Time-frequency analysis of linear and nonlinear otoacoustic emissions and removal of a short-latency stimulus artifact

Optimal Scale-Invariant Wavelet Representation and Filtering of Human Otoacoustic Emissions

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are generated in the cochlea and recorded in the ear canal either as a time domain waveform or as a collection of complex responses to tones in the frequency domain (Probst et al. J Account Soc Am 89:2027-2067, 1991). They are typically represented either in their original acquisition domain or in its Fourier-conjugated domain. Round-trip excursions to the conjugated domain are often used to perform filtering operations in the computationally simplest way, exploiting the convolution theorem. OAE signals consist of the superposition of backward waves generated in different cochlear regions by different generation mechanisms, over a wide frequency range. The cochlear scaling symmetry (cochlear physics is the same at all frequency scales), which approximately holds in the human cochlea, leaves its fingerprints in the mathematical properties of OAE signals. According to a generally accepted taxonomy (Sher and Guinan Jr, J Acoust Soc Am 105:782-798, 1999), OAEs are generated either by wave-fixed sources, moving with frequency according with the cochlear scaling (as in nonlinear distortion) or by place-fixed sources (as in coherent reflection by roughness). If scaling symmetry holds, the two generation mechanisms yield OAEs with different phase gradient delay: almost null for wave-fixed sources, and long (and scaling as 1/f) for place-fixed sources. Thus, the most effective representation of OAE signals is often that respecting the cochlear scale-invariance, such as the time-frequency domain representation provided by the wavelet transform. In the time-frequency domain, the elaborate spectra or waveforms yielded by the superposition of OAE components from different generation mechanisms assume a much clearer 2-D pattern, with each component localized in a specific and predictable region. The wavelet representation of OAE signals is optimal both for visualization purposes and for designing filters that effectively separate different OAE components, improving both the specificity and the sensitivity of OAE-based applications. Indeed, different OAE components have different physiological meanings, and filtering dramatically improves the signal-to-noise ratio.

Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging

Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).

Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?

OBJECTIVES

The function of the medial olivocochlear system can be evaluated by measuring the suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) by contralateral stimulation. One of the obstacles preventing the clinical use of the OAE suppression is that it has considerable variability across subjects. One feature that tends to differentiate subjects is the presence or absence of spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the reliability of contralateral suppression of transiently evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) measured using a commercial device in ears with and without SOAEs.

DESIGN

OAEs were recorded in a group of 60 women with normal hearing. TEOAEs were recorded with a linear protocol (identical stimuli), a constant stimulus level of 65 dB peSPL, and contralateral broadband noise (60 dB SPL) as a suppressor. Each recording session consisted of three measurements: the first two were made consecutively without taking out the probe (the "no refit" condition); the third measurement was made after taking out and refitting the probe (a "refit" condition). Global (for the whole signal) and half-octave band values of TEOAE response levels, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), raw dB TEOAE suppression, and normalized TEOAE suppression, and latency were investigated. Each subject was tested for the presence of SOAEs using the synchronized SOAE (SSOAE) technique. Reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change.

RESULTS

The TEOAE suppression was higher in ears with SSOAEs in terms of normalized percentages. However, when calculated in terms of decibels, the effect was not significant. The reliability of the TEOAE suppression as assessed by SEM was similar for ears with and without SSOAEs. The SEM for the whole dataset (with and without SSOAEs) was 0.08 dB for the no-refit condition and 0.13 dB for the refit condition (equivalent to 1.6% and 2.2%, respectively). SEMs were higher for half-octave bands than for global values. TEOAE SNRs were higher in ears with SSOAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of SSOAEs on reliability of the TEOAE suppression remains complicated. On the one hand, we found that higher SNRs generally provide lower variability of calculated suppressions, and that the presence of SSOAEs favors high SNRs. On the other hand, reliability estimates were not much different between ears with and without SSOAEs. Therefore, in a clinical setting, the presence of SOAEs does not seem to have an effect on suppression measures, at least when testing involves measuring global or half-octave band response levels.

Denoising click-evoked otoacoustic emission signals by optimal shrinkage

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) are clinically used as an objective way to infer whether cochlear functions are normal. However, because the sound pressure level of CEOAEs is typically much lower than the background noise, it usually takes hundreds, if not thousands, of repetitions to estimate the signal with sufficient accuracy. In this paper, we propose to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of CEOAE signals within limited measurement time by optimal shrinkage (OS) in two different settings: covariance-based optimal shrinkage (cOS) and singular value decomposition-based optimal shrinkage (sOS). By simulation, the cOS consistently enhanced the SNR by 1-2 dB from a baseline method that is based on calculating the median. In real data, however, the cOS cannot enhance the SNR over 1 dB. The sOS achieved a SNR enhancement of 2-3 dB in simulation and demonstrated capability to enhance the SNR in real recordings. In addition, the level of enhancement increases as the baseline SNR decreases. An appealing property of OS is that it produces an estimate of all single trials. This property makes it possible to investigate CEOAE dynamics across a longer period of time when the cochlear conditions are not strictly stationary.

