Molecular basis of junctional current rectification at an electrical synapse

Correcting instructive electric potential patterns in multicellular systems: External actions and endogenous processes

BACKGROUND

Transmembrane electrical potential differences in cells modulate the spatio-temporal distribution of signaling ions and molecules that are instructive for downstream signaling pathways in multicellular systems. The local coupling between bioelectricity and protein transcription patterns allows dynamic subsystems (modules) of cells that share the same bioelectrical state to show similar biochemical downstream processes.

METHODS

We simulate theoretically how the integration-segregation pattern formed by the different multicellular modules that define a biosystem can be controlled by multicellular potentials. To this end, we couple together the model equations of the bioelectrical network to those of the genetic network.

RESULTS

The coupling provided by the intercellular junctions and the external microenvironment allows the restoration of the target bioelectrical pattern by changing the transcription rate of specific ion channels, the post-translational blocking of these channels, and changes in the environmental ionic concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The simulations show that the single-cell feedback between bioelectrical and transcriptional processes, together with the coupling provided by the intercellular junctions and the environment, can correct large-scale patterns by means of suitable external actions.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides a theoretical advancement in the understanding of how the multicellular bioelectric coupling may guide repolarizing interventions for regenerating a tissue, with potential implications in biomedicine.

An assessment of genome-editing efficiency of a newly developed Cas9 in C. elegans

Minimizing the off-target effects of the programmable genome editing tool CRISPR/Cas9 is critical for its potential therapeutic applications. A recent study reported a new Cas9 variant, SuperFi-Cas9, that dramatically reduces off-target DNA cleavage while retaining on-target DNA cleavage activity in in vitro assays. Here we evaluated the genome editing potential of SuperFi-Cas9 by examining its efficiency in mutagenizing targeted genes in the nematode C. elegans . We found that gene mutagenesis rates induced by SuperFi-Cas9 through either non-homologous end joining or homology-directed repair were much lower than those by the wild type Cas9, indicating that Super-Cas9 had very low in vivo DNA cleavage activity. Our results also suggest that C. elegans may serve as an excellent model system for assessing in vivo genome-editing efficiency of newly-developed Cas9 variants.

Intrinsic Sources and Functional Impacts of Asymmetry at Electrical Synapses

Electrical synapses couple inhibitory neurons across the brain, underlying a variety of functions that are modifiable by activity. Despite recent advances, many functions and contributions of electrical synapses within neural circuitry remain underappreciated. Among these are the sources and impacts of electrical synapse asymmetry. Using multi-compartmental models of neurons coupled through dendritic electrical synapses, we investigated intrinsic factors that contribute to effective synaptic asymmetry and that result in modulation of spike timing and synchrony between coupled cells. We show that electrical synapse location along a dendrite, input resistance, internal dendritic resistance, or directional conduction of the electrical synapse itself each alter asymmetry as measured by coupling between cell somas. Conversely, we note that asymmetrical gap junction (GJ) conductance can be masked by each of these properties. Furthermore, we show that asymmetry modulates spike timing and latency of coupled cells by up to tens of milliseconds, depending on direction of conduction or dendritic location of the electrical synapse. Coordination of rhythmic activity between two cells also depends on asymmetry. These simulations illustrate that causes of asymmetry are diverse, may not be apparent in somatic measurements of electrical coupling, influence dendritic processing, and produce a variety of outcomes on spiking and synchrony of coupled cells. Our findings highlight aspects of electrical synapses that should always be included in experimental demonstrations of coupling, and when assembling simulated networks containing electrical synapses.

Function and Plasticity of Electrical Synapses in the Mammalian Brain: Role of Non-Junctional Mechanisms

Simple Summary

Relevant brain functions, such as perception, organization of behavior, and cognitive processes, are the outcome of information processing by neural circuits. Within these circuits, communication between neurons mainly relies on two modalities of synaptic transmission: chemical and electrical. Moreover, changes in the strength of these connections, aka synaptic plasticity, are believed to underlie processes of learning and memory, and its dysfunction has been suggested to underlie a variety of neurological disorders. While the relevance of chemical transmission and its plastic changes are known in great detail, analogous mechanisms and functional impact of their electrical counterparts were only recently acknowledged. In this article, we review the basic physical principles behind electrical transmission between neurons, the plethora of functional operations supported by this modality of neuron-to-neuron communication, as well as the basic principles of plasticity at these synapses.

Abstract

Electrical transmission between neurons is largely mediated by gap junctions. These junctions allow the direct flow of electric current between neurons, and in mammals, they are mostly composed of the protein connexin36. Circuits of electrically coupled neurons are widespread in these animals. Plus, experimental and theoretical evidence supports the notion that, beyond synchronicity, these circuits are able to perform sophisticated operations such as lateral excitation and inhibition, noise reduction, as well as the ability to selectively respond upon coincident excitatory inputs. Although once considered stereotyped and unmodifiable, we now know that electrical synapses are subject to modulation and, by reconfiguring neural circuits, these modulations can alter relevant operations. The strength of electrical synapses depends on the gap junction resistance, as well as on its functional interaction with the electrophysiological properties of coupled neurons. In particular, voltage and ligand gated channels of the non-synaptic membrane critically determine the efficacy of transmission at these contacts. Consistently, modulatory actions on these channels have been shown to represent relevant mechanisms of plasticity of electrical synaptic transmission. Here, we review recent evidence on the regulation of electrical synapses of mammals, the underlying molecular mechanisms, and the possible ways in which they affect circuit function.

Behavioral control by depolarized and hyperpolarized states of an integrating neuron

Coordinated transitions between mutually exclusive motor states are central to behavioral decisions. During locomotion, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans spontaneously cycles between forward runs, reversals, and turns with complex but predictable dynamics. Here, we provide insight into these dynamics by demonstrating how RIM interneurons, which are active during reversals, act in two modes to stabilize both forward runs and reversals. By systematically quantifying the roles of RIM outputs during spontaneous behavior, we show that RIM lengthens reversals when depolarized through glutamate and tyramine neurotransmitters and lengthens forward runs when hyperpolarized through its gap junctions. RIM is not merely silent upon hyperpolarization: RIM gap junctions actively reinforce a hyperpolarized state of the reversal circuit. Additionally, the combined outputs of chemical synapses and gap junctions from RIM regulate forward-to-reversal transitions. Our results indicate that multiple classes of RIM synapses create behavioral inertia during spontaneous locomotion.

GABAergic motor neurons bias locomotor decision-making in C. elegans

Proper threat-reward decision-making is critical to animal survival. Emerging evidence indicates that the motor system may participate in decision-making but the neural circuit and molecular bases for these functions are little known. We found in C. elegans that GABAergic motor neurons (D-MNs) bias toward the reward behavior in threat-reward decision-making by retrogradely inhibiting a pair of premotor command interneurons, AVA, that control cholinergic motor neurons in the avoidance neural circuit. This function of D-MNs is mediated by a specific ionotropic GABA receptor (UNC-49) in AVA, and depends on electrical coupling between the two AVA interneurons. Our results suggest that AVA are hub neurons where sensory inputs from threat and reward sensory modalities and motor information from D-MNs are integrated. This study demonstrates at single-neuron resolution how motor neurons may help shape threat-reward choice behaviors through interacting with other neurons.