Dose-Response Analysis When There Is a Correlation between Affinity and Efficacy

Agonist efficiency links binding and gating in a nicotinic receptor

Receptors signal by switching between resting (C) and active (O) shapes ('gating') under the influence of agonists. The receptor's maximum response depends on the difference in agonist binding energy, O minus C. In nicotinic receptors, efficiency (η) represents the fraction of agonist binding energy applied to a local rearrangement (an induced fit) that initiates gating. In this receptor, free energy changes in gating and binding can be interchanged by the conversion factor η. Efficiencies estimated from concentration-response curves (23 agonists, 53 mutations) sort into five discrete classes (%): 0.56 (17), 0.51(32), 0.45(13), 0.41(26), and 0.31(12), implying that there are 5 C versus O binding site structural pairs. Within each class efficacy and affinity are corelated linearly, but multiple classes hide this relationship. η unites agonist binding with receptor gating and calibrates one link in a chain of coupled domain rearrangements that comprises the allosteric transition of the protein.

Glycine agonism in ionotropic glutamate receptors

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate the majority of excitatory neurotransmission in the vertebrate CNS. Classified as AMPA, kainate, delta and NMDA receptors, iGluRs are central drivers of synaptic plasticity widely considered as a major cellular substrate of learning and memory. Surprisingly however, five out of the eighteen vertebrate iGluR subunits do not bind glutamate but glycine, a neurotransmitter known to mediate inhibitory neurotransmission through its action on pentameric glycine receptors (GlyRs). This is the case of GluN1, GluN3A, GluN3B, GluD1 and GluD2 subunits, all also binding the D amino acid d-serine endogenously present in many brain regions. Glycine and d-serine action and affinities broadly differ between glycinergic iGluR subtypes. On 'conventional' GluN1/GluN2 NMDA receptors, glycine (or d-serine) acts in concert with glutamate as a mandatory co-agonist to set the level of receptor activity. It also regulates the receptor's trafficking and expression independently of glutamate. On 'unconventional' GluN1/GluN3 NMDARs, glycine acts as the sole agonist directly triggering opening of excitatory glycinergic channels recently shown to be physiologically relevant. On GluD receptors, d-serine on its own mediates non-ionotropic signaling involved in excitatory and inhibitory synaptogenesis, further reinforcing the concept of glutamate-insensitive iGluRs. Here we present an overview of our current knowledge on glycine and d-serine agonism in iGluRs emphasizing aspects related to molecular mechanisms, cellular function and pharmacological profile. The growing appreciation of the critical influence of glycine and d-serine on iGluR biology reshapes our understanding of iGluR signaling diversity and complexity, with important implications in neuropharmacology.

A Methyl Scan of the Pyrrolidinium Ring of Nicotine Reveals Significant Differences in Its Interactions with α7 and α4β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

The two major nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the brain are the α4β2 and α7 subtypes. A "methyl scan" of the pyrrolidinium ring was used to detect differences in nicotine's interactions with these two receptors. Each methylnicotine was investigated using voltage-clamp and radioligand binding techniques. Methylation at each ring carbon elicited unique changes in nicotine's receptor interactions. Replacing the 1'-N-methyl with an ethyl group or adding a second 1'-N-methyl group significantly reduced interaction with α4β2 but not α7 receptors. The 2'-methylation uniquely enhanced binding and agonist potency at α7 receptors. Although 3'- and 5'-trans-methylations were much better tolerated by α7 receptors than α4β2 receptors, 4'-methylation decreased potency and efficacy at α7 receptors much more than at α4β2 receptors. Whereas cis-5'-methylnicotine lacked agonist activity and displayed a low affinity at both receptors, trans-5'-methylnicotine retained considerable α7 receptor activity. Differences between the two 5'-methylated analogs of the potent pyridyl oxymethylene-bridged nicotine analog A84543 were consistent with what was found for the 5'-methylnicotines. Computer docking of the methylnicotines to the Lymnaea acetylcholine binding protein crystal structure containing two persistent waters predicted most of the changes in receptor affinity that were observed with methylation, particularly the lower affinities of the cis-methylnicotines. The much smaller effects of 1'-, 3'-, and 5'-methylations and the greater effects of 2'- and 4'-methylations on nicotine α7 nAChR interaction might be exploited for the design of new drugs based on the nicotine scaffold. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Using a comprehensive "methyl scan" approach, we show that the orthosteric binding sites for acetylcholine and nicotine in the two major brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors interact differently with the pyrrolidinium ring of nicotine, and we suggest reasons for the higher affinity of nicotine for the heteromeric receptor. Potential sites for nicotine structure modification were identified that may be useful in the design of new drugs targeting these receptors.

