Hearing thresholds, for underwater sounds, of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) at the water surface

Similar susceptibility to temporary hearing threshold shifts despite different audiograms in harbor porpoises and harbor seals

When they are exposed to loud fatiguing sounds in the oceans, marine mammals are susceptible to hearing damage in the form of temporary hearing threshold shifts (TTSs) or permanent hearing threshold shifts. We compared the level-dependent and frequency-dependent susceptibility to TTSs in harbor seals and harbor porpoises, species with different hearing sensitivities in the low- and high-frequency regions. Both species were exposed to 100% duty cycle one-sixth-octave noise bands at frequencies that covered their entire hearing range. In the case of the 6.5 kHz exposure for the harbor seals, a pure tone (continuous wave) was used. TTS was quantified as a function of sound pressure level (SPL) half an octave above the center frequency of the fatiguing sound. The species have different audiograms, but their frequency-specific susceptibility to TTS was more similar. The hearing frequency range in which both species were most susceptible to TTS was 22.5-50 kHz. Furthermore, the frequency ranges were characterized by having similar critical levels (defined as the SPL of the fatiguing sound above which the magnitude of TTS induced as a function of SPL increases more strongly). This standardized between-species comparison indicates that the audiogram is not a good predictor of frequency-dependent susceptibility to TTS.

Thresholds for noise induced hearing loss in harbor porpoises and phocid seals

Intense sound sources, such as pile driving, airguns, and military sonars, have the potential to inflict hearing loss in marine mammals and are, therefore, regulated in many countries. The most recent criteria for noise induced hearing loss are based on empirical data collected until 2015 and recommend frequency-weighted and species group-specific thresholds to predict the onset of temporary threshold shift (TTS). Here, evidence made available after 2015 in light of the current criteria for two functional hearing groups is reviewed. For impulsive sounds (from pile driving and air guns), there is strong support for the current threshold for very high frequency cetaceans, including harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Less strong support also exists for the threshold for phocid seals in water, including harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). For non-impulsive sounds, there is good correspondence between exposure functions and empirical thresholds below 10 kHz for porpoises (applicable to assessment and regulation of military sonars) and between 3 and 16 kHz for seals. Above 10 kHz for porpoises and outside of the range 3-16 kHz for seals, there are substantial differences (up to 35 dB) between the predicted thresholds for TTS and empirical results. These discrepancies call for further studies.

Can harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) discriminate familiar conspecific calls after long periods of separation?

The ability to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar calls may play a key role in pinnipeds' communication and survival, as in the case of mother-pup interactions. Vocal discrimination abilities have been suggested to be more developed in pinniped species with the highest selective pressure such as the otariids; yet, in some group-living phocids, such as harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), mothers are also able to recognize their pup's voice. Conspecifics' vocal recognition in pups has never been investigated; however, the repeated interaction occurring between pups within the breeding season suggests that long-term vocal discrimination may occur. Here we explored this hypothesis by presenting three rehabilitated seal pups with playbacks of vocalizations from unfamiliar or familiar pups. It is uncommon for seals to come into rehabilitation for a second time in their lifespan, and this study took advantage of these rare cases. A simple visual inspection of the data plots seemed to show more reactions, and of longer duration, in response to familiar as compared to unfamiliar playbacks in two out of three pups. However, statistical analyses revealed no significant difference between the experimental conditions. We also found no significant asymmetry in orientation (left vs. right) towards familiar and unfamiliar sounds. While statistics do not support the hypothesis of an established ability to discriminate familiar vocalizations from unfamiliar ones in harbor seal pups, further investigations with a larger sample size are needed to confirm or refute this hypothesis.

