1
|
Gallio E, Sardo A, Badellino S, Mantovani C, Levis M, Fiandra C, Guarneri A, Arcadipane F, Richetto V, Ricardi U, Giglioli FR. Helical tomotherapy and two types of volumetric modulated arc therapy: dosimetric and clinical comparison for several cancer sites. Radiol Phys Technol 2023; 16:272-283. [PMID: 37084071 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00716-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy accelerators have undergone continuous technological developments. We investigated the differences between Radixact™ and VMAT treatment plans. Sixty patients were included in this study. Dosimetric comparison between the Radixact™ and VMAT plans was performed for six cancer sites: whole-brain, head and neck, lymphoma, lung, prostate, and rectum. The VMAT plans were generated with two Elekta linear accelerators (Synergy® and Versa HD™). The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, organs-at-risk dose constraints, and four dosimetric indexes were considered. The deliverability of the plans was assessed using quality assurance (gamma index evaluation) measurements; clinical judgment was included in the assessment. The mean AAPM TG218 (3%-2 mm, global normalization) gamma index values were 99.4%, 97.8%, and 96.6% for Radixact™, Versa HD™, and Synergy®, respectively. Radixact™ performed better than Versa HD™ in terms of dosimetric indexes, hippocampi D100%, spinal cord Dmax, rectum V38.4 Gy, bladder V30 Gy, and V40 Gy. Versa HD™ saved more of the (lungs-PTV) V5 Gy and (lungs-PTV) Dmean, heart Dmean, breasts V4 Gy, and bowel V45 Gy. Regarding Synergy®, the head and neck Radixact™ plan saved more of the parotid gland, oral cavity, and supraglottic larynx. From a clinical point of view, for the head and neck, prostate, and rectal sites, the Radixact™ and Versa HD™ plans were similar; Radixact™ plans were preferable for the head and neck and rectum to Synergy® plans. The quality of linac plans has improved, and differences with tomotherapy have decreased. However, tomotherapy continues to be an essential add-on in multi-machine departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Gallio
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy.
| | - Anna Sardo
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Serena Badellino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Veronica Richetto
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Francesca Romana Giglioli
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Curcuru AN, Kim T, Yang D, Gach HM. Real-time B 0 compensation during gantry rotation in a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. Med Phys 2022; 49:6451-6460. [PMID: 35906957 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rotation of the ferromagnetic gantry of a low magnetic field MRI-Linac was previously demonstrated to cause large center frequency offsets of ±400 Hz. The B0 off-resonances cause image artifacts and imaging isocenter shifts that would preclude MRI-guided arc therapy. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to measure and compensate for center frequency offsets in real-time during gantry rotation on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac using a free induction decay (FID) navigator. METHODS A nonselective FID navigator was added before each 2D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine image acquisition on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. Images were acquired at 7.3 frames per second. Phase data from the initial FID navigator (while the gantry was stationary) was used as a reference. The phase data from each subsequent FID navigator was used to calculate the real-time B0 off-resonance. The transmitter/receiver phase and the phase accrual over the adjacent image acquisition were adjusted to correct for the center frequency offset. Measurements were performed using a MRI-Linac dynamic phantom prior to and while the gantry rotated clockwise and counterclockwise. Image quality and signal-to-noise ratio were compared between uncorrected and B0 corrected MRIs using a reference image acquired while the gantry was stationary. Four targets in the phantom were manually contoured on the first image frame and an active contouring algorithm was used retrospectively on each subsequent frame to assess image variations and calculate Dice coefficients. Additionally, three healthy volunteers were imaged using the same pulse sequences with and without real-time B0 compensation during gantry rotation. Normalized root mean square errors (nRMSEs) were calculated for the phantom and in vivo to assess the efficacy of the B0 compensation on image quality. The measured center frequency offsets from the volunteer and MRI dynamic phantom navigator data were also compared. The sinusoidal behavior of the center frequency offsets was modeled based on the gantry layout and long time constant eddy currents resulting from gantry rotation. RESULTS The duration of the FID navigator and processing was 4.5 ms. The FID navigator resulted in a ≤11% drop in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the phantom and in vivo (liver). Dice coefficients from the MR-IGRT phantom contour measurements remained above 0.8 with B0 compensation. Without B0 compensation, the Dice coefficients dropped below 0.8 for up to 21% of the time depending on the contour. Real-time B0 compensation resulted in mean reductions in nRMSE of 51% and 16% for the MR-IGRT phantom and in vivo, respectively. Peak-to-peak center frequency offsets ranged from 757 to 773 Hz in the phantom and 670 to 871 Hz in vivo. CONCLUSION Dynamic real-time B0 compensation significantly improved image quality and reduced artifacts during gantry rotation in the phantom and in vivo. However, the FID navigator resulted in a small drop in the imaging duty cycle and SNR. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austen N Curcuru
