Prolactin Upregulates Female-Predominant P450 Gene Expressions and Downregulates Male-Predominant Gene Expressions in Mouse Liver

A cautionary tale: Alien prolactins may induce lesser, no, or opposite effects to homologous hormone!

Cost and availability have often dictated the use of heterologous/alien prolactins in experiments, particularly in vivo. The assumption has been that what is initiated in the target cell is representative of the homologous hormone since many heterologous mammalian prolactins bind to and activate rodent receptors. Here, we examined gene expression in mouse liver in response to a 7-day treatment with recombinant mouse prolactin (mRecPRL), recombinant ovine prolactin (oRecPRL) and pituitary extract ovine prolactin (oPitPRL). Having established mouse ribosomal protein S9 as the most stable reference gene in the liver in the absence and presence of prolactin treatment, we examined expression of the two most highly expressed prolactin receptors (PRLRs) and three members of the Cyp3a group of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes by qRTPCR. For short form (SF) 3 PRLR, mRecPRL doubled expression while for oRecPRL and oPitPRL expression was only 1.3-fold control. For the long form (LF) PRLR, changes were similar to those seen for SF 3 PRLR, such that the SF3:LF PRLR ratio remained the same. Expression of the Cyp3as was also dependent on the prolactin origin and, although mRecPRL always stimulated, the other PRLs caused varying results. Compared to control, Cyp3a16 was stimulated 12-fold by mRecPRL, 3-fold by oRecPRL, and 6-fold by oPitPRL. For Cyp3a41, mRecPRL was 3.7-fold control, oRecPRL was without effect, and oPitPRL was 2-fold control. Importantly, for Cyp3a44, mRecPRL stimulated 2-fold, whereas both oRecPRL and oPitPRL had an opposite, inhibitory effect, with expression at 0.5-fold control. We conclude that homologous hormone had the largest stimulatory effect on expression of all measured genes and that by contrast heterologous hormone showed reduced activity, no activity, or opposite activity, depending on the gene being analyzed. Thus, experimentation using alien heterologous PRL may lead to inaccurate conclusions.

The Hepatoprotective and Hepatotoxic Roles of Sex and Sex-Related Hormones

Most liver diseases, including acute liver injury, drug-induced liver injury, viral hepatitis, metabolic liver diseases, and end-stage liver diseases, are strongly linked with hormonal influences. Thus, delineating the clinical manifestation and underlying mechanisms of the “sexual dimorphism” is critical for providing hints for the prevention, management, and treatment of those diseases. Whether the sex hormones (androgen, estrogen, and progesterone) and sex-related hormones (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and prolactin) play protective or toxic roles in the liver depends on the biological sex, disease stage, precipitating factor, and even the psychiatric status. Lifestyle factors, such as obesity, alcohol drinking, and smoking, also drastically affect the involving mechanisms of those hormones in liver diseases. Hormones deliver their hepatic regulatory signals primarily via classical and non-classical receptors in different liver cell types. Exogenous sex/sex-related hormone therapy may serve as a novel strategy for metabolic liver disease, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. However, the undesired hormone-induced liver injury should be carefully studied in pre-clinical models and monitored in clinical applications. This issue is particularly important for menopause females with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and transgender populations who want to receive gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). In conclusion, basic and clinical studies are warranted to depict the detailed hepatoprotective and hepatotoxic mechanisms of sex/sex-related hormones in liver disease. Prolactin holds a promising perspective in treating metabolic and advanced liver diseases.

Regulation of Sexually Dimorphic Expression of Major Urinary Proteins

Male house mice excrete large amounts of protein in their urinary scent marks, mainly composed of Major Urinary Proteins (MUPs), and these lipocalins function as pheromones and pheromone carriers. Here, we review studies on sexually dimorphic MUP expression in house mice, including the proximate mechanisms controlling MUP gene expression and their adaptive functions. Males excrete 2 to 8 times more urinary protein than females, though there is enormous variation in gene expression across loci in both sexes. MUP expression is dynamically regulated depending upon a variety of factors. Males regulate MUP expression according to social status, whereas females do not, and males regulate expression depending upon health and condition. Male-biased MUP expression is regulated by pituitary secretion of growth hormone (GH), which binds receptors in the liver, activating the JAK2-STAT5 signaling pathway, chromatin accessibility, and MUP gene transcription. Pulsatile male GH secretion is feminized by several factors, including caloric restriction, microbiota depletion, and aging, which helps explain condition-dependent MUP expression. If MUP production has sex-specific fitness optima, then this should generate sexual antagonism over allelic expression (intra-locus sexual conflict) selectively favoring sexually dimorphic expression. MUPs influence the sexual attractiveness of male urinary odor and increased urinary protein excretion is correlated with the reproductive success of males but not females. This finding could explain the selective maintenance of sexually dimorphic MUP expression. Producing MUPs entails energetic costs, but increased excretion may reduce the net energetic costs and predation risks from male scent marking as well as prolong the release of chemical signals. MUPs may also provide physiological benefits, including regulating metabolic rate and toxin removal, which may have sex-specific effects on survival. A phylogenetic analysis on the origins of male-biased MUP gene expression in Mus musculus suggests that this sexual dimorphism evolved by increasing male MUP expression rather than reducing female expression.

