(R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl) phosphinic acid (AZD3355), a novel GABAB receptor agonist, inhibits transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation through a peripheral mode of action

GABAB-Receptor Agonist-Based Immunotherapy for Type 1 Diabetes in NOD Mice

Some immune system cells express type A and/or type B γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABA_A-Rs and/or GABA_B-Rs). Treatment with GABA, which activates both GABA_A-Rs and GABA_B-Rs), and/or a GABA_A-R-specific agonist inhibits disease progression in mouse models of type 1 diabetes (T1D), multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and COVID-19. Little is known about the clinical potential of specifically modulating GABA_B-Rs. Here, we tested lesogaberan, a peripherally restricted GABA_B-R agonist, as an interventive therapy in diabetic NOD mice. Lesogaberan treatment temporarily restored normoglycemia in most newly diabetic NOD mice. Combined treatment with a suboptimal dose of lesogaberan and proinsulin/alum immunization in newly diabetic NOD mice or a low-dose anti-CD3 in severely hyperglycemic NOD mice greatly increased T1D remission rates relative to each monotherapy. Mice receiving combined lesogaberan and anti-CD3 displayed improved glucose tolerance and, unlike mice that received anti-CD3 alone, had some islets with many insulin⁺ cells, suggesting that lesogaberan helped to rapidly inhibit β-cell destruction. Hence, GABA_B-R-specific agonists may provide adjunct therapies for T1D. Finally, the analysis of microarray and RNA-Seq databases suggested that the expression of GABA_B-Rs and GABA_A-Rs, as well as GABA production/secretion-related genes, may be a more common feature of immune cells than currently recognized.

Metabolic and Pharmaceutical Aspects of Fluorinated Compounds

The applications of fluorine in drug design continue to expand, facilitated by an improved understanding of its effects on physicochemical properties and the development of synthetic methodologies that are providing access to new fluorinated motifs. In turn, studies of fluorinated molecules are providing deeper insights into the effects of fluorine on metabolic pathways, distribution, and disposition. Despite the high strength of the C-F bond, the departure of fluoride from metabolic intermediates can be facile. This reactivity has been leveraged in the design of mechanism-based enzyme inhibitors and has influenced the metabolic fate of fluorinated compounds. In this Perspective, we summarize the literature associated with the metabolism of fluorinated molecules, focusing on examples where the presence of fluorine influences the metabolic profile. These studies have revealed potentially problematic outcomes with some fluorinated motifs and are enhancing our understanding of how fluorine should be deployed.

Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The management of proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD (rGERD) is a challenge in clinical practice. Since up to one-third of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) are not satisfied with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, new drug development targeting different pathophysiologies of GERD is imperative. At present, no other drugs serve as a more potent acid suppression agent than PPIs. As an add-on therapy, histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, alginates, prokinetics and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors have some impact on the subgroups of rGERD, but greater effectiveness and fewer adverse effects for widespread use are required. Visceral hypersensitivity also contributes to the perception of GERD symptoms, and neuromodulators including antidepressants play a role in this category. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring helps to distinguish functional heartburn from true GERD, and psychologic medication and cognitive behavior therapy are further therapy options instead of PPIs.

Repurposing Lesogaberan to Promote Human Islet Cell Survival and β-Cell Replication

The activation of β-cell's A- and B-type gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABAA-Rs and GABAB-Rs) can promote their survival and replication, and the activation of α-cell GABAA-Rs promotes their conversion into β-cells. However, GABA and the most clinically applicable GABA-R ligands may be suboptimal for the long-term treatment of diabetes due to their pharmacological properties or potential side-effects on the central nervous system (CNS). Lesogaberan (AZD3355) is a peripherally restricted high-affinity GABAB-R-specific agonist, originally developed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that appears to be safe for human use. This study tested the hypothesis that lesogaberan could be repurposed to promote human islet cell survival and β-cell replication. Treatment with lesogaberan significantly enhanced replication of human islet cells in vitro, which was abrogated by a GABAB-R antagonist. Immunohistochemical analysis of human islets that were grafted into immune-deficient mice revealed that oral treatment with lesogaberan promoted human β-cell replication and islet cell survival in vivo as effectively as GABA (which activates both GABAA-Rs and GABAB-Rs), perhaps because of its more favorable pharmacokinetics. Lesogaberan may be a promising drug candidate for clinical studies of diabetes intervention and islet transplantation.

