Two Novel Slip Training Methods Improve the Likelihood of Recovering Balance After a Laboratory-Induced Slip

A Cross-Sectional Study on Fall Direction and Lower Limb Loading in Response to a Perturbation on Laterally Inclined Platform

Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) improves reactive stepping in older adults and people with neurological disorders. Slip-induced falls are a threat to older adults, leading to hip fractures. Fall-prone individuals must be trained to regain balance during a fall in the posterolateral direction. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of the reactive step induced by a laterally inclined platform. This cross-sectional study included 46 healthy participants who performed a "lean and release" backward fall using a platform with two inclined angles on each side. Kinovea software was used to analyze the step width. Reactive steps, characterized by crossover or medial foot placement, are preventive measures against posterolateral falls. The first objective was on the narrowed step width that was subjected to analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc assessment, indicating a tendency toward posterolateral falls. As part of our second objective, the inclined platform resulted in uneven loading between the legs, with a preference for the unloaded leg as the reactive leg (p < 0.001), as determined by Fisher's exact test and Cramer's V. These characteristics align closely with those observed in modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT). The angled platform had a significant effect on selecting the reactive leg, particularly at higher angles (p < 0.001). Thus, the study suggested that the device is capable of inducing posterolateral falls and exhibited mCIMT characteristics.

Adaptation to repeated standing-slips in professional ballet dancers

Ballet training is being increasingly used to improve physical functions in older adults. Our previous work showed that ballet dancers react to a novel standing-slip more effectively than their non-dancer counterparts through better control of the recovery step and trunk movement. The purpose of this study was to test if and to what extent ballet dancers adapt differently to repeated standing-slips relative to non-dancers. Protected by a harness, twenty young adults (10 professional ballet dancers and 10 age/sex-matched non-dancers) experienced five repeated and standardized standing-slips on a treadmill. Changes from the first slip (S1) to the fifth slip (S5) in dynamic gait stability (primary outcome) and other variables, including the center of mass position and velocity, step latency, slip distance, ankle angle, and trunk angle (secondary outcomes) were compared between groups. Results revealed that both groups adopted similar proactive controls to improve dynamic gait stability by using the ankle and hip strategies. However, dancers showed a better reactive improvement in stability after the repeated slips than non-dancers. From S1 to S5, dancers reactively improved their dynamic gait stability more than non-dancers at the recovery step liftoff (p = 0.003). Dancers decreased their recovery step latency (p = 0.004) and shortened the slip distance (p = 0.004) significantly more than non-dancers from S1 to S5. These findings suggest that ballet dancers could facilitate the adaptation to repeated slips, which may be attributed to their ballet practice experience. This finding augments our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of ballet practice reducing falls.

Identification of balance recovery patterns after slips using hierarchical cluster analysis

Accidental falls often result from loss of balance initiated by slips. People may adopt different balance recovery patterns after slips which could affect recovery outcomes. The present study aimed to identify balance recovery patterns after slips and to determine whether these balance recovery patterns could be associated with different levels of slip-induced fall likelihood. Sixty young (age 24.2 ± 2.1 years) participants were involved in an experimental study. They were instructed to walk on a linear walkway, where unexpected slips were induced when stepping onto a removable vinyl tile sheet covered with water-detergent mixture. One hundred and fifty slip trials were obtained, including 85 successful balance recovery trials and 65 failed balance recovery trials (i.e., fall trials). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify balance recovery patterns based on the kinematic measures of both feet over the period from 100 to 300 ms after heel contact of the slipping foot. Three balance recovery patterns were identified, and these balance recovery patterns were found to be associated with different levels of slip-induced fall likelihood. Findings from the present study can contribute to better understanding of balance recovery mechanisms associated with slips, and guide developing and evaluating fall prevention interventions.

Severity of Unconstrained Simultaneous Bilateral Slips: The Impact of Frontal Plane Feet Velocities Relative to the Center of Mass to Classify Slip-Related Falls and Recoveries

