Relationship Between Hip Frontal Dynamic Joint Stiffness and Frontal and Transverse Plane Hip Kinematics During Gait: Sex Differences

Effects of Gluteus Maximus Muscle Activity and Pelvic Width on Dynamic Frontal Plane Hip Joint Stiffness During Gait in Healthy Young Women

CONTEXT

Excessive hip adduction and internal rotation are abnormal movements that may lead to the onset and progression of patellofemoral pain. Previous studies have reported that lower dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness in the gait of women is associated with the magnitude of hip adduction and internal rotation angles. However, the factors contributing to the lack of dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness in the gait of young women are unclear. This study aims to investigate the factors affecting dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness during the weight-acceptance phase of the gait of healthy young women.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This study included 30 healthy women between the ages of 18 and 30 years. The pelvic width/femur length ratio was calculated by dividing the pelvic width by the femur length. Data on hip kinematics and kinetics and activation of the gluteus maximus and medius, tensor fasciae latae, and adductor longus muscles during gait were collected using a motion capture system, force plates, and surface electromyography. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the extent to which each independent factor affected dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness.

RESULTS

In healthy young women, decreased dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness was associated with decreased muscle activity of the gluteus maximus during the gait, as well as greater pelvic width/femur length ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with a relatively great pelvic width relative to femur length may have more difficulty in producing dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness. However, increasing the muscle activity of the gluteus maximus may contribute to increased dynamic frontal plane hip joint stiffness.

Relationship Among 3 Different Core Stability Tests in Healthy Young Adults: Validity and Gender Differences

CONTEXT

Core stability is important for preventing injury and improving performance. Although various tests for evaluating core stability have been reported to date, information on their relationship and the effect of gender differences is limited. This study aimed to (1) identify correlations among the 3 core stability tests and to examine the validity of each test and (2) identify gender differences in the test relationship and determine whether gender influenced test selection.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Fifty-one healthy volunteers (27 men and 24 women) participated in the study. The participants underwent the following 3 tests: Sahrmann Core Stability Test (SCST), the lumbar spine motor control tests battery (MCBT), and Y Balance Test (YBT). Each parameter was analyzed according to all parameters and gender using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a strong positive correlation between SCST and MCBT and moderate positive correlations between SCST and YBT and between MCBT and YBT. Conversely, gender-specific analyses revealed no significant correlations between YBT and SCST and between YBT and MCBT in women, although significantly strong correlations were found among all tests in men.

CONCLUSION

Although these 3 tests evaluated interrelated functions and may be valid as core stability tests, the results should be carefully interpreted when performing YBT in women.

The effect of lumbopelvic region rotation relative flexibility on thorax-pelvis and pelvis-femur coordination during walking

BACKGROUND

Lumbopelvic region rotation relative flexibility (LRRF), which is defined as lumbopelvic region that is relatively less stiffness than the hip region, is associated with low back pain (LBP) symptoms. However, how LRRF is influenced by lumbopelvic region motion during walking is unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the influence of LBP and LRRF on coordination patterns of the thorax, pelvis, and femur during walking?

METHODS

The presence of LRRF was determined based on whether the lumbopelvic rotation occurred in the first 50% of knee flexion or hip external rotation movement. Participants with LBP and LRRF were classified into the LBP group. Participants with LRRF but without LBP were classified into the early pelvis rotation (ROT) group, and those without LBP and relative flexibility were classified as controls. The thorax-pelvis coordination and pelvis-femur coordination during the stance cycles were calculated from the segmental angles obtained by three-dimensional motion analysis using a modified vector coding technique.

RESULTS

In the sagittal plane, the thorax-pelvis coordination of the LBP group showed more anti-phase patterns at both the early stance and midstance compared with controls and the ROT group. In the sagittal and horizontal planes, pelvis-femur coordination of the LBP and ROT groups showed more in-phase patterns during the early stance and midstance compared with controls.

SIGNIFICANCE

Regardless of LBP, the presence of LRRF alters the intersegmental coordination during walking. In individuals with LRRF, stiffness of the hip may increase during walking. People who have LRRF without LBP may develop LBP in the future, and it is important for prevention to identify these differences in kinematics during walking.