Clinical experience of the importance of daily portal imaging for head and neck IMRT treatments

Image preprocessing to improve the accuracy and robustness of mutual-information-based automatic image registration in proton therapy

PURPOSE

We propose a method that potentially improves the outcome of mutual-information-based automatic image registration by using the contrast enhancement filter (CEF).

METHODS

Seventy-six pairs of two-dimensional X-ray images and digitally reconstructed radiographs for 20 head and neck and nine lung cancer patients were analyzed retrospectively. Automatic image registration was performed using the mutual-information-based algorithm in VeriSuite®. Images were preprocessed using the CEF in VeriSuite®. The correction vector for translation and rotation error was calculated and manual image registration was compared with automatic image registration, with and without CEF. In addition, the normalized mutual information (NMI) distribution between two-dimensional images was compared, with and without CEF.

RESULTS

In the correction vector comparison between manual and automatic image registration, the average differences in translation error were < 1 mm in most cases in the head and neck region. The average differences in rotation error were 0.71 and 0.16 degrees without and with CEF, respectively, in the head and neck region; they were 2.67 and 1.64 degrees, respectively, in the chest region. When used with oblique projection, the average rotation error was 0.39 degrees with CEF. CEF improved the NMI by 17.9 % in head and neck images and 18.2 % in chest images.

CONCLUSIONS

CEF preprocessing improved the NMI and registration accuracy of mutual-information-based automatic image registration on the medical images. The proposed method achieved accuracy equivalent to that achieved by experienced therapists and it will significantly contribute to the standardization of image registration quality.

Repositioning accuracy of a novel thermoplastic mask for head and neck cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of patient shoulder position immobilized with a novel and innovative prototype mask (E-Frame, Engineering System).

METHODS

The E-frame mask fixes both shoulders and bisaxillary regions compared with that of a commercial mask (Type-S, CIVCO). Thirteen and twelve patients were immobilized with the Type-S and E-Frame mask systems, respectively. For each treatment fraction, cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of the patient were acquired and retrospectively analyzed. The CBCT images were registered to the planning CT based on the cervical spine, and then the displacements of the acromial extremity of the clavicle were measured.

RESULTS

The systematic and random errors between the two mask systems were evaluated. The differences of the systematic errors between the two mask systems were not statistically significant. The mean random errors in the three directions (AP, SI and LR) were 2.7 mm, 3.1 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively for the Type-S mask, and 2.8 mm 2.5 mm and 1.4 mm, respectively for the E-Frame mask. The random error of the E-Frame masks in the SI direction was significantly smaller than that of the Type-S. The number of cases showing displacements exceeding 10 mm in the SI direction for at least one fraction was eight (61% of 13 cases) and three (25% of 12 cases) for Type-S and E-Frame masks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The E-Frame masks reduced the random displacements of patient's shoulders in the SI direction, effectively preventing large shoulder shifts that occurred frequently with Type-S masks.

Impact of shoulder deformation on volumetric modulated arc therapy doses for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

When using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer, setup errors regarding the shoulders can create loss of target coverage or increased organ-at-risk doses. This study created variations of realistic shoulder deformations to understand the associated VMAT dosimetric effects and investigated water-equivalent thickness (WET) differences using in-house software.

METHODS

Ten patients with head and neck cancer with lower neck involvement were retrospectively and randomly enrolled. Their retrospective analysis comprised treatment planning using RayStation 5.0 (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden), shoulder deformation of 5-15 mm in three-dimensional axes using the ImSimQA package (Oncology Systems Limited, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK), and evaluation of the clinical impact of the dose distribution after recalculating the dose distribution using computed tomography images of deformed shoulders and deforming the dose distribution. Additionally, our in-house software program was used to measure WET differences for shoulder deformation.

