Differences Among Overhand, 3-Quarter, and Sidearm Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Players

Kinematic Modeling of Pitch Velocity in High School and Professional Baseball Pitchers: Comparisons With the Literature

Background

Kinematic parameters predictive of pitch velocity have been evaluated in adolescent and collegiate baseball pitchers; however, they have not been established for high school or professional pitchers.

Purpose

To create multiregression models using anthropometric and kinematics features most predictive for pitch velocity in high school and professional pitchers and compare them with prior multiregression models evaluating other playing levels.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

High school (n = 59) and professional (n = 337) baseball pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastballs while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Using anthropometric and kinematic variables, multiregression models for pitch velocity were created for each group. A systematic review was conducted to determine previous studies that established kinematic models for ball velocity in youth, high school, and collegiate pitchers.

Results

Leg length was predictive of pitch velocity for high school and professional pitchers (P < .001 for both). When compared with previously established models for pitch velocity, almost all groups were distinct from one another when assessing age (P maximum < .001), weight (P max = .0095), and pitch velocity (P max < .001). Stride length was a significant predictor for the youth/high school pitchers, as well as the current study's high school and professional pitchers (P < .001 for all). Maximal shoulder external rotation (collegiate: P = .001; professional: P < .001) and maximal elbow extension velocity (high school/collegiate: P = .024; collegiate: P < .001; professional: P = .006) were shared predictors for the collegiate and current study's professional group multiregression models. Trunk flexion at ball release was a commonly shared predictor in the youth/high school (P = .04), high school/collegiate (P = .003), collegiate (P < .001), and the current study's professional group (P < .001).

Conclusion

Youth, high school, collegiate, and professional pitchers had unique, predictive kinematic and anthropometric features predictive of pitch velocity. Leg length, stride length, trunk flexion at ball release, and maximal shoulder external rotation were predictive features that were shared between playing levels.

Clinical Relevance

Coaches, clinicians, scouts, and pitchers can consider both the unique and the shared predictive features at each playing level when attempting to maximize pitch velocity.

Biomechanical effects of foot placement during pitching

Baseball coaches often focus on the landing position of a pitcher's front foot as a key aspect of mechanics. Furthermore, controversy persists regarding positioning the rear foot on the first base or third base end of the rubber. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of rear and front foot placement on pitching biomechanics. Our hypotheses were that there would be significant kinematic and kinetic differences associated with foot placement. This was a retrospective review including 144 healthy right-handed adult baseball pitchers divided into groups based on their rear and front foot placements: first base open (1B-Open), first base closed (1B-Closed), third base open (3B-Open), and third base closed (3B-Closed). Two-way ANOVAs detected no statistically significant main effects for kinetic variables but several for kinematic variables. Open pitchers had less shoulder abduction at the time of ball release and greater maximum shoulder internal rotation velocity in comparison with closed pitchers. They also had less forearm pronation at the time of ball release and greater maximum elbow extension velocity. Additional statistically significant results were found; however, low effect sizes may lessen the clinical significance of many of the results.

History of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury and College Pitcher Fastball Profiles: A Retrospective, Observational, Live Pitching Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the fastball profiles of pitchers who had previously sustained grade I or II ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries, were rehabilitated, and released back for competition with those of pitchers with no history of elbow injury.

METHODS

Eighteen pitchers from the pitching staff of 1 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III team participated in this study. Group 1 had a history of grade I or II UCL injury (n = 8), and group 2 (n = 10) did not. A computerized pitch tracking device was used to analyze ball movement and pitching mechanics. The hypothesis was that the pitchers with a history of injury (group 1) would display differing fastball velocity-ball movement relationships compared to those without (group 2).

RESULTS

The groups had similar heights, weights, pitching experiences, and arm slot positions at ball release. The pitching coach-determined preinjury arm slot position and the postinjury computerized pitch tracking device measurements after return to competition displayed strong agreement (r = 0.83), suggesting comparable pre and postinjury pitching techniques. The groups had comparable glenohumeral joint range of motion and fastball profiles, except that group 1 released the ball at a 2.5 times lesser horizontal distance away from the pitching rubber center. Group 2 also displayed consistently more robust and more frequent fastball movement relationships with velocity, horizontal break, and vertical break than group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced horizontal ball release distances at comparable vertical ball release heights without changes in the arm slot position suggest that pitchers with a history of grade I or II UCL injury have greater contralateral trunk tilt and elbow flexion at ball release. Increased contralateral trunk tilt may occur to increase pitch velocity at the expense of ball movement while placing the pitching elbow in a potentially injurious position. Computerized fastball profile analysis using a computerized pitch tracking device, in conjunction with coach pitching technique observation, and team medical staff clinical examination may help better identify pitchers with an increased risk of UCL injury.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Comparison of glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics between fastballs and curveballs during baseball pitching

Shoulder injuries are common in baseball pitchers and primarily involve the glenohumeral joint. Past analyses have examined shoulder biomechanics during different pitch types simply as the motion of the upper arm relative to the thorax. In this study, glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics were compared between fastballs and curveballs at key timepoints throughout a pitch. Upper extremity kinematics of thirteen collegiate pitchers were collected during fastball and curveball pitches with motion capture. A linear model approach was utilised to estimate scapular kinematics based on measurable humerothoracic motion. Glenohumeral kinematics were computed from the scapular and humeral motion data. Comparisons of scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematic variables at times of maximum glenohumeral external rotation, ball release, and maximum glenohumeral internal rotation between pitch types were made using paired t-tests with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections. There were no significant differences in glenohumeral kinematics. Fastballs elicited significantly less scapulothoracic internal rotation and more posterior tilt at maximum glenohumeral external rotation. Fastballs produced significantly less scapulothoracic internal rotation and anterior tilt at maximum glenohumeral internal rotation. This study provides further evidence that risk of injury to the glenohumeral joint may be consistent between fastballs and curveballs and offers insights into subtle differences in scapular kinematics between pitch types.

Biomechanical Basis of Interval Throwing Programs for Baseball Pitchers: A Systematic Review

Background

Interval throwing programs are used in rehabilitation of throwing injuries, especially ulnar collateral ligament injuries. Athletes who are rehabilitating begin by throwing on flat ground progressing through increasing distances, number of throws, and intensity of throwing. If the athlete is a baseball pitcher, the flat-ground throwing phase is followed by pitching on a mound at progressively increased effort. The goal is to build back arm strength and capacity with an emphasis on proper mechanics.

Purpose

To determine whether interval throwing progressively builds joint kinetics (specifically, elbow varus torque) to the level required during full-effort baseball pitching. A secondary purpose was to examine the kinematics produced during interval throwing compared to those seen during baseball pitching.

Study Design

Systematic Review.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for biomechanical studies of flat-ground throwing and partial-effort pitching in baseball between 1987 and 2023. Studies that reported the biomechanics of either flat-ground throwing, or partial-effort pitching were included in this review. The AXIS tool was used to assess study quality.

Results

Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies were determined to be of moderate quality, while three studies were deemed high quality. Elbow varus torque during partial-effort pitching was less than during full-effort pitching. Elbow varus torque for most flat-ground throws did not exceed full-effort pitching torque. While most studies showed increased elbow varus torque with increased flat-ground throwing distance, the distance at which elbow varus torque matched or exceeded full-effort pitching elbow varus torque was not consistent.As flat-ground throwing distance increased, shoulder external rotation angle and shoulder internal rotation velocity increased. Arm slot (forearm angle above horizontal) decreased as flat-ground throwing distance increased. For varied effort pitching, shoulder external rotation angle, shoulder internal rotation velocity, elbow extension velocity, and ball velocity increased as effort increased. While the front knee extended slightly from foot contact to ball release in full-effort pitching, the front knee flexed slightly during partial-effort pitching.