Management of refractory typical GERD symptoms

The management of patients with refractory GERD (rGERD) is a major clinical challenge for gastroenterologists. In up to 30% of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation), acid-suppressive therapy does not provide clinical benefit. In this Review, we discuss the current management algorithm for GERD and the features and management of patients who do not respond to treatment (such as those individuals with an incorrect diagnosis of GERD, inadequate PPI intake, persisting acid reflux and persisting weakly acidic reflux). Symptom response to existing surgical techniques, novel antireflux procedures, and the value of add-on medical therapies (including prokinetics and reflux inhibitors) for rGERD symptoms are discussed. Pharmaceutical agents targeting oesophageal sensitivity, a condition that can contribute to symptom generation in rGERD, are also discussed. Finally, on the basis of available published data and our expert opinion, we present an outline of a current, usable algorithm for management of patients with rGERD that considers the timing and diagnostic use of pH-impedance monitoring on or off PPI, additional diagnostic tests, the clinical use of baclofen and the use of add-on neuromodulators (tricyclic agents and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).

Reducing Adverse Effects During Drug Development: The Example of Lesogaberan and Paresthesia

PURPOSE

Lesogaberan, a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor agonist, was developed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with a partial response to proton pump inhibitor therapy. A high prevalence of paresthesia was observed in healthy individuals after dosing with lesogaberan in early-phase clinical trials. The aim of this review was to gain further insight into paresthesia caused by lesogaberan by summarizing the relevant preclinical and clinical data.

METHODS

This study was a narrative review of the literature and unpublished data.

FINDINGS

The occurrence of paresthesia may depend on the route or rate of drug administration; several studies were conducted to test this hypothesis, and formulations were developed to minimize the occurrence of paresthesia. Phase I clinical studies showed that, in healthy individuals, paresthesia occurred soon after administration of lesogaberan in a dose-dependent manner regardless of the route of administration. The occurrence of paresthesia could be decreased by fractionating the dose or reducing the rate of administration. These findings suggest that the initial rate of absorption plays an important part in the development of paresthesia. Modified-release formulations minimize the occurrence of paresthesia while retaining the anti-reflux activity of the drug, as measured by esophageal pH and the number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations.

IMPLICATIONS

The development of lesogaberan was halted because the effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms observed in Phase II studies was not considered clinically meaningful in the target patient population. Nevertheless, it is an example of successful formulation development designed to minimize the occurrence of a compound's adverse effect while retaining its pharmacodynamic action.

Activation of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type B (GABA(B)) Receptor by Agonists and Positive Allosteric Modulators

Since the discovery of the GABA(B) agonist and muscle relaxant baclofen, there have been substantial advancements in the development of compounds that activate the GABA(B) receptor as agonists or positive allosteric modulators. For the agonists, most of the existing structure-activity data apply to understanding the role of substituents on the backbone of GABA as well as replacing the carboxylic acid and amine groups. In the cases of the positive allosteric modulators, the allosteric binding site(s) and structure-activity relationships are less well-defined; however, multiple classes of molecules have been discovered. The recent report of the X-ray structure of the GABA(B) receptor with bound agonists and antagonists provides new insights for the development of compounds that bind the orthosteric site of this receptor. From a therapeutic perspective, these data have enabled efforts in drug discovery in areas of addiction-related behavior, the treatment of anxiety, and the control of muscle contractility.

Dose-dependent effects of lesogaberan on reflux measures in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Background

The γ-aminobutyric acid type B-receptor agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) has been developed for use in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (partial responders). This study aimed to explore the dose–response effect of lesogaberan on reflux episodes in partial responders.

Methods

In this randomized, single-centre, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study, partial responders taking optimised PPI therapy were given 30, 90, 120 and 240 mg doses of lesogaberan. Each dose was given twice (12 h apart) during a 24-h period, during which impedance–pH measurements were taken.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included in the efficacy analysis and 27 in the safety analysis. The effect of lesogaberan on the mean number of reflux episodes was dose-dependent, and all doses significantly reduced the mean number of reflux episodes relative to placebo. Lesogaberan also dose-dependently reduced the mean number of acid reflux episodes (except the 30 mg dose) and weakly acid reflux episodes (all doses) significantly, relative to placebo. Regardless of dose, lesogaberan had a similar effect on the percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 [mean reduction: 68.5% (30 mg), 54.2% (90 mg), 65.9% (120 mg), 72.1% (240 mg); p < 0.05 except 90 mg dose]. No adverse events led to discontinuation and no serious adverse events occurred during active treatment.