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA
| | - Taeho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA
| | - Deshan Yang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA
| | - H Michael Gach
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Radiology, and Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kearney M, Keys M, Faivre-Finn C, Wang Z, Aznar MC, Duane F. Exposure of the heart in lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of heart doses published during 2013 to 2020. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:118-125. [PMID: 35577022 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Lung cancer radiotherapy increases the risk of cardiotoxicity and heart radiation dose is an independent predictor of poor survival. This study describes heart doses and strategies aiming to reduce exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of lung cancer dosimetry studies reporting heart doses published 2013-2020 was undertaken. Doses were compared according to laterality, region irradiated, treatment modality (stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and non-SABR), planning technique, and respiratory motion management. RESULTS For 392 non-SABR regimens in 105 studies, the average MHD was 10.3 Gy (0.0-48.4) and was not significantly different between left and right-sided tumours. It was similar between IMRT and 3DCRT (10.9 Gy versus 10.6 Gy) and lower with particle beam therapy (proton 7.0 Gy; carbon-ion 1.9 Gy). Active respiratory motion management reduced exposure (7.4 Gy versus 9.3 Gy). For 168 SABR regimens in 35 studies, MHD was 4.0 Gy (0.0-32.4). Exposure was higher in central and lower lobe lesions (6.3 and 5.8 Gy respectively). MHD was lowest for carbon ions (0.5 Gy) compared to other techniques. Active respiratory motion management reduced exposure (2.4 Gy versus 5.0 Gy). Delineation guidelines and Dose Volume Constraints for the heart varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS There is scope to reduce heart radiation dose in lung cancer radiotherapy. Consensus on planning objectives, contouring and DVCs for the heart may lead to reduced heart doses in the future. For IMRT, more stringent optimisation objectives may reduce heart dose. Active respiratory motion management or particle therapy may be considered in situations where cardiac dose is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve Kearney
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Maeve Keys
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Zhe Wang
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marianne C Aznar
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Duane
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao Q, Li T, Du S, He J, Zeng Z. Shortened Radiation Time Promotes Recovery From Radiation-induced Lymphopenia in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221112287. [PMID: 35816375 PMCID: PMC9297706 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221112287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the potential impact of radiation time on
radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) and subsequently recovery after stereotactic
body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to examine the associations between radiation
time and with patient outcomes in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer
(NSCLC). Methods: Clinical and laboratory records of subjects
consisted of 115 patients who had received SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Clinical
and laboratory records were retrospective reviewed to assess the changes in
total lymphocyte counts (TLCs) following SBRT. Associations of TLCs kinetics
with the clinical and treatment features, and outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Most patients (100/115, 86.96%) experienced
significantly decreased median TLCs following SBRT (1700 vs 1100 cells/µL;
P < .001), and 52 patients (45.21%) met the criteria for
lymphopenia. Six months after SBRT, 44 patients (38.26%) had recovered. A
negative correlation between TLCs reduction and radiation time was observed
(r = −0.381, P < .001). According to
the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value
for radiation time to was 3950 s to predict lymphocyte count recovery (LR)
following RIL was 3950 s (P < .001). Multivariate analyses
demonstrated that radiation time was significantly associated with LR (odds
ratio [OR], 0.113; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.029-0.432;
P = .001) but not TLCs reduction (P = .575).
LR within 6 months after SBRT was associated with improved progression-free
survival in patients without non-lymphopenia (P = .034), but
had little effect in patients with lymphopenia (P = .405).