Conclusions

An interval throwing program progressively builds elbow varus torque up to levels produced in full-effort baseball pitching. While differences exist between interval throwing kinematics and pitching kinematics, the patterns are similar in general.

Level of Evidence

2.

Kinematic and Kinetic Comparisons of Arm Slot Position Between High School and Professional Pitchers

Background

Throwing arm kinetics differ in pitchers at varying arm slot (AS) positions (frontal-plane arm position at ball release relative to the vertical axis).

Purpose

To determine how kinematic and kinetic values differ between professional and high school pitchers with varying AS positions, and whether these differences are similarly observed in both populations.

Methods

High school (n = 130) and professional (n = 288) pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastballs under 3-dimensional motion capture technology. Pitchers in each cohort were subdivided based on mean AS position at ball release: AS1 (least degree of AS: most overhand throwing styles), AS2 (intermediate degree of AS: three-quarter throwing styles), or AS3 (greatest degree of AS: most sidearm throwing styles). Kinetic and kinematic parameters were compared between groups.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Results

High school pitchers had a more overhand AS at ball release (50° ± 11°) compared with professional pitchers (58° ± 14°) (P < .001). In both cohorts, AS1 pitchers had significantly greater shoulder abduction (high school, P <0.001; professional, P <0.0001) and lateral trunk flexion (high school, P < 0.001; professional, P <0.0001) at ball release compared with AS3 pitchers. Professional pitchers with an AS3 position had significantly delayed timing of maximum upper trunk angular velocity compared with AS1 pitchers (64% ± 7% vs 57% ± 7% of pitch time, respectively; P < .0001). A significant positive correlation between AS and elbow flexion torque was found in high school pitchers (P = .002; β = 0.28), and a significant negative correlation between AS and elbow varus torque (P < .001; β = -0.22) and shoulder internal rotation torque (P < .001; β = -0.20) was noted in professional pitchers.

Conclusion

AS position was related to shoulder abduction and trunk lateral tilt. Professional and high school pitchers with varying AS positions did not experience similar changes in throwing arm kinetics.

Clinical Relevance

In professional pitchers, the earlier onset of maximum upper trunk angular velocity with overhand throwing style may reflect inappropriate pelvis-trunk timing separation, a parameter implicated in upper extremity injury, and the negative correlation between AS and elbow varus and shoulder internal rotation torque suggests that both excessive and minimal AS positions have negative implications.

The Characteristics of Badminton-Related Pain in Pre-Adolescent and Adolescent Badminton Players

Body pain, often considered as an early sign of injury in young players, warrants thorough study. This study aimed to examine the distribution of badminton-related pain and prevalence in pre-adolescent and adolescent badminton players. Profiles of badminton-related pain were surveyed using a questionnaire among 366 pre-adolescent and adolescent badminton players aged 7-12 years. The distribution of badminton-related pain was described, and the pain incidence was calculated. Proportions of pain per 1000-training-hour exposures were the main outcome measures. The analysis considered various age groups (7-8, 9-10, and 11-12 years) and years of badminton experience (≤2, 2-3, and > 3 years). In total, 554 cases of badminton-related pain were reported. The ankle was the most common site, followed by knee, plantar, shoulder, and lower back. The overall pain rate per 1000-training-hour exposure was 3.06. The 11-12-year-old group showed the highest pain rate, significantly greater than the 7-8-year-old group and the 9-10-year-old group. Additionally, the prevalence of pain exhibited an increasing trend with age. Finally, regardless of the age groups, participants with 2-3 years of badminton experience had the highest pain rate. These findings might help inform targeted interventions to reduce the high prevalence of pain in various body regions across pre-adolescent and adolescent badminton players.

Changes in Elbow Stress and Ball Velocity During Reduced Effort Pitching: A Marker-Based Motion Capture Analysis

BACKGROUND

Baseball pitchers often participate in throwing programs that involve throwing at reduced effort levels to gradually increase the amount of stress experienced across the elbow. It is currently unknown how reduced effort pitching compares with maximum effort with respect to elbow stress and ball velocity.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to determine the correlation between elbow stress and ball velocity with reduced effort pitching. We hypothesized that decreased perceived effort would disproportionately correlate with elbow stress and ball velocity.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten healthy male high school baseball pitchers threw 5 pitches from a regulation pitching mound at 3 effort levels: maximum effort, 75% effort, and 50% effort. Elbow stress, specifically elbow varus torque, was calculated for all pitches using a validated marker-based 3-dimensional motion capture system. Ball velocity was measured using a Doppler radar gun. Intrathrower variability was calculated for each effort level.

RESULTS

Elbow stress and ball velocity decreased with reduced effort throws (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). However, the reductions in elbow stress and ball velocity were not proportional. At 75% effort throws, elbow stress measured 81% (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.95), and ball velocity measured 90% (ICC, 0.80) of maximum, respectively. At 50% effort throws, elbow stress measured 75% (ICC, 0.93), and ball velocity measured 85% (ICC, 0.87) of maximum. Intrathrower reliability was excellent for elbow stress and ball velocity, with all ICCs ≥0.80.

CONCLUSION

Pitching at a reduced effort level resulted in decreased elbow stress and ball velocity. However, for every 25% reduction in perceived effort, elbow stress decreased by a mean 13%, and ball velocity decreased 7.5%. When baseball pitchers attempt to throw at a reduced effort of maximum, throwing metrics do not decrease proportionately.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

While pitching at a reduced effort of maximum decreases elbow stress and ball velocity, the decrease is not proportional, subjecting the elbow to more stress than intended. This has significant clinical importance to pitchers, coaches, and medical professionals in the setting of injury prevention and return to sports.

Effects of Contralateral Trunk Tilt on Shoulder and Elbow Injury Risk and Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Baseball pitchers employ various contralateral trunk tilt (CTT) positions when pitching depending on if they have an overhand, three-quarter, or sidearm delivery. There are no known studies that have examined how pitching biomechanics are significantly different in professional pitchers with varying amounts of CTT, which may provide insight into shoulder and elbow injury risk among pitchers with different CTT.

PURPOSE

To assess differences in shoulder and elbow forces and torques and baseball pitching biomechanics in professional pitchers with maximum 30° to 40° CTT (MaxCTT), moderate 15° to 25° CTT (ModCTT), and minimum 0° to 10° CTT (MinCTT).

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

In total, 215 pitchers were examined, including 46 pitchers with MaxCTT, 126 pitchers with ModCTT, and 43 pitchers with MinCTT. All pitchers were tested using a 240-Hz, 10-camera motion analysis system, and 37 kinematic and kinetic parameters were calculated. Differences in kinematic and kinetic variables among the 3 CTT groups were assessed with a 1-way analysis of variance (P < .01).