Conclusions

Lesogaberan inhibited reflux in a dose-dependent manner in partial responders taking optimised PPI therapy, and these effects were significant versus placebo. All lesogaberan doses were well tolerated and were not associated with clinically relevant adverse events.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01043185.

Evaluation of peripheral versus central effects of GABA(B) receptor activation using a novel, positive allosteric modulator of the GABA(B) receptor ADX71943, a pharmacological tool compound with a fully peripheral activity profile

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen, has shown promising effects in patients suffering from pain, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcoholism, overactive bladder and gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, baclofen's short duration of action and side effects limit its wider use. Here we characterized a novel, GABA(B) receptor positive allosteric modulator (PAM) ADX71943.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

In vitro, ADX71943 was assessed for pharmacological activity and selectivity using recombinant and native GABA(B) receptors. In vivo ADX71943 was assessed in the acetic acid-induced writhing (AAW) test in mice and formalin tests (FTs) in mice and rats. Marble burying (MB) and elevated plus maze (EPM) tests, rotarod, spontaneous locomotor activity (sLMA) and body temperature (BT) tests in mice and rats were used to investigate centrally-mediated effects.

KEY RESULTS

In vitro, in the presence of GABA, ADX71943 increased the potency and efficacy of agonists and showed selectivity at the GABA(B) receptor. ADX71943 reduced pain-associated behaviours in AAW; an effect blocked by GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP63360. ADX71943 reduced pain in the FT in mice and rats, but was inactive in the MB and EPM despite reaching high concentrations in plasma. ADX71943 had no effect on BT, rotarod and sLMA.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

ADX71943 showed consistent and target-related efficacy in tests of disorders that have a significant peripheral component (acute and chronic pain), while having no effect in those associated with centrally-mediated anxiety-like reactivity and side effects. Thus, ADX71943 is a useful pharmacological tool for delineation of peripherally- versus centrally-mediated effects of GABA(B) receptor activation.

Efficacy and safety of lesogaberan in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Lesogaberan (AZD3355) is a novel γ-aminobutyric acid B-type receptor agonist designed to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by inhibiting transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre phase IIb study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of lesogaberan as an add-on to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with GERD who are partially responsive to PPI therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT01005251).

DESIGN

In total, 661 patients were randomised to receive 4 weeks of placebo or 60, 120, 180 or 240 mg of lesogaberan twice daily, in addition to ongoing PPI therapy. Symptoms were measured using the Reflux Symptom Questionnaire electronic Diary. Response to treatment was defined as having an average of ≥ 3 additional days per week of not more than mild GERD symptoms during treatment compared with baseline.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, 20.9%, 25.6%, 23.5% and 26.2% of patients responded to the 60, 120, 180 and 240 mg twice daily lesogaberan doses, respectively, and 17.9% responded to placebo. The response to the 240 mg twice daily dose was statistically significantly greater than the response to placebo using a one-sided test at the predefined significance level of p < 0.1. However, the absolute increases in the proportions of patients who responded to lesogaberan compared with placebo were low. Lesogaberan was generally well tolerated, although six patients receiving lesogaberan developed reversible elevated alanine transaminase levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with GERD symptoms partially responsive to PPI therapy, lesogaberan was only marginally superior to placebo in achieving an improvement in symptoms.

Colorectal distension-evoked potentials in awake rats: a novel method for studies of visceral sensitivity

BACKGROUND

Quantification of the visceromotor response induced by colorectal distension (CRD) in rodents is commonly used for preclinical studies of visceral pain. The model is well established but does not fully assess the central response to stimulation. The aim of this study was to establish a novel model assessing cerebral evoked potentials (CEPs) in response to CRD in awake rats.

METHODS

Epidural recording electrodes were chronically implanted in the skull of female Sprague-Dawley rats. Colorectal distension-induced CEPs were recorded using either rapid balloon distensions (100 ms, 20-80 mmHg) or electric stimulation (1 ms, 1-4 mA) using stimulation probes placed in the distal colon.