Temporary hearing threshold shift in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) due to one-sixth-octave noise bands centered at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz

This study concludes a larger project on the frequency-dependent susceptibility to noise-induced temporary hearing threshold shift (TTS) in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Here, two seals were exposed to one-sixth-octave noise bands (NBs) centered at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz at several sound exposure levels (SELs, in dB re 1 μPa²s). TTSs were quantified at the center frequency of each NB, half an octave above, and one octave above, at the earliest within 1-4 min after exposure. Generally, elicited TTSs were low, and the highest TTS_1-4 occurred at half an octave above the center frequency of the fatiguing sound: after exposure to the 0.5-kHz NB at 210 dB SEL, the TTS_1-4 at 0.71 kHz was 2.3 dB; after exposure to the 1-kHz NB at 207 dB SEL, the TTS_1-4 at 1.4 kHz was 6.1 dB; and after exposure to the 2-kHz NB at 215 dB SEL, TTS_1-4 at 2.8 kHz was 7.9 dB. Hearing always recovered within 60 min, and susceptibility to TTS was similar in both seals. The results show that, for the studied frequency range, the lower the center frequency of the fatiguing sound, the higher the SEL required to cause the same TTS.

Temporary hearing threshold shift in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) due to a one-sixth-octave noise band centered at 32 kHz

Two female harbor seals were exposed for 60 min to a continuous one-sixth-octave noise band centered at 32 kHz at sound pressure levels of 92 to 152 dB re 1 μPa, resulting in sound exposure levels (SELs) of 128 to 188 dB re 1 μPa²s. This was part of a larger project determining frequency-dependent susceptibility to temporary threshold shift (TTS) in harbor seals over their entire hearing range. After exposure, TTSs were quantified at 32, 45, and 63 kHz with a psychoacoustic technique. At 32 kHz, only small TTSs (up to 5.9 dB) were measured 1-4 min (TTS_1-4) after exposure, and recovery was within 1 h. The higher the SEL, the higher the TTS induced at 45 kHz. Below ∼176 dB re 1 μPa²s, the maximum TTS_1-4 was at 32 kHz; above ∼176 dB re 1 μPa²s, the maximum TTS_1-4 (up to 33.8 dB) was at 45 kHz. During one particular session, a seal was inadvertently exposed to an SEL of ∼191 dB re 1 μPa²s and at 45 kHz, her TTS_1-4 was >45 dB; her hearing recovered over 4 days. Harbor seals appear to be equally susceptible to TTS caused by sounds in the 2.5-32 kHz range.

The use of seal scarers as a protective mitigation measure can induce hearing impairment in harbour porpoises

Acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) are used to deter seals from aquacultures but exposure of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) occurs as a side-effect. At construction sites, by contrast, ADDs are used to deter harbour porpoises from the zone in which pile driving noise can induce temporary threshold shifts (TTSs). ADDs emit such high pressure levels that there is concern that ADDs themselves may induce a TTS. A harbour porpoise in human care was exposed to an artificial ADD signal with a peak frequency of 14 kHz. A significant TTS was found, measured by auditory evoked potentials, with an onset of 142 dB re 1 μPa²s at 20 kHz and 147 dB re 1 μPa²s at 28 kHz. The authors therefore strongly recommend to gradually increase and down regulate source levels of ADDs to the desired deterrence range. However, further research is needed to develop a reliable relationship between received levels and deterrence.

Temporary hearing threshold shift in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) due to a one-sixth-octave noise band centered at 16 kHz

Temporary hearing threshold shifts (TTSs) were investigated in two adult female harbor seals after exposure for 60 min to a continuous one-sixth-octave noise band centered at 16 kHz (the fatiguing sound) at sound pressure levels of 128-149 dB re 1 μPa, resulting in sound exposure levels (SELs) of 164-185 dB re 1 μPa²s. TTSs were quantified at the center frequency of the fatiguing sound (16 kHz) and at half an octave above that frequency (22.4 kHz) by means of a psychoacoustic hearing test method. Susceptibility to TTS was similar in both animals when measured 8-12 and 12-16 min after cessation of the fatiguing sound. TTS increased with increasing SEL at both frequencies, but above an SEL of 174 dB re 1 μPa²s, TTS was greater at 22.4 kHz than at 16 kHz for the same SELs. Recovery was rapid: the greatest TTS, measured at 22.4 kHz 1-4 min after cessation of the sound, was 17 dB, but dropped to 3 dB in 1 h, and hearing recovered fully within 2 h. The affected hearing frequency should be considered when estimating ecological impacts of anthropogenic sound on seals. Between 2.5 and 16 kHz the species appears equally susceptible to TTS.