RESULTS

Maximum shoulder anterior force and maximum elbow proximal force were significantly greater in ModCTT (403 ± 79 N) than MaxCTT (369 ± 75 N) and MinCTT (364 ± 70 N), while maximum elbow flexion torque and shoulder proximal force, respectively, were significantly greater in ModCTT (69 ± 11 N·m and 1176 ± 152 N, respectively) than MaxCTT (62 ± 12 N·m and 1085 ± 119 N, respectively). During arm cocking, maximum pelvis angular velocity was greater in MinCTT than MaxCTT and ModCTT, and maximum upper trunk angular velocity was greater in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT. At ball release, trunk forward tilt was greater in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT and greater in MaxCTT than ModCTT, while arm slot angle was less in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT and less in MaxCTT than ModCTT.

CONCLUSION

The greatest shoulder and elbow peak forces occurred in ModCTT, which occurs in pitchers who throw with a three-quarter arm slot. More research is needed to assess if pitchers with ModCTT are at a higher risk of shoulder and elbow injury compared with pitchers with MaxCTT (overhand arm slot) and MinCTT (sidearm arm slot), although in the pitching literature, excessive elbow and shoulder forces and torques have been shown to correlate with elbow and shoulder injuries.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results from the current study will help clinicians better understand if differences in kinematic and kinetic measures differ with pitching, or if differences in force, torque, and arm position occur at different arm slots.

The Clinician's Guide to Baseball Pitching Biomechanics

CONTEXT

Improper baseball pitching biomechanics are associated with increased stresses on the throwing elbow and shoulder as well as an increased risk of injury.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Previous studies quantifying pitching kinematics and kinetics were reviewed.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

RESULTS

At the instant of lead foot contact, the elbow should be flexed approximately 90° with the shoulder at about 90° abduction, 20° horizontal abduction, and 45° external rotation. The stride length should be about 85% of the pitcher's height with the lead foot in a slightly closed position. The pelvis should be rotated slightly open toward home plate with the upper torso in line with the pitching direction. Improper shoulder external rotation at foot contact is associated with increased elbow and shoulder torques and forces and may be corrected by changing the stride length and/or arm path. From foot contact to maximum shoulder external rotation to ball release, the pitcher should demonstrate a kinematic chain of lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, upper trunk rotation, elbow extension, and shoulder internal rotation. The lead knee should be flexed about 45° at foot contact and 30° at ball release. Corrective strategies for insufficient knee extension may involve technical issues (stride length, lead foot position, lead foot orientation) and/or strength and conditioning of the lower body. Improper pelvis and upper trunk rotation often indicate the need for core strength and flexibility. Maximum shoulder external rotation should be about 170°. Insufficient external rotation leads to low shoulder internal rotation velocity and low ball velocity. Deviation from 90° abduction decreases the ability to achieve maximum external rotation, increases elbow torque, and decreases the dynamic stability in the glenohumeral joint.

CONCLUSION

Improved pitching biomechanics can increase performance and reduce risk of injury.

SORT

Level C.

The influence of modeling parameters for computing joint kinetics in adolescent and adult pitchers

Baseball pitching is a well-studied area of sports biomechanics partially due to high upper extremity (UE) injury rates. Joint kinetics have not been linked directly to UE injury in pitchers but are often used in lieu of injury data as a proxy for injury risk. Pitchers exhibit adaptations in the throwing arm that may affect body segment inertial parameters (BSIPs); however, these are unaccounted for in traditional modelling methods and may contribute to the lack of evidence linking joint kinetics to injury. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the BSIPs of the throwing arm in adolescent and adult pitchers and compare joint kinetics computed from traditional modelling methods to those using individualised BSIPs. Forty-five pitchers underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and motion capture sessions in a biomechanics laboratory. Individual BSIPs from the DXA scans were used to estimate UE joint kinetics via inverse dynamics and compared to joint kinetics computed from scaled BSIPs. Throwing arm BSIPs in pitchers were significantly different from studies of the general population. Variable levels of agreement and significant differences in joint kinetics existed between methods, indicating that using joint kinetics computed via scaled models to identify pitchers at risk of injury may be inappropriate.

Pectoralis Major Muscle Belly Rupture in a 17-Year-Old Female Softball Player: A Case Report

CASE

We report the case of a healthy 17-year-old female softball player with a subacute full-thickness intramuscular tear of the pectoralis major (PM) muscle. A successful muscle repair was obtained using a modified Kessler technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite initially being a rare injury pattern, the incidence of PM muscle rupture is likely to increase as interest in sports and weight training increases, and although this injury pattern is more common in men, it is becoming more common in women as well. Furthermore, this case presentation provides support for operative treatment of intramuscular ruptures of the PM muscle.

Pitching mechanics and performance of adult baseball pitchers: A systematic review and meta-analysis for normative data

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to critically review and synthesise the findings from primary studies on pitching mechanics and performance of healthy adult baseball pitchers.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eight English- and Japanese-language databases were systematically searched from inception to 22nd July 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 29 descriptive biomechanical studies were included. Overall study quality was moderate. In subgroup analyses, professional pitchers showed significantly higher stride length, peak shoulder internal rotation velocity, peak shoulder proximal force and ball velocity compared to collegiate pitchers. Conversely, collegiate pitchers were found to have significantly higher peak pelvis rotation velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

Available normative data suggested potentially heterogeneous pitching mechanics and performance between professional and collegiate pitchers. However, the findings in this review should be interpreted cautiously. Since statistical heterogeneity was significant within most data sets, more detailed subgroup analyses are required. Additionally, more high-quality studies utilising measurement systems with established reliability are required to obtain accurate data in baseball pitching mechanics and performance.

Rib Fractures in Professional Baseball Pitchers: Mechanics, Epidemiology, and Management

Pitching is a complex kinetic chain activity requiring the transfer of energy from the lower body, through the core and trunk, and finally through the arm to generate explosive acceleration of the baseball. As a result, large forces are generated in the trunk musculature and rib attachments from the late cocking phase of pitching through deceleration. The repetitive cumulative load and high pitch velocities put professional pitchers at risk of rib stress fracture. Given the potential for a prolonged recovery course and high rate of recurrence, early recognition of rib bone stress injury is critical to optimize care. Identifying torso strength imbalances, suboptimal pitching biomechanics (such as late or inadequate pelvic rotation), as well as metabolic deficiencies that may adversely affect bone health are essential to expedite safe return to play and prevent future injury. In this review, we discuss risk factors, mechanism of injury, typical clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging findings, and propose treatment and prevention strategies for rib stress fractures in overhand pitchers.

Determinants of Biomechanical Efficiency in Collegiate and Professional Baseball Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical efficiency, defined as fastball velocity per unit of normalized elbow varus torque, is a relatively new metric applied to improving the performance and health of baseball pitching.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this work was to evaluate kinematic parameters influencing biomechanical efficiency among professional and collegiate pitchers. Kinematic differences were compared between pitchers of high and low biomechanical efficiency. We hypothesized that professional pitchers would have greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A deidentified biomechanical database of 545 pitchers (447 professional, 98 collegiate) was analyzed. A multivariate linear regression model was used to evaluate significant findings a priori with α = .05. Additionally, biomechanical differences were identified between competition levels and between high and low biomechanical efficiency groups using Mann-Whitney U test (α = .05).

