Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field

Masking release in cortical auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus

ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze the effect of masking on the Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential with speech stimulus in young adults. Methods Fourteen individuals aged between 19 and 28 years of both sexes with no hearing loss participated in the study. The Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential examination was performed with synthetic speech stimulus /ba/ simultaneous to Speech Shaped Noise presented under three conditions: steady noise with a 30 dB SPLep intensity (weak steady noise), steady noise with a 65 dB SPLep intensity o (strong steady noise) and modulated noise with 30 dB SPLep and 65 dB SPLep intensities at 25Hz and modulation period of 40 ms. Results Higher latencies were observed in the cortical components, except P2, in the condition of strong steady noise and more meaningful measures of amplitude of the cortical components P1, N1 and P2 in the condition of modulated noise with statistically significant difference in comparison to the strong steady noise condition. There was worse wave morphology in the condition of strong steady noise, when compared to the other records. The average electrophysiological thresholds for the conditions of strong steady noise and modulated noise were 60 dB SPLep and 49 dB SPLep, respectively, showing a 11.7 dB mean difference. Conclusion We could infer that there was a lower masking effect of modulated noise when compared to the strong steady noise condition, in the amplitude measurements of the cortical components and an average difference of 11.7 dB between the electrophysiological thresholds (interpreted as the measure of the Masking Release).

Masking release in cortical auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of masking on the Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential with speech stimulus in young adults.

METHODS

Fourteen individuals aged between 19 and 28 years of both sexes with no hearing loss participated in the study. The Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential examination was performed with synthetic speech stimulus /ba/ simultaneous to Speech Shaped Noise presented under three conditions: steady noise with a 30 dB SPLep intensity (weak steady noise), steady noise with a 65 dB SPLep intensity o (strong steady noise) and modulated noise with 30 dB SPLep and 65 dB SPLep intensities at 25Hz and modulation period of 40 ms.

RESULTS

Higher latencies were observed in the cortical components, except P2, in the condition of strong steady noise and more meaningful measures of amplitude of the cortical components P1, N1 and P2 in the condition of modulated noise with statistically significant difference in comparison to the strong steady noise condition. There was worse wave morphology in the condition of strong steady noise, when compared to the other records. The average electrophysiological thresholds for the conditions of strong steady noise and modulated noise were 60 dB SPLep and 49 dB SPLep, respectively, showing a 11.7 dB mean difference.

CONCLUSION

We could infer that there was a lower masking effect of modulated noise when compared to the strong steady noise condition, in the amplitude measurements of the cortical components and an average difference of 11.7 dB between the electrophysiological thresholds (interpreted as the measure of the Masking Release).

[Effects of background noise on auditory response characteristics of primary auditory cortex neurons in awake mice]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of different continuous background noises on auditory response characteristics of primary auditory cortex (A1) neurons in awake mice.

METHODS

We performed in vivo cell-attached recordings in layer 4 neurons of the A1 of awake mice to investigate how continuous background noises of different levels affected the intensity tuning, frequency tuning and time characteristics of individual A1 neurons. According to the intensity tuning characteristics and types of stimulation, 44 neurons were devided into 4 groups: monotonic-intensity group (20 monotonic neurons), nonmonotonic-intensity group (6 nonmonotonic neurons), monotonic-frequency group (25 monotonic neurons) and monotonic-latency group (15 monotonic neurons).

RESULTS

The A1 neurons only had transient spike response within 10 to 40 ms after the onset of continuous wild-band noise stimulation. The noise intensity had no significant effects on the background firing rates of the A1 neurons (P>0.05). The increase of background noise resulted in a significant linear elevation of the intensity threshold of monotonic and nonmonotonic neurons for tone-evoked response (R²>0.90, P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the slopes of threshold changes between monotonic and nonmonotonic neurons (P>0.05). The best intensity of nonmonotonic neurons increased along with the intensity of the background noise, and the variation of the best intensity was positively correlated with the change of the threshold of the same neuron (r=0.944, P < 0.001). The frequency response bandwidth and the firing rate of the A1 neurons decreased as the noise intensity increased (P < 0.001), but the best frequency almost remained unchanged (P < 0.001). The increase of background noise intensity resulted in an increased first spike latency of the neurons to the same tone stimulus (P < 0.05) without affecting the time accuracy of the first action potential (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The acoustic response threshold of the A1 neurons increases linearly with the increase of background noise intensity. An increased background noise leads to compressed frequency band-width, a decreased firing rate and a prolonged spike latency, but the frequency selectivity and the time accuracy of auditory response to the same noise remain stable.