1
|
Deodato F, Cilla S, Gabriella M, Massaccesi M, Ippolito E, Caravatta L, Picardi V, Romanella M, Di Falco C, Bartollino A, Valentini V, Cellini N, De Spirito M, Piermattei A, Morganti AG. Daily On-Line Set-Up Correction in 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy: Is It Feasible? TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 98:441-4. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161209800407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background The aim of this report was to investigate the feasibility in terms of treatment time prolongation of an on-line no-action level correction protocol, based on daily electronic portal image verification. Methods and study design The occupation of a linear accelerator (LINAC) delivering 3-D conformal treatments was monitored for two weeks (from Monday to Friday, 10 working days). An electronic portal image device I-View (Elekta, UK) was used for setup verification. Single-exposure portal images were acquired daily using the initial 8 monitor units delivered for each treatment field. Translational deviations of isocenter position larger than 5 mm or 7 mm, for radical or palliative treatments, respectively, were immediately corrected. In order to estimate the extra workload involved with the on-line protocol, the time required for isocenter check and table correction was specifically monitored. Results Forty-eight patients were treated. In all, 482 fractions had electronic portal images taken. Two hundred and forty-five setup corrections were made (50.8% of all fractions). The occupation of the LINAC lasted 106 h on the whole. Twelve h and 25 min (11.7% of LINAC occupation time) were spent for portal image verification and setup correction. On the average, 4.3 fractions per hour were carried out. Conclusions When used by trained therapists, ideally, portal imaging may be carried out before each fraction, requiring approximately 10% of LINAC occupation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Università Cattolica, Campobasso
| | | | | | - Edy Ippolito
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology
- Radiotherapy Department, Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Carlo Di Falco
- Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”, Università Cattolica, Campobasso
| | - Alessandra Bartollino
- Service of Clinical Engineering, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”, Università Cattolica, Campobasso
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico A Gemelli, Università Cattolica, Rome
| | - Numa Cellini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico A Gemelli, Università Cattolica, Rome
| | | | | | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology
- Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico A Gemelli, Università Cattolica, Rome
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohammadi M, Bezak E. Evaluation of relative transmitted dose for a step and shoot head and neck intensity modulated radiation therapy using a scanning liquid ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device. J Med Phys 2012; 37:14-26. [PMID: 22363108 PMCID: PMC3283912 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.92716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2011] [Revised: 09/29/2011] [Accepted: 10/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The dose delivery verification for a head and neck static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) case using a scanning liquid ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device (SLIC-EPID) was investigated. Acquired electronic portal images were firstly converted into transmitted dose maps using an in-house developed method. The dose distributions were then compared with those calculated in a virtual EPID using the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (TPS). Using gamma evaluation with the ΔDmax and DTA criteria of 3%/2.54 mm, an excellent agreement was observed between transmitted dose measured using SLIC-EPID and that calculated by TPS (gamma score approximately 95%) for large MLC fields. In contrast, for several small subfields, due to SLIC-EPID image blurring, significant disagreement was found in the gamma results. Differences between EPID and TPS dose maps were also observed for several parts of the radiation subfields, when the radiation beam passed through air on the outside of tissue. The transmitted dose distributions measured using portal imagers such as SLIC-EPID can be used to verify the dose delivery to a patient. However, several aspects such as accurate calibration procedure and imager response under different conditions should be taken into the consideration. In addition, SLIC-EPID image blurring is another important issue, which should be considered if the SLIC-EPID is used for clinical dosimetry verification.