Uric Acid Has Direct Proinflammatory Effects on Human Macrophages by Increasing Proinflammatory Mediators and Bacterial Phagocytosis Probably via URAT1

The relationship of uric acid with macrophages has not been fully elucidated. We investigated the effect of uric acid on the proinflammatory ability of human macrophages and then examined the possible molecular mechanism involved. Primary human monocytes were differentiated into macrophages for subsequent exposure to 0, 0.23, 0.45, or 0.9 mmol/L uric acid for 12 h, in the presence or absence of 1 mmol/L probenecid. Flow cytometry was used to measure proinflammatory marker production and phagocytic activity that was quantified as a percentage of GFP-labeled Escherichia coli positive macrophages. qPCR was used to measure the macrophage expression of the urate anion transporter 1 (URAT1). As compared to control cells, the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and cluster of differentiation (CD) 11c was significantly increased by uric acid. In contrast, macrophages expressing CD206, CX3C-motif chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1), and C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) were significantly reduced. Uric acid progressively increased macrophage phagocytic activity and downregulated URAT1 expression. Probenecid-a non-specific blocker of URAT1-dependent uric acid transport-inhibited both proinflammatory cytokine production and phagocytic activity in macrophages that were exposed to uric acid. These results suggest that uric acid has direct proinflammatory effects on macrophages possibly via URAT1.

Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change

Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on the resting/active agonist-binding energy ratio. In a plot of activation energy versus binding energy (an "efficiency" plot), the slope gives η and the y intercept gives the receptor's intrinsic activation energy (without agonists; ΔG₀). We used single-channel electrophysiology to estimate η for eight different agonists and ΔG₀ in human endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). From published equilibrium constants, we also estimated η for agonists of K_Ca1.1 (BK channels) and muscarinic, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glycine, and aryl-hydrocarbon receptors, and ΔG₀ for all of these except K_Ca1.1. Regarding AChRs, η is 48-56% for agonists related structurally to acetylcholine but is only ∼39% for agonists related to epibatidine; ΔG₀ is 8.4 kcal/mol in adult and 9.6 kcal/mol in fetal receptors. Efficiency plots for all of the above receptors are approximately linear, with η values between 12% and 57% and ΔG₀ values between 2 and 12 kcal/mol. Efficiency appears to be a general attribute of agonist action at receptor binding sites that is useful for understanding binding mechanisms, categorizing agonists, and estimating concentration-response relationships.

Analysis of Biased Agonism

Agonists and most natural ligands bind to receptors in their inactive state and quickly induce an active receptor conformation that initiates cell signaling. The active receptor state initiates signaling because of its structural complementariness with coupling proteins that activate signaling pathways, such as G proteins and G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Agonist bias refers to the propensity of an agonist to direct receptor signaling through one pathway relative to another. Thus, if the agonist exhibits much higher affinity for active state 1 compared to active state 2, it will cause a robust activation of receptor coupling protein 1 but not 2, and ultimately, a preferential stimulation of signaling pathway 1. Biased agonists are potentially more selective therapeutic agents because there are numerous cases where the therapeutic and adverse effects of an agonist are mediated by distinct pathways involving G proteins and β-arrestin. Given the mechanism for agonist bias, the most straightforward approach for quantifying bias involves the estimation of agonist affinity for the inactive receptor state and the active receptor states involved in signaling through different pathways. The approach provides quantitative estimates of the sensitivities of different signaling pathways, enabling one to determine to what extent the observed selectivity is caused by agonist or system bias. In addition, the approach is a powerful adjunct to in silico docking studies and can be applied to in vivo assays, structure-activity relationships, and the analysis of published agonist concentration-response curves.

