Physiological and Mechanical Indices Serving the New Cross-Country Olympic Mountain Bike Performance

Mechanism involved of post-exercise cold water immersion: Blood redistribution and increase in energy expenditure during rewarming

Thermogenesis is well understood, but the relationships between cold water immersion (CWI), the post-CWI rewarming and the associated physiological changes are not. This study investigated muscle and systemic oxygenation, cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic responses, and gastrointestinal temperature during and after CWI. 21 healthy men completed randomly 2 protocols. Both protocols consisted of a 48 minutes heating cycling exercise followed by 3 recovery periods (R1-R3), but they differed in R2. R1 lasted 20 minutes in a passive semi-seated position on a physiotherapy table at ambient room temperature. Depending on the protocol, R2 lasted 15 minutes at either ambient condition (R2_AMB) or in a CWI condition at 10°C up to the iliac crest (R2_CWI). R3 lasted 40 minutes at AMB while favoring rewarming after R2_CWI. This was followed by 10 minutes of cycling. Compared to R2_AMB, R2_CWI ended at higherV ˙ O2 in the non-immersed body part due to thermogenesis (7.16(2.15) vs. 4.83(1.62) ml.min-1.kg-1) and lower femoral artery blood flow (475(165) vs. 704(257) ml.min-1) (p < 0.001). Only after CWI, R3 showed a progressive decrease in vastus and gastrocnemius medialis O2 saturation, significant after 34 minutes (p < 0.001). As blood flow did not differ from the AMB protocol, this indicated local thermogenesis in the immersed part of the body. After CWI, a lower gastrointestinal temperature on resumption of cycling compared to AMB (36.31(0.45) vs. 37.30(0.49) °C, p < 0.001) indicated incomplete muscle thermogenesis. In conclusion, the rewarming period after CWI was non-linear and metabolically costly. Immersion and rewarming should be considered as a continuum rather than separate events.

Acute Effects of Sprint Interval Training and Chronic Effects of Polarized Training (Sprint Interval Training, High Intensity Interval Training, and Endurance Training) on Choice Reaction Time in Mountain Bike Cyclists

This study evaluated the acute effects of sprint interval training and chronic effects of polarized training on choice reaction time in cyclists. Twenty-six mountain bike cyclists participated in the study and were divided into experimental (E) and control (C) groups. The cyclists trained for 9-weeks and performed five training sessions each week. Types of training sessions: (1) sprint interval training (SIT) which consisted of 8-16, 30 s repetitions at maximal intensity, (2) high-intensity interval training (HIIT) included 5 to 7, 5-min efforts at an intensity of 85-95% maximal aerobic power (Pmax), and (3) endurance training (ET) performed at an intensity of 55-60% Pmax, lasting 120--180 min. In each week the cyclists performed: in group E a polarized training program, which included 2 × SIT, 1 × HIIT and 2 × ET, while in group C 2 × HIIT and 3 × ET. Before (acute effects) and after the 9-week training period (chronic effects) participants performed laboratory sprint interval testing protocol (SITP), which consisted of 12 maximal repetitions lasting 30 s. During SITP maximal and mean anaerobic power, as well as lactate ion concentration and blood pH were measured. Choice reaction time (RT) was measured 4-times: before and immediately after the SITP test-before and after the 9-week training period. Evaluated the average choice RT, minimal choice RT (shortest reaction), maximal choice RT (longest reaction), and the number of incorrect reactions. Before the training period as acute effects of SITP, it was observed: a shorter average choice RT (F = 13.61; p = 0.001; η2 = 0.362) and maximal choice RT (F = 4.71; p = 0.040; η2 = 0.164), and a decrease the number of incorrect reactions (F = 53.72; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.691), for E and C groups. After the 9-week training period, chronic effects showed that choice RT did not change in any of the cyclists' groups. Only in the E group after the polarized training period, the number of incorrect reactions decreased (F = 49.03; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.671), average anaerobic power increased (F = 8.70; p = 0.007; η2 = 0.274) and blood pH decreased (F = 27.20; p = 0.000; η2 = 0.531), compared to the value before the training period. In conclusion, a shorter choice RT and a decrease in the number of incorrect reactions as acute effects of SITP, and a decrease in the number of incorrect reactions and higher average power as chronic effects of the polarized training program are beneficial for mountain bike cyclists.

Exercise Intensity and Pacing Pattern During a Cross-Country Olympic Mountain Bike Race

Objective: To examine the power profiles and pacing patterns in relation to critical power (CP) and maximal aerobic power (MAP) output during a cross-country Olympic (XCO) mountain bike race.

Methods: Five male and two female national competitive XCO cyclists completed a UCI Cat. 1 XCO race. The races were 19 km and 23 km and contained five (female) and six (male) laps, respectively. Power output (PO) during the race was measured with the cyclists’ personal power meters. On two laboratory tests using their own bikes and power meters, CP and work capacity above CP (W') were calculated using three time trials of 12, 7, and 3 min, while MAP was established based on a 3-step submaximal test and the maximal oxygen uptake from the 7-min time trial.

Results: Mean PO over the race duration (96 ± 7 min) corresponded to 76 ± 9% of CP and 63 ± 4% of MAP. 40 ± 8% of race time was spent with PO > CP, and the mean duration and magnitude of the bouts >CP was ~8 s and ~120% of CP. From the first to last lap, time >CP and accumulated W' per lap decreased with 9 ± 6% and 45 ± 17%, respectively. For single >CP bouts, mean magnitude and mean W' expended decreased by 25 ± 8% and 38 ± 15% from the first to the last lap, respectively. Number and duration of bouts did not change significantly between laps.

Conclusion: The highly variable pacing pattern in XCO implies the need for rapid changes in metabolic power output, as a result of numerous separate short-lived >CP actions which decrease in magnitude in later laps, but with little lap-to-lap variation in number and duration.