The neurobiology of tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis: a model for regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I gene transcription within nigrostriatal dopamine neurons

Within the brain, the reduced pteridine cofactor 6R-L-erythro-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) is absolutely required for the synthesis of the monoamine (MA) neurotransmitters dopamine (DA), norepinephrine, epinephrine (E), and serotonin (5-HT), the novel gaseous neurotransmitter nitric oxide and the production of yet to be identified 1-O-alkylglycerol-derived lipids. GTP cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH) catalyzes the first and limiting step in the BH4 biosynthetic pathway, which is now thought to involve up to eight different proteins supporting six alternate de novo and two alternate salvage pathways. Gene expression analysis across different regions of the human brain shows the abundance of transcripts coding for all eight of these proteins to be highly correlated with each other and to be enriched within human MA neurons. The potential for multiple routes for BH4 synthesis therefore exists within the human brain. GTPCH expression is particularly heterogeneous across different populations of human and rodent MA-containing neurons, with low expression levels and therefore BH4 being a characteristic of nigrostriatal DA (NSDA) neurons. Basic knowledge of how GCH1 gene transcription is controlled within NSDA neurons may explain the distinctive susceptibility of these neurons to human genetic mutations that result in BH4 deficiency. A model for cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent GCH1 transcription is described that involves a unique combination of DNA regulatory sequences and transcription factors. This model proposes that low levels of GCH1 transcription within NSDA neurons are driven by their distinctive physiology, suggesting that pharmacological manipulation of GCH1 gene transcription can be used to modify BH4 levels and therefore DA synthesis in the basal ganglia.

NF-Y and the transcriptional activation of CCAAT promoters

The CCAAT box promoter element and NF-Y, the transcription factor (TF) that binds to it, were among the first cis-elements and trans-acting factors identified; their interplay is required for transcriptional activation of a sizeable number of eukaryotic genes. NF-Y consists of three evolutionarily conserved subunits: a dimer of NF-YB and NF-YC which closely resembles a histone, and the "innovative" NF-YA. In this review, we will provide an update on the functional and biological features that make NF-Y a fundamental link between chromatin and transcription. The last 25 years have witnessed a spectacular increase in our knowledge of how genes are regulated: from the identification of cis-acting sequences in promoters and enhancers, and the biochemical characterization of the corresponding TFs, to the merging of chromatin studies with the investigation of enzymatic machines that regulate epigenetic states. Originally identified and studied in yeast and mammals, NF-Y - also termed CBF and CP1 - is composed of three subunits, NF-YA, NF-YB and NF-YC. The complex recognizes the CCAAT pentanucleotide and specific flanking nucleotides with high specificity (Dorn et al., 1997; Hatamochi et al., 1988; Hooft van Huijsduijnen et al, 1987; Kim & Sheffery, 1990). A compelling set of bioinformatics studies clarified that the NF-Y preferred binding site is one of the most frequent promoter elements (Suzuki et al., 2001, 2004; Elkon et al., 2003; Mariño-Ramírez et al., 2004; FitzGerald et al., 2004; Linhart et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2007; Abnizova et al., 2007; Grskovic et al., 2007; Halperin et al., 2009; Häkkinen et al., 2011). The same consensus, as determined by mutagenesis and SELEX studies (Bi et al., 1997), was also retrieved in ChIP-on-chip analysis (Testa et al., 2005; Ceribelli et al., 2006; Ceribelli et al., 2008; Reed et al., 2008). Additional structural features of the CCAAT box - position, orientation, presence of multiple Transcriptional Start Sites - were previously reviewed (Dolfini et al., 2009) and will not be considered in detail here.

Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins

The function of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-binding proteins is key to understanding how SUMOylation regulates cellular processes. We identified two related Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins, Rfp1 and Rfp2, each having an N-terminal SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) and a C-terminal RING-finger domain. Genetic analysis shows that Rfp1 and Rfp2 have redundant functions; together, they are essential for cell growth and genome stability. Mammalian RNF4, an active ubiquitin E3 ligase, is an orthologue of Rfp1/Rfp2. Rfp1 and Rfp2 lack E3 activity but recruit Slx8, an active RING-finger ubiquitin ligase, through a RING-RING interaction, to form a functional E3. RNF4 complements the growth and genomic stability defects of rfp1rfp2, slx8, and rfp1rfp2slx8 mutant cells. Both the Rfp-Slx8 complex and RNF4 specifically ubiquitylate artificial SUMO-containing substrates in vitro in a SUMO binding-dependent manner. SUMOylated proteins accumulate in rfp1rfp2 double-null cells, suggesting that Rfp/Slx8 proteins may promote ubiquitin-dependent degradation of SUMOylated targets. Hence, we describe a family of SIM-containing RING-finger proteins that potentially regulates eukaryotic genome stability through linking SUMO-interaction with ubiquitin conjugation.

Regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I expression by orphan receptor Nurr1 in cell culture and in vivo

Nurr1 is an orphan nuclear transcription factor essential for the terminal differentiation of dopamine (DA) neurons in the ventral midbrain (VM). To identify the Nurr1-target genes, we carried out microarray and quantitative real-time PCR analyses of Nurr1 null and wild-type mice in VM at embryonic day (E) 12.5 and shortly after birth (P0). In addition to the absence of mRNAs of DA synthesizing enzymes, the guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP) cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH) was also substantially reduced in the VM of Nurr1-null mice. GTPCH is the first enzyme in the synthesis pathway of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), an essential cofactor for tyrosine hydroxylase in DA synthesis. In the mouse, Nurr1 and GTPCH mRNA were first detected at E10.5, and GTPCH transcription paralleled that of Nurr1. Small interfering RNA targeted against Nurr1 decreases GTPCH expression in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts in cell culture. Cotransfection of Nurr1 and the GTPCH-luciferase (luc) reporter increased the luc activity by about threefold in N2A cells. Additional analysis using 5'-deletions and mutants revealed that Nurr1 activates GTPCH transcription indirectly through the proximal promoter region, in the absence of the nerve growth factor-induced clone B (NGFI-B) responsive element-like sites, similarly, as recently reported for DA transporter regulation by Nurr1.

Protein kinase A-dependent recruitment of RNA polymerase II, C/EBP beta and NF-Y to the rat GTP cyclohydrolase I proximal promoter occurs without alterations in histone acetylation

Cyclic-AMP stimulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH1) gene transcription was investigated in PC12 cells, the protein kinase A-deficient PC12 cell line 126-1B2 and C6 cells using transient transfection assays of proximal promoter reporter constructs and wild type or dominant negative proteins, chromatin immunoprecipitation and real-time quantitative PCR. These studies show that protein kinase A is necessary and sufficient for cAMP-dependent transcription conferred by both the cAMP regulatory element and the adjacent CCAAT-box. In intact cells these cis-elements were shown to bind cAMP response element binding protein, CCAAT-enhancer binding protein beta and nuclear factor-Y, with each protein controlling a different aspect of the cAMP response. Cyclic-AMP acting through protein kinase A stimulated promoter recruitment of CCAAT-enhancer binding protein beta, nuclear factor-Y and RNA polymerase II while depleting the promoter of cyclic-AMP response element binding protein. Stimulation of transcription by cAMP was not associated with increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4 at proximal promoter nucleosomes, indicating that histone acetyltransferases are not involved in this response. Nonetheless, pharmacological inhibition of histone deacetylase activity did increase histone H4 acetylation and the recruitment of RNA polymerase II, indicating that histone acetyltransferases are normally associated with the proximal promoter. Only in C6 cells, however, did inhibition of histone deacetylases stimulate transcription and synergize with cAMP. These experiments provide the first glimpse of the GCH1 gene promoter functioning within intact cells and supply evidence for the involvement of histone acetyltransferase-containing complexes in GCH1 gene transcription.