficial dose measurements.
Results and discussion:
The percentage of surface-absorbed dose relative to the prescription point for 8 points of measurements was between 102·78–121·48% and 104·51–127·43% at 5 and 10 mm depth, respectively. In the chest wall region due to the presence of lung blocks, the absorbed dose was below the acceptable level, so an electron boost was required to increase the chest wall absorbed dose.
Conclusions:
According to the results, the implemented technique was able to deliver sufficient dose to the shallow surface of phantom’s body.
Collapse
|