RESULTS

Competition level and 11 (of 21) kinematic variables explained 27% of the variance in biomechanical efficiency, with most of the predictors being throwing arm kinematics (elbow flexion at stride foot contact [SFC]: β, -1.47; SE, 0.26; shoulder abduction at SFC: β, -1.78; SE, 0.39; shoulder external rotation at SFC: β, 0.60; SE, 0.22; maximum external rotation [MER] angle: β, 1.82; SE, 0.42; shoulder horizontal adduction at MER: β, -3.42; SE, 0.71) (all P≤ .05). Professional pitchers had greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers (711.0 ± 101.0 vs 657.0 ± 99.3, respectively; P < .001; d = 0.53). Compared with the low-efficiency group, the high-efficiency group had significantly lower normalized elbow varus torque with greater weight and height (high: 0.047 ± 0.004 %wt*ht vs. low: 0.063 ± 0.006 %wt*ht, P <.001; d = 3.20). At the instant of SFC, the high-efficiency group demonstrated greater shoulder external rotation and less elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and pelvic rotation. The high-efficiency group also had greater MER and less shoulder horizontal adduction at MER, trunk side tilt at ball release, and knee excursion from foot contact to ball release.

CONCLUSION

Professional pitchers had greater biomechanical efficiency than collegiate pitchers. Biomechanical efficiency was also affected by 11 kinematic variables identified in this study. Pitchers with higher efficiency had distinct differences in arm position, trunk side tilt, and lead-knee extension range of motion in the delivery. Thus, pitchers and baseball organizations should focus on these factors to lower normalized elbow varus torque relative to ball velocity.

Validation of a Follow-Through Developmental Sequence for the Overarm Throw for Force in University Students

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the follow-through on thrown ball velocity, potentially justifying inclusion of the follow-through in Roberton’s five critical components. Method: Seventy-eight University students participated in the overarm, dominant hand, throwing task, which involved throwing a standard tennis ball with maximum force three times. Each throw was filmed by two cameras placed behind and to the open side of the thrower to assess the throwing technique. The velocity of the throws was recorded with a radar gun. Results: Results indicated that, after accounting for the effects of gender, age, and throwing experience, there was a significant effect of follow-through level on throw velocity. Analysis of covariance also revealed a significant gender effect, with males throwing significantly faster than females. Results indicated the follow-through had the second largest impact on thrown ball velocity of all six components. Discussion: These findings provide preliminary support that the follow-through should be added to Roberton’s developmental levels. The inclusion of the follow-through component could assist teachers and coaches to facilitate learner and athlete development and could also improve the accuracy of throwing development assessment.

Differences in Glenohumeral Range of Motion and Humeral Torsion Between Right-Handed and Left-Handed Professional Baseball Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Elite pitchers have demonstrated significant differences in glenohumeral range of motion and humeral torsion compared with the nonthrowing population. Furthermore, abnormal shoulder range of motion measurements have been associated with different injury risks and challenges in assessing rehabilitation progress. Variations in range of motion and torsion due to handedness in the asymptomatic professional population have yet to be investigated in the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

No significant differences in glenohumeral range of motion and humeral torsion would exist between asymptomatic right- and left-handed professional pitchers.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

217 Major League Baseball pitchers from a single organization were evaluated over a 7-year period between 2013 and 2020. Range of motion was measured with a standard goniometer. Ultrasound scanning was used to determine neutral position of the shoulder, and the degree of humeral torsion was measured with a goniometer.

RESULTS

Right-handed pitchers demonstrated significantly greater values of glenohumeral external rotation (118.5° vs 112.7°; P < .001) in their throwing arms compared with their left-handed counterparts. Right-handed pitchers also showed greater values of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (13.9° vs 4.8°; P < .001) and side-to-side differences in humeral retrotorsion (-23.1° vs -2.2°; P < .001). Left-handed pitchers demonstrated significantly greater flexion deficits in the throwing arm compared with their right-handed counterparts (7.5° vs 0.0°; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In the throwing arm, right-handed pitchers demonstrated significantly greater measures of external rotation, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, and humeral retrotorsion compared with left-handed counterparts. Furthermore, right-handed pitchers demonstrated a significant side-to-side difference in retrotorsion, whereas left-handed pitchers did not. However, left-handed pitchers demonstrated a side-to-side shoulder flexion deficit that was not present in the cohort of right-handed pitchers. The correlation between humeral retrotorsion and increased external rotation indicates that osseous adaptations may play a role in range of motion differences associated with handedness. Additionally, these findings may explain observed differences in several throwing metrics between right- and left-handed pitchers. Knowledge of these differences can inform rehabilitation programs and shoulder maintenance regimens.

Evaluating Pelvis Rotation Style at Foot Contact: A Propensity Scored Biomechanical Analysis in High School and Professional Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Early pelvis rotation has been associated with decreased throwing arm kinetics and conventionally was considered a component of proper pitching form in baseball throwers. However, previous assessments of pelvis rotation style have not accounted for confounders such as playing level, anthropometric characteristics, or ball velocity and have not evaluated sufficient sample sizes.

PURPOSE

To compare kinetic and kinematic parameters based on pelvis rotation style in high school and professional pitchers.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

High school and professional baseball pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while being evaluated using 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). These pitchers were 1:1 propensity score matched by age, height, weight, handedness, and ball velocity based on early (<60°) versus late (≥60°) pelvis rotation style at foot contact. A total of 26 kinematic and 10 kinetic parameters were compared between groups. The kinematic parameters were used to conduct a linear regression between early and late pelvis rotation at foot contact.

RESULTS

Pelvis rotation at foot contact was not significantly associated with ball velocity for either high school (P = .243) or professional pitchers (P = .075). No difference was found in elbow varus torque between high school early rotators (57.5 ± 14.9 N·m) and late rotators (51.3 ± 14.7 N·m; P = .036) and between professional early rotators (80.1 ± 11.8 N·m) and late rotators (79.0 ± 11.2 N·m; P = .663). At foot contact in high school pitchers, stride length increased by 2.1% of body height (B = -0.205; β = -0.470; P < .001), trunk rotation increased by 4.2° (B = -0.417; β = -0.488; P < .001), and trunk flexion at foot contact decreased by 4.4° (B = 0.442; β = 0.476; P < .001) with every 10° increase in pelvis rotation. At foot contact in professional pitchers, stride length increased by 2.3% of body height (B = -0.229; β = -0.478; P < .001), trunk rotation increased by 4.3° (B = -0.431; β = -0.515; P < .001), and trunk flexion decreased by 4.0° (B = 0.404; β = 0.373; P < .001) with every 10° increase in pelvis rotation.

CONCLUSION

Pelvis rotation at foot contact was associated with several kinematic parameters in both groups and may influence mechanics further along the kinetic chain. Landing open or closed was not significantly associated with throwing arm kinetics or ball velocity for both high school and professional baseball pitchers, contrary to previous thought.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Coaches and players may better focus their efforts on refining other kinematic parameters for enhanced performance outcomes and safe pitching mechanics.

Athletic Shoulder Test Differences Exist Bilaterally in Healthy Pitchers

Background

There is a lack of valid and reliable tests that assess upper extremity strength and function for rehabilitation and injury prevention purposes in throwing athletes. The Athletic Shoulder (ASH) test has been proposed as a reliable measure of shoulder strength, but has not yet been studied in baseball pitchers.

Hypothesis/Purpose

The purpose of this study was to establish values for healthy baseball pitchers performing the ASH test, compare those values with other common tests of shoulder strength and function, and compare ASH test performance bilaterally. It was hypothesized that the dominant arm would perform significantly better on the ASH test compared to the non-dominant arm. A secondary purpose of the study was to evaluate if ASH test performance was related to fastball velocity in baseball pitchers. It was hypothesized that ASH test performance would positively correlate with fastball velocity.

Study Design

Cross-Sectional Study.

