1
|
Chuang HD, Lin YH, Lin CH, Lai YC, Wu CH, Hsu SM. Radiation Safety Assessment in Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Predictive Approach for I-125 Brachytherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1790. [PMID: 38791869 PMCID: PMC11120066 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
This study uses Monte Carlo simulation and experimental measurements to develop a predictive model for estimating the external dose rate associated with permanent radioactive source implantation in prostate cancer patients. The objective is to estimate the accuracy of the patient's external dose rate measurement. First, I-125 radioactive sources were implanted into Mylar window water phantoms to simulate the permanent implantation of these sources in patients. Water phantom experimental measurement was combined with Monte Carlo simulation to develop predictive equations, whose performance was verified against external clinical data. The model's accuracy in predicting the external dose rate in patients with permanently implanted I-125 radioactive sources was high (R2 = 0.999). A comparative analysis of the experimental measurements and the Monte Carlo simulations revealed that the maximum discrepancy between the measured and calculated values for the water phantom was less than 5.00%. The model is practical for radiation safety assessments, enabling the evaluation of radiation exposure risks to individuals around patients with permanently implanted I-125 radioactive sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho-Da Chuang
- Medical Physics and Radiation Measurements Laboratory, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (H.-D.C.); (C.-H.L.)
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Physics, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center, Taipei 11259, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hung Lin
- Department of Urology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center, Taipei 11259, Taiwan;
| | - Chin-Hsiung Lin
- Medical Physics and Radiation Measurements Laboratory, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (H.-D.C.); (C.-H.L.)
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Physics, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center, Taipei 11259, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Chun Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan;
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 40601, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Hui Wu
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Tzu-Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien 97005, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Ming Hsu
- Medical Physics and Radiation Measurements Laboratory, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (H.-D.C.); (C.-H.L.)
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dai X, Zhang Y, Jiang J, Li B. Image-guided robots for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy: Perspectives on safety in design and use. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2239. [PMID: 33689202 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-guided brachytherapy (BT) robots can be used to assist urologists during seed implantation, thereby improving therapeutic effects. However, safety issues must be considered in the design of such robots, including their structure, mechanical movements, function, materials and actuators. Previous reviews focused on image-guided prostate BT robot technology (e.g., imaging and robot navigation technology and robot system introduction); however, this review is the first time that safety issues have been investigated as part of a study on low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate BT robots. METHODS Multiple electronic databases were searched for LDR prostate BT robot articles published during the last 24 years (1996-2020), with a particular focus on two aspects of robots: safety in design and use. RESULTS We retrieved a total of 26 LDR prostate BT robots. BT robots were divided into ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and fusion-guided systems. The conditions associated with each system were then analysed to develop a set of requirements for the safety of prostate BT robots. Recommendations are also provided for future BT robot development. CONCLUSIONS The transrectal approach for prostate seed implantation is safer than the traditional transperineal approach. Research into the control of a steerable needle by the urologists and robot, the needle deflection model, and robotic automated needle changing and seed injection equipment should be pursued in a future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuesong Dai
- Robotics & Engineering Research Center, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| | - Yongde Zhang
- Robotics & Engineering Research Center, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.,Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| | - Jingang Jiang
- Robotics & Engineering Research Center, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.,Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| | - Bing Li
- Robotics & Engineering Research Center, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang C, Hilts M, Batchelar D, Orlando N, Gardi L, Fenster A, Crook J. Characterization and registration of 3D ultrasound for use in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy treatment planning. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:248-256. [PMID: 32900644 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) brachytherapy is a novel technique for early-stage breast cancer. Computed tomography (CT) images are used for treatment planning and freehand 2D ultrasound for implant guidance. The multimodality imaging approach leads to discrepancies in target identification. To address this, a prototype 3D ultrasound (3DUS) system was recently developed for PBSI. In this study, we characterize the 3DUS system performance, establish QA baselines, and develop and test a method to register 3DUS images to CT images for PBSI planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS 3DUS system performance was characterized by testing distance and volume measurement accuracy, and needle template alignment accuracy. 