Response to Comment on "Uracil DNA Glycosylase Activity Is Dispensable for Immunoglobulin Class Switch"

The Complex Interplay between DNA Injury and Repair in Enzymatically Induced Mutagenesis and DNA Damage in B Lymphocytes

Lymphocytes are endowed with unique and specialized enzymatic mutagenic properties that allow them to diversify their antigen receptors, which are crucial sensors for pathogens and mediators of adaptive immunity. During lymphocyte development, the antigen receptors expressed by B and T lymphocytes are assembled in an antigen-independent fashion by ordered variable gene segment recombinations (V(D)J recombination), which is a highly ordered and regulated process that requires the recombination activating gene products 1 & 2 (RAG1, RAG2). Upon activation by antigen, B lymphocytes undergo additional diversifications of their immunoglobulin B-cell receptors. Enzymatically induced somatic hypermutation (SHM) and immunoglobulin class switch recombination (CSR) improves the affinity for antigen and shape the effector function of the humoral immune response, respectively. The activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) enzyme is crucial for both SHM and CSR. These processes have evolved to both utilize as well as evade different DNA repair and DNA damage response pathways. The delicate balance between enzymatic mutagenesis and DNA repair is crucial for effective immune responses and the maintenance of genomic integrity. Not surprisingly, disturbances in this balance are at the basis of lymphoid malignancies by provoking the formation of oncogenic mutations and chromosomal aberrations. In this review, we discuss recent mechanistic insight into the regulation of RAG1/2 and AID expression and activity in lymphocytes and the complex interplay between these mutagenic enzymes and DNA repair and DNA damage response pathways, focusing on the base excision repair and mismatch repair pathways. We discuss how disturbances of this interplay induce genomic instability and contribute to oncogenesis.

Implications of Alternative Substrate Binding Modes for Catalysis by Uracil-DNA Glycosylase: An Apparent Discrepancy Resolved

A theoretical study showed that the base excision repair enzyme uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) exploits electrostatic interactions with backbone phosphate groups in the substrate for catalysis. Although experiments performed to test the calculated results confirmed the predicted importance of the -2, -1, and +1 phosphate groups, there was an apparent disagreement with regard to the +2 phosphate group. The calculations indicated that it made an important contribution, while experimentally, the effect of its deletion or neutralization was small. The +2 phosphate group interacts directly with an active site histidine (H148 in humans) in the crystal structure of UDG in complex with double-stranded (ds) DNA. We previously calculated that H148 has a strong anticatalytic effect due to its protonation, and here we use alchemical free energy simulations to estimate its site-specific pKa. We find that it is positively charged over the entire experimental pH range (4-10), so its deprotonation cannot compensate for deletion or neutralization of the +2 phosphate group. The free energy simulations are facilitated by an efficient charge-scaling procedure that allows quantitative correction for the implicit treatment of solvent far from the active site; improvements are made to that method to account carefully for differences in the truncation of electrostatic interactions in the contributing molecular-mechanical and continuum-electrostatic approaches. Additional simulations are used to demonstrate that the +2 phosphate group is fully solvent exposed in complexes with single-stranded DNA substrates like those used in the experiments. In contrast, it is well-structured and buried in the dsDNA complex used in the original simulations. Differences in solvent shielding thus account for the apparent lack of an effect observed experimentally upon neutralization or deletion of this group.