Methods

College and high school baseball pitchers were recruited to complete shoulder range of motion (ROM), isokinetic shoulder strength, and isometric shoulder strength testing using the ASH test. The ASH test was used to assess force production as a proxy for strength bilaterally at four levels of shoulder abduction (0°, 90°, 135°, and 180°), using a force plate. Approximately one-week later subjects returned for a bullpen session where fastball velocity was recorded with a radar gun. Bilateral differences in passive ROM, isokinetic, and isometric shoulder strength were examined using paired t-tests while linear relationships between isometric shoulder strength and fastball velocity were assessed using Pearson correlations.

Results

Thirty-five healthy pitchers participated in the study (19.7 ± 1.8 years). Pitchers demonstrated significantly greater isometric shoulder strength at the 90° and 135° abduction positions with the throwing arm compared to the non-throwing arm. Pitchers also demonstrated commonly observed musculoskeletal adaptations in the throwing arm such as increased passive external rotation, decreased passive internal rotation, and greater internal and external rotator strength during isokinetic testing. Peak force production during the ASH test was not related to fastball velocity.

Conclusion

The ASH test is capable of detecting bilateral shoulder strength adaptations commonly observed in other clinical tests in healthy pitchers. Pitchers demonstrated greater isometric peak force during the ASH test at levels of shoulder abduction similar to those observed in pitching. While these results may be intriguing for clinical use, peak force from the ASH test was not correlated to fastball velocity in pitchers, and therefore should be used with caution for predictions in this realm.

Level of Evidence

2.

Clinical Relevance

A need exists for objective measures of shoulder strength for rehabilitation and injury risk monitoring in throwing athletes that are easy to administer, have high reliability and validity, and provide minimal re-injury risk to athletes recovering from injury.

What is known about the subject

Data from the ASH test has been published previously in non-throwing athletes and was shown to be valid and reliable in that group. However, the test has not been explored widely in throwing athletes who are known to have significant musculoskeletal adaptations to the throwing shoulder.

What this study adds to existing knowledge

The results from this study confirm that the ASH test is sensitive enough to detect the adaptations that are present in the healthy throwing athlete's shoulder. Due to the prior proven validity and reliability and these results, the test can be used to monitor throwing arm strength and function during rehabilitation or as a pre/intra-season screening tool to help describe arm health.

Comparison of marker-less and marker-based motion capture for baseball pitching kinematics

The purpose of this study was to compare baseball pitching kinematics measured with marker-less and marker-based motion capture. Two hundred and seventy-five fastball pitches were captured at 240 Hz simultaneously with a 9-camera marker-less system and a 12-camera marker system. The pitches were thrown by 30 baseball pitchers (age 17.1 ± 3.1 years). Data for each trial were time-synchronised between the two systems using the instant of ball release. Coefficients of Multiple Correlations (CMC) were computed to assess the similarity of waveforms between the two systems. Discrete measurements at foot contact, during arm cocking, and at ball release were compared between the systems using Bland-Altman plots and descriptive statistics. CMC values for the five time series analysed ranged from 0.88 to 0.97, indicating consistency in movement patterns between systems. Biases for discrete measurements ranged in magnitude from 0 to 16 degrees. Standard deviations of the differences between systems ranged from 0 to 14 degrees, while intraclass correlations ranged from 0.64 to 0.92. Thus, the marker-based and marker-less motion capture systems produced similar patterns for baseball pitching kinematics. However, based on the variations between the systems, it is recommended that a database of normative ranges be established for each system.

The relationship among lead knee extension, fastball velocity and elbow torque in professional baseball pitchers

The purpose of this study was to investigate potential differences in lead knee extension velocity, elbow varus torque and lead knee extension (the change in lead knee flexion from foot contact to ball release) in high and low velocity professional pitchers. Three-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz) was used to assess 322 professional pitchers.         T-test were used to compare the two groups and multiple linear regression analyses were performed on all pitchers (n = 322). The high-velocity group (n = 99; 40.3 ±  0.9m/s) had greater lead knee extension (17 ± 13 vs 5 ± 14°, p < 0.001, g = 0.9), lead knee extension velocity (419 ± 135 vs 297 ± 121°/s, p < 0.001, g = 0.9) and elbow varus torque (91.1 ± 15.5 vs 84.0 ± 14.7 Nm, p < 0.001, g = 0.5) compared to the low-velocity group (n = 88; 36.1  ± 1.2 m/s). Lead knee extension (R2 = 0.352, p < 0.001) and lead knee extension velocity (R2 = 0.326, p < 0.001) were found to be positive predictors of ball velocity but not elbow varus torque (p = 0.807). Instructing professional pitchers to utilise a lead leg bracing technique that facilitates increased lead knee extension can contribute to faster ball velocity, but most likely results from a combination of other mechanics.

Kinematic and kinetic analyses of professional pitchers with history of core or groin injuries: A propensity-score matched analysis

Background

Core injuries in professional baseball pitchers have been linked to both diminished performance and time missed during the season injury was sustained. It is currently unclear how a history of a core injury may affect the future pitching performance and mechanics of professional baseball pitchers.

Purpose

To compare kinetic and kinematic variables between professional baseball pitchers with prior core/groin injuries and those without prior injury.

Study design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

Professional baseball pitchers with a history of core injury pitched 8-12 fastball pitches while evaluated with 3D-motion capture (480 Hz). Inclusion criteria necessitated that the core injury occurred within one to four-years prior to biomechanical evaluation and that the core injury required time off from professional play for a minimum of 2 weeks and maximum of 3 months. These pitchers were 4:1 propensity-scored matched by age, height, weight, and handedness to pitchers with no prior injury history (control). Twenty kinematic and eleven normalized and non-normalized kinetic parameters were compared between groups using appropriate parametric testing. Sub-analysis of pitchers with distinct core muscle and spinal injuries were also analyzed.

Results

The No Prior Injury (NPI) subgroup (n = 76) had significantly less elbow flexion at ball release (31 ± 5° vs. 35 ± 6° respectfully, p = 0.044) compared to the Core Musculature/Soft Tissue subgroup (CM/ST, n = 10), with no significant difference in kinematics for other injury groups (p > 0.05). The General Core/Groin injury group (GCG, n = 19) had significantly greater normalized elbow anterior force (43.9 ± 4.7 vs. 40.0 ± 5.2 %BodyWeight[BW], p = 0.006) and elbow flexion torque (4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5 %BWxBodyHeight[BH], p = 0.001) than the NPI pitchers. CM/ST had significantly greater normalized elbow anterior force (p = 0.031), elbow flexion torque (p = 0.002), and shoulder adduction torque (p = 0.007) than NPI pitchers.

Conclusion

Professional baseball pitchers with prior core/groin injuries demonstrated increased elbow anterior force and elbow flexion torque compared to pitchers with no prior core injuries. One possible explanation for this finding includes inadequate recruitment and utilization of the lower extremities as a component of the kinetic chain leading to compensation at the level of the throwing arm. Whether these kinetic differences arise as a consequence of injury or present a risk for such warrants additional investigation.