Collapse
|
3
|
Adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer-can an old goal evolve into a new standard? JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2010; 2011. [PMID: 20847944 PMCID: PMC2933914 DOI: 10.1155/2011/690595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2010] [Accepted: 06/21/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Current head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques cause significant toxicity. This may be explained in part by the fact that IMRT cannot compensate for changes in the location of disease and normal anatomy during treatment, leading to exposure of at-risk bystander tissues to higher-than-anticipated doses. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a novel approach to correct for daily tumor and normal tissue variations through online or offline modification of original IMRT target volumes and plans. ART has been discussed on a conceptual level for many years, but technical limitations have hampered its integration into routine care. In this paper, we review the key anatomic, dosimetric, and treatment delivery issues at play in current investigational development of head and neck ART. We also describe pilot findings from initial clinical deployment of head and neck ART, as well as emerging pathways of future research.
Collapse
|
4
|
Balter JM, Antonuk LE. Quality assurance for kilo- and megavoltage in-room imaging and localization for off- and online setup error correction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71:S48-52. [PMID: 18406937 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2007] [Revised: 06/22/2007] [Accepted: 06/22/2007] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In-room radiography is not a new concept for image-guided radiation therapy. Rapid advances in technology, however, have made this positioning method convenient, and thus radiograph-based positioning has propagated widely. The paradigms for quality assurance of radiograph-based positioning include imager performance, systems integration, infrastructure, procedure documentation and testing, and support for positioning strategy implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Balter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spadea MF, Baroni G, Riboldi M, Luraschi R, Tagaste B, Garibaldi C, Catalano G, Orecchia R, Pedotti A. Benefits of Six Degrees of Freedom for Optically Driven Patient Set-up Correction in SBRT. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2008; 7:187-95. [DOI: 10.1177/153303460800700304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To quantify the advantages of a 6 degrees of freedom (dof) versus the conventional 3- or 4-dof correction modality for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments. Eighty-five patients were fitted with 5–7 infra-red passive markers for optical localization. Data, acquired during the treatment, were analyzed retrospectively to simulate and evaluate the best approach for correcting patient misalignments. After the implementation of each correction, the new position of the target (tumor's center of mass) was estimated by means of a dedicated stereotactic algorithm. The Euclidean distance between the corrected and the planned location of target point was calculated and compared to the initial mismatching. Initial and after correction median±quartile displacements affecting external control points were 3.74±2.55 mm (initial), 2.45±0.91 mm (3-dof), 2.37±0.95 mm (4-dof), and 2.03±1.47 mm (6-dof). The benefit of a six-parameter adjustment was particularly evident when evaluating the results relative to the target position before and after the re-alignment. In this context, the Euclidean distance between the planned and the current target point turned to 0.82±1.12mm (median±quartile values) after the roto-translation versus the initial displacement of 2.98±2.32mm. No statistical improvements were found after 3- and 4-dof correction (2.73±1.22 mm and 2.60±1.31 mm, respectively). Angular errors were 0.09±0.93° (mean±std). Pitch rotation in abdomen site showed the most relevant deviation, being − 0.46±1.27° with a peak value of 5.46°. Translational misalignments were −0.68±2.60 mm (mean±std) with the maximum value of 12 mm along the cranio-caudal direction. We conclude that positioning system platforms featuring 6-dof are preferred for high precision radiation therapy. Data are in line with previous results relative to other sites and represent a relevant record in the framework of SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Francesca Spadea
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Università degli Studi Magna Græcia Catanzaro, Italy
- Department of Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano University Milano, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano University Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano University Milano, Italy
| | - Rosa Luraschi
- Medical Physics Department Istituto Europeo Oncologico Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Tagaste
- Medical Physics Department Istituto Europeo Oncologico Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Pedotti
- Department of Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano University Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Accurate and routine target localization is necessary for successful outcome in radiation therapy treatments. Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) provide an advanced tool with digital technology to improve target localization and maintain clinical efficiency. EPIDs are ubiquitous in the radiation therapy clinic, and they provide a powerful and flexible tool to collect and process data in a quantitative manner to improve treatment accuracy for virtually any treatment site. This manuscript provides an overview of the clinical implementation process for effective use of EPIDs. It continues with a review of correction strategies and finally highlights numerous examples of effective clinical application of EPID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Herman
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|