3DUS-CT registration was achieved through point-based registration using a 3D-printed model designed and constructed to provide visible landmarks on both images and tested on an in-house made gel breast phantom. RESULTS The 3DUS system mean distance measurement accuracy was within 1% in axial, lateral, and elevational directions. A volumetric error of 3% was observed. The mean needle template alignment error was 1.0° ± 0.3 ° and 1.3 ± 0.5 mm. The mean 3DUS-CT registration error was within 3 mm when imaging at the breast centre or across all breast quadrants. CONCLUSIONS This study provided baseline data to characterize the performance of a prototype 3DUS system for PBSI planning and developed and tested a method to obtain accurate 3DUS-CT image registration for PBSI planning. Future work will focus on system validation and characterization in a clinical context as well as the assessment of impact on treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Michelle Hilts
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Deidre Batchelar
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nathan Orlando
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lori Gardi
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Fenster
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Juanita Crook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roumeliotis M, Quirk S, Husain S, Guebert A, Watt E, Frederick A, Martell K, Hilts M, Crook J, Batchelar D, Ma I, Meyer T. Establishing a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy: Building validation evidence. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:812-819. [PMID: 31786168 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to establish a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy. The first step in formalizing any education program is a validation process that builds evidence-based verification that the learning environment is appropriate. METHODS AND MATERIALS The primary education task allowed practitioners to use an anthropomorphic breast phantom to simulate a permanent seed implant brachytherapy delivery. Validation evidence is built by generating data to assess learner and expert cohorts according to their proficiency. Each practitioner's performance during the simulation was evaluated by seed placement accuracy, procedural time-to-complete, and two qualitative evaluation tools-a global rating scale and procedural checklist. RESULTS The average seed placement accuracy (±SD) was 8.1 ± 3.5 mm compared to 6.1 ± 2.6 mm for the learner and expert cohort, respectively. The median (range) procedural time-to-complete was 64 (60-77) minutes and 43 (41-50) minutes for the learner and expert cohort, respectively. Seed placement accuracy (student t-test, p < 0.05) and procedural time-to-complete (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05) were statistically different between the cohorts. In both the global rating scale and procedural checklist, the expert cohort demonstrated improved proficiency compared to the learner cohort. CONCLUSIONS This validation evidence supports the utilization of this simulation environment toward appropriately capturing the delivery experience of practitioners. The results demonstrate that, in all areas of evaluation, expert cohort proficiency was superior to learner cohort proficiency. This methodology will be used to establish a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Roumeliotis
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
| | - Sarah Quirk
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Siraj Husain
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Alexandra Guebert
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Elizabeth Watt
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Amy Frederick
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Kevin Martell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Michelle Hilts
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia
| | - Juanita Crook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia
| | - Deidre Batchelar
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia
| | - Irene Ma
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Tyler Meyer
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perez-Calatayud J, Ballester F, Carlsson Tedgren Å, Rijnders A, Rivard MJ, Andrássy M, Niatsetski Y, Schneider T, Siebert FA. GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations on calibration and traceability of LE-LDR photon-emitting brachytherapy sources at the hospital level. Radiother Oncol 2019; 135:120-129. [PMID: 31015157 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy treatment using permanent implantation of low-energy (LE) low-dose rate (LDR) sources is successfully and widely applied in Europe. In addition, seeds are used in other tumour sites, such as ophthalmic tumours, implanted temporarily. The calibration issues for LE-LDR photon emitting sources are specific and different from other sources used in brachytherapy. In this report, the BRAPHYQS (BRAchytherapy PHYsics Quality assurance System) working group of GEC-ESTRO, has developed the present recommendations to assure harmonized and high-quality seed calibration in European clinics. There are practical aspects for which a clarification/procedure is needed, including aspects not specifically accounted for in currently existing AAPM and ESTRO societal recommendations. The aim of this report has been to provide a European wide standard in LE-LDR source calibration at end-user level, in order to keep brachytherapy treatments with high safety and quality levels. The recommendations herein reflect the guidance to the ESTRO brachytherapy users and describe the procedures in a clinic or hospital to ensure the correct calibration of LE-LDR seeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Perez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain; IRIMED Joint Research Unit (IIS La Fe - UV), Valencia, Spain.