KEY RESULTS

Colorectal distension-induced CEPs were separated in three partly temporally overlapping components consisting of five prominent peaks. Peak latencies at 80 mmHg were (P1, N1) 23 ± 1 and 55 ± 4 ms, (N2, P2a, P2b) 91 ± 3, 143 ± 5 and 174 ± 3 ms, and (P3) 297 ± 3 ms. Amplitudes and latencies were, except for the early component, intensity dependent. Intrarectal administration of lidocaine significantly reduced the amplitude of N2 (by 42 ± 6%, P < 0.001) and P2 (by 34 ± 6%, P < 0.001). Electrically induced CEPs were intensity dependent and had similar topography and latencies as the mechanical evoked potentials (P1: 26 ± 2 ms; N1: 61 ± 1 ms; P2: 84 ± 6 ms; N2: 154 ± 6 ms; P3: 326 ± 10 ms), but there were large variations in amplitudes in between repeated electrical stimulations.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Colorectal distension-induced CEPs can be recorded reliably in awake rats and may serve as a surrogate marker of colonic sensation and be a useful parameter in studies of visceral sensitivity.

Antitussive effects of the peripherally restricted GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan in guinea pigs: comparison to baclofen and other GABAB receptor-selective agonists

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common cause of chronic cough. Both acid and nonacid reflux is thought to play a role in the initiation of coughing and cough hypersensitivity. The GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan was developed as a peripherally restricted anti-reflux therapy that reduces the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESR; the major cause of reflux) in animals and in patients with GERD. GABAB receptor agonists have also been shown to possess antitussive effects in patients and in animals independent of their effects on TLESR, suggesting that lesogaberan may be a promising treatment for chronic cough.

METHODS

We have assessed the direct antitussive effects of lesogaberan (AZD3355). The effects of other GABAB receptor agonists were also determined. Coughing was evoked in awake guinea pigs using aerosol challenges with citric acid.

RESULTS

Lesogaberan dose-dependently inhibited citric acid evoked coughing in guinea pigs. Comparable effects of the GABAB receptor agonists baclofen and 3-aminopropylphosphinic acid (3-APPiA) on cough were also observed. Baclofen produced obvious signs of sedation and respiratory depression. By contrast, both lesogaberan and 3-APPiA (both inactivated centrally by GABA transporters) were devoid of sedative effects and did not alter respiratory rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, the data suggest that lesogaberan and related GABAB receptor agonists may hold promise as safe and effective antitussive agents largely devoid of CNS side effects.

Evolving pharmacological approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have considerably improved quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, many patients remain symptomatic despite standard PPI therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on evolving therapeutic strategies related to the pathophysiological processes of GERD and insufficient response to PPIs. Several clinical trials evaluated new PPI formulations and newer types of acid-suppressive drugs. These studies have evaluated traditional end points in GERD, but have not shown clinical superiority to current PPIs. Novel therapeutic strategies targeting underlying mechanisms of GERD, such as transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and esophageal hypersensitivity, are being developed for add-on therapy to PPIs. Prokinetic drugs may also have some potential in the add-on treatment of GERD with insufficient response to PPIs. Add-on studies are hampered by insufficient information on optimal patient selection and lack of established end points.

EXPERT OPINION

Newer drugs for symptomatic control in GERD have largely focused on improved acid suppression, without evidence of clinical superiority. Drugs targeting esophageal motility and sensitivity to be used as add-onc therapy in PPI insufficient responders have not reached Phase III trials to date, due to difficulties with patient selection, tolerability and end points.

Different in vitro and in vivo profiles of substituted 3-aminopropylphosphinate and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinate GABA(B) receptor agonists as inhibitors of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is predominantly caused by transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) and GABA(B) receptor stimulation inhibits TLOSR. Lesogaberan produces fewer CNS side effects than baclofen, which has been attributed to its affinity for the GABA transporter (GAT), the action of which limits stimulation of central GABA(B) receptors. To understand the structure-activity relationship for analogues of lesogaberan (3-aminopropylphosphinic acids), and corresponding 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids, we have compared representatives of these classes in different in vitro and in vivo models.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The compounds were characterized in terms of GABA(B) agonism in vitro. Binding to GATs and cellular uptake was done using rat brain membranes and slices respectively. TLOSR was measured in dogs, and CNS side effects were evaluated as hypothermia in mice and rats.

KEY RESULTS

3-Aminopropylphosphinic acids inhibited TLOSR with a superior therapeutic index compared to 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids. This difference was most likely due to differential GAT-mediated uptake into brain cells of the former but not latter. In agreement, 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids were much more potent in producing hypothermia in rats even when administered i.c.v.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

An enhanced therapeutic window for 3-aminopropylphosphinic acids compared with 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids with respect to inhibition of TLOSR was observed and is probably mechanistically linked to neural cell uptake of the former but not latter group of compounds. These findings offer a platform for discovery of new GABA(B) receptor agonists for the treatment of reflux disease and other conditions where selective peripheral GABA(B) receptor agonism may afford therapeutic effects.