Kinematic and kinetic findings in high vs. low consistency professional baseball pitchers

While the performance metric ball velocity has often been associated with increased kinetics at the upper extremity and risk of injury in baseball pitchers, it is unclear if the performance metric pitch location consistency has any positive/negative associations with pitching kinetics. Professional pitchers subdivided into high(Hcon) and low(Lcon) consistency groups were instructed to throw 8-12 fastballs while assessed with motion-capture technology(480 Hz). To further assess pitching consistency, 95% confidence ellipses with comparisons of major and minor radii were conducted with an external comparison to a cohort of high school pitchers. Lastly, kinematic and kinetic values were compared between Hcon and Lcon professional pitchers. Professional baseball pitchers(n = 338) had consistency in pitch location comparable to high school pitchers(n = 59) (22.0 ± 6.7 vs. 23.2 ± 7.5% grid width respectively, p-value = 0.21). Hcon professional pitchers(n = 91) compared to Lcon pitchers(n = 98) had a smaller major radius(15.2 ± 3.0 vs. 26.3 ± 5.9 respectively, p-value<0.001) and a smaller minor radius(9.4 ± 1.9 vs. 16.1 ± 4.4 respectively, p-value<0.001) in the 95% confidence ellipses. Hcon pitchers compared to Lcon pitchers had increased arm slot(59.7 ± 13.5 vs. 54.7 ± 12.4° respectfully, p-value = 0.009), trunk tilt(-33.4 ± 9.1 vs. -37.2 ± 8.9° respectfully, p-value = 0.004), and trunk lateral flexion(-27.1 ± 9.3 vs. -31.8 ± 9.0° respectfully, p-value<0.001) at ball release. These pitchers also had lower shoulder(112.4 ± 15.9 vs. 118.3 ± 15.1% BW respectfully, p-value = 0.001) and elbow distraction forces(110.5 ± 17 vs. 117.0 ± 15.2% BW respectfully, p-value = 0.006) during arm deceleration. Professional pitchers who approach a sidearm style of pitching, typically involving less contralateral trunk tilt, may achieve higher consistency in their throws while also experiencing diminished peak distractive forces at the elbow and shoulder.

The association of stride length to ball velocity and elbow varus torque in professional pitchers

Professional basebal pitchers (n =315) were divided into quartiles based on increasing stride length and random intercept linear mixed-effect models were used to correlate stride length with ball velocity, pelvis and trunk rotation at foot contact, and throwing arm kinetics. Average stride length among all pitchers was 78.3±5.3%body height (%BH). For every 10% increase in stride length, ball velocity increased by 0.9 m/s (B =0.089, β =0.25, p <0.001) and trunk rotation initiation occurred 4.23 ms earlier (B =-0.42, β =-0.14, p <0.001). When divided into quartiles pelvis rotation was less towards home plate in Q1 compared to Q3 and Q4 (70.0±10.7° vs. 60.9±8.9° and 58.6±9.1°, p <0.001). No significant differences in shoulder internal rotation torque (p =0.173) or elbow varus torque (p =0.072) were noted between quartiles. Professional baseball pitchers who reached stride lengths of 80%BH or greater achieved faster ball velocity without an increase in elbow varus torque. This may, be a byproduct of rotating the pelvis for a greater proportion of the pitching motion and thereby more effectively utilising the lower extremities in the kinetic chain. Encouraging players to achieve this threshold of stride length may enhance ball velocity outcomes.

The Effects of Contralateral Trunk Tilt on Elbow Varus Torque in Baseball Pitchers: A Critically Appraised Topic

Clinical Scenario: Ulnar collateral ligament injuries are common in baseball pitchers, with excessive elbow varus torque linked to medial elbow injuries. Trunk tilt, or motion in the frontal plane, could be an identifiable and modifiable factor in medial elbow loading. Clinical Question: In high school through professional baseball pitchers, how does increased contralateral trunk tilt compared with no/limited contralateral trunk tilt influence elbow varus torque? Summary of Key Findings: Four studies were included: all were labeled as "controlled" or "descriptive laboratory studies," representing cross-sectional observational analytic design. One study compared biomechanics of professional pitchers with and without ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. Two studies measured biomechanics in college pitchers, one of which also included simulations of joint angles. The fourth study measured biomechanics of high school pitchers. All studies measured trunk tilt and its relationship to elbow varus torque, with 3 of the studies linking increased contralateral trunk tilt with increased elbow varus torque. Clinical Bottom Line: Moderate evidence indicated as contralateral trunk tilt increased, so did elbow varus torque, indicating trunk tilt may be a modifiable factor to decrease medial elbow loading during pitching. Strength of Recommendation: Majority consistent findings from the level 3 cross-sectional observational analytic designs suggest grade B evidence in support of trunk tilt as a factor in increasing elbow varus torque.

Shadow pitching deviates ball release position: kinematic analysis in high school baseball pitchers

Background

Although shadow pitching, commonly called “towel drill,” is recommended to improve the throwing motion for the rehabilitation of pitching disorders before the initiation of a throwing program aimed at returning to throwing using a ball, the motion differs from that of normal throwing. Learning improper motion during ball release (BR) may increase shoulder joint forces. Abnormal throwing biomechanics leads to injures. However, there has been no study of shadow pitching focusing on the BR position. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the BR position and kinematic differences between shadow pitching and normal throwing. In addition, the effect of setting a target guide for BR position on throwing motion was examined in shadow pitching.

Methods

The participants included in this study were 20 healthy male students who were overhand right-handed pitchers with no pain induced by a throwing motion. Participants performed normal throwing (task 1), shadow pitching using a hand towel (task 2), and shadow pitching by setting a target of the BR position (task 3). A motion capture system was used to evaluate kinematic differences in throwing motions, respectively. Examination items comprised joint angles and the differences in BR position.

Results

BR position of task 2 shifted significantly toward the anterior, leftward, and downward directions compared with task 1. The distance of BR position between tasks 1 and 2 was 24 ± 10%. However, task 3 had decreased BR deviation compared with task 2 (the distance between 3 and 1 was 14 ± 7%). Kinematic differences were observed among groups at BR. For shoulder joint, task 2 showed the highest value in abduction and horizontal adduction among groups. In spine flexion, left rotation and thorax flexion, task 2 was significantly higher than task 1. Task 3 showed small differences compared with task 1.

Conclusions

The BR position of shadow pitching deviated significantly in the anterior, leftward, and downward directions compared with normal throwing. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the setting of BR target reduces this deviation. Thus, the target of BR position should be set accurately during shadow pitching exercises in the process of rehabilitation.

Electromyography activity of the teres minor muscle with varying positions of horizontal abduction in the quadruped position

Background

The teres minor (TMi) muscle exposed relatively high activity during the acceleration and deceleration phases of the throwing motion, compared with the infraspinatus muscle. However, few studies have identified TMi muscle activity in intervention exercises. The purpose of this study was to investigate TMi muscle activities in different horizontal adduction positions in the quadruped horizontal abduction exercise. This study hypothesized that TMi muscle activity would differ in response to resistance application across different horizontal adduction positions.

Materials and methods

Nineteen collegiate baseball players volunteered their participation. Raw electromyography activity of the TMi muscle along with 7 different muscles attached to the scapula on the dominant-side were collected, and normalized by each of the corresponding maximum voluntary isometric contractions. All subjects performed manual isometric resistance horizontal abduction exercises at 90° and 135° of abduction with 3 horizontal adduction angles in the quadruped position: 1) coronal, 2) scapular, and 3) sagittal plane. Electromyography data were also collected from rhythmical concentric contraction of horizontal abduction at 90° of abduction in the quadruped position.

Results

TMi muscle activity was significantly greater with the arm positioned in the coronal plane than that of the scapular and sagittal planes (41, 26, and 17% maximum voluntary isometric contraction, respectively) (P < .05).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that TMi muscle activity varied depending on horizontal adduction positions.