Conclusion: A longer radiation time was associated with a lower
rate of LR within 6 months after SBRT in patients with early-stage NSCLC. Given
the association of severe and persistent RIL with survival in NSCLC, further
study of the effect of radiation time on immune status is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianqian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tingting Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shisuo Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 92323Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bayasgalan U, Moon SH, Kim TH, Kim TY, Lee SH, Suh YG. Dosimetric Comparisons between Proton Beam Therapy and Modern Photon Radiation Techniques for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Tumor Location. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246356. [PMID: 34944976 PMCID: PMC8699272 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-established technique used to treat stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages over photon SABR techniques by reducing doses to normal organs. Hence, it is believed that PBT is helpful for patients with tumors located centrally in stage I NSCLC. However, the benefits of PBT for other locations, such as peripherally located tumors, have not been well-described. We investigated dosimetric benefits for PBT over modern photon radiation techniques for stage I NSCLC according to tumor locations. A total of 42 patients’ (including tumors that were central (11), peripheral (nine), and close to the chest wall (22)) PBT plans were compared with those of modern photon radiation techniques. In all locations, PBT significantly reduced radiation exposure to the lung and heart. To reduce potential lung and heart toxicities, PBT is ideal, even in the peripherally located stage I NSCLC. Abstract Herein, we investigated the dosimetric benefits for proton beam therapy (PBT) over modern photon radiation techniques according to tumor location (central, peripheral, and close to the chest wall) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 42 patients with stage I NSCLC were treated with PBT with a total dose of 50–70 Gy in four or 10 fractions considering the risk of treatment-related toxicities. Simulation plans for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), static-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were retrospectively generated using the same treatment volumes as implemented in the PBT plans for these patients. Dosimetric improvements were observed with PBT as compared with all the photon-based radiation techniques with regards to the mean lung dose, lung V5 and V10, mean heart dose, and heart V5 and V10 in all locations. Moreover, lower radiation exposure to the chest wall was observed within PBT for peripherally located and close to the chest wall tumors. All radiotherapy modalities achieved clinically satisfactory treatment plans in the current study. Notably, the usage of PBT resulted in significant dosimetric improvements in the lung and heart over photon-based techniques at all tumor locations, including the periphery, for stage I NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Unurjargal Bayasgalan
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (U.B.); (S.H.M.); (T.H.K.); (T.Y.K.); (S.H.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Ulaanbaatar 13370, Mongolia
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (U.B.); (S.H.M.); (T.H.K.); (T.Y.K.); (S.H.L.)
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (U.B.); (S.H.M.); (T.H.K.); (T.Y.K.); (S.H.L.)
| | - Tae Yoon Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (U.B.); (S.H.M.); (T.H.K.); (T.Y.K.); (S.H.L.)
| | - Seung Hyun Lee
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (U.B.); (S.H.M.); (T.H.K.); (T.Y.K.); (S.H.L.)
| | - Yang-Gun Suh
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (U.B.); (S.H.M.); (T.H.K.); (T.Y.K.); (S.H.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-920-1722
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raymakers AJN, Cameron D, Tyldesley S, Regier DA. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Tumors versus Standard of Care. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:1857-1866. [PMID: 34068400 PMCID: PMC8161824 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent clinical trial results reported that stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) may improve survival for patients with oligometastatic (OM) cancer. Given that these results come from a phase II trial, there remains considerable uncertainty about this finding, and about the cost-effectiveness of SABR for patients with OM cancer. In this analysis, we estimate the cost-effectiveness of SABR for oligometastatic cancer patients. METHODS A probabilistic time-dependent Markov model was constructed to simulate treatment of oligometastatic cancer patients over five- and ten-year time horizons. The primary data source was the phase II, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastases (SABR-COMET )trial and supplemented with data from the literature. We estimated the effect of SABR and the standard of care (SoC) using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a provincial payer perspective (2018 Canadian dollars). RESULTS In the reference case analysis (five-year time horizon), SABR was associated with additional incremental costs of CAD 38,487 and an incremental QALY gain of 0.84. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD 45,726 per QALY gained. Over a ten-year time horizon, the increased uncertainty in the long-term effectiveness of SABR resulted in an ICER of CAD 291,544 per QALY gained. Estimates from the probabilistic analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD 50,000 and CAD 100,000 per QALY gained, there is 54% and 78% probability (respectively) that SABR would be cost-effective using the five-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS The adoption of SABR therapy requires a considerable upfront capital investment. Our results suggest that the cost-effectiveness of SABR is contingent on the uncertainty in the evidence base. Further clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness of SABR and research into the real-world costs associated with this treatment could reduce the uncertainty around implementation of the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. N. Raymakers
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (A.J.N.R.); (D.C.)
