Double-strand breaks in genome-sized DNA caused by megahertz ultrasound

The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) status of Shewanella putrefaciens (S. putrefaciens) with thermosonication (TS) treatment

Although thermosonication (TS) treatment has been widely used in food sterilization, the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) of bacteria with TS treatment has still concerned potential food safety and public health. The molecular mechanism of VBNC status of bacteria with TS treatment is not clearly known. Therefore, in this study, we used Shewanella putrefaciens, which was a common putrefactive bacteria in aquatic products, to study the VBNC state of bacteria with TS treatment. Firstly, our results revealed that S. putrefaciens still could enter the VBNC state after TS treatments: 50 kHz, 300 W, 30 min ultrasonic treatment and 70 °C heating; Subsequently, we found the VBNC state of S. putrefaciens can resist the damage of TS treatment, such as cell wall break, DNA degradation, etc; Finally, four-dimensional data-independent acquisition-based proteomics showed that under VBNC state, S. putrefaciens upregulated functional proteins to resist TS treatment, such as: ribosomal proteins to accelerate the synthesis of stress proteins to counteract TS treatments, ornithine decarboxylase SpeF and MraY to repair TS treatment-induced damage, etc. Meanwhile, S. putrefaciens downregulates metabolic and transport functional proteins such as dehydrogenase to reduce the metabolism. Importantly, among those proteins, the ribosomal transcriptional regulatory protein family, such as rpsB, etc, may be the key proteins for S. putrefaciens entering VBNC state. This finding can provide some new strategies for preventing VBNC status of bacteria with TS treatment, such as: inhibition of key proteins, etc.

Safety of Sonazoid in Assisting High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Therapy for Advanced Liver Malignant Lesions: A Single-Arm Clinical Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study described here was to evaluate the safety of Sonazoid-assisted high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of advanced malignant liver lesions.

METHODS

A single-arm study was designed to enroll participants who were diagnosed with advanced primary liver cancer or liver metastases and proposed to receive Sonazoid assistance during HIFU treatment. Serological examination was conducted within 1 wk, and side effects in each patient were monitored for 1 mo. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, the contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 mo after treatment, and short-term follow-up was conducted a year later.

RESULTS

A total of 17 participants (12 male, 5 female) with an average age of 58 y (range: 46-73 y) were enrolled, including 11 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 2 patients with hepatic metastasis and 4 patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The total volume of tumor mass was 111.82 (11.01-272.30) cm3. The average total ablation time for a patient was 2021 ± 1030 s, and the energy efficiency factor was 5979.7 (3108.0, 45634.5) J/cm3. Immediately after HIFU treatment, 1 patient (5.9%) achieved complete response (CR), 4 patients (23.5%) had a moderate response, 8 patients (47.1%) had partial reperfusion and 4 patients (23.5%) had stable disease (SD). The average ablation rate for all the tumors was 51.5 ± 26.7%. The level of glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (ALT) was mildly increased in 71.6% (12/17) of patients after HIFU therapy. Mean ALT values before and after treatment were 22 (14, 35) U/L and 36 (25, 41) U/L, respectively (Z = 1.947, p = 0.051). Mild or obvious edema in skin and subcutaneous soft tissues were observed in 76.5% of patients, but no serious side effects were found. Twelve months after treatment, the follow-up results revealed that 1 patient (5.8%) achieved a CR, 8 patients (47.1%) had SD and 8 patients (47.1%) had progressive disease. The estimated median time to progression was 11 mo after treatment, with a 95% confidence interval of 6, 11 for all involved patients.

CONCLUSION

Use of Sonazoid is safe and feasible for improving HIFU ablation efficiency during the treatment of advanced malignant liver lesions. The therapeutic efficacy of Sonazoid-assisted HIFU needs to be explored in additional controlled clinical investigations.

Quantitative evaluation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through single-molecule observation

By adapting the method of single molecular observation for individual DNAs, it will be shown that reliable analysis of double-strand breaks, DSBs, becomes possible for various kinds of damage sources. Single DNA above the size of several-tens kilo base-pairs exhibits the length scale above several μm, indicating that their whole conformation is visible with fluorescence microscopy by adding suitable fluoresce dye to the solution. Various examples of the quantitative evaluation on DSBs are described, together with the evaluation of the protective effects of anti-oxidants.

Mechanical force induced DNA double-strand breaks: Ultrasound

Since the application of ultrasound for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic purposes has been increased rapidly, the effects of exposure to ultrasound on DNA molecules were studied. In this chapter, we introduced various effects of DNA damages caused by different conditions of exposure of ultrasound. Ultrasound with different sound pressure and pulse transmission conditions have been applied in our study. We discussed the threshold of sound pressure of ultrasound-induced DNA damages. Different kinds of pulses of ultrasound and microbubbles' influences on DNA double-strand breaks were also shown.

Ultrasound-Induced DNA Damage and Cellular Response: Historical Review, Mechanisms Analysis, and Therapeutic Implications

The biological effects of ultrasound may be classified into thermal and nonthermal mechanisms. The nonthermal effects may be further classified into cavitational and noncavitational mechanisms. DNA damage induced by ultrasound is considered to be related to nonthermal cavitations. For this aspect, many in vitro studies on DNA have been conducted for evaluating the safety of diagnostic ultrasound, particularly in fetal imaging. Technological advancement in detecting DNA damage both in vitro and in vivo have elucidated the mechanism of DNA damage formation and their cellular response. Damage to DNA, and the residual damages after DNA repair are implicated in the biological effects. Here, we discuss the historical evidence of ultrasound on DNA damage and the mechanism of DNA damage formation both in vitro and in vivo, compared with those induced by ionizing radiation. We also offer a commentary on the safety of ultrasound over X-ray-based imaging. Also, understanding the various mechanisms involved in the bioeffects of ultrasound will lead us to alternative strategies for use of ultrasound for therapy.