| | - Facundo Ballester
- IRIMED Joint Research Unit (IIS La Fe - UV), Valencia, Spain; Departmento of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Radiation Physics, Department of Medicine and Health (IMH), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alex Rijnders
- Department of Radiotherapy, Europe Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | | | - Yury Niatsetski
- R&D Elekta Brachytherapy Waardgelder 1, Veenendaal, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Schneider
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Department of Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Frank-André Siebert
- UK S-H, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Strahlentherapie (Radioonkologie), Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beaulieu L, Radford DA, Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas J. COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018. [PMID: 29542269 PMCID: PMC5978974 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP), in close partnership with the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) has developed a series of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment. These guidelines outline the performance objectives that equipment should meet in order to ensure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The TQC guidelines have been rigorously reviewed and field tested in a variety of Canadian radiation treatment facilities. The development process enables rapid review and update to keep the guidelines current with changes in technology. This article contains detailed performance objectives and safety criteria for low‐dose‐rate (LDR) permanent seed brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc Beaulieu
- Department of Physics, Université Laval Cancer Research Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, CRCHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Ville de Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Dee-Ann Radford
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - J Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zijlstra F, Moerland MA, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Noteboom JL, Viergever MA, Seevinck PR. Challenges in MR-only seed localization for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy. Med Phys 2017; 44:5051-5060. [PMID: 28777451 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An MR-only postimplant dosimetry workflow for low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy could reduce patient burden, improve accuracy, and improve cost efficiency. However, localization of brachytherapy seeds on MRI scans remains a major challenge for this type of workflow. In this study, we propose and validate an MR-only seed localization method and identify remaining challenges. METHODS AND MATERIALS The localization method was based on template matching of simulations of complex-valued imaging artifacts around metal brachytherapy seeds. The method was applied to MRI scans of 25 prostate cancer patients who underwent LDR brachytherapy and for whom postimplant dosimetry was performed after 4 weeks. The seed locations found with the MR-only method were validated against the seed locations found on CT. The circumstances in which detection errors were made were classified to gain an insight in the nature of the errors. RESULTS A total of 1490 of 1557 (96%) seeds were correctly detected, while 67 false-positive errors were made. The correctly detected seed locations had a high spatial accuracy with an average error of 0.8 mm compared with CT. A majority of the false positives occurred near other seeds. Most false negatives were found in either stranded configurations without spacers or near other seeds. CONCLUSIONS The low detection error rate and high localization accuracy obtained by the complex-valued template matching approach are promising for future clinical application of MR-only dosimetry. The most important remaining challenge is robustness with regard to configurations of multiple seeds in close vicinity, such as in strands of seeds without spacers. This issue could potentially be resolved by simulating specific configurations of multiple seeds or by constraining the treatment planning to avoid these configurations, which could make the proposed method competitive with CT-based seed localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zijlstra
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus A Moerland
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Juus L Noteboom
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Max A Viergever
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter R Seevinck
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rivard MJ, Ballester F, Butler WM, DeWerd LA, Ibbott GS, Meigooni AS, Melhus CS, Mitch MG, Nath R, Papagiannis P. Supplement 2 for the 2004 update of the AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: Joint recommendations by the AAPM and GEC-ESTRO. Med Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J. Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tufts University School of Medicine; Boston MA 02111 USA
| | - Facundo Ballester
- Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe)-Universitat de Valéncia; Bujassot 46100 Spain
| | - Wayne M. Butler
- Schiffler Cancer Center; Wheeling Hospital; Wheeling WV 26003 USA
| | - Larry A. DeWerd
- Accredited Dosimetry and Calibration Laboratory; University of Wisconsin; Madison WI 53706 USA
| | - Geoffrey S. Ibbott
- Department of Radiation Physics; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX 77030 USA
| | - Ali S. Meigooni
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada; Las Vegas NV 89169 USA
| | - Christopher S. Melhus
