Audiogram of the kea parrot, Nestor notabilis

Hearing in helmeted guineafowl (Numida meleagris): audiogram from 2 Hz to 10 kHz and localization acuity for brief noise bursts

Behavioral hearing thresholds and noise localization acuity were determined using a conditioned avoidance/suppression procedure for three Helmeted guineafowl (Numida meleagris). The guineafowl responded to frequencies as low as 2 Hz at 82.5 dB SPL, and as high as 8 kHz at 84.5 dB SPL. At a level of 60 dB SPL, their hearing range spanned 8.12 octaves (24.6 Hz-6.86 kHz). Like most birds, they do not hear sounds above 8 kHz. However, the guineafowl demonstrated good low-frequency hearing (frequencies below 32 Hz), showing thresholds that are more sensitive than both the peafowl and pigeon, both of which hear infrasound. It thus appears that infrasound perception may be more common than previously thought and may have implications for species that inhabit areas with wind energy facilities. The guineafowls' minimum audible angle for a 100-ms broadband noise burst was 13.8 °, at the median for birds and near the mean for mammals. Unlike in mammals, the small sample of bird species and limited representation of lifestyles do not yet allow for meaningful interpretations of the selective pressures or mechanisms that underlie their abilities to locate sound sources.

Scaling of ear morphology across 127 bird species and its implications for hearing performance

The dimensions of auditory structures among animals of varying body size can have implications for hearing performance. Larger animals often have a hearing range focused on lower frequencies than smaller animals, which may be explained by several anatomical mechanisms in the ear and their scaling relationships. While the effect of size on ear morphology and hearing performance has been explored in some mammals, anurans and lizards, much less is known about the scaling relationships for the single-ossicle, internally-coupled ears of birds. Using micro- and nano-CT scans of the tympanic middle and inner ears of 127 ecologically and phylogenetically diverse bird species, spanning more than 400-fold in head mass (2.3 to 950 g), we undertook phylogenetically-informed scaling analyses to test whether 12 morphological traits, of functional importance to hearing, maintain their relative proportions with increasing head mass. We then extended our analysis by regressing these morphological traits with measures of hearing sensitivity and range to better understand morphological underpinnings of hearing performance. We find that most auditory structures scale together in equal proportions, whereas columella length increases disproportionately. We also find that the size of several auditory structures is associated with increased hearing sensitivity and frequency hearing limits, while head mass did not explain these measures. Although both birds and mammals demonstrate proportional scaling between auditory structures, the consequences for hearing in each group may diverge due to unique morphological predictors of auditory performance.

Hearing in Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus): sensitivity to infrasound

Despite the excitement that followed the report of infrasound sensitivity in pigeons 40 years ago, there has been limited followup, with only eleven species of birds having auditory thresholds at frequencies below 250 Hz. With such sparse data on low-frequency hearing, there is little understanding of why some birds hear very low frequencies while others do not. To begin to expand the phylogenetic and ecological sample of low-frequency hearing in birds, we determined the behavioral audiogram of the Indian peafowl, Pavo cristatus. Peafowl are thought to use low frequencies generated by the males' tail feathers and wing flutters during courtship displays, and their crest feathers are reported to resonate at infrasound frequencies. The peafowl were able to respond to frequencies as low as 4 Hz, and their hearing range at 60 dB SPL extended from 29 Hz to 7.065 kHz (7.9 octaves). Removing the crest feathers reduced sensitivity at their resonant frequencies by as much as 7.5 dB, indicating a modest contribution to detectability in that range. However, perforation of the tympanic membranes severely reduced sensitivity to low frequencies, indicating that sensitivity to low frequencies is mediated primarily by the ears and cannot be attributed to some other sensory modality.