In vitro effect of pantoprazole on lower esophageal sphincter tone in rats

AIM: To investigate the in vitro effects of pantoprazole on rat lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tone.

METHODS: Rats weighing 250-300 g, provided by the Yeditepe University Experimental Research Center (YÜDETAM), were used throughout the study. They were anesthetized before decapitation. LES tissues whose mucosal lining were removed were placed in a standard 30-mL organ bath with a modified Krebs solution and continuously aerated with 95% oxygen-5% carbon dioxide gas mixture and kept at room temperature. The tissues were allowed to stabilize for 60 min. Subsequently, the contractile response to 10^-6 mol/L carbachol was obtained. Different concentrations of freshly prepared pantoprazole were added directly to the tissue bath to generate cumulative concentrations of 5 × 10^-6 mol/L, 5 × 10^-5 mol/L, and 1.5 × 10^-4 mol/L. Activities were recorded on an online computer via a 4-channel transducer data acquisition system using the software BSL PRO v 3.7, which also analyzed the data.

RESULTS: Pantoprazole at 5 × 10^-6 mol/L caused a small, but statistically insignificant, relaxation in the carbachol-contracted LES (2.23% vs 3.95%). The 5 × 10^-5 mol/L concentration, however, caused a significant relaxation of 10.47% compared with the control. 1.5 × 10^-4 mol/L concentration of pantoprazol caused a 19.89% relaxation in the carbachol contracted LES (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that pantoprazole has a relaxing effect in isolated LESs. These results might have significant clinical implications for the subset of patients using proton pump inhibitors who do not receive full symptomatic alleviation from gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between lesogaberan (AZD3355) and esomeprazole in healthy subjects

Background: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) have been identified as a primary cause of reflux events in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GABAB receptor agonists such as lesogaberan (AZD3355) have been shown to inhibit TLESRs in healthy subjects and patients with GERD, and, therefore, offer a novel therapeutic add-on strategy to acid suppression for the management of GERD. As lesogaberan is being developed as an add-on treatment for the management of patients with GERD who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, it is important to rule out any clinically important pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between lesogaberan and PPIs.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of lesogaberan and vice versa.

Study Design: This was an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study. The study was open to healthy adult male and female subjects. The study subjects received treatment with, in random order, lesogaberan (150mg twice daily [dose interval 12 hours]), esomeprazole (40 mg once daily), and a combination of both, during 7-day treatment periods.

Main Outcome: The presence or absence of pharmacokinetic interactions between lesogaberan and esomeprazole was assessed by measuring the steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curves during the dosing interval (AUC_τ) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) for lesogaberan and esomeprazole.

Results: Thirty male subjects (mean age 23.2 years, 97% Caucasian) were randomized to treatment and 28 subjects completed the study (one subject was lost to follow-up, and one subject discontinued due to an adverse event). The 95% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for AUC_τ and C_max of lesogaberan and esomeprazole administered alone and concomitantly were within the recognized boundaries of bioequivalence (0.8–1.25). No new safety concerns were raised during this study. The number of patients with adverse events during treatment with lesogaberan alone (n = 17) and concomitantly with esomeprazole (n = 18) were comparable but higher than with esomeprazole alone (n = 10). Paresthesia (episodic, mild, and transient), pharyngitis, and flatulence were the most frequently reported adverse events.

Conclusions: There was no observed pharmacokinetic interaction between lesogaberan and esomeprazole when concomitantly administered to healthy subjects, and concomitant therapy was well tolerated.

Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00684190

Pharmacokinetic profile of lesogaberan (AZD3355) in healthy subjects: a novel GABA(B)-receptor agonist reflux inhibitor

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of lesogaberan in healthy subjects after single oral and intravenous administration of ¹⁴C-labeled lesogaberan and non-¹⁴C-labeled lesogaberan.

Study Design: This was an open-label, single-center, randomized, two-way crossover, phase I study.

Participants: Ten healthy male subjects took part in the study.

Intervention: Volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of either orally dosed (100 mg) or intravenously infused (20 mg) non-¹⁴C-labeled lesogaberan, and then orally (100 mg) or intravenously (20 mg) administered ¹⁴C-labeled lesogaberan in a crossover design. Treatment periods were separated by a washout period of at least 7 days.

