Neighborhood-conditioned phonetic enhancement of an allophonic vowel split

Comparing human and machine's use of coarticulatory vowel nasalization for linguistic classificationa)

Anticipatory coarticulation is a highly informative cue to upcoming linguistic information: listeners can identify that the word is ben and not bed by hearing the vowel alone. The present study compares the relative performances of human listeners and a self-supervised pre-trained speech model (wav2vec 2.0) in the use of nasal coarticulation to classify vowels. Stimuli consisted of nasalized (from CVN words) and non-nasalized (from CVCs) American English vowels produced by 60 humans and generated in 36 TTS voices. wav2vec 2.0 performance is similar to human listener performance, in aggregate. Broken down by vowel type: both wav2vec 2.0 and listeners perform higher for non-nasalized vowels produced naturally by humans. However, wav2vec 2.0 shows higher correct classification performance for nasalized vowels, than for non-nasalized vowels, for TTS voices. Speaker-level patterns reveal that listeners' use of coarticulation is highly variable across talkers. wav2vec 2.0 also shows cross-talker variability in performance. Analyses also reveal differences in the use of multiple acoustic cues in nasalized vowel classifications across listeners and the wav2vec 2.0. Findings have implications for understanding how coarticulatory variation is used in speech perception. Results also can provide insight into how neural systems learn to attend to the unique acoustic features of coarticulation.

Selective tuning of nasal coarticulation and hyperarticulation across slow-clear, casual, and fast-clear speech styles

This study investigates how California English speakers adjust nasal coarticulation and hyperarticulation on vowels across three speech styles: speaking slowly and clearly (imagining a hard-of-hearing addressee), casually (imagining a friend/family member addressee), and speaking quickly and clearly (imagining being an auctioneer). Results show covariation in speaking rate and vowel hyperarticulation across the styles. Additionally, results reveal that speakers produce more extensive anticipatory nasal coarticulation in the slow-clear speech style, in addition to a slower speech rate. These findings are interpreted in terms of accounts of coarticulation in which speakers selectively tune their production of nasal coarticulation based on the speaking style.

Clear speech in Tashlhiyt Berber: The perception of typologically uncommon word-initial contrasts by native and naive listeners

Tashlhiyt Berber is known for having typologically unusual word-initial phonological contrasts, specifically, word-initial singleton-geminate minimal pairs (e.g., sin vs ssin) and sequences of consonants that violate the sonority sequencing principle (e.g., non-rising sonority sequences: fsin). The current study investigates the role of a listener-oriented speaking style on the perceptual enhancement of these rarer phonological contrasts. It examines the perception of word-initial singleton, geminate, and complex onsets in Tashlhiyt Berber across clear and casual speaking styles by native and naive listeners. While clear speech boosts the discriminability of pairs containing singleton-initial words for both listener groups, only native listeners performed better in discriminating between initial singleton-geminate contrasts in clear speech. Clear speech did not improve perception for lexical contrasts containing a non-rising-sonority consonant cluster for either listener group. These results are discussed in terms of how clear speech can inform phonological typology and the role of phonetic enhancement in language-universal vs language-specific speech perception.

Out of sight, out of mind: The influence of communicative load and phonological neighborhood density on phonetic variation in real listener-directed speech

Some models of speech production propose that speech variation reflects an adaptive trade-off between the needs of the listener and constraints on the speaker. The current study considers communicative load as both a situational and lexical variable that influences phonetic variation in speech to real interlocutors. The current study investigates whether the presence or absence of a target word in the sight of a real listener influences speakers' patterns of variation during a communicative task. To test how lexical difficulty also modulates intelligibility, target words varied in phonological neighborhood density (ND), a measure of lexical difficulty. Acoustic analyses reveal that speakers produced longer vowels in words that were not visually present for the listener to see, compared to when the listener could see those words. This suggests that speakers assess in real time the presence or absence of supportive visual information in assessing listener comprehension difficulty. Furthermore, the presence or absence of the word interacted with ND to predict both vowel duration and hyperarticulation patterns. These findings indicate that lexical measures of a word's difficulty and speakers' online assessment of lexical intelligibility (based on a word's visual presence or not) interactively influence phonetic modifications during communication with a real listener.