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tufts University School of Medicine; Boston MA 02111 USA
| | - Michael G. Mitch
- Radiation Physics Division; National Institute of Standards and Technology; Gaithersburg MD 20899 USA
| | - Ravinder Nath
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT 06510 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Multicenter Evaluation of Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival Outcomes for Intraoperatively Planned Prostate Brachytherapy Using an Automated Delivery System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:895-903. [PMID: 28807532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer treated with intraoperatively planned low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using an automated delivery system (IO-LDRB). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2003 and 2013, 2608 patients from 3 centers were treated with IO-LDRB as single-modality treatment for low or low-tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Databases from the 3 centers have been analyzed. These independent databases were collected prospectively. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were then compared, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) were generated, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors predicting for relapse. RESULTS A total of 2608 patients with a median follow-up of 4.7 (interquartile range, 3.1-6.9) years were analyzed. Median age was 64 (range, 42-84) years. In these patients, median initial prostate-specific antigen was 5.5 ng/mL, 74% were T1, and 26% were T2; 73% were Gleason 6, and 25% Gleason 7. Median percentage of biopsy cores positive was 33%, and median gland volume was 34.2 cm3. Eleven percent of patients received hormones for a median of 3.0 months before implantation. Median seed activity was 0.437 mCi, D90 (dose covering 90% of the prostate volume) was 186.7 Gy, and V100 was 99.37%. Biochemical relapse was observed in 124 patients (4.8%), and median time to failure was 4.0 years. Predicted bRFS was 93% at 7 years. On Cox regression bRFS was dependent only on D90 at the time of implantation and prostate-specific antigen density. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that IO-LDRB is an effective treatment option for patients with low and low-tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Rates of biochemical relapse remain low several years after treatment. These results compared favorably to published manual preplan technique results.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivard MJ. A directional 103Pd brachytherapy device: Dosimetric characterization and practical aspects for clinical use. Brachytherapy 2016; 16:421-432. [PMID: 28039011 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A brachytherapy (BT) device has been developed with shielding to provide directional BT for preferentially irradiating malignancies while sparing healthy tissues. The CivaSheet is a flexible low-dose-rate BT device containing CivaDots with 103Pd shielded by a thin Au disk. This is the first report of a clinical dosimetric characterization of the CivaSheet device. METHODS AND MATERIALS Radiation dose distributions near a CivaDot were estimated using the MCNP6 radiation transport code. CivaSheet arrays were also modeled to evaluate the dose superposition principle for treatment planning. The resultant data were commissioned in a treatment planning system (TPS) (VariSeed 9.0), and the accuracy of the dose superposition principle was evaluated for summing individual elements comprising a planar CivaSheet. RESULTS The dose-rate constant (0.579 cGy/h/U) was lower than for 103Pd seeds due to Au L-shell x-rays increasing the air-kerma strength. Radial dose function values at 0.1, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 cm were 1.884, 1.344, 0.558, 0.088, and 0.0046, respectively. The two-dimensional anisotropy function exhibited dramatic reduction between the forward (0°) and rearward (180°) directions by a factor of 276 at r = 0.1 cm, 24 at r = 1 cm, and 5.3 at r = 10 cm. This effect diminished due to increasingly scattered radiation. The largest gradient in the two-dimensional anisotropy function was in contact with the device at 92° due to the Au disk shielding. TPS commissioning and dose superposition accuracies were typically within 2%. CONCLUSIONS Simulations of the CivaDot yielded comprehensive dosimetry parameters that were entered into a TPS and deemed acceptable for clinical use. Dosimetry measurements of the CivaSheet are also of interest to the BT community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brachytherapy next generation: robotic systems. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 7:510-4. [PMID: 26816510 PMCID: PMC4716136 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2015.56769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In a field dominated by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), both the therapeutic and technical possibilities of brachytherapy (BT) are underrated, shadowed by protons and intensity modulated radiotherapy. Decreasing expertise and indications, as well as increasing lack of specific BT training for radiation therapy (RT) residents led to the real need of shortening its learning curve and making it more popular. Developing robotic BT devices can be a way to mitigate the above issues. There are many teams working at custom-made robotic BT platforms to perfect and overcome the limitations of the existing systems. This paper provides a picture of the current state-of-the-art in robotic assisted BT, as it also conveys the author's solution to the problem, a parallel robot that uses CT-guidance.
