Pharmacokinetics, Disposition, and Biotransformation of [14C]Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Healthy Male Subjects after a Single Intravenous or Oral Dose

Omecamtiv Mecarbil in the treatment of heart failure: the past, the present, and the future

Heart failure, a prevailing global health issue, imposes a substantial burden on both healthcare systems and patients worldwide. With an escalating prevalence of heart failure, prolonged survival rates, and an aging demographic, an increasing number of individuals are progressing to more advanced phases of this incapacitating ailment. Against this backdrop, the quest for pharmacological agents capable of addressing the diverse subtypes of heart failure becomes a paramount pursuit. From this viewpoint, the present article focuses on Omecamtiv Mecarbil (OM), an emerging chemical compound said to exert inotropic effects without altering calcium homeostasis. For the first time, as a review, the present article uniquely started from the very basic pathophysiology of heart failure, its classification, and the strategies underpinning drug design, to on-going debates of OM's underlying mechanism of action and the latest large-scale clinical trials. Furthermore, we not only saw the advantages of OM, but also exhaustively summarized the concerns in sense of its effects. These of no doubt make the present article the most systemic and informative one among the existing literature. Overall, by offering new mechanistic insights and therapeutic possibilities, OM has carved a significant niche in the treatment of heart failure, making it a compelling subject of study.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Omecamtiv Mecarbil With Amiodarone and Digoxin in Healthy Subjects

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM), a novel cardiac myosin activator, is being evaluated for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. In vitro studies demonstrate OM as a substrate and inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which can result in drug-drug interactions. Two phase 1, open-label studies assessed the effect of coadministration of OM (50-mg single dose) on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin (0.5-mg single dose; N = 15), a P-gp substrate, and the effect of coadministration of amiodarone (600-mg single dose), a P-gp inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of OM (50-mg single dose; N = 14) in healthy subjects. The ratios of the geometric least squares mean (90% confidence interval [CI]) of digoxin coadministered with OM vs digoxin alone for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity, AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum observed plasma concentration were 1.06 (90%CI, 0.99-1.14), 1.06 (90%CI, 0.98-1.14), and 1.08 (90%CI, 0.92-1.26), respectively. The ratios of the geometric least squares mean of OM coadministered with amiodarone vs OM alone for AUC from time 0 to infinity, AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum observed plasma concentration were 1.21 (90%CI, 1.08-1.36), 1.21 (90%CI, 1.07-1.36), and 1.08 (90%CI, 0.96-1.22), respectively. In conclusion, OM coadministered with digoxin or amiodarone did not result in any clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.

Evaluation of drug-drug interaction potential between omecamtiv mecarbil and rosuvastatin, a BCRP substrate, with a clinical study in healthy subjects and using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel cardiac myosin activator in development for the treatment of heart failure. In vitro, OM is an inhibitor of BCRP. Rosuvastatin, a BCRP substrate, is one of the most commonly prescribed medications in patients with heart failure. The potential for a pharmacokinetic (PK) drug‐drug interaction (DDI) was investigated, specifically to determine whether a single 50 mg dose of OM would impact the PKs of a single 10 mg dose of rosuvastatin in an open‐label study in 14 healthy subjects. The ratios of the geometric least‐square means (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of rosuvastatin co‐administered with OM compared to rosuvastatin alone were 127.1% (90% CI 113.8–141.9), 132.8% (90% CI 120.7–146.1), and 154.2% (90% CI 132.8–179.1) for area under the plasma‐concentration time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf), area under the plasma‐concentration time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC_last), and maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max), respectively. Whereas the DDI study with rosuvastatin was conducted with the co‐administration of a single dose of OM, in the clinical setting, patients receive OM at doses of 25, 37.5, or 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Hence, to extrapolate the results of the DDI study to a clinically relevant scenario of continuous b.i.d. dosing with OM, physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was performed to explore the potential of BCRP inhibition following continuous b.i.d. dosing of OM at the highest 50 mg dose. Modeling results indicated that following 50 mg b.i.d. dosing of OM, the predicted ratios of the geometric means (90% CIs) for rosuvastatin AUC_inf and C_max were 1.18 (90% CI 1.16–1.20) and 2.04 (90% CI 1.99–2.10), respectively. Therefore, these results suggest that OM, following multiple dose administration, is a weak inhibitor of BCRP substrates and is in accordance with that observed in the single dose OM DDI clinical study.

Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of Single and Multiple Omecamtiv Mecarbil Doses in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a cardiac myosin activator under development for the treatment of heart failure. The pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of OM were investigated in healthy Japanese subjects in two clinical studies.

METHODS

Study 1 (n = 36) evaluated the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics after intravenous infusion (15 mg/h for 4 h) and an oral modified release (MR) tablet in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects using 25 mg single and multiple doses and 50 mg single dose. Study 2 (n = 50) evaluated the pharmacokinetics of OM with multiple oral doses of 25 mg MR tablets twice a day (BID) followed by up-titration to either 37.5 mg or 50 mg BID in healthy Japanese subjects.

RESULTS

In Study 1, the maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf) in Japanese subjects after a single oral dose of 50 mg were twice that at the 25 mg dose, consistent with that observed in Caucasian subjects. Following single oral doses of 25 mg and 50 mg, absolute bioavailability was 56.5% and 59.2% for Japanese subjects and 63.1 and 83.6% for Caucasian subjects, respectively. No ethnic differences were observed in the pharmacokinetics of OM and its metabolites following single and multiple doses of 25 mg and 50 mg. In Study 2, the mean accumulation ratios based on AUC from 0 to 12 h (AUC₁₂) were approximately four-fold from day 1 to day 8 and from day 20 to day 27 across ethnic groups. The mean ratios of C_max to predose concentrations (C_predose) ranged from 1.25 to 1.38 across subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

OM showed consistent and predictable pharmacokinetics after multiple dosing in Japanese subjects.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Omecamtiv Mecarbil With Omeprazole, a Proton Pump Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel cardiac myosin activator in development for the treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. OM is administered as a 25-, 37.5-, or 50-mg modified-release formulation in patients with HF. Proton pump inhibitors are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in this patient population. Given the potential for coadministration of both drugs in patients with HF, we evaluated the potential for omeprazole to affect the pharmacokinetics of OM in an open-label study in 14 healthy subjects. Subjects received a single 50-mg dose of OM on day 1, followed by 40-mg once-daily doses of omeprazole on days 4 to 8. On day 9, a single 40-mg dose of omeprazole was administered first and immediately followed by 50-mg of OM. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after dosing following administration of OM on days 1 and 9 to characterize plasma concentrations of OM. The ratios of the geometric least-square means (90% confidence intervals) of OM coadministered with omeprazole compared to OM alone were 94.5% (81.7%-109.3%), 94.3% (81.5%-109.1%), and 101.2% (95.4%-107.3%) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and maximum observed plasma concentration, respectively. Coadministration of OM with omeprazole was not associated with any clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Single doses of OM were safe and well tolerated when coadministered with omeprazole.