Estimating Center of Mass Kinematics During Perturbed Human Standing Using Accelerometers

Center of Mass Estimation for Impaired Gait Assessment Using Inertial Measurement Units

Injury or disease often compromise walking dynamics and negatively impact quality of life and independence. Assessing methods to restore or improve pathological gait can be expedited by examining a global parameter that reflects overall musculoskeletal control. Center of mass (CoM) kinematics follow well-defined trajectories during unimpaired gait, and change predictably with various gait pathologies. We propose a method to estimate CoM trajectories from inertial measurement units (IMUs) using a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory neural network to evaluate rehabilitation interventions and outcomes. Five non-disabled volunteers participated in a single session of various dynamic walking trials with IMUs mounted on various body segments. A neural network trained with data from four of the five volunteers through a leave-one-subject out cross validation estimated the CoM with average root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 1.44cm, 1.15cm, and 0.40cm in the mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP), and inferior/superior (IS) directions respectively. The impact of number and location of IMUs on network prediction accuracy was determined via principal component analysis. Comparing across all configurations, three to five IMUs located on the legs and medial trunk were the most promising reduced sensor sets for achieving CoM estimates suitable for outcome assessment. Lastly, the networks were tested on data from an individual with hemiparesis with the greatest error increase in the ML direction, which could stem from asymmetric gait. These results provide a framework for assessing gait deviations after disease or injury and evaluating rehabilitation interventions intended to normalize gait pathologies.

Use of Lower Limb Exoskeletons as an Assessment Tool for Human Motor Performance: A Systematic Review

Exoskeletons are a promising tool to support individuals with a decreased level of motor performance. Due to their built-in sensors, exoskeletons offer the possibility of continuously recording and assessing user data, for example, related to motor performance. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of studies that rely on using exoskeletons to measure motor performance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review, following the PRISMA Statement guidelines. A total of 49 studies using lower limb exoskeletons for the assessment of human motor performance were included. Of these, 19 studies were validity studies, and six were reliability studies. We found 33 different exoskeletons; seven can be considered stationary, and 26 were mobile exoskeletons. The majority of the studies measured parameters such as range of motion, muscle strength, gait parameters, spasticity, and proprioception. We conclude that exoskeletons can be used to measure a wide range of motor performance parameters through built-in sensors, and seem to be more objective and specific than manual test procedures. However, since these parameters are usually estimated from built-in sensor data, the quality and specificity of an exoskeleton to assess certain motor performance parameters must be examined before an exoskeleton can be used, for example, in a research or clinical setting.