Collapse
|
12
|
Assaying multiple (125)I seeds with the well-ionization chamber SourceCheck(4π) 33005 and a new insert. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2015; 7:492-6. [PMID: 26816507 PMCID: PMC4716135 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2015.56768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a practical solution that can be adopted in clinical routine to fulfill the AAPM-ESTRO recommendations regarding quality assurance of seeds used in prostate permanent brachytherapy. The aim is to design a new insert for the well-ionization chamber SourceCheck(4π) 33005 (PTW, Germany) that allows evaluating the mean air-kerma strength of up to ten (125)I seeds with one single measurement instead of measuring each seed individually. MATERIAL AND METHODS The material required is: a) the SourceCheck(4π) 33005 well-ionization chamber provided with a PTW insert to measure the air-kerma strength S K of one single seed at a time; b) a newly designed insert that accommodates ten seeds in one column, which allows measuring the mean S K of the ten seeds in one single measurement; and c) a container with ten seeds from the same batch and class of the seeds used for the patient implant, and a set of nine non-radioactive seeds. The new insert is characterized by determining its calibration coefficient, used to convert the reading of the well-chamber when ten seeds are measured to their mean S K . The proposed method is validated by comparing the mean S K of the ten seeds obtained from the new insert with the individual measurement of S K of each seed, evaluated with the PTW insert. RESULTS The ratio between the calibration coefficient of the new insert and the calibration coefficient of the PTW insert for the SourceCheck(4π) 33005 is 1.135 ± 0.007 (k = 1). The mean S K of a set of ten seeds evaluated with this new system is in agreement with the mean value obtained from measuring independently the S K of each seed. CONCLUSIONS The new insert and procedure allow evaluating the mean S K of ten seeds prior to the implant in a single measurement. The method is faster and more efficient from radiation protection point of view than measuring the individual S K of each seed.
Collapse
|
13
|
I-125 seed calibration using the SeedSelectron(®) afterloader: a practical solution to fulfill AAPM-ESTRO recommendations. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2012; 4:21-8. [PMID: 23346136 PMCID: PMC3551372 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2012.27948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2012] [Revised: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 02/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose SeedSelectron® v1.26b (Nucletron BV, The Netherlands) is an afterloader system used in prostate interstitial permanent brachytherapy with I-125 selectSeed seeds. It contains a diode array to assay all implanted seeds. Only one or two seeds can be extracted during the surgical procedure and assayed using a well chamber to check the manufacturer air-kerma strength (SK) and to calibrate the diode array. Therefore, it is not feasible to assay 5–10% seeds as required by the AAPM-ESTRO. In this study, we present a practical solution of the SeedSelectron® users to fulfill the AAPM- ESTRO recommendations. Material and methods The method is based on: a) the SourceCheck® well ionization chamber (PTW, Germany) provided with a PTW insert; b) n = 10 selectSeed from the same batch and class as the seeds for the implant; c) the Nucletron insert to accommodate the n = 10 seeds on the SourceCheck® and to measure their averaged SK. Results for 56 implants have been studied comparing the SK value from the manufacturer with the one obtained with the n = 10 seeds using the Nucletron insert prior to the implant and with the SK of just one seed measured with the PTW insert during the implant. Results We are faced with SK deviation for individual seeds up to 7.8%. However, in the majority of cases SK is in agreement with the manufacturer value. With the method proposed using the Nucletron insert, the large deviations of SK are reduced and for 56 implants studied no deviation outside the range of the class were found. Conclusions The new Nucletron insert and the proposed procedure allow to evaluate the SK of the n = 10 seeds prior to the implant, fulfilling the AAPM-ESTRO recommendations. It has been adopted by Nucletron to be extended to seedSelectron® users under request.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rivard MJ, Beaulieu L, Mourtada F. Enhancements to commissioning techniques and quality assurance of brachytherapy treatment planning systems that use model-based dose calculation algorithmsa). Med Phys 2010; 37:2645-58. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3429131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
