Cervical Spine Musculotendon Lengths When Reading a Tablet in Three Seated Positions

The influence of chair recline and head and neck position on upper trapezius activity and stiffness during seated computer work

Increasing chair recline during seated computer work may reduce the load placed on the upper trapezius (UT), a common location of pain for those with idiopathic chronic neck pain. This study determined the effect of increasing chair recline on UT stiffness and muscle activity during computer work in people with and without idiopathic chronic neck pain. Surface electromyography and ultrasound shear wave elastography were collected from three subdivisions of the UT in 15 individuals with idiopathic chronic neck pain and 15 sex-matched healthy controls. Participants sat in a standardized computer-work setup while chair recline (0°, 25°, 45°) and head and neck position (self-selected, neutral, flexed) were systematically adjusted and maintained for 2.5-min intervals. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were completed for each sex, muscle, and data type, with group (chronic neck pain, control), chair recline (0°,25°,45°), head and neck position (self-selected, flexed, neutral), and side of collected data (dominant, non-dominant) as fixed factors. Men with idiopathic chronic neck pain demonstrated greater UT stiffness in the cranial subdivision when compared to healthy men. Additionally, the 25° and 45° recline levels increased the stiffness of men's dominant UT compared to men's non-dominant UT. Women's UT was more affected by head and neck position, and a neutral head and neck position resulted in lower UT activation, but higher UT stiffness for the cranial subdivision and midway between C-7 and the acromion process. Overall, our findings suggest that the commonly suggested neutral position may not be a beneficial prompt when positioning someone during seated computer work.

An Electromyographically Driven Cervical Spine Model in OpenSim

Relatively few biomechanical models exist aimed at quantifying the mechanical risk factors associated with neck pain. In addition, there is a need to validate spinal-rhythm techniques for inverse dynamics spine models. Therefore, the present investigation was 3-fold: (1) the development of a cervical spine model in OpenSim, (2) a test of a novel spinal-rhythm technique based on minimizing the potential energy in the passive tissues, and (3) comparison of an electromyographically driven approach to estimating compression and shear to other cervical spine models. The authors developed ligament force-deflection and intervertebral joint moment-angle curves from published data. The 218 Hill-type muscle elements, representing 58 muscles, were included and their passive forces validated against in vivo data. Our novel spinal-rhythm technique, based on minimizing the potential energy in the passive tissues, disproportionately assigned motion to the upper cervical spine that was not physiological. Finally, using kinematics and electromyography collected from 8 healthy male volunteers, the authors calculated the compression at C7-T1 as a function of the head-trunk Euler angles. Differences from other models varied from 25.5 to 368.1 N. These differences in forces may result in differences in model geometry, passive components, number of degrees of freedom, or objective functions.