Metabolic functions of prolactin: Physiological and pathological aspects

Prolactin is named after its vital role of promoting milk production during lactation, although it has been implicated in multiple functions within the body, including metabolism and energy homeostasis. Prolactin has been hypothesised to play a key role in driving many of the adaptations of the maternal body to allow the mother to meet the physiological demands of both pregnancy and lactation, including the high energetic demands of the growing foetus followed by milk production to support the offspring after birth. Prolactin receptors are found in many tissues involved in metabolism and food intake, such as the pancreas, liver, hypothalamus, small intestine and adipose tissue. We review the literature examining the effects of prolactin in these various tissues and how they relate to changes in function in physiological states of high prolactin, such as pregnancy and lactation, and in pathological states of hyperprolactinaemia in the adult. In many cases, whether prolactin promotes healthy metabolism or leads to dysregulation of metabolic functions is highly dependent on the situation. Overall, although prolactin may not play a major role in regulating metabolism and body weight outside of pregnancy and lactation, it definitely has the ability to contribute to metabolic function.

Dietary Erythrodiol Modifies Hepatic Transcriptome in Mice in a Sex and Dose-Dependent Way

Erythrodiol is a terpenic compound found in a large number of plants. To test the hypotheses that its long-term administration may influence hepatic transcriptome and this could be influenced by the presence of APOA1-containing high-density lipoproteins (HDL), Western diets containing 0.01% of erythrodiol (10 mg/kg dose) were provided to Apoe- and Apoa1-deficient mice. Hepatic RNA-sequencing was carried out in male Apoe-deficient mice fed purified Western diets differing in the erythrodiol content. The administration of this compound significantly up- regulated 68 and down-regulated 124 genes at the level of 2-fold change. These genes belonged to detoxification processes, protein metabolism and nucleic acid related metabolites. Gene expression changes of 21 selected transcripts were verified by RT-qPCR. Ccl19-ps2, Cyp2b10, Rbm14-rbm4, Sec61g, Tmem81, Prtn3, Amy2a5, Cyp2b9 and Mup1 showed significant changes by erythrodiol administration. When Cyp2b10, Dmbt1, Cyp2b13, Prtn3 and Cyp2b9 were analyzed in female Apoe-deficient mice, no change was observed. Likewise, no significant variation was observed in Apoa1- or in Apoe-deficient mice receiving doses ranging from 0.5 to 5 mg/kg erythrodiol. Our results give evidence that erythrodiol exerts a hepatic transcriptional role, but this is selective in terms of sex and requires a threshold dose. Furthermore, it requires an APOA1-containing HDL.

Effect of Prolactin on Biochemical and Morphological Parameters of Rabbit Liver in Warm Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the degree of liver damage in a rabbit perfused with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK [Custodiol]) solution with and without the presence of prolactin (PRL) based on biochemical studies in perfundate and ultrastructural analysis of hepatocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was carried out on rabbits. Liver ischemia was used in the study, based on Pringle's maneuver. About 70% of the rabbit liver lobes were perfused with HTK with or without the addition of PRL (2.5μg/g liver/h) under ischemic conditions for 2 hours. In the perfundate, the activity of enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and lactate concentration were determined. Liver biopsies were collected for histopathologic evaluation under an electron microscope.

RESULTS

The addition of PRL to the HTK significantly reduced the leakage of enzymes from the liver to perfundate compared with the control group without PRL. The activity of ALT, AST, LDH, and GGT in the perfundates obtained after 2-hour perfusion with HTK-PRL solution was lower when compared with activity of the same parameters determined in perfundates with liver perfused with HTK without PRL. The area under the curve (AUC_0-2h) calculated for GGT, LDH, and lactates was significantly higher after perfusion with the HTK than with HTK with the addition of PRL. In the study group, bile was secreted throughout the whole experiment. The morphological confirmation of these results was obtained by means of transmission microscopy.

CONCLUSION

PRL added to the preservation solution significantly inhibits the process of liver cell cytolysis, which may suggest its hepatoprotective effect.