PLK1 regulates the PrimPol damage tolerance pathway during the cell cycle

Balancing Plk1 activity levels: The secret of synchrony between the cell and the centrosome cycle

The accuracy of cell division requires precise regulation of the cellular machinery governing DNA/genome duplication, ensuring its equal distribution among the daughter cells. The control of the centrosome cycle is crucial for the formation of a bipolar spindle, ensuring error-free segregation of the genome. The cell and centrosome cycles operate in close synchrony along similar principles. Both require a single duplication round in every cell cycle, and both are controlled by the activity of key protein kinases. Nevertheless, our comprehension of the precise cellular mechanisms and critical regulators synchronizing these two cycles remains poorly defined. Here, we present our hypothesis that the spatiotemporal regulation of a dynamic equilibrium of mitotic kinases activities forms a molecular clock that governs the synchronous progression of both the cell and the centrosome cycles.

The Eyes Absent family: At the intersection of DNA repair, mitosis, and replication

The Eyes Absent family (EYA1-4) are a group of dual function proteins that act as both tyrosine phosphatases and transcriptional co-activators. EYA proteins play a vital role in development, but are also aberrantly overexpressed in cancers, where they often confer an oncogenic effect. Precisely how the EYAs impact cell biology is of growing interest, fuelled by the therapeutic potential of an expanding repertoire of EYA inhibitors. Recent functional studies suggest that the EYAs are important players in the regulation of genome maintenance pathways including DNA repair, mitosis, and DNA replication. While the characterized molecular mechanisms have predominantly been ascribed to EYA phosphatase activities, EYA co-transcriptional activity has also been found to impact the expression of genes that support these pathways. This indicates functional convergence of EYA phosphatase and co-transcriptional activities, highlighting the emerging importance of the EYA protein family at the intersection of genome maintenance mechanisms. In this review, we discuss recent progress in defining EYA protein substrates and transcriptional effects, specifically in the context of genome maintenance. We then outline future directions relevant to the field and discuss the clinical utility of EYA inhibitors.

"Bridging the DNA divide": Understanding the interplay between replication- gaps and homologous recombination proteins RAD51 and BRCA1/2

A key but often neglected component of genomic instability is the emergence of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps during DNA replication in the absence of functional homologous recombination (HR) proteins, such as RAD51 and BRCA1/2. Research in prokaryotes has shed light on the dual role of RAD51's bacterial ortholog, RecA, in HR and the protection of replication forks, emphasizing its essential role in preventing the formation of ssDNA gaps, which is vital for cellular viability. This phenomenon was corroborated in eukaryotic cells deficient in HR, where the formation of ssDNA gaps within newly synthesized DNA and their subsequent processing by the MRE11 nuclease were observed. Without functional HR proteins, cells employ alternative ssDNA gap-filling mechanisms to ensure survival, though this compensatory response can compromise genomic stability. A notable example is the involvement of the translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase POLζ, along with the repair protein POLθ, in the suppression of replicative ssDNA gaps. Persistent ssDNA gaps may result in replication fork collapse, chromosomal anomalies, and cell death, which contribute to cancer progression and resistance to therapy. Elucidating the processes that avert ssDNA gaps and safeguard replication forks is critical for enhancing cancer treatment approaches by exploiting the vulnerabilities of cancer cells in these pathways.

Human CST complex restricts excessive PrimPol repriming upon UV induced replication stress by suppressing p21

DNA replication stress, caused by various endogenous and exogenous agents, halt or stall DNA replication progression. Cells have developed diverse mechanisms to tolerate and overcome replication stress, enabling them to continue replication. One effective strategy to overcome stalled replication involves skipping the DNA lesion using a specialized polymerase known as PrimPol, which reinitiates DNA synthesis downstream of the damage. However, the mechanism regulating PrimPol repriming is largely unclear. In this study, we observe that knockdown of STN1 or CTC1, components of the CTC1/STN1/TEN1 complex, leads to enhanced replication progression following UV exposure. We find that such increased replication is dependent on PrimPol, and PrimPol recruitment to stalled forks increases upon CST depletion. Moreover, we find that p21 is upregulated in STN1-depleted cells in a p53-independent manner, and p21 depletion restores normal replication rates caused by STN1 deficiency. We identify that p21 interacts with PrimPol, and STN1 depletion stimulates p21-PrimPol interaction and facilitates PrimPol recruitment to stalled forks. Our findings reveal a previously undescribed interplay between CST, PrimPol and p21 in promoting repriming in response to stalled replication, and shed light on the regulation of PrimPol repriming at stalled forks.