Main Outcome Measures Analyses of the rate and route of excretion, dose recovery, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), AUC to the last quantifiable concentration, maximal plasma concentration (C_max), time to C_max, the apparent elimination half-life, bioavailability, total clearance, renal clearance, fraction of the bioavailable dose excreted unchanged in the urine, cumulative amount of drug excreted unchanged in urine, and the apparent volume of distribution at steady state of lesogaberan.

Results: Lesogaberan was rapidly and extensively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and C_max was achieved within 1–2 hours of oral dosing. The terminal half-life of lesogaberan was between 11 and 13 hours. Renal clearance accounted for approximately 22% of total body clearance. Based on the recovery of administered radioactivity, approximately 84% of the dose was excreted into the urine either as the parent compound or as water-soluble metabolite(s). There were no safety concerns raised during the study.

Conclusion: Orally administered lesogaberan is rapidly absorbed with high bioavailability and the majority of the dose is excreted by the kidneys either as the parent compound or as metabolites. The major elimination pathway for lesogaberan in man is metabolism.

Oral baclofen reduces visceral pain-related pseudo-affective responses to colorectal distension in rats: relation between plasma exposure and efficacy

OBJECTIVE

We previously showed that activation of GABA(B) receptors by intravenous baclofen reduces pseudo-affective responses to colorectal distension in rats. Here we evaluate the potential clinical significance of these observations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinically relevant colorectal distension protocols were used to assess the effects of oral baclofen on visceromotor and autonomic cardiovascular responses in conscious rats. Plasma levels of baclofen were monitored to provide clinical relevance to the doses used. Conscious female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to repeated noxious colorectal distension (12 × 80 mmHg), ascending-phasic colorectal distension (10-80 mmHg, 10 mmHg increments) or ramp colorectal distension (10 min ramp at 8 mmHg/min). Visceromotor and cardiovascular responses (mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate) were monitored. Pain-related response thresholds were assessed using ascending-phasic and ramp colorectal distension.

RESULTS

Baclofen (1-10 μmol/kg, p.o.) reduced the visceromotor response to colorectal distension, reaching a 40% maximal inhibition (p < 0.05). The highest dose (10 μmol/kg, p.o.) also inhibited pain-related cardiovascular responses in telemetrized rats (50-55% reduction in colorectal distension-evoked hypertensive and tachycardic responses; p < 0.05). Similar thresholds for pain-related visceromotor responses were determined during ramp or ascending-phasic colorectal distension (34.1 ± 1.9 and 31.7 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively). Baclofen (10 μmol/kg, p.o.) increased thresholds to 71.1 ± 3.7 and 77.5 ± 1.8 mmHg during ramp and ascending-phasic colorectal distension, respectively (p < 0.001). Plasma levels of baclofen were 3.3 ± 0.2 μmol/l at 90 min post-dosing, corresponding to the end of the colorectal distension procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral baclofen, at plasma levels similar to those reported safe and within a therapeutic range in humans, produced significant visceral anti-nociceptive effects in rats.

Review article: the clinical relevance of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSR) are considered the physiological mechanism that enables venting of gas from the stomach and appear as sphincter relaxations that are not induced by swallowing. It has become increasingly clear that most reflux episodes occur during TLOSRs and therefore play a key role in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To describe the current knowledge about TLOSRs and its clinical implications.

METHODS

Search of the literature published in English using the PubMed database and relevant abstracts presented at international conventions.

RESULTS

Several factors influence the rate of TLOSRs including anti-reflux surgery, meal, body position, nutrition, lifestyle and a wide array of neurotransmitters. Ongoing insights in the neurotransmitters responsible for the modulation of TLOSRs, as well as the neural pathways involved in TLOSR induction, have lead to novel therapeutic targets. These therapeutic targets can serve as an add-on therapy in patients with an unsatisfactory response to proton pump inhibitor by inhibiting TLOSRs and its associated reflux events. However, the TLOSR-inhibiting drugs that are currently available still have significant side effects.

CONCLUSION

It is likely that in the future, selected GERD patients may benefit from transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation inhibition when compounds are found without significant side effects.

