1
|
Crossley CB, Diamond LE, Saxby DJ, de Sousa A, Lloyd DG, Che Fornusek, Pizzolato C. Joint contact forces during semi-recumbent seated cycling. J Biomech 2024; 168:112094. [PMID: 38640830 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Semi-recumbent cycling performed from a wheelchair is a popular rehabilitation exercise following spinal cord injury (SCI) and is often paired with functional electrical stimulation. However, biomechanical assessment of this cycling modality is lacking, even in unimpaired populations, hindering the development of personalised and safe rehabilitation programs for those with SCI. This study developed a computational pipeline to determine lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and joint contact forces (JCF) in 11 unimpaired participants during voluntary semi-recumbent cycling using a rehabilitation ergometer. Two cadences (40 and 60 revolutions per minute) and three crank powers (15 W, 30 W, and 45 W) were assessed. A rigid body model of a rehabilitation ergometer was combined with a calibrated electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model to determine JCF at the hip, knee, and ankle. Joint excursions remained consistent across all cadence and powers, but joint moments and JCF differed between 40 and 60 revolutions per minute, with peak JCF force significantly greater at 40 compared to 60 revolutions per minute for all crank powers. Poor correlations were found between mean crank power and peak JCF across all joints. This study provides foundation data and computational methods to enable further evaluation and optimisation of semi-recumbent cycling for application in rehabilitation after SCI and other neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire B Crossley
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Laura E Diamond
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - David J Saxby
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Ana de Sousa
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Australia; Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering (CREB) at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David G Lloyd
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Che Fornusek
- Exercise & Sports Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Claudio Pizzolato
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clanchy K, Mitchell J, Mulholland K, Jurd E, Kendall E, Lloyd DG, Palipana D, Pizzolato C, Shirota C. Towards co-design of rehabilitation technologies: a collaborative approach to prioritize usability issues. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2024; 5:1302179. [PMID: 38450206 PMCID: PMC10915061 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1302179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Early stakeholder engagement is critical to the successful development and translation of rehabilitation technologies, a pivotal step of which is usability testing with intended end-users. To this end, several methods employ end-user feedback to identify usability and implementation issues. However, the process of prioritizing identified issues seldom leverages the knowledge and expertise of the range of stakeholders who will ultimately affect the demand and supply of a device. This paper describes a novel method to prioritize end-user feedback using transdisciplinary stakeholder consultation and address it in subsequent product development. The proposed approach was demonstrated using a case study relating to the development of a novel technology for neural recovery after spinal cord injury. Method Feedback from five individuals with chronic spinal cord injury was collected during two-hour usability evaluation sessions with a fully functional high-fidelity system prototype. A think-aloud and semi-structured interview protocol was used with each participant to identify usability and acceptability issues relating to the system in a 3-phase approach. Phase 1 involved extracting usability issues from think-aloud and semi-structured interview data. Phase 2 involved rating the usability issues based on their significance, technical feasibility, and implementation priority by relevant internal and external stakeholders. Finally, Phase 3 involved aggregating the usability issues according to design and implementation elements to facilitate solution generation, and these solutions were then raised as action tasks for future design iterations. Results Sixty usability issues representing nine facets of usability were rated. Eighty percent of issues were rated to be of moderate to high significance, 83% were rated as being feasible to address, and 75% were rated as addressable using existing project resources. Fifty percent of the issues were rated to be a high priority for implementation. Evaluation of the grouped issues identified 21 tasks which were mapped to the product roadmap for integration into future design iterations. Discussion This paper presents a method for meaningful transdisciplinary stakeholder engagement in rehabilitation technology development that can extended to other projects. Alongside a worked example, we offer practical considerations for others seeking to co-develop rehabilitation technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Clanchy
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - J. Mitchell
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - K. Mulholland
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - E. Jurd
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - E. Kendall
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - D. G. Lloyd
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - D. Palipana
- Emergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - C. Pizzolato
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - C. Shirota
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lloyd DG, Jonkers I, Delp SL, Modenese L. The History and Future of Neuromusculoskeletal Biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 2023; 39:273-283. [PMID: 37751904 DOI: 10.1123/jab.2023-0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
The Executive Council of the International Society of Biomechanics has initiated and overseen the commemorations of the Society's 50th Anniversary in 2023. This included multiple series of lectures at the ninth World Congress of Biomechanics in 2022 and XXIXth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics in 2023, all linked to special issues of International Society of Biomechanics' affiliated journals. This special issue of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics is dedicated to the biomechanics of the neuromusculoskeletal system. The reader is encouraged to explore this special issue which comprises 6 papers exploring the current state-of the-art, and future directions and roles for neuromusculoskeletal biomechanics. This editorial presents a very brief history of the science of the neuromusculoskeletal system's 4 main components: the central nervous system, musculotendon units, the musculoskeletal system, and joints, and how they biomechanically integrate to enable an understanding of the generation and control of human movement. This also entails a quick exploration of contemporary neuromusculoskeletal biomechanics and its future with new fields of application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Lloyd
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, School of Health Science and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Ilse Jonkers
- Institute of Physics-Based Modeling for in Silico Health, Human Movement Science Department, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Scott L Delp
- Bioengineering, Mechanical Engineering and Orthopedic Surgery, and Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Luca Modenese
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|