A Study on Pharmacokinetics of Bosentan with Systems Modeling, Part 2: Prospectively Predicting Systemic and Liver Exposure in Healthy Subjects

The Critical Role of Passive Permeability in Designing Successful Drugs

Passive permeability is a key property in drug disposition and delivery. It is critical for gastrointestinal absorption, brain penetration, renal reabsorption, defining clearance mechanisms and drug-drug interactions. Passive diffusion rate is translatable across tissues and animal species, while the extent of absorption is dependent on drug properties, as well as in vivo physiology/pathophysiology. Design principles have been developed to guide medicinal chemistry to enhance absorption, which combine the balance of aqueous solubility, permeability and the sometimes unfavorable compound characteristic demanded by the target. Permeability assays have been implemented that enable rapid development of structure-permeability relationships for absorption improvement. Future advances in assay development to reduce nonspecific binding and improve mass balance will enable more accurately measurement of passive permeability. Design principles that integrate potency, selectivity, passive permeability and other ADMET properties facilitate rapid advancement of successful drug candidates to patients.

Interpretation of Drug Interaction Using Systemic and Local Tissue Exposure Changes

Systemic exposure of a drug is generally associated with its pharmacodynamic (PD) effect (e.g., efficacy and toxicity). In this regard, the change in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of a drug, representing its systemic exposure, has been mainly considered in evaluation of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Besides the systemic exposure, the drug concentration in the tissues has emerged as a factor to alter the PD effects. In this review, the status of systemic exposure, and/or tissue exposure changes in DDIs, were discussed based on the recent reports dealing with transporters and/or metabolic enzymes mediating DDIs. Particularly, the tissue concentration in the intestine, liver and kidney were referred to as important factors of PK-based DDIs.

Estimation of the Effect of OAT2-Mediated Active Uptake on Meloxicam Exposure in the Human Liver

Active uptake mediated by organic anion transporter 2 (OAT2) has been previously hypothesized as a key player in hepatic disposition of its substrates. Previous studies have shown that another hepatic uptake transporter, organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP) 1B1, significantly elevates liver concentrations of drugs transported by it. As tissue concentration typically governs pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions, and toxicity in the liver, it is important to understand if OAT2 functions similarly to OATP1B1 in raising liver exposure. Since this is a research problem that cannot be easily assessed in clinical studies at this time, here we estimated human liver exposure of an OAT2 substrate meloxicam using a deduction method based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of clinical systemic exposure data. Although in vitro data suggest that OAT2-mediated active uptake is involved in meloxicam disposition, the modeling result concludes that its unbound liver exposure is unlikely significantly different from its unbound systemic exposure. This conclusion is further supported by data and modeling from a terminal monkey study and in vitro hepatocyte studies with bovine serum albumin. Overall, based on currently available data, we do not expect that OAT2 has a strong impact on the liver exposure of meloxicam.

Target-Mediated Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists

PURPOSE

Bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan are three small-molecule endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), displacing endothelin-1 (ET-1) from its binding site. A target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) pharmacokinetic (PK) model described the non-linearity in the PK of bosentan caused by its high receptor binding affinity with time-dependent varying receptor expression or reappearance. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the presence of TMDD for clazosentan and tezosentan and to corroborate the hypothesis of a diurnal receptor synthesis.

METHODS

PK data from healthy subjects after intravenous (i.v.) administration of single ascending doses of bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan were analyzed. Frequent blood samples for PK measurements were collected. Population analyses, simulations, and evaluations were performed using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach.

RESULTS

Two-compartment TMDD models were successfully developed describing the PK of all three ERAs with different receptor-complex internalization properties. The observed multiple peaks in the concentration-time profiles were captured with cosine functions on the receptor synthesis rate mimicking a diurnal receptor expression or reappearance. The results strongly suggest that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.

CONCLUSION

The developed TMDD PK models are a next step towards understanding the complex PK of ERAs and further support the hypothesis that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.

Drug Concentration Asymmetry in Tissues and Plasma for Small Molecule-Related Therapeutic Modalities

The well accepted "free drug hypothesis" for small-molecule drugs assumes that only the free (unbound) drug concentration at the therapeutic target can elicit a pharmacologic effect. Unbound (free) drug concentrations in plasma are readily measurable and are often used as surrogates for the drug concentrations at the site of pharmacologic action in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis and clinical dose projection in drug discovery. Furthermore, for permeable compounds at pharmacokinetic steady state, the free drug concentration in tissue is likely a close approximation of that in plasma; however, several factors can create and maintain disequilibrium between the free drug concentration in plasma and tissue, leading to free drug concentration asymmetry. These factors include drug uptake and extrusion mechanisms involving the uptake and efflux drug transporters, intracellular biotransformation of prodrugs, membrane receptor-mediated uptake of antibody-drug conjugates, pH gradients, unique distribution properties (covalent binders, nanoparticles), and local drug delivery (e.g., inhalation). The impact of these factors on the free drug concentrations in tissues can be represented by K _p,uu, the ratio of free drug concentration between tissue and plasma at steady state. This review focuses on situations in which free drug concentrations in tissues may differ from those in plasma (e.g., K _p,uu > or <1) and discusses the limitations of the surrogate approach of using plasma-free drug concentration to predict free drug concentrations in tissue. This is an important consideration for novel therapeutic modalities since systemic exposure as a driver of pharmacologic effects may provide limited value in guiding compound optimization, selection, and advancement. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of the relationship between free drug concentrations in plasma and tissues is needed.