An historical perspective on GABAergic drugs

In 1950, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was discovered in the brain and in 1967 it was recognized as an inhibitory neurotransmitter. The discovery of the benzodiazepines Librium® (launched in 1960) and Valium® by Sternbach initiated huge research activities resulting in 50 marketed drugs. In 1975, Haefely found that GABA is involved in the actions of benzodiazepines. The baclofen-sensitive, bicuculline-insensitive GABAB receptor was discovered by Bowery in 1980, and the baclofen-insensitive, bicuculline-insensitive GABAC receptor by Johnston in 1984. Barnard & Seeburg reported the cloning of the GABAA receptor in 1987, Cutting the GABAC receptor in 1991 and Bettler the GABAB1a and GABAB1b receptors in 1997. Six groups cloned the GABAB2 receptor in 1998/1999 showing that the GABAB receptor functions as a heterodimer with GABAB1b/GABAB2 mediating postsynaptic inhibition and GABAB1a/GABAB2 mediating presynaptic inhibition. Möhler and McKernan dissected the pharmacology of the benzodiazepine-receptor subtypes. Antagonists and positive allosteric modulators of GABAB receptors were discovered in 1987 and 2001, respectively. GABA transporter inhibitor, tiagabine, was launched in 1996, a GABA aminotransferase inhibitor, vigabatrin, in 1998 and a glutamic acid decarboxylase activator, pregabalin, in 2004. Most recently, brain-penetrating GABAC-receptor antagonists were reported in 2009.

Beyond acid suppression: new pharmacologic approaches for treatment of GERD

Proton pump inhibitors are highly successful in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease, but a significant proportion of patients have persistent symptoms from weakly or nonacidic reflux. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) represents the dominant mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux and has therefore become the most intensely investigated therapeutic target. The triggering of TLESR involve the vagal pathways and the gamma-aminobutyric type B (GABA(B)) and metabotropic glutamate type 5 (mGluR5) receptors. Baclofen is a GABA(B) receptor agonist that is effective in inhibiting TLESR and reducing the number of reflux episodes, but is associated with significant central nervous system (CNS) side effects. The newer GABA(B) agonists, such as AZD9343 and AZD3355, and mGluR5 antagonists, such as 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), have been shown in small, randomized, controlled trials to have comparable efficacy to baclofen, but possibly a more favorable CNS side effect profile. Cannibinoid agonists, such as Delta(9)-THC, have also been demonstrated to reduce TLESRs and reflux events respectively. Macrolide antibiotics (eg, erythromycin) show early promise in a select group of patients with possible reflux associated post-lung transplant problems.

A Gut Feeling about GABA: Focus on GABA(B) Receptors

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the body and hence GABA-mediated neurotransmission regulates many physiological functions, including those in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. GABA is located throughout the GI tract and is found in enteric nerves as well as in endocrine-like cells, implicating GABA as both a neurotransmitter and an endocrine mediator influencing GI function. GABA mediates its effects via GABA receptors which are either ionotropic GABA(A) or metabotropic GABA(B). The latter which respond to the agonist baclofen have been least characterized, however accumulating data suggest that they play a key role in GI function in health and disease. Like GABA, GABA(B) receptors have been detected throughout the gut of several species in the enteric nervous system, muscle, epithelial layers as well as on endocrine-like cells. Such widespread distribution of this metabotropic GABA receptor is consistent with its significant modulatory role over intestinal motility, gastric emptying, gastric acid secretion, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and visceral sensation of painful colonic stimuli. More intriguing findings, the mechanisms underlying which have yet to be determined, suggest GABA(B) receptors inhibit GI carcinogenesis and tumor growth. Therefore, the diversity of GI functions regulated by GABA(B) receptors makes it a potentially useful target in the treatment of several GI disorders. In light of the development of novel compounds such as peripherally acting GABA(B) receptor agonists, positive allosteric modulators of the GABA(B) receptor and GABA producing enteric bacteria, we review and summarize current knowledge on the function of GABA(B) receptors within the GI tract.

Evolving drugs in gastroesophageal reflux disease: pharmacologic treatment beyond proton pump inhibitors

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Despite the clinical success of proton pump inhibitors to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), for the majority of patients in both gastroenterology and primary care clinics there is still a substantial group of patients (up to 40% in some studies) who do not completely respond symptomatically to a standard dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Specific explanations for these PPI noncomplete responders included transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), sensitivity to weakly acidic and/or alkaline reflux, large volume of reflux and esophageal hypersensitivity. There is a clear need for GERD therapies beyond the PPIs.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