Underwater sound localization abilities of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) for high-frequency noise band stimuli in the median plane

Pinnipeds use a variety of acoustic information underwater for social interactions, hunting, and predator avoidance. Thus, the ability to accurately localize a sound source in the environment can have a clear survival value. Nonetheless, the sound localization mechanisms for seals underwater still have to be clarified, especially for sounds received in the median plane. In this study, the sound localization abilities of five harbor seals for high-frequency noise band stimuli were measured underwater in the median plane. The seals' minimum audible angles (MAAs) were determined for two different high-frequency noise band stimuli using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Noise 1 had a frequency range between 8 and 16 kHz. Noise 2 contained frequencies between 14 and 16 kHz. Psychoacoustic results for the tested harbor seals show that the seals were able to localize these stimuli in the median plane underwater with MAAs between 5.1° and 17.5°. The results suggest that spectral cues improve the seals' ability to localize high-frequency sound signals in the median plane.

Frequency of greatest temporary hearing threshold shift in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) depends on fatiguing sound level

Harbor seals may suffer hearing loss due to intense sounds. After exposure for 60 min to a continuous 6.5 kHz tone at sound pressure levels of 123-159 dB re 1 µPa, resulting in sound exposure levels (SELs) of 159-195 dB re 1 μPa²s, temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in two harbor seals were quantified at the center frequency of the fatiguing sound (6.5 kHz) and at 0.5 and 1.0 octaves above that frequency (9.2 and 13.0 kHz) by means of a psychoacoustic technique. Taking into account the different timing of post-exposure hearing tests, susceptibility to TTS was similar in both animals. The higher the SEL, the higher the TTS induced at frequencies above the fatiguing sound's center frequency. Below ∼179 dB re 1 μPa²s, the maximum TTS was at the center frequency (6.5 kHz); above ∼179 dB re 1 μPa²s, the maximum TTS was at half an octave above the center frequency (9.2 kHz). These results should be considered when interpreting previous TTS studies, and when estimating ecological impacts of anthropogenic sound on the hearing and ecology of harbor seals. Based on the results of the present study and previous studies, harbor seal hearing, in the frequency range 2.5-6.5 kHz, appears to be approximately equally susceptible to TTS.

Effect of pile-driving sounds on harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) hearing

Seals exposed to intense sounds may suffer hearing loss. After exposure to playbacks of broadband pile-driving sounds, the temporary hearing threshold shift (TTS) of two harbor seals was quantified at 4 and 8 kHz (frequencies of the highest TTS) with a psychoacoustic technique. The pile-driving sounds had: a 127 ms pulse duration, 2760 strikes per h, a 1.3 s inter-pulse interval, a ∼9.5% duty cycle, and an average received single-strike unweighted sound exposure level (SEL_ss) of 151 dB re 1 μPa²s. Exposure durations were 180 and 360 min [cumulative sound exposure level (SEL_cum): 190 and 193 dB re 1 μPa²s]. Control sessions were conducted under low ambient noise. TTS only occurred after 360 min exposures (mean TTS: seal 02, 1-4 min after sound stopped: 3.9 dB at 4 kHz and 2.4 dB at 8 kHz; seal 01, 12-16 min after sound stopped: 2.8 dB at 4 kHz and 2.6 dB at 8 kHz). Hearing recovered within 60 min post-exposure. The TTSs were small, due to the small amount of sound energy to which the seals were exposed. Biological TTS onset SEL_cum for the pile-driving sounds used in this study is around 192 dB re 1 μPa²s (for mean received SEL_ss of 151 dB re 1 μPa and a duty cycle of ∼9.5%).