A comprehensive analysis of the IsoRay Medical model CS-1 Rev2 131Cs brachytherapy source was performed. Dose distributions were simulated using Monte Carlo methods (MCNP5) in liquid water, Solid Water, and Virtual Water spherical phantoms. From these results, the in-water brachytherapy dosimetry parameters have been determined, and were compared with those of Murphy et al. [Med. Phys. 31, 1529-1538 (2004)] using measurements and simulations. Our results suggest that calculations obtained using erroneous cross-section libraries should be discarded as recommended by the 2004 AAPM TG-43U1 report. Our Mclambda value of 1.046+/-0.019 cGy h(-1) U(-1) is within 1.3% of that measured by Chen et al. [Med. Phys. 32, 3279-3285 (2005)] using TLDs and the calculated results of Wittman and Fisher [Med. Phys. 34, 49-54 (2007)] using MCNP5. Using the discretized energy approach of Rivard [Appl. Radiat. Isot. 55, 775-782 (2001)] to ascertain the impact of individual 131Cs photons on radial dose function and anisotropy functions, there was virtual equivalence of results for 29.461< or =Egamma< or = 34.419 keV and for a mono-energetic 30.384 keV photon source. Comparisons of radial dose function and 2D anisotropy function data are also included, and an analysis of material composition and cross-section libraries was performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts-New England Medical Center Tufts University School of Medicine, Box #246, 750 Washington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lessard E, Kwa SLS, Pickett B, Roach M, Pouliot J. Class solution for inversely planned permanent prostate implants to mimic an experienced dosimetrist. Med Phys 2006; 33:2773-82. [PMID: 16964853 DOI: 10.1118/1.2210565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present a method for the selection of inverse planning parameters and to establish a set of inverse planning parameters (class solution) for the inverse planning included in a commercial permanent prostate implant treatment planning system. The manual planning of more than 750 patients since 1996 led to the establishment of general treatment planning rules. A class solution is tuned to fulfill the treatment planning rules and generate equivalent implants. For ten patients, the inverse planning is compared with manual planning performed by our experienced physicist. The prostate volumes ranged from 17 to 51 cc and are implanted with low activity 1-125 seeds. Dosimetric indices are calculated for comparison. The inverse planning needed about 15 s for each optimization (400 000 iterations on a 2.5 GHz PC). In comparison, the physicist needed about 20 min to perform each manual plan. A class solution is found that consistently produces dosimetric indices equivalent or better than the manual planning. Moreover, even with strict seed placement rules, the inverse planning can produce adequate prostate dose coverage and organ at risk protection. The inverse planning avoids implant with seeds outside of the prostate and too close to the urethra. It also avoids needles with only one seed and needles with three consecutive seeds. This reduces the risk of complication due to seed misplacement and edema. The inverse planning also uses a smaller number of needles, reducing the cause of trauma. The quality of the treatment plans is independent of the gland size and shape. A class solution is established that consistently and rapidly produces equivalent dosimetric indices as manual planning while respecting severe seed placement rules. The class solution can be used as a starting point for every patient, dramatically reducing the time needed to plan individual patient treatments. The class solution works with inverse preplanning, intraoperative inverse preplanning, and intraoperative real-time planning. This technology is not intended to replace the physicist but to accelerate the planning process, making intraoperative treatment planning more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Lessard
- UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California 94143-1708, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|