Cyclic activation of endplate acetylcholine receptors

Agonists turn on receptors because they have a higher affinity for active versus resting conformations of the protein. Activation can occur by either of two pathways that connect to form a cycle: Agonists bind to resting receptors that then become active, or resting receptors activate and then bind agonists. We used mutations to construct endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) having only one functional neurotransmitter-binding site and single-channel electrophysiology to measure independently binding constants for four different agonists, to both resting and active conformations of each site. For all agonists and sites, the total free energy change in each pathway was the same, confirming the activation cycle without external energy. Other results show that (i) there is no cooperativity between sites; (ii) agonist association is slower than diffusion in resting receptors but nearly diffusional in active receptors; (iii) whereas resting affinity is determined mainly by agonist association, active affinity is determined mainly by agonist dissociation; and (iv) at each site and for all agonists, receptor activation approximately doubles the agonist-binding free energy. We discuss a two-step mechanism for binding that involves diffusion and a local conformational change ("catch") that is modulated by receptor activation. The results suggest that binding to a resting site and the switch to high affinity are both integral parts of a single allosteric transition. We hypothesize that catch ensures proper signal recognition in complex chemical environments and that binding site compaction is a determinant of both resting and active affinity.

Structural mechanisms of activation and desensitization in neurotransmitter-gated ion channels

Ion channels gated by neurotransmitters are present across metazoans, in which they are essential for brain function, sensation and locomotion; closely related homologs are also found in bacteria. Structures of eukaryotic pentameric cysteine-loop (Cys-loop) receptors and tetrameric ionotropic glutamate receptors in multiple functional states have recently become available. Here, I describe how these studies relate to established ideas regarding receptor activation and how they have enabled decades' worth of functional work to be pieced together, thus allowing previously puzzling aspects of receptor activity to be understood.

Mechanism of partial agonism in AMPA-type glutamate receptors

Neurotransmitters trigger synaptic currents by activating ligand-gated ion channel receptors. Whereas most neurotransmitters are efficacious agonists, molecules that activate receptors more weakly-partial agonists-also exist. Whether these partial agonists have weak activity because they stabilize less active forms, sustain active states for a lesser fraction of the time or both, remains an open question. Here we describe the crystal structure of an α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptor (AMPAR) ligand binding domain (LBD) tetramer in complex with the partial agonist 5-fluorowillardiine (FW). We validate this structure, and others of different geometry, using engineered intersubunit bridges. We establish an inverse relation between the efficacy of an agonist and its promiscuity to drive the LBD layer into different conformations. These results suggest that partial agonists of the AMPAR are weak activators of the receptor because they stabilize multiple non-conducting conformations, indicating that agonism is a function of both the space and time domains.

Molecular recognition at cholinergic synapses: acetylcholine versus choline

KEY POINTS

Neuromuscular acetylcholine (ACh) receptors have a high affinity for the neurotransmitter ACh and a low affinity for its metabolic product choline. At each transmitter binding site three aromatic groups determine affinity, and together provide ∼50% more binding energy for ACh than for choline. Deprotonation of αY190 by a nearby lysine strengthens the interaction between this aromatic ring and both ACh and choline. H-bonds position ACh and choline differently in the aromatic cage to generate the different affinities.

ABSTRACT

Acetylcholine (ACh) released at the vertebrate nerve-muscle synapse is hydrolysed rapidly to choline (Cho), so endplate receptors (AChRs) are exposed to high concentrations of both of these structurally related ligands. To understand how these receptors distinguish ACh and Cho, we used single-channel electrophysiology to measure resting affinities (binding free energies) of these and other agonists in adult-type mouse AChRs having a mutation(s) at the transmitter-binding sites. The aromatic rings of αY190, αW149 and αY198 each provide ∼50% less binding energy for Cho compared to ACh. At αY198 a phenylalanine substitution had no effect, but at αY190 this substitution caused a large, agonist-independent loss in binding energy that depended on the presence of αK145. The results suggest that (1) αY190 is deprotonated by αK145 to strengthen the interaction between this benzene ring and the agonist's quaternary ammonium (QA) and (2) AChRs respond strongly to ACh because an H-bond positions the QA to interact optimally with the rings, and weakly to Cho because a different H-bond tethers the ligand to misalign the QA and form weaker interactions with the aromatic groups. The results suggest that the difference in ACh versus Cho binding energies is determined by different ligand positions within a fixed protein structure.