RESULTS

WET differences were greater in the superoinferior (SI) direction than in the other directions (the WET difference was >20 mm for 15-mm SI deformation). D99%, D98%, and D95% for all clinical target volumes were within 3%. Local dose differences of more than ±10% were found for normal tissues at the level of the shoulder for 15-mm movement in the SI direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder deformation of >6 mm could cause large dose variations delivered to the targeted tissue at the level of the shoulder. Thus, to ensure delivery of appropriate treatment coverage to the targeted tissue, shoulder deformation should be taken into consideration during the planning stage.

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Dual-Registration Image-Guided Radiotherapy in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article was to determine the impact of Dual Registration (DR) image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) on clinical judgement and treatment delivery for patients with oropharyngeal cancer before implementation.

METHODS

Ninety cone beam computed tomography images from 10 retrospective patients were matched using standard clipbox registration (SCR) and DR. Three IGRT specialist radiographers performed all registrations and evaluated by intraclass correlation to determine inter-rater agreement, Bland-Altman with 95% limits of agreement to determine differences between SCR and DR procedures, changes in clinical judgment, time taken to perform registrations, and radiographer satisfaction.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement between radiographers using both SCR and DR was high (0.867 and 0.917, P ≤ .0001). The 95% limits of agreement between SCR and DR procedures in the mediolateral, cranial-caudal, and ventrodorsal translational directions were -6.40 to +4.91, -7.49 to +6.05, and -7.00 to +5.44 mm, respectively. The mediolateral direction demonstrated significant proportional bias (P ≤ .001) suggesting non-agreement between SCR and DR. Eighty percent of DR matches resulted in a change in clinical judgement to ensure maximum target coverage. Mean registration times for SCR and DR were 94 and 115 seconds, respectively, and radiographers found DR feasible and satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

The standard method using SCR in patients with oropharyngeal cancer underestimates the deviation in the lower neck. In these patients, DR is an effective IGRT tool to ensure target coverage of the inferior neck nodes and has demonstrated acceptability to radiotherapy clinical practice.

Measurement of eye lens dose for Varian On-Board Imaging with different cone-beam computed tomography acquisition techniques

The objective of this work was to measure patient eye lens dose for different cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition protocols of Varian's On-Board Imaging (OBI) system using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) and to study the variation in eye lens dose with patient geometry and distance of isocenter to the eye lens. During the experimental measurements, OSLD was placed on the patient between the eyebrows of both eyes in line of nose during CBCT image acquisition to measure eye lens doses. The eye lens dose measurements were carried out for three different cone-beam acquisition protocols (standard dose head, low-dose head [LDH], and high-quality head [HQH]) of Varian OBI. Measured doses were correlated with patient geometry and distance between isocenter and eye lens. Measured eye lens doses for standard head and HQH protocols were in the range of 1.8-3.2 mGy and 4.5-9.9 mGy, respectively. However, the measured eye lens dose for the LDH protocol was in the range of 0.3-0.7 mGy. The measured data indicate that eye lens dose to patient depends on the selected imaging protocol. It was also observed that eye lens dose does not depend on patient geometry but strongly depends on distance between eye lens and treatment field isocenter. However, undoubted advantages of imaging system should not be counterbalanced by inappropriate selection of imaging protocol, especially for very intense imaging protocol.

Improved setup and positioning accuracy using a three-point customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization system for stereotactic reirradiation of head and neck cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the setup and positioning uncertainty of a custom cushion/mask/bite‐block (CMB) immobilization system and determine PTV margin for image‐guided head and neck stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (HN‐SABR). We analyzed 105 treatment sessions among 21 patients treated with HN‐SABR for recurrent head and neck cancers using a custom CMB immobilization system. Initial patient setup was performed using the ExacTrac infrared (IR) tracking system and initial setup errors were based on comparison of ExacTrac IR tracking system to corrected online ExacTrac X‐rays images registered to treatment plans. Residual setup errors were determined using repeat verification X‐ray. The online ExacTrac corrections were compared to cone‐beam CT (CBCT) before treatment to assess agreement. Intrafractional positioning errors were determined using prebeam X‐rays. The systematic and random errors were analyzed. The initial translational setup errors were −0.8±1.3 mm, −0.8±1.6 mm, and 0.3±1.9 mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, with a three‐dimensional (3D) vector of 2.7±1.4 mm. The initial rotational errors were up to 2.4° if 6D couch is not available. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac X‐ray images to within 2 mm and 2.5°. The intrafractional uncertainties were 0.1±0.6 mm, 0.1±0.6 mm, and 0.2±0.5 mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, and 0.0∘±0.5°, 0.0∘±0.6°, and −0.1∘±0.4∘ in yaw, roll, and pitch direction, respectively. The translational vector was 0.9±0.6 mm. The calculated PTV margins mPTV(90,95) were within 1.6 mm when using image guidance for online setup correction. The use of image guidance for online setup correction, in combination with our customized CMB device, highly restricted target motion during treatments and provided robust immobilization to ensure minimum dose of 95% to target volume with 2.0 mm PTV margin for HN‐SABR.

