HLM-beads: Rapid Assessment of Nonspecific Binding to Human Liver Microsomes Using Magnetizable Beads

Comparison of Commonly Used and New Methods to Determine Small Molecule Non-Specific Binding to Human Liver Microsomes

Accurate measurement of non-specific binding of a drug candidate to human liver microsomes (HLM) can be critical for the accurate determination of key enzyme kinetic parameters such as Michaelis-Menton (Km), reversible inhibition (Ki), or inactivation (KI) constants. Several methods have been developed to determine non-specific binding of small molecules to HLM, such as rapid equilibrium dialysis (RED), ultrafiltration (UF), HLM bound to magnetizable beads (HLM-beads), ultracentrifugation (UC), the linear extrapolation stability assay (LESA), and the Transil™ system. Despite various differences in methodology between these methods, it is generally presumed that similar free fraction values (fu,mic) should be generated. To evaluate this hypothesis, a test set of 9 compounds were selected, representing low (high fu,mic value) and significant (low fu,mic value) HLM binding, respectively, across HLM concentrations tested in this manuscript. The fu,mic values were determined using a single compound concentration (1.0 µM) and three HLM concentrations (0.025, 0.50, and 1.0 mg/mL). When the HLM non-specific binding event is not extensive resulting in high fu,mic values, all methods generated similar fu,mic values. However, fu,mic values varied markedly across assay formats when high binding to HLM occurred, where fu,mic values differed by up to 33-fold depending on the method used. Potential causes for such discrepancies across the various methods employed, practical implications related to conduct the different assays, and implications to clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) predictions are discussed.

Human Serum Albumin Immobilized On Magnetizable Beads: A Rapid Method for Compound HSA Binding Study

Immobilized human serum albumin (HSA) was developed by coupling His-tagged HSA onto Ni2+-coupled magnetizable beads (HSA-beads), allowing the HSA to be easily removed from incubation components. The HSA-beads system provides a rapid and convenient method to study HSA compound binding. In this study, the HSA-beads system was characterized and evaluated as a tool for assessing compound HSA binding properties. The free fraction (fu) values of test compounds measured using HSA-beads were comparable to those determined by equilibrium dialysis (ED), which is commonly used to evaluate albumin binding in vitro. The equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) values determined for a series of compounds using the HSA-beads method demonstrated good correlation with literature data. This good correlation also suggests that the binding of His-HSA to the beads does not impact the conformations of the two compound binding sites of HSA, as the range of compounds tested encompassed binding to both sites. Furthermore, the Kd values of representative compounds itraconazole and BIRT2584 that were difficult to assess using ED, due to significant cellulose membrane adsorption, were successfully determined. The HSA-beads provide several advantages over ED, such as simple preparation, short assay incubation duration, and the ability to quantify both free and HSA-bound species of the test compound, facilitated by the simple separation of HSA-beads from the solution phase using a magnetic field. These properties render the HSA-beads method suitable for high-throughput studies on compound HSA binding.

A novel system to determine activity of individual uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) isoforms: Recombinant UGT-beads

Previous work demonstrated that human liver microsomes (HLMs) can spontaneously bind to silica-coated magnetizable beads (HLM-beads) and that these HLM-beads retain uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activity. However, the contributions of individual UGT isoforms are not directly assessable in this system except through use of model inhibitors. Thus, a preparation wherein recombinant UGT (rUGT) microsomes bound to these same beads to form rUGT-beads of individual UGT isoforms would provide a novel system for measuring the contribution of individual UGT isoforms in a direct manner. To this end, the enzyme activities and kinetic parameter estimates of various rUGT isoforms in rUGT-beads were investigated, as well as the impact of fatty acids (FAs) on enzyme activity. The catalytic efficiencies (Vmax/Km) of the tested rUGTs were twofold to sevenfold higher in rUGT-beads compared with rUGT microsomes, except for rUGT1A6, where Vmax is the maximum product formation rate normalized to milligram of microsomal protein (pmol/min/mg protein). Interestingly, in contrast to traditional rUGT preparations, the sequestration of UGT-inhibitory FA using bovine serum albumin did not alter the catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) of the rUGTs in rUGT-beads. Moreover, the increase in catalytic efficiency of rUGT-beads over rUGT microsomes was similar to increases in catalytic efficiency noted with rUGT microsomes (not bound to beads) incubated with bovine serum albumin, suggesting the beads in some way altered the potential for FAs to inhibit activity. The rUGT-bead system may serve as a useful albumin-free tool to determine kinetic constants for UGT substrates, particularly those that exhibit high binding to albumin.

Non-specific binding of compounds in in vitro metabolism assays: a comparison of microsomal and hepatocyte binding in different species and an assessment of the accuracy of prediction models

Non-specific binding in in vitro metabolism systems leads to an underestimation of the true intrinsic metabolic clearance of compounds being studied. Therefore in vitro binding needs to be accounted for when extrapolating in vitro data to predict the in vivo metabolic clearance of a compound. While techniques exist for experimentally determining the fraction of a compound unbound in in vitro metabolism systems, early in drug discovery programmes computational approaches are often used to estimate the binding in the in vitro system.Experimental fraction unbound data (n = 60) were generated in liver microsomes (fu_mic) from five commonly used pre-clinical species (rat, mouse, dog, minipig, monkey) and humans. Unbound fraction in incubations with mouse, rat or human hepatocytes was determined for the same 60 compounds. These data were analysed to determine the relationship between experimentally determined binding in the different matrices and across different species. In hepatocytes there was a good correlation between fraction unbound in human and rat (r²=0.86) or mouse (r²=0.82) hepatocytes. Similar correlations were observed between binding in human liver microsomes and microsomes from rat, mouse, dog, Göttingen minipig or monkey liver microsomes (r² of >0.89, n = 51 - 52 measurements in different species). Physicochemical parameters (logP, pKa and logD) were predicted for all evaluated compounds. In addition, logP and/or logD were measured for a subset of compounds.Binding to human hepatocytes predicted using 5 different methods was compared to the measured data for a set of 59 compounds. The best methods evaluated used measured microsomal binding in human liver microsomes to predict hepatocyte binding. The collated physicochemical data were used to predict the human fu_mic using four different in silico models for a set of 53-60 compounds. The correlation (r²) and root mean square error between predicted and observed microsomal binding was 0.69 & 0.20, 0.47 & 0.23, 0.56 & 0.21 and 0.54 & 0.26 for the Turner-Simcyp, Austin, Hallifax-Houston and Poulin models, respectively. These analyses were extended to include measured literature values for binding in human liver microsomes for a larger set of compounds (n=697). For the larger dataset of compounds, microsomal binding was well predicted for neutral compounds (r²=0.67 - 0.70) using the Poulin, Austin, or Turner-Simcyp methods but not for acidic or basic compounds (r²<0.5) using any of the models. While the lipophilicity-based models can be used, the in vitro binding should be measured for compounds where more certainty is needed, using appropriately calibrated assays and possibly established weak, moderate, and strong binders as reference compounds to allow comparison across databases.