Nonleisure-Time Physical Activity Guidance Following Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Interventions to Change Movement Behaviors After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to determine which interventions increase physical activity (PA) and decrease sedentary behavior (SB) based on objective measures of movement behavior in individuals with stroke.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published up to January 3, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

The StArt 3.0.3 BETA software was used to screen titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies with randomized controlled trial designs; individuals with stroke (≥18 years of age); interventions aimed at increasing PA or decreasing SB; and objective measurement instruments.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was standardized, considering participants and assessments of interest. The risk of bias and quality of evidence of the included studies were assessed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-eight studies involving 1855 patients were included. Meta-analyses revealed that in the post-stroke acute/subacute phase, exercise interventions combined with behavior change techniques (BCTs) increased both daily steps (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.65, P=.0002) and time spent on moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activities (MVPAs) duration of PA (SMD=0.68, P=.0004) with moderate-quality evidence. In addition, interventions based only on BCTs increased PA levels with very low-quality evidence (SMD (low-intensity physical activity)=0.36, P=.02; SMD (MVPA)=0.56, P=.0004) and decreased SB with low-quality evidence (SMD=0.48, P=.03). In the post-stroke chronic phase, there is statistical significance in favor of exercise-only interventions in PA frequency (steps/day) with moderate-quality evidence (SMD=0.68, P=.002). In general, the risk of bias in the included studies was low.

CONCLUSIONS

In the acute/subacute phase after stroke, the use of BCTs combined with exercise can increase the number of daily steps and time spent on MVPA. In contrast, in the post-stroke chronic phase, exercise-only interventions resulted in a significant increase in daily steps.

Effects on sedentary behaviour of an approach to reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects on sedentary behaviour of an approach that promotes reduction in sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke after intervention and at follow-up.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

During hospitalisation and after hospital discharge.

SUBJECTS

In total, 86 patients with minor ischaemic stroke admitted to an acute care hospital were assigned to the intervention (n = 43) and control (n = 43) groups.

INTERVENTION

An intervention group that received an approach to reduce sedentary behaviour upon hospital admission until 3 months after discharge (education, self-monitoring, phone calls, etc.) and a control group that received the usual care during hospitalisation. From 3 to 6 months after discharge, no group received any intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary outcome was the change (%) in sedentary behaviour from baseline to post-intervention (3 months after discharge) and follow-up (6 months after discharge). Sedentary behaviour was measured at baseline (upon hospital admission), post-intervention, and at follow-up using accelerometers.

RESULTS

At the post-intervention stage, the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in sedentary behaviour from baseline than that shown by the control group (sedentary behaviour: intervention group, -22.7%; control group, -14.9%; P = 0.013; effect size = 0.58). At follow-up too, the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in sedentary behaviour from baseline than that shown by the control group (sedentary behaviour: intervention group, -20.4%; control group, -13.6%; P = 0.025; effect size = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

An approach to reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke effectively reduces sedentary behaviour, which is sustained up to follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered at www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index/htm UMIN000038616.

Approaches to Promote Reduction in Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an approach that promotes reduction in sedentary behavior (SB) during hospitalization and after hospital discharge reduces SB in patients with minor ischemic stroke (MIS) compared with an approach that promotes an increase in physical activity levels.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial design.

SETTING

During hospitalization and after hospital discharge.

PARTICIPANTS

We randomly assigned patients (N=61) with MIS (average age, 71.3±8.3y; 65.6% men) admitted to an acute hospital to either the intervention group (reduced SB, n=31) or the control group (increased physical activity levels, n=30).

INTERVENTIONS

During hospitalization, the intervention group received education on reducing SB, goal setting for SB after hospital discharge, and self-monitoring of SB and step count. In contrast, the control group received education on increasing physical activity levels and self-monitoring of step count. Patients in both groups wore an accelerometer during hospitalization until 3 months after hospital discharge. The intervention group received self-monitoring of SB and step count, stickers including information about reducing their SB, and phone calls once every 2 weeks for encouragement and feedback. The control group only wore the accelerometer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was SB (in percentage) at 3 months after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

There was an interaction between the 2 groups for SB. Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed a significantly reduced SB (intervention group: baseline, 70.5%; 3 months after hospital discharge, 48.6%; control group: baseline, 71.5%; 3 months after hospital discharge, 57.5%; F value=5.981; P=.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that an approach that promotes SB reduction during hospitalization and after hospital discharge is effective in reducing SB in patients with MIS 3 months after hospital discharge.