Stride-Phase Kinematic Parameters That Predict Peak Elbow Varus Torque

Background:

During baseball pitching, a high amount of elbow varus torque in the arm cocking-to-acceleration phase is thought to be a biomechanical risk factor for medial elbow pain and injury. The biomechanics of the stride phase may provide preparation for the arm cocking-to-acceleration phase that follows it.

Purpose:

To determine the kinematic parameters that predict peak elbow varus torque during the stride phase of pitching.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Participants were 107 high school baseball pitchers (age range, 15-18 years) without shoulder or elbow problems. Whole-body kinematics and kinetics during fastball pitching were analyzed using 3-dimensional measurements from 36 retroreflective markers. A total of 26 kinematic parameters of the upper and lower limbs during the stride phase leading up to the stride foot contact were extracted for multiple regression analysis to assess their combined effect on the magnitude of peak elbow varus torque.

Results:

Increased wrist extension, elbow pronation, knee flexion on the leading leg, knee extension on the trailing leg at stride foot contact, and upward displacement of the body’s center of mass in the stride phase were significantly correlated with decreased peak elbow varus torque (all P < .05). Moreover, 38% of the variance in peak elbow varus torque was explained by a combination of these 5 significant kinematic variables (P < .001).

Conclusion:

We found that 5 kinematic parameters during the stride phase and the combination of these parameters were associated with peak elbow varus torque. The stride phase provides biomechanical preparation for pitching and plays a key role in peak elbow varus torque in subsequent pitching phases.

Clinical Relevance:

The present data can be used to screen pitching mechanics with motion capture assessment to reduce peak elbow varus torque. Decreased peak elbow varus torque is expected to reduce the risk of elbow medial pain and injury.

The influence of baseball pitching distance on pitching biomechanics, pitch velocity, and ball movement

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether increasing pitching distance for adult baseball pitchers would affect their upper extremity kinetics, full-body kinematics, and pitched ball kinematics (ball velocity, duration of ball flight, vertical and horizontal break, strike percentage).

DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-six collegiate baseball pitchers threw sets of five full-effort fastballs from three different pitching distances (18.44m, 19.05m, 19.41m) in a randomized order. Ball velocity, horizontal and vertical break, duration of ball flight, and strike percentage were computed by a ball tracking system, while pitching kinetics and kinematics were calculated with a 12-camera optical motion capture system. Repeated measures analysis of variance was utilized to detect significant differences among the three different pitching distances (p<0.05).

RESULTS

No significant differences in pitching kinetics and kinematics were observed among the varying pitching distances. Ball velocity and strike percentage were also not significantly different among the pitching distances, however, the duration of ball flight and horizontal and vertical break significantly increased with pitching distance.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing pitching distance may not alter upper extremity kinetics, full-body kinematics, ball velocity or strike percentage in adult pitchers. However, as pitching distance increases the duration of ball flight and amount of horizontal and vertical break also increase. Increased ball flight duration could be an advantage for the hitter while increased ball break could help the pitcher. In conclusion, it is unlikely that moving the mound backwards would significantly affect pitching biomechanics and injury risk; however, the effects on pitching and hitting performance are unknown.

Softball pitching mechanics and shoulder injuries: a narrative review

Softball is the third most popular women's collegiate sport in the United States, with 19,680 total athletes as of the 2015-2016 season. Despite its popularity and growth in recent years, research focusing on the biomechanics of the windmill pitch and its associated shoulder injuries is relatively scarce. The incidence of shoulder injury is highest during the preseason and the beginning of the regular season. The windmill pitch can be divided into distinct phases, with the shoulder experiencing the greatest force during the delivery phase. Significant demands placed on the shoulder during the windmill pitch put pitchers at a higher risk of developing shoulder injuries than position players. Maximum shoulder compression/distraction forces during the windmill pitch have been shown to be comparable to those experienced during the baseball overhand throw, dispelling the myth that the windmill pitch is not taxing on the shoulder. Injuries associated with the high compression/distraction forces include lesions to the rotator cuff, glenoid labrum, and biceps brachii. Pitcher-specific training, cross-training, and whole-body conditioning should be incorporated into current training regimens to decrease the risk of shoulder injuries.

Rehabilitation and Prehabilitation for Upper Extremity in Throwing Sports: Emphasis on Lacrosse

Lacrosse imposes multiple simultaneous physical demands during play including throwing and catching a ball while holding a crosse, running, cutting, and jumping. Often, these skills are completed while experiencing contact from another player leading to both on-and-off platform movements. Other motions include defensive blocking and pushing past defenders. Repetitive motions over sustained durations in practice or competition impart mechanical stresses to the shoulder or elbow joints, supportive muscles, and connective tissue. Preparation for lacrosse participation involves bilateral optimization of strength and durability of stabilizer muscles. Passing and shooting skills are encouraged to be equally effective on both sides; therefore, symmetric strength and flexibility are vital for prehabilitation and rehabilitation efforts. This article will: 1) provide insights on the upper-extremity musculoskeletal demands of lacrosse and related sports with similar throwing motion and 2) describe prehabilitation and rehabilitation methods that improve athlete durability and reduce likelihood of upper-extremity injury.

Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During a Structured Long-Toss Program: Does One Size Fit All or Should Programs Be Individualized?

BACKGROUND

The variability of throwing metrics, particularly elbow torque and ball velocity, during structured long-toss programs is unknown.

HYPOTHESES

(1) Elbow torque and ball velocity would increase as throwers progressed through a structured long-toss program and (2) intrathrower reliability would be high while interthrower reliability would be variable.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Sixty healthy high school and collegiate pitchers participated in a structured long-toss program while wearing a validated inertial measurement unit, which measured arm slot, arm velocity, shoulder rotation, and elbow varus torque. Ball velocity was assessed by radar gun. These metrics were compared within and between all pitchers at 90, 120, 150, and 180 ft and maximum effort mound pitching. Intra- and interthrower reliabilities were calculated for each metric at every stage of the program.

RESULTS

Ball velocity significantly changed at each progressive throwing distance, but elbow torque did not. Pitching from the mound did not place more torque on the elbow than long-toss throwing from 120 ft and beyond. Intrathrower reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75) throughout the progressive long-toss program, especially on the mound. Ninety-one percent of throwers had acceptable interthrower reliability (coefficient of variation <5%) for ball velocity, whereas only 79% of throwers had acceptable interthrower reliability for elbow torque.

CONCLUSION

Based on trends in elbow torque, it may be practical to incorporate pitching from the mound earlier in the program (once a player is comfortable throwing from 120 ft). Ball velocity and elbow torque do not necessarily correlate with one another, so a degree of caution should be exercised when using radar guns to estimate elbow torque. Given the variability in elbow torque between throwers, some athletes would likely benefit from an individualized throwing program.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Increased ball velocity does not necessarily equate to increased elbow torque in long-toss. Some individuals would likely benefit from individualized long-toss programs for rehabilitation.

Baseball Pitching Biomechanics Shortly After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair

Background:

The probability of returning to competition for injured baseball pitchers is similar after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair as after UCL reconstruction, but the time to return is significantly quicker after UCL repair. Previous research has found no differences in pitching biomechanics between pitchers with and without a history of UCL reconstruction, but pitching biomechanics after UCL repair has not been studied.