PACS number(s): 87.55.ne

Quality Improvement Investigation for Head and Neck Stabilization in Radiotherapy Using Setup Tattoos

PURPOSE

Highly complex planning techniques and delivery methods in the treatment of head and neck cancer require an advanced level of accuracy and reproducibility.

AIM

To determine if the addition of tattoos placed on the chest inferior to the CIVCO Vac-Lok stabilization system improves accuracy and reproducibility of patient set up.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with head and neck cancer were studied. Nine underwent radical treatment using the routine CIVCO stabilization system. The second group of nine used the same stabilization device but were positioned daily with the use of tattoos. Daily orthogonal kilovoltage setup images were used to calculate setup errors. Displacements in the left/right (Lt/Rt), superior/inferior (Sup/Inf), and anterior/posterior (Ant/Post) directions were determined as well as pitch and yaw rotational errors.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty-three image pairs were analysed. Clinically significant differences were found in yaw error, Lt/Rt displacement, and Sup/Inf displacement in the tattooed patients. The median (interquartile range) absolute yaw error was larger for patients without tattoos: 1.4° (1.4° to 2.1°) compared to 0.8° (0.8° to 1.4°) for patients with tattoos. The percentage of both Sup/Inf and Lt/Rt errors >3 mm was also greater for patients without tattoos: 23.7% of Sup/Inf errors were >3 mm compared with 17.3% for patients with tattoos, and 22.3% of Lt/Rt errors were >3 mm compared with 10.0% for patients with tattoos.

CONCLUSION

The addition of chest tattoos resulted in clinically relevant improvements in Lt/Rt and Sup/Inf translational displacements and variations in yaw for head and neck cancer patients.

Variation of neck position with image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

An understanding of the setup variation of the low neck in relation to the upper neck is necessary to define appropriate planning margins, while treating the full neck with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The setup of 20 sequential head and neck cancer patients was studied. Daily position verification was performed with a computed tomography (CT) on rails. An upper neck point was defined as the anterior-most portion of the cervical spine on the lowest CT cut on which both styloid processes are visible. A low neck point was defined as the anterior-most portion of the cervical spine on the lowest CT cut on which the thyroid gland was visible bilaterally. This procedure was carried out on the planning CT and on each daily treatment CT. The variation of the low neck was analyzed, assuming perfect alignment of the upper neck anatomy.

RESULTS

Daily treatment CT of upper neck anterior cervical spine points were normalized to the planning CT. Relative to this coordinate system, the low neck cervical spine point was displaced an average of 3.08 mm anteriorly, ±0.17 mm. There was no systematic lateral or craniocaudal displacement. Random setup errors resulted in low neck standard deviations of 3.9 mm (anteroposterior), 3.3 mm (lateral), and 2.6 mm (craniocaudal).

CONCLUSIONS

Position variation in the low neck varied in excess of the planning margins. There was a systematic anterior displacement. Random setup error was greater than expected. The results suggest that the neck volumes located distant from the region of fusion should be drawn with larger planning margins.