An ATR-PrimPol pathway confers tolerance to oncogenic KRAS-induced and heterochromatin-associated replication stress

Activation of the KRAS oncogene is a source of replication stress, but how this stress is generated and how it is tolerated by cancer cells remain poorly understood. Here we show that induction of KRASG12V expression in untransformed cells triggers H3K27me3 and HP1-associated chromatin compaction in an RNA transcription dependent manner, resulting in replication fork slowing and cell death. Furthermore, elevated ATR expression is necessary and sufficient for tolerance of KRASG12V-induced replication stress to expand replication stress-tolerant cells (RSTCs). PrimPol is phosphorylated at Ser255, a potential Chk1 substrate site, under KRASG12V-induced replication stress and promotes repriming to maintain fork progression and cell survival in an ATR/Chk1-dependent manner. However, ssDNA gaps are generated at heterochromatin by PrimPol-dependent repriming, leading to genomic instability. These results reveal a role of ATR-PrimPol in enabling precancerous cells to survive KRAS-induced replication stress and expand clonally with accumulation of genomic instability.

Regulation of Human DNA Primase-Polymerase PrimPol

Transmission of genetic information depends on successful completion of DNA replication. Genomic DNA is subjected to damage on a daily basis. DNA lesions create obstacles for DNA polymerases and can lead to the replication blockage, formation of DNA breaks, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. Cells have evolutionary adapted to DNA damage by developing mechanisms allowing elimination of lesions prior to DNA replication (DNA repair) and helping to bypass lesions during DNA synthesis (DNA damage tolerance). The second group of mechanisms includes the restart of DNA synthesis at the sites of DNA damage by DNA primase-polymerase PrimPol. Human PrimPol was described in 2013. The properties and functions of this enzyme have been extensively studied in recent years, but very little is known about the regulation of PrimPol and association between the enzyme dysfunction and diseases. In this review, we described the mechanisms of human PrimPol regulation in the context of DNA replication, discussed in detail interactions of PrimPol with other proteins, and proposed possible pathways for the regulation of human PrimPol activity. The article also addresses the association of PrimPol dysfunction with human diseases.

The Adaptive Mechanisms and Checkpoint Responses to a Stressed DNA Replication Fork

DNA replication is a tightly controlled process that ensures the faithful duplication of the genome. However, DNA damage arising from both endogenous and exogenous assaults gives rise to DNA replication stress associated with replication fork slowing or stalling. Therefore, protecting the stressed fork while prompting its recovery to complete DNA replication is critical for safeguarding genomic integrity and cell survival. Specifically, the plasticity of the replication fork in engaging distinct DNA damage tolerance mechanisms, including fork reversal, repriming, and translesion DNA synthesis, enables cells to overcome a variety of replication obstacles. Furthermore, stretches of single-stranded DNA generated upon fork stalling trigger the activation of the ATR kinase, which coordinates the cellular responses to replication stress by stabilizing the replication fork, promoting DNA repair, and controlling cell cycle and replication origin firing. Deregulation of the ATR checkpoint and aberrant levels of chronic replication stress is a common characteristic of cancer and a point of vulnerability being exploited in cancer therapy. Here, we discuss the various adaptive responses of a replication fork to replication stress and the roles of ATR signaling that bring fork stabilization mechanisms together. We also review how this knowledge is being harnessed for the development of checkpoint inhibitors to trigger the replication catastrophe of cancer cells.

PARP Inhibitors and Proteins Interacting with SLX4

PARP inhibitors are small molecules currently used with success in the treatment of certain cancer patients. Their action was first shown to be specific to cells with DNA repair deficiencies, such as BRCA-mutant cancers. However, recent work has suggested clinical interest of these drugs beyond this group of patients. Preclinical data on relationships between the activity of PARP inhibitors and other proteins involved in DNA repair exist, and this review will only highlight findings on the SLX4 protein and its interacting protein partners. As suggested from these available data and depending on further validations, new treatment strategies could be developed in order to broaden the use for PARP inhibitors in cancer patients.