Hypothesis:

There will be significant differences in pitching biomechanics between pitchers returning to play after UCL repair and pitchers with no injury history.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 33 pitchers were tested shortly after UCL repair (9.8 ± 2.6 months) and compared with a matched group of 33 uninjured pitchers. Each group comprised 14 college pitchers and 19 high school pitchers. Shoulder and elbow passive ranges of motion were measured. The biomechanics of 10 fastballs was then collected using a 12-camera automated motion capture system. Ball velocity was measured using a separate 3-camera optical tracking system. Data were compared between the UCL repair group and the control group using the Student t test (significance set at P < .05).

Results:

There were no differences in passive range of motion or fastball velocity between the 2 groups. There were no differences in joint kinetics during pitching, but 3 kinematic variables showed significant differences. Specifically, the UCL repair group produced less elbow extension (flexion: 27° ± 6° vs 24° ± 4°, respectively; P = .03), less elbow extension velocity (2442 ± 367 vs 2631 ± 292 deg/s, respectively; P = .02), and less shoulder internal rotation velocity (6273 ± 1093 vs 6771 ± 914 deg/s, respectively; P = .049 ) compared with the control group.

Conclusion:

Elbow extension, elbow velocity, and shoulder velocity differed between pitchers with a recent history of UCL repair and a matched control group, but it is unclear whether this has clinical significance, as there were no differences in ball velocity and passive range of motion. Furthermore, it is unknown whether these few differences in pitching biomechanics resolve with time.

Clinical Relevance:

Elbow and shoulder kinematics during pitching might not be completely regained within the first year after UCL repair, although passive range of motion and pitch velocity show no difference in comparison to other healthy pitchers.

Baseball Pitchers' Perceived Effort Does Not Match Actual Measured Effort During a Structured Long-Toss Throwing Program

BACKGROUND

During rehabilitation throwing programs, baseball players are commonly asked to throw at reduced levels of effort (ie, 50% effort, 75% effort, etc) to moderate stress to healing tissues. It is currently unknown how changes in players' perceived exertion compares with changes in actual exertion during structured long-toss programs.

PURPOSE

To determine whether decreased effort correlates with decreased throwing metrics, whether metrics decrease proportionally with reductions in perceived effort, and to quantify intrathrower variability.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Sixty male high school and collegiate baseball pitchers participated in a structured throwing program. A motusBASEBALL sleeve was worn by all players, which measured elbow varus torque, arm velocity, arm slot, and shoulder rotation. Ball velocity was measured with a radar gun. Each pitcher threw 5 throws a distance of 120 ft with 3 efforts: maximum effort, 75% effort, and 50% effort. Throwing metrics were compared among the 3 levels of effort to see if each 25% decrease resulted in proportional decreases in elbow varus torque and ball velocity. Intrathrower variability was determined for each throwing metric at each degree of effort.

RESULTS

All throwing metrics decreased as players decreased their perceived effort (P < .001). However, these observed decreases were much smaller in magnitude than the decreases in perceived effort. During the 75% effort throws, elbow varus torque was only reduced to 93% of maximum and velocity dropped to 86% of maximum. Similarly, for the 50% effort throws, elbow varus torque remained 87% of max effort torque, while velocity remained 78% of max. Intrathrower reliability was considered excellent for most metrics (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.75).

CONCLUSION

For every 25% decrease in perceived effort, elbow varus torque only decreased 7% and velocity only decreased 11%. Thus, when players throw at what they perceive to be reduced effort, their actual throwing metrics do not decrease at the same rate as their perceived exertion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Measured effort decreased with decreasing perceived effort, but these were not proportional. This has significant implications for physical therapists, physicians, trainers, coaches, and athletes to understand and monitor elbow stress during the rehabilitation process.

Sagittal Plane Trunk Tilt Is Associated With Upper Extremity Joint Moments and Ball Velocity in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers

Background

The trunk is a major contributor to the kinetic chain during baseball pitching by helping to transfer energy from the lower limbs to produce the desired ball speed. However, most of the research detailing the trunk's contribution to the pitch is focused on rotational timing and coronal plane lean, with little attention focused on sagittal plane positioning of the trunk.

Purpose

To determine the association between sagittal plane trunk motion and elbow varus moment and ball velocity in collegiate baseball pitchers.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 99 collegiate pitchers were recruited for this study and underwent a comprehensive biomechanical assessment of their pitching motion using 3-dimensional motion techniques. A random-intercepts, mixed-effects regression model was used to determine whether statistically significant associations were noted between sagittal plane trunk motion and the ball velocity and elbow varus moment.

Results

There were a number of significant associations between sagittal plane trunk tilt and the elbow varus moment and ball velocity. Increased forward trunk tilt at the time of ball release was associated with an increase in elbow varus moment and a small increase in ball velocity; for every 10° of increased forward trunk tilt greater than 28° at ball release, the elbow varus moment increased by 2.9 N·m (P = .007), and the ball velocity increased by 0.7 m/s (P = .002).

Conclusion

Sagittal plane positioning of the trunk plays a role in pitching mechanics, as it can affect both pitching performance and elbow moments. The results also indicated that there is a potential optimal trunk position and range of motion during the acceleration of the pitch that could limit the stress placed on the elbow joint. Implementing proper trunk mechanics from an early age could lead to a reduction in joint moments.

Clinical Relevance

The results provide evidence for coaches and trainers to emphasize the importance of proper trunk positioning through the inclusion of core strengthening and motor control in their practice and coaching sessions in an effort to reduce the moments placed on the elbow during the pitch.

Do Mound Height and Pitching Distance Affect Youth Baseball Pitching Biomechanics?

BACKGROUND

Pitching injuries continue to be a serious problem, with adolescents now representing the group with the most injuries. Some have proposed that lowering or eliminating the pitching mound in youth baseball may reduce joint stress and subsequent injuries. Another potential risk factor is advancing from youth to adult pitching distance without an intermediate distance.

HYPOTHESES

It was hypothesized that for a group of young pitchers, pitching kinetics and kinematics would change with mound height. It was also hypothesized that pitching kinetics and kinematics would change with pitching distance.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-one young (12.6 ± 0.5 years) baseball pitchers pitched 5 full-effort fastballs each from 5 different conditions, in random order: 14.02-, 16.46-, and 18.44-m distances from a 25 cm-high mound, 16.46-m distance from a 15 cm-high mound, and 16.46-m distance from flat ground. Pitching biomechanical values were collected with a 12-camera automated motion capture system. Ball velocity and 31 other parameters were computed for each pitch. Data were compared between the 3 mound heights at 16.46 m by use of repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired post hoc t tests ( P < .05). Similarly, data were compared between the 3 distances from the 25-cm mound via repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired post hoc t tests ( P < .05).

RESULTS

No differences were found in ball velocity, shoulder kinetics, or elbow kinetics associated with mound height. Ten kinematic parameters differed with mound height, including 8 parameters at lead foot contact. Maximum shoulder horizontal adduction torque and maximum shoulder anterior force increased with pitching distance. Only 3 kinematic parameters showed significant differences with pitching distance.

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis that shoulder and elbow kinetics would change with mound height was not supported by the data. Several kinematic differences were found, but the majority were at lead foot contact before the rapid, dynamic phases of pitching. Change in pitching distance was associated with slight increase in shoulder kinetics as well as a few kinematic differences.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Lowering or eliminating pitching mounds in youth baseball would not significantly decrease joint stress and injury risk to young pitchers. However, when available, transition from 14.02-m to 16.46-m to 18.44-m pitching distance may reduce stress on the young throwing shoulder.