These drug classes include the GABA(B) receptor agonists (including lesogaberan and arbaclofen placarbil), mGluR5 receptor antagonists, P-CABs, cholecystokinin(2) antagonists and add-on therapies to PPIs including mosapride and rikkunshito.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Both physicians and patients are eagerly awaiting the development and FDA approval of a new class of anti-GERD medications targeting distinct mechanisms. This article provides information on pharmacologic strategies, clinical trials and side-effect profiles on several of the most promising and heavily researched compounds being developed today for the treatment of GERD symptoms and inflammation. Hopefully, this important research will help a large group of PPI noncomplete responding patients receive symptomatic relief and reduce esophageal inflammation through a unique pharmacologic mechanism in the near future.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The treatment of GERD has greatly improved with the PPI class of therapy. Despite excellent success, there is a sizeable population of patients who do not have adequate response to therapies directed only at acid suppression. Emerging new pharmacologic treatment options show promise in further advancing the treatment success of GERD.

Treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: the new kids to block

Refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), defined as persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, is an increasingly prevalent condition and is becoming a major challenge for the clinician. Since non-acidic reflux may be associated with symptoms persisting during PPI treatment, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the most important barrier protecting against reflux, has become an important target for the treatment of (refractory) GERD. Preclinical research has identified several receptors that are involved in the control of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), the predominant mechanism of both acid and non-acidic reflux events, and several drugs have now been tested in humans. The GABA(B) agonist baclofen has demonstrated to effectively reduce the rate of TLESRs and the amount of reflux in both GERD patients and healthy volunteers. Nevertheless, the occurrence of central side effects limits its clinical use for the treatment of GERD. Several analogues are being developed to overcome this limitation and have shown promising results. Additionally, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) receptor antagonists have shown to reduce both acid and non-acidic reflux in GERD patients and several molecules are currently being evaluated. Although CB(1) antagonists have been shown to reduce TLESRs, they are also associated with central side effects, limiting their clinical applicability. Despite the identification of several potentially interesting drugs, the main challenge for the future remains the reduction of central side effects. Moreover, future studies will need to demonstrate the efficacy of these treatments in patients with refractory GERD.

The novel, peripherally restricted GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) inhibits acid reflux and reduces esophageal acid exposure as measured with 24-h pHmetry in dogs

While patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease generally respond well to proton pump inhibitors, 20-30% continue to experience troublesome symptoms. In such cases, agents that target transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation may be useful as add-on therapy to proton pump inhibitors. The GABAB receptor agonist baclofen inhibits transient LES relaxation but it is not an ideal agent due to central nervous system activity. Lesogaberan (AZD3355) is a peripherally restricted GABAB receptor agonist with limited central nervous system activity that inhibits transient LES relaxation in dogs. In the present study, the comparative effects of lesogaberan (7 micromol/kg) and baclofen (2.8 micromol/kg) on reflux were studied in dogs using 24-h pHmetry. Drugs (or vehicle control) were administered orally prior to the first meal of the day, and the number of reflux episodes (pH<4 for > or = 5 s) and acid exposure time were computed for the 24-h monitoring period. The mean (S.E.M.) number of reflux episodes/24 h was 4.6 (0.4) and 6.4 (0.6) for lesogaberan and baclofen, respectively, versus 10.7 (0.5) for control (P<0.0001 for both). Acid exposure time was 51.2 (4.5) min for control versus 23.6 (3.8) min for lesogaberan (P<0.0001) and 35.4 (6.5) min with baclofen (P=0.05). It is concluded that lesogaberan significantly reduces acid reflux in dogs, with comparable efficacy to baclofen.

GABAB receptor agonism as a novel therapeutic modality in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Defined pharmacologically by its insensitivity to the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline and sensitivity to the GABA analogue baclofen, the G protein-linked gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor couples to adenylyl cyclase, voltage-gated calcium channels, and inwardly-rectifying potassium channels. On the basis of a wealth of preclinical data in conjunction with early clinical observations that baclofen improves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the GABA(B) receptor has been proposed as a therapeutic target for a number of diseases including GERD. Subsequently, there has been a significant effort to develop a peripherally-restricted GABA(B) agonist that is devoid of the central nervous system side effects that are observed with baclofen. In this article we review the in vitro and in vivo pharmacology of the peripherally-restricted GABA(B) receptor agonists and the preclinical and clinical development of lesogaberan (AZD3355, (R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl) phosphinic acid), a potent and predominately peripherally-restricted GABA(B) receptor agonist with a preclinical therapeutic window superior to baclofen.