Assessment of shoulder position variation and its impact on IMRT and VMAT doses for head and neck cancer

Background

For radiotherapy of the head and neck, 5-point mask immobilization is used to stabilize the shoulders. Still, the daily position of the shoulders during treatment may be different from the position in the treatment plan despite correct isocenter setup. The purpose of this study was to determine the interfractional displacement of the shoulders relative to isocenter over the course of treatment and the associated dosimetric effect of this displacement.

Methods

The extent of shoulder displacements relative to isocenter was assessed for 10 patients in 5-point thermoplastic masks using image registration and daily CT-on-rails scans. Dosimetric effects on IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated in Pinnacle based on simulation CTs modified to represent shoulder shifts between 3 and 15 mm in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and right-left directions. The impact of clinically observed shoulder shifts on the low-neck dose distributions was examined.

Results

Shoulder motion was 2-5 mm in each direction on average but reached 20 mm. Superior shifts resulted in coverage loss, whereas inferior shifts increased the dose to the brachial plexus. These findings were generally consistent for both IMRT and VMAT plans. Over a course of observed shifts, the dose to 99% of the CTV decreased by up to 101 cGy, and the brachial plexus dose increased by up to 72 cGy.

Conclusions

he position of the shoulder affects target coverage and critical structure dose, and may therefore be a concern during the setup of head and neck patients, particularly those with low neck primary disease.

Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance

Our goal is to determine an optimized image‐guided setup by comparing setup errors determined by two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) image guidance for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients immobilized by customized thermoplastic masks. Nine patients received weekly imaging sessions, for a total of 54, throughout treatment. Patients were first set up by matching lasers to surface marks (initial) and then translationally corrected using manual registration of orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) radiographs with DRRs (2D‐2D) on bony anatomy. A kV cone beam CT (kVCBCT) was acquired and manually registered to the simulation CT using only translations (3D‐3D) on the same bony anatomy to determine further translational corrections. After treatment, a second set of kVCBCT was acquired to assess intrafractional motion. Averaged over all sessions, 2D‐2D registration led to translational corrections from initial setup of 3.5±2.2 (range 0–8) mm. The addition of 3D‐3D registration resulted in only small incremental adjustment (0.8±1.5mm). We retrospectively calculated patient setup rotation errors using an automatic rigid‐body algorithm with 6 degrees of freedom (DoF) on regions of interest (ROI) of in‐field bony anatomy (mainly the C2 vertebral body). Small rotations were determined for most of the imaging sessions; however, occasionally rotations >3° were observed. The calculated intrafractional motion with automatic registration was <3.5 mm for eight patients, and <2° for all patients. We conclude that daily manual 2D‐2D registration on radiographs reduces positioning errors for mask‐immobilized HNC patients in most cases, and is easily implemented. 3D‐3D registration adds little improvement over 2D‐2D registration without correcting rotational errors. We also conclude that thermoplastic masks are effective for patient immobilization.

PACS number: 87.53.Kn

Megavoltage versus kilovoltage image guidance for efficiency and accuracy in head and neck IMRT

Accurate patient positioning is vitally important in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer. The introduction of kilovoltage (kV) on-board imaging (OBI) at our centre was anticipated to improve the accuracy and efficiency of H&N IMRT patient position verification over traditional megavoltage (MV) electronic portal imaging (EPI). This study compares these imaging systems with a phantom accuracy study and retrospective analysis of imaging workload in H&N IMRT at our centre. Six therapists performed online evaluation of phantom images, and residual positional errors for each system were recorded. The largest residual error was 1 mm for OBI and 3 mm for EPI. The estimated improvement in residual error in OBI over EPI was 0.57 mm (95% confidence interval 0.33–0.81 mm), suggesting treatment staff would be better able to detect set-up deviations with OBI. Electronic treatment records of 20 H&N IMRT patients (10 verified daily with MV EPI and 10 with kV OBI) were analysed. Mean imaging session duration was 9.51 min for EPI and 9.76 min for OBI. Analysis found no evidence of an effect on duration due to the imaging system used for this subset of patients (p = 0.664).