Differences between Pressurized and Non-Pressurized Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Subjects

INTRODUCTION

Recently, Interacoustics presented a new otoacoustic emission protocol where the probe pressurizes the ear cavity, thus eliminates the risk of non-assessment (REFER outcome) due to a negative middle ear pressure. This study evaluated the characteristics and the performance of this new protocol on a newborn well-baby population.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-three newborns (age 2.7 ± 1.1 days) for a total of 294 ears were assessed randomly. Transiently evoked otoacoustic responses were acquired by the Titan device (Interacoustics), using the default and a pressurized TEOAE protocol. The data were analyzed in terms of signal to noise ratios (S/Ns) at 5 frequencies, namely, 0.87, 1.94, 2.96, 3.97, and 4.97 kHz. To assess any possible gestational age (GE) effects on the TEOAE variables, the responses were subdivided in 4 different age subgroups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the left and right ear TEOAE responses, for age (in days), GE (in weeks), weight (in grams), and S/N at all 5 frequencies. Considering the pooled 294 ears, paired t tests between the default and the pressurized TEOAE data showed significant differences across all 5 frequencies (p < 0.01). The pressurized protocol generated TEOAE responses presenting larger S/Ns, and a positive additive effect of approximately 2.31 dB was observed at all tested frequencies. There were no significant GE effects on the pressurized TEOAE responses. In terms of performance, both protocols performed equally (same number of PASSes).

CONCLUSION

The pressurized TEOAE protocol generates responses with higher S/Ns which might be useful in borderline cases where the middle ear status might cause a REFER screening outcome.

Reliability of contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to determine the reliability in children of the medial olivocochlear reflex when measured as decibels of suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS).

DESIGN

TEOAEs with and without CAS (white noise) were measured. In each subject, measurements were performed twice. Of particular interest was the suppression of TEOAEs by CAS and its reliability. Reliability was evaluated by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).

STUDY SAMPLE

Fifty-one normally hearing girls aged 3-6 years.

RESULTS

The average global TEOAE suppression was around 0.6 dB. The highest reliability was for global values, with SEM of 0.2 dB and MDC of ±0.55 dB for the standard 2.5-20 ms recording window and slightly higher values for an 8-18 ms window. The worst reliability in the studied group was for the 1 kHz half-octave frequency band. Additionally, ears without spontaneous otoacoustic emissions had higher suppression levels than those with, but they also had lower signal-to-noise ratios, which may limit their clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that, under the studied paradigm, TEOAE suppression does not have satisfactory reliability since MDC was similar to the level of suppression.

Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children

BACKGROUND

Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) may serve as an index of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex. To date, this index has been studied in various populations but never in pre-school children. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap and describe how the MOC reflex affects the properties of transiently evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) in this age group. In addition, the influence of the presence of spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs) in the studied ear on the suppression of TEOAEs was also investigated.

METHODS

TEOAEs with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) by white noise were measured in 126 normally hearing pre-school children aged 3-6 years. The values of response levels, suppression by CAS, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of TEOAEs were investigated for the whole signal (global) and for half-octave frequency bands from 1 to 4 kHz. Only ears with SNR >6 dB were used in the analyses. SOAEs were acquired using the so-called synchronized SOAEs (SSOAEs) technique.

RESULTS

Ears with SSOAEs had higher response levels and SNRs than ears without SSOAEs, and suppression was lower (0.58 dB compared to 0.85 dB). Only 22% of all studied ears had an SNR >20 dB, a level recommended in some studies for measuring suppression. There were no significant effects of age or gender on TEOAE suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Suppression levels for pre-school children did not differ appreciably from those of adults measured under similar conditions in other studies. Taken together with no effect of age in the data studied here, it seems that there is no effect of age on TEOAE suppression. However, we did find that the presence of SSOAEs had an effect on TEOAE suppression, a finding which has not been reported in earlier studies on different populations. We suggest that the presence of SSOAEs might be a crucial factor related to MOC function.

Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks

It has been reported that both click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) have higher amplitudes in ears that possess spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs). The general aim of the present study was to investigate whether the presence of spontaneous activity in the cochlea affected tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs). As a benchmark, the study also measured growth functions of CEOAEs. Spontaneous activity in the cochlea was measured by the level of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs), an emission evoked by a click but closely related to spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs, which are detectable without any stimulus). Measurements were made on a group of 15 adults whose ears were categorized as either having recordable SSOAEs or no SSOAEs. In each ear, CEOAEs and TBOAEs were registered at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, and input/output functions were measured at 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 dB SPL. Global and half-octave-band values of response level and latency were estimated. Our main finding was that in ears with spontaneous activity, TBOAEs had higher levels than in ears without. The difference was more apparent for global values, but were also seen with half-octave-band analysis. Input/output functions had similar growth rates for ears with and without SSOAEs. There were no significant differences in latencies between TBOAEs from ears with and without SSOAEs, although latencies tended to be longer for lower stimulus levels and lower stimulus frequencies. When TBOAE levels were compared to CEOAE levels, the latter showed greater differences between recordings from ears with and without SSOAEs. Although TBOAEs reflect activity from a more restricted cochlear region than CEOAEs, at all stimulus frequencies their behavior still depends on whether SSOAEs are present or not.

Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions

Previous research has indicated that inner ear function might be modulated by visual attention, although the results have not been totally conclusive. Conceivably, modulation of hearing might occur due to stimulation of the cochlea via descending medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons. The aim of the present study was to test whether increased visual attention caused corresponding changes in inner ear function, which was measured by the strength of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) recorded from the ear canal in response to a steady train of clicks. To manipulate attention, we asked subjects to attend to, or ignore, visual stimuli delivered according to an odd-ball paradigm. The subjects were presented with two types of visual stimuli: standard and deviant (20% of all stimuli, randomly presented). During a passive part of the experiment, subjects had to just observe a pattern of squares on a computer screen. In an active condition, the subject's task was to silently count the occasional inverted (deviant) pattern on the screen. At all times, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were used to objectively gauge the subject's state of attention, and OAEs in response to clicks (transiently evoked OAEs, TEOAEs) were used to gauge inner ear function. As a test of descending neural activity, TEOAE levels were evaluated with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) by broadband noise, a paradigm known to activate the MOC pathway. Our results showed that the recorded VEPs were, as expected, a good measure of visual attention, but even when attention levels changed there was no corresponding change in TEOAE levels. We conclude that visual attention does not significantly affect inner ear function.

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) are one of the least studied types of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to determine the prevalence of SOAEs in schoolchildren, and second to test whether there was dependence between the presence or absence of SOAEs in a subject and the corresponding level of their transiently evoked OAEs (TEOAEs).

METHODS

Measurements were made on a group of normally hearing children of age 7-13 years. A technique which detects synchronized SOAEs (SSOAEs) was used in which the response to repetitive clicks (12.5/s) was analyzed in the 60-80 ms time window following each click. The matching pursuit method was used to detect SSOAEs components above the noise in this window. For comparison, TEOAEs evoked by clicks (40/s) were obtained using the standard nonlinear protocol (20 ms time window).

RESULTS

The prevalence of SOAEs was 37%, and higher in females and right ears. There was an average of 2.3 SOAEs per emitting ear. TEOAE levels were higher for ears that had SOAEs and were lower for ears that did not have any SOAEs.

CONCLUSION

Although not all normal human have SOAEs, they appear to reflect an important aspect of cochlear function. Their presence is strongly related to elevated levels of TEOAEs which are routinely used in audiological tests.

Otoacoustic Emissions in Smoking and Nonsmoking Young Adults

Objectives

The present study investigates the usefulness of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) in detecting small changes in the hearing of young smoking adults.

Methods

Otoacoustic emissions were acquired from the ears of 48 young adults (age, 20 to 27 years). The dataset was divided into two groups, smoking (24 persons/48 ears) and nonsmoking (24 persons/48 ears). The level of smoking was relatively small in comparison to previous studies, an average of 3.8 years and 8.7 cigarettes per day. In each ear three OAE measurements were made: TEOAEs, DPOAEs, and spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs). Pure tone audiometry and tympanometry were also conducted. Audiometric thresholds did not differ significantly between the datasets. Half-octave-band values of OAE signal to noise ratios and response levels were used to assess statistical differences.

Results

Averaged data initially revealed that differences between the two study groups occurred only for TEOAEs at 1 kHz. However when the datasets were divided into ears with and without SOAEs more differences became apparent, both for TEOAEs and DPOAEs. In ears that exhibited SOAEs, both smokers and nonsmokers, there were no statistically significant differences between evoked OAEs; however in all ears without SOAEs, evoked OAEs were higher in the ears of nonsmokers, by as much as 5 dB. These differences were most prominent in the 1-2 kHz range.