Research on the mechanisms of Shu Yu wan in the treatment of cervical cancer based on network pharmacology analyses and molecular docking technology

Combining network pharmacology with molecular docking, our study revealed the candidate targets and mechanisms of Shu Yu Wan (SYW) for treating cervical cancer (CC). The targets associated with CC and active compounds in SYW were identified through TCGA, GeneCards and TCMSP databases. Consequently, a total of 16 active compounds in SYW and 38 common targets related to CC were predicted. Genes TP53 and CDK2 are among the hub genes in the PPI network. The results of GO and KEGG enrichment analyses suggested that SYW exerted pharmacological effects on CC by regulating cellular senescence, p53 signaling pathway, cell cycle, apoptosis, viral carcinogenesis and human papillomavirus infection (HPV) signaling pathway. Finally, molecular docking confirmed a strong binding affinity between the main active compounds of SYW with the core target proteins.

PRIMPOL competes with RAD51 to resolve G-quadruplex-induced replication stress via its interaction with RPA

<p indent="0mm">PRIMPOL (primase-polymerase) is a recently discovered DNA primase-polymerase involved in DNA damage tolerance and replication stress response in eukaryotic cells. However, the detailed mechanism of the PRIMPOL response to replication stress remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that replication-related factors, including replication protein A (RPA), regulate the accumulation of PRIMPOL in subnuclear foci in response to replication stress induced by replication inhibitors. Moreover, PRIMPOL works at G-quadruplexes (G4s) in human cells to resolve the replication stress induced by G4s. The formation of PRIMPOL foci persists throughout the cell cycle. We further demonstrate that PRIMPOL competes with RAD51 to resolve G4-induced replication stress. In conclusion, our results provide novel insight into the mechanism of PRIMPOL in G4s to resolve replication stress and competition between PRIMPOL (repriming)- and RAD51 (fork reversal)-mediated pathways, which indicates a new strategy to improve the tumor response to DNA-damaging chemotherapy by targeting the PRIMPOL pathway.</p>.

CHK1 phosphorylates PRIMPOL to promote replication stress tolerance

Replication-coupled DNA repair and damage tolerance mechanisms overcome replication stress challenges and complete DNA synthesis. These pathways include fork reversal, translesion synthesis, and repriming by specialized polymerases such as PRIMPOL. Here, we investigated how these pathways are used and regulated in response to varying replication stresses. Blocking lagging-strand priming using a POLα inhibitor slows both leading- and lagging-strand synthesis due in part to RAD51-, HLTF-, and ZRANB3-mediated, but SMARCAL1-independent, fork reversal. ATR is activated, but CHK1 signaling is dampened compared to stalling both the leading and lagging strands with hydroxyurea. Increasing CHK1 activation by overexpressing CLASPIN in POLα-inhibited cells promotes replication elongation through PRIMPOL-dependent repriming. CHK1 phosphorylates PRIMPOL to promote repriming irrespective of the type of replication stress, and this phosphorylation is important for cellular resistance to DNA damage. However, PRIMPOL activation comes at the expense of single-strand gap formation, and constitutive PRIMPOL activity results in reduced cell fitness.

PrimPol: A Breakthrough among DNA Replication Enzymes and a Potential New Target for Cancer Therapy

DNA replication can encounter blocking obstacles, leading to replication stress and genome instability. There are several mechanisms for evading this blockade. One mechanism consists of repriming ahead of the obstacles, creating a new starting point; in humans, PrimPol is responsible for carrying out this task. PrimPol is a primase that operates in both the nucleus and mitochondria. In contrast with conventional primases, PrimPol is a DNA primase able to initiate DNA synthesis de novo using deoxynucleotides, discriminating against ribonucleotides. In vitro, PrimPol can act as a DNA primase, elongating primers that PrimPol itself sythesizes, or as translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerase, elongating pre-existing primers across lesions. However, the lack of evidence for PrimPol polymerase activity in vivo suggests that PrimPol only acts as a DNA primase. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of human PrimPol covering its biochemical properties and structure, in vivo function and regulation, and the processes that take place to fill the gap-containing lesion that PrimPol leaves behind. Finally, we explore the available data on human PrimPol expression in different tissues in physiological conditions and its role in cancer.