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - David Cameron
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (A.J.N.R.); (D.C.)
| | - Scott Tyldesley
- Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada;
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Dean A. Regier
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (A.J.N.R.); (D.C.)
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen J, Dai J, Nobah A, Bai S, Bi N, Lai Y, Li M, Tian Y, Wang X, Fu Q, Liang B, Zhang T, Xia W, Xu Y, Ren W, Yan X, Zhu J, Chen D, Yang J. A Special Report on 2019 International Planning Competition and a Comprehensive Analysis of Its Results. Front Oncol 2020; 10:571644. [PMID: 33344231 PMCID: PMC7746833 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.571644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work is to introduce the 2019 International Planning Competition and to analyze its results. Methods and materials A locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) case using the simultaneous integrated boost approach was selected. The plan quality was evaluated by using a ranking system in accordance with practice guidelines. Planners used their clinical Treatment Planning System (TPS) to generate the best possible plan along with a survey, designed to obtain medical physics aspects information. We investigated the quality of the large population of plans designed by worldwide planners using different planning and delivery systems. The correlations of plan quality with relevant planner characteristics (work experience, department scale, and competition experience) and with technological parameters (TPS and modality) were examined. Results The number of the qualified plans was 287 with a wide range of scores (38.61–97.99). The scores showed statistically significant differences by the following factors: 1) department scale: the mean score (89.76 ± 8.36) for planners from the departments treating >2,000 patients annually was the highest of all; 2) competition experience: the mean score for the 107 planners with previous competition experience was 88.92 ± 9.59, statistically significantly from first-time participants (p = .001); 3) techniques: the mean scores for planners using VMAT (89.18 ± 6.43) and TOMO (90.62 ± 7.60) were higher than those using IMRT (82.28 ± 12.47), with statistical differences (p <.001). The plan scores were negligibly correlated with the planner’s years of work experience or the type of TPS used. Regression analysis demonstrated that plan score was associated with dosimetric objectives that were difficult to achieve, which is generally consistent with a clinical practice evaluation. However, 51.2% of the planners abandoned the difficult component of total lung receiving a dose of 5 Gy in their plan design to achieve the optimal plan. Conclusion The 2019 international planning competition was carried out successfully, and its results were analyzed. Plan quality was not correlated with work experiences or the TPS used, but it was correlated with department scale, modality, and competition experience. These findings differed from those reported in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ahmad Nobah
- Radiation Physics Section, Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sen Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Youqun Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Minghui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuetao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qi Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenlong Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenting Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuena Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Deqi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiming Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kielbasa JE, Meeks SL, Kelly P, Willoughby TR, Zeidan O, Shah AP. Evaluation of cine imaging during multileaf collimator and gantry motion for real-time magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:178-187. [PMID: 33226709 PMCID: PMC7769407 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Real‐time magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) uses 2D cine imaging for target tracking. This work evaluates the percent image uniformity (PIU) and spatial integrity of cine images in the presence of multileaf collimator (MLC) and gantry motion in order to simulate sliding window and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) conditions. Methods Percent image uniformity and spatial integrity of cine images were measured (1) during MLC motion, (2) as a function of static gantry position, and (3) during gantry rotation. PIU was calculated according to the ACR MRI Quality Control Manual. Spatial integrity was evaluated by measuring the geometric distortion of 16 measured marker positions (10 cm or 15.225 cm from isocenter). Results The PIU of cine images did not vary by more than 1% from static linac conditions during MLC motion and did not vary by more than 3% during gantry rotation. Banding artifacts were present during gantry rotation. The geometric distortion in the cine images was less than 0.88 mm for all points measured throughout MLC motion. For all static gantry positions, the geometric distortion was less than 0.88 mm at 10 cm from isocenter and less than 1.4 mm at 15.225 cm from isocenter. During gantry rotation, the geometric distortion remained less than 0.92 mm at 10 cm from isocenter and less than 1.60 mm at 15.225 cm from isocenter. Conclusion During MLC motion, cine images maintained adequate PIU, and the geometric distortion of points within 15.225 cm from isocenter was less than the 1 mm threshold necessary for real‐time target tracking and gating. During