Conclusion

A general decrease in OAE levels was found in the group of smokers. However, in ears which exhibited SOAEs, there was no difference between the evoked OAEs of smokers and nonsmokers. We conclude that smoking had not yet measurably affected the ears of those with acute hearing (i.e., those who exhibit SOAEs). However, in ears without SOAEs, smokers exhibited smaller evoked OAE amplitudes than nonsmokers, even though their audiometric thresholds were within the norm.

Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts

BACKGROUND

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are currently widely used in newborn hearing screening programs. OAEs evoked by transients (TEOAEs) in newborns are usually characterized by large response levels at higher frequencies but lower frequencies are affected by physiological noise. The purpose of the present study was to acquire responses at lower frequencies by measuring OAEs evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts (TBOAEs).

METHODS

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were recorded from 49 newborns. Measurements were made using the ILO 292 equipment from Otodynamics. In each ear, three measurements were made: first with a standard click stimulus at 80dB pSPL (CEOAEs), a second using a 0.5kHz tone burst at 80dB pSPL (TBOAEs), and a third recording of spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs). Global and half-octave-band values of OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and response level were used to assess statistical differences between CEOAEs and 0.5kHz TBOAEs. Additionally, time-frequency (TF) analysis of signals was performed using the matching pursuit method.

RESULTS

Global levels were highest for CEOAEs. However, at low frequencies (0.7-1kHz), 0.5kHz TBOAEs had significantly higher levels and SNRs than CEOAEs. At these frequencies, SNRs of CEOAEs were usually below 0dB. At 0.5kHz there were no statistically significant differences between CEOAEs and TBOAEs. In ears with recordable SOAEs, CEOAEs and TBOAEs had higher levels and SNRs than in ears without SOAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of 0.5kHz TBOAEs may be a useful addition to standard CEOAE tests in newborns. They provide information about lower frequencies, a region where CEOAEs are usually prone to noise. The presence of SOAEs affects the magnitudes of both CEOAEs and TBOAEs.

Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the properties of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked by chirp stimuli and compare them with standard click-evoked OAEs. Differences between evoked OAEs in children with and without spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were also assessed.

METHODS

OAEs were first recorded from 54 children (age 4-10 years) in a screening setup. In each ear five OAE measurements were made using two types of chirps (7.5 ms and 10.5 ms) at around 70 dB pSPL; clicks at 70 and 80 dB pSPL; and a standard synchronized SOAE stimulation protocol. Tympanometry was also conducted. Pass/refer criteria based on signal to noise ratios (SNRs) were applied to all OAEs. Pass/refer rates from all methods (OAEs evoked by chirps and clicks, and tympanometry) were compared. Additionally, half-octave-band values of OAE SNRs and response levels were used to assess statistical differences.

RESULTS

Chirp-evoked OAEs generated a similar number of passes to click-evoked OAEs when the same level of stimulus was used. When using lower stimulus levels, both chirp- and click-evoked OAEs diagnosed nearly all ears that failed tympanometry. The response levels and SNRs of OAEs evoked by clicks and chirps were very similar. The highest response levels were in the 1.4 kHz half-octave band. The SNRs for ears with SOAEs were highest at 1.4 kHz, whereas they were at 4 kHz for ears without SOAEs. Both response levels and SNRs were higher by about 5 dB for ears with SOAEs than ears without SOAEs. Also all ears with SOAEs generated a pass result in screening, while ears without SOAEs gave a pass less frequently (at least 30% fewer cases).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that performance of chirp-evoked OAEs for screening purposes is similar to click-evoked OAEs when the same stimulus level is applied. OAEs evoked with lower stimulus levels (70 vs. 80 dB pSPL) are more sensitive to middle ear pathology. The presence of SOAEs significantly influences the pass rates of OAEs evoked by chirps and clicks.

Time-frequency domain filtering of evoked otoacoustic emissions

Time-domain filtering is a standard analysis technique, which is used to disentangle the two main vector components of the distortion product otoacoustic emission response, exploiting their different phase-frequency relation. In this study, a time-frequency filtering technique based on the continuous wavelet transform is proposed to overcome the intrinsic limitations of the time-domain filtering technique and to extend it also to the analysis of stimulus-frequency and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. The advantages of the proposed technique are first discussed on a theoretical basis, then practically demonstrated by applying it to the analysis of synthesized and real otoacoustic data. The results show that the time-frequency approach can be empirically optimized to get effective separation of the components of the otoacoustic response associated with either different generation mechanisms or different generation places. Focusing on a single component of the otoacoustic response with a given time-frequency signature may also improve significantly the signal-to-noise ratio, because the random noise contribution tends to be uniformly distributed on the time-frequency plane.