Targeted interventions to prevent slip-related falls may be informed by specific kinematic factors measured during the reactive response that accurately discriminate recoveries from falls. But reactive responses to diverse slipping conditions during unconstrained simultaneous bilateral slips, which are closely related to real-world slips, are currently unknown. It is challenging to identify these critical kinematic factors due to the wide variety of upper and lower body postural deviations that occur following the slip, which affect stability in both the sagittal and frontal planes. To explore the utility of kinematic measurements from each vertical plane to discriminate slip-related falls from recoveries, we compared the accuracy of four Linear Discriminant Analysis models informed by predetermined sagittal or frontal plane measurements from the lower body (feet velocities relative to the center of mass) or upper body (angular momentum of trunk and arms) during reactive responses after slip initiation. Unconstrained bilateral slips during over-ground walking were repeatedly administered using a wearable device to 10 younger (24.7 ± 3.2 years) and 10 older (72.4 ± 3.9 years) adults while whole-body kinematics were measured using motion capture. Falls (n = 20) and recoveries (n = 40) were classified by thresholding the dynamic tension forces measured in an overhead harness support system and verified through video observation. Frontal plane measurements of the peak feet velocities relative to the center of mass provided the best classification (classification accuracy = 73.3%), followed by sagittal plane measurements (classification accuracy = 68.3%). Measurements from the lower body resulted in higher accuracy models than those from the upper body, but the accuracy of all models was generally low compared to the null accuracy of 66.7% (i.e., predicting all trials as recoveries). Future work should investigate novel models that include potential interactions between kinematic factors. The performance of lower limb kinematics in the frontal plane in classifying slip-related falls demonstrates the importance of administering unconstrained slips and measuring kinematics outside the sagittal plane.

Which Are the Key Kinematic and Kinetic Components to Distinguish Recovery Strategies for Overground Slips Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults?

Slip outcomes are categorized as either a backward loss of balance (LOB) or a no loss of balance (no-LOB) in which an individual does not take a backward step to regain their stability. LOB includes falls and nonfalls, while no-LOB includes skate overs and walkovers. Researchers are uncertain about which factors determine slip outcomes and at which critical instants they do so. The purpose of the study was to investigate factors affecting slip outcomes in proactive and early reactive phases by analyzing 136 slip trials from 68 participants (age: 72.2 [5.3] y, female: 22). Segment angles and average joint moments in the sagittal plane of the slipping limb were compared for different slip outcomes. The results showed that knee flexor, hip extensor, and plantar flexor moments were significantly larger for no-LOB than for LOB in the midproactive phase, leading to smaller shank-ground and foot-ground angles at the slip onset, based on forward dynamics. In the early reactive phase, the hip extensor and plantar flexor moments were larger for no-LOB than for LOB, and all segment angles were smaller for no-LOB. Our findings indicate that the shank angle and knee moment were the major determinants of slip outcomes in both proactive and reactive phases.

Perturbation-based balance training targeting both slip- and trip-induced falls among older adults: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Falls are the leading cause of injuries among older adults. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) is an innovative approach to fall prevention that aims to improve the reactive balance response following perturbations such as slipping and tripping. Many of these PBT studies have targeted reactive balance after slipping or tripping, despite both contributing to a large proportion of older adult falls. The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of PBT targeting slipping and tripping on laboratory-induced slips and trips. To build upon prior work, the present study included: 1) a control group; 2) separate training and assessment sessions; 3) PBT methods potentially more amenable for use outside the lab compared to methods employed elsewhere, and 4) individualized training for older adult participants.

METHODS

Thirty-four community-dwelling, healthy older adults (61-75 years) were assigned to PBT or a control intervention using minimization. Using a parallel design, reactive balance (primary outcome) and fall incidence were assessed before and after four sessions of BRT or a control intervention involving general balance exercises. Assessments involved exposing participants to an unexpected laboratory-induced slip or trip. Reactive balance and fall incidence were compared between three mutually-exclusive groups: 1) baseline participants who experienced a slip (or trip) before either intervention, 2) post-control participants who experienced a slip (or trip) after the control intervention, and 3) post-PBT participants who experienced a slip (or trip) after PBT. Neither the participants nor investigators were blinded to group assignment.

RESULTS

All 34 participants completed all four sessions of their assigned intervention, and all 34 participants were analyzed. Regarding slips, several measures of reactive balance were improved among post-PBT participants when compared to baseline participants or post-control participants, and fall incidence among post-PBT participants (18%) was lower than among baseline participants (80%). Regarding trips, neither reactive balance nor fall incidence differed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PBT targeting slipping and tripping improved reactive balance and fall incidence after laboratory-induced slips. Improvements were not observed after laboratory-induced trips. The disparity in efficacy between slips and trip may have resulted from differences in dosage and specificity between slip and trip training.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov Trial Registration number: NCT04308239. Date of Registration: March 13, 2020 (retrospectively registered).