gantry rotation, PIU was negatively affected by banding artifacts, and spatial integrity was only maintained within 10 cm from isocenter. Future work should investigate the effects imaging artifacts have on real‐time target tracking during MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerrold E Kielbasa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health - UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Sanford L Meeks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health - UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Patrick Kelly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health - UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Twyla R Willoughby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health - UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Omar Zeidan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health - UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Amish P Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health - UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang D, Chen J, Zhang X, Zhang T, Wang L, Feng Q, Zhou Z, Dai J, Bi N. Sparing Organs at Risk with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Automatic Treatment Planning Study. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:9643-9653. [PMID: 33116824 PMCID: PMC7547766 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s273197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The technique of simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) has been widely used in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer; however, its dosimetric advantages are seldom reported. This study aimed to quantify dosimetric advantages of SIB-VMAT. Methods Forty patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer in our hospital were retrospectively included. SIB-VMAT and conventional VMAT (C-VMAT) plans were generated for every patient using the automatic treatment planning system. A reduced dose was delivered to PTV in SIB-VAMT plans compared to C-VMAT plans (50.4Gy vs 60Gy). The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTV and 59.92 Gy in 28 fractions to PGTV in SIB-VMAT plans, while 60 Gy in 30 fractions to PTV in C-VMAT plans. Dose-volume metrics of PTV, total lung, heart, esophagus and spinal cord were recorded. The quality score was used to evaluate organs at risk (OAR) protection for two type prescription plans. Results Conformal coverage of the targets (PGTV/PTV) by 95% of the prescription dose was well achieved in radiation plans. SIB-VMAT plans achieved significantly higher quality score than C-VMAT plans (Mean: 68.15±13.32 vs 49.15±13.35, P<0.001). More plans scored above sixty in SIB-VMAT group compared to C-VMAT group (72.5% vs 20%, P<0.001). Notable reductions in mean dose, V30, V40 and V50 of total lung were observed in SIB-VMAT plans compared to C-VMAT plans, with median decreased proportions of 6.5%, 8.7%, 19.6% and 32.1%, respectively. Statistically significant decrease in heart V30 and V40 was also achieved in SIB-VMAT plans, with median decreased proportions of 26.1% and 38.8%. SIB-VMAT plans achieved significant reductions in the maximum doses to both esophagus and spinal cord. Patients with CTV/(GTV+GTVnd) ≥8.6 showed more notable decrease in total lung V50 (median, 33.6% vs 28.8%, P=0.001) in SIB-VMAT plans compared to those with the ratio being less than 8.6. Conclusion SIB-VMAT technique could lead to a substantial sparing of normal organs, including lung, heart, esophagus and cord, mainly through reducing high and inter-median dose exposure. Patients with CTV/(GTV+GTVnd) ≥8.6 might benefit more from SIB-VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daquan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiayun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Luhua Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Helical tomotherapy: Comparison of Hi-ART and Radixact clinical patient treatments at the Technical University of Munich. Sci Rep 2020; 10:4928. [PMID: 32188899 PMCID: PMC7080845 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61499-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The helical tomotherapy (HT) Hi-ART system was installed at our department in April 2007. In July 2018 the first Radixact system in Germany has been launched for clinical use. We present differences, advantages and disadvantages and show future perspectives in patient treatment using two HT devices. We investigate patient characteristics, image quality, radiotherapy treatment specifications and analyze the time effort for treatments with the Hi-ART system from April 2010 until May 2017 and compare it to the data acquired in the first nine months of usage of the Radixact system. Comparing the Hi-ART and Radixact system, the unique option of integrated MVCT image acquisition has experienced distinct improvement in image quality. Time effort for irradiation treatment could be improved resulting in a mean beam on time for craniospinal axis treatment of 636.2 s for the Radixact system compared to 915.9 s for the Hi-ART system. The beneficial use of tomotherapy for complex target volumes is demonstrated by a head and neck tumor case and craniospinal axis treatment. With the Radixact system MVCT image quality has been improved allowing for fast and precise interfraction dose adaptation. The improved time effort for patient treatment could increase the accessibility for clinical usage.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang D, Cui J, Zhao J, You J, Yu R, Yu H, Jiang L, Li D, Xu B, Shi A. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of 60 Gy in eight fractions is safe for ultracentral non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2020; 11:754-761. [PMID: 32012484 PMCID: PMC7049487 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is no consensus on the definition or recommended radiotherapy treatment of ultracentral non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report our institution's experience in treating ultracentral lung cancer patients with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of 60 Gy in eight fractions. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 21 ultracentral NSCLC patients treated with 60 Gy SABR in eight fractions. We defined ultracentral lung cancer as the planning target volume (PTV) directly abutting or overlapping central structures, including the proximal bronchial tree, heart, and great vessels but not the esophagus. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and local control (LC). Toxicity was scored per the CTCAE v4.03. Results The median follow‐up time was 15 months, and the median OS was 15 months. The one‐ and two‐year OS rates were 87.5% and 76.6%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year PFS rates were 71.1% and 64.0%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year LC rates were 92.9% and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 treatment‐related toxicities was 19.1%. There was no grade ≥ 3 treatment‐related toxicity. Conclusion SABR of 60 Gy in eight fractions is feasible for ultracentral NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianing Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Oncology I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jing You
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Huiming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Leilei Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Dongming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Anhui Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Do SABR-related toxicities for lung cancer depend on treatment delivery? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 129:67-78. [PMID: 30097239 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for lung cancer is an advanced technique where tumours are ablated with hypofractionated radiation doses, with a high degree of accuracy. The aim of this paper is to review the available literature and to discuss the SABR-induced toxicities for lung malignancies as a function of radiation delivery technique. A Medline search was conducted to identify the appropriate literature to fulfil the aim of this review and data from all applicable papers were collated and analysed. The most common techniques of SABR delivery employ linear accelerators, CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system, TomoTherapy and the Novalis beam surgery system. Linear accelerator-based treatments give rise to a variety of toxicities that are strongly dependent on both patient-related factors and planning/dosimetry-related factors. The limited number of studies using CyberKnife reported low grade toxicities. Grade three toxicities mainly include fatigue and chest pain, usually in less than 10% of patients. All treatment techniques presented show efficiency in SABR delivery with various toxicities which, at this stage, cannot render one technique better than the other. For more conclusive results, well-designed phase three randomised clinical trials are required with better patient selection criteria, including dose and fractionation, treatment machine and technique, along with the consistent selection of a common toxicity grading criterion.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dosimetric analysis of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer using MR-guided Tri- 60Co unit, MR-guided LINAC, and conventional LINAC-based plans. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:e312-e321. [PMID: 29703704 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
14
|
Xu Y, Deng W, Yang S, Li P, Kong Y, Tian Y, Liao Z, Chen M. Dosimetric comparison of the helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage IIB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep 2017; 7:14863. [PMID: 29093491 PMCID: PMC5665865 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14629-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to compare the dosimetric parameters to target dose coverage and the critical structures in the treatment planning of helical tomotherapy (TOMO), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for NSCLC delivering conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Thirty patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC were included. Three radiation treatment plans were designed for each patient. All patients received the uniform prescription dose of 60 Gy to the planning target volume. The conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), and parameters of critical structures were calculated. A significantly superior mean CI was observed in VMAT than in TOMO or IMRT (P = 0.013, 0.001). Mean HI was also better using VAMT or IMRT than TOMO (P = 0.002, 0.003). Mean lung V20 and V30 were significantly reduced by TOMO compared to IMRT (P = 0.019, 0.029). The heart was spared by IMRT compared to TOMO in terms of mean heart dose, V5, V10, and V20 (P < 0.05). In larger tumor, VMAT provided the optimal dose distribution and sparing to heart. Compared to TOMO and IMRT, VMAT achieved better target dose distribution and similar sparing of critical structures. VMAT seemed to be the optimal technique for NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujin Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiye Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Shuangyan Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pu Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yue Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|