1
|
Mayati A, Moreau A, Jouan E, Febvre-James M, Denizot C, Parmentier Y, Fardel O. mRNA Expression and Activity of Nucleoside Transporters in Human Hepatoma HepaRG Cells. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10:pharmaceutics10040246. [PMID: 30469356 PMCID: PMC6320972 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10040246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The HepaRG cell line is a highly differentiated human hepatoma cell line, displaying the expression of various drug transporters. However, functional expression of nucleoside transporters remains poorly characterized in HepaRG cells, although these transporters play a key role in hepatic uptake of antiviral and anticancer drugs. The present study was, therefore, designed to characterize the expression, activity and regulation of equilibrative (ENT) and concentrative (CNT) nucleoside transporter isoforms in differentiated HepaRG cells. These cells were found to exhibit a profile of nucleoside transporter mRNAs similar to that found in human hepatocytes, i.e., notable expression of ENT1, ENT2 and CNT1, with very low or no expression of CNT2 and CNT3. ENT1 activity was, next, demonstrated to be the main uridine transport activity present in HepaRG cells, like in cultured human hepatocytes. Various physiological factors, such as protein kinase C (PKC) activation or treatment by inflammatory cytokines or hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), were additionally found to regulate expression of ENT1, ENT2 and CNT1; PKC activation and HGF notably concomitantly induced mRNA expression and activity of ENT1 in HepaRG cells. Overall, these data suggest that HepaRG cells may be useful for analyzing cellular pharmacokinetics of nucleoside-like drugs in human hepatic cells, especially of those handled by ENT1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Mayati
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
| | - Amélie Moreau
- Centre de Pharmacocinétique, Technologie Servier, F-45000 Orléans, France.
| | - Elodie Jouan
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
| | - Marie Febvre-James
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
| | - Claire Denizot
- Centre de Pharmacocinétique, Technologie Servier, F-45000 Orléans, France.
| | - Yannick Parmentier
- Centre de Pharmacocinétique, Technologie Servier, F-45000 Orléans, France.
| | - Olivier Fardel
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
- Pôle Biologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, F-35033 Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kell DB, Oliver SG. How drugs get into cells: tested and testable predictions to help discriminate between transporter-mediated uptake and lipoidal bilayer diffusion. Front Pharmacol 2014; 5:231. [PMID: 25400580 PMCID: PMC4215795 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
One approach to experimental science involves creating hypotheses, then testing them by varying one or more independent variables, and assessing the effects of this variation on the processes of interest. We use this strategy to compare the intellectual status and available evidence for two models or views of mechanisms of transmembrane drug transport into intact biological cells. One (BDII) asserts that lipoidal phospholipid Bilayer Diffusion Is Important, while a second (PBIN) proposes that in normal intact cells Phospholipid Bilayer diffusion Is Negligible (i.e., may be neglected quantitatively), because evolution selected against it, and with transmembrane drug transport being effected by genetically encoded proteinaceous carriers or pores, whose “natural” biological roles, and substrates are based in intermediary metabolism. Despite a recent review elsewhere, we can find no evidence able to support BDII as we can find no experiments in intact cells in which phospholipid bilayer diffusion was either varied independently or measured directly (although there are many papers where it was inferred by seeing a covariation of other dependent variables). By contrast, we find an abundance of evidence showing cases in which changes in the activities of named and genetically identified transporters led to measurable changes in the rate or extent of drug uptake. PBIN also has considerable predictive power, and accounts readily for the large differences in drug uptake between tissues, cells and species, in accounting for the metabolite-likeness of marketed drugs, in pharmacogenomics, and in providing a straightforward explanation for the late-stage appearance of toxicity and of lack of efficacy during drug discovery programmes despite macroscopically adequate pharmacokinetics. Consequently, the view that Phospholipid Bilayer diffusion Is Negligible (PBIN) provides a starting hypothesis for assessing cellular drug uptake that is much better supported by the available evidence, and is both more productive and more predictive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas B Kell
- School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester Manchester, UK ; Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen G Oliver
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK ; Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Graham K, Yao S, Johnson L, Mowles D, Ng A, Wilkinson J, Young JD, Cass CE. Nucleoside transporter gene expression in wild-type and mENT1 knockout miceThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in a Special Issue entitled CSBMCB 53rd Annual Meeting — Membrane Proteins in Health and Disease, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process. Biochem Cell Biol 2011; 89:236-45. [DOI: 10.1139/o10-152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Owing to the overlapping and redundant roles of the seven mammalian nucleoside transporters (NTs), which belong to two protein families (ENTs and CNTs), the physiological importance of individual NTs has been difficult to assess. Mice that have NT genes knocked out can be a valuable tool in gaining an understanding of the NT proteins. We have generated a strain of mice that is homozygous for a disruption mutation between exons 2 and 3 of the mouse equilibrative nucleoside transporter, mENT1. We have undertaken a quantitative survey of NT gene expression in 10 tissues, as well as microarray analysis of heart and kidney, from wild-type and mENT1 knockout mice. Rather than a consistent change in expression of NT genes in all tissues of mENT1 knockout mice, a complex pattern of changes was found. Some genes, such as those encoding mCNT1 and mCNT3 in colon tissue, exhibited increased expression, whereas other genes, such as those encoding mCNT2 and mENT4 in lung tissue, exhibited decreased expression. Although mCNT3 has been shown to be important in human and rat kidney tissue, we were unable to detect mCNT3 transcripts in the kidney of either the wild-type or mENT1 knockout mice, suggesting differences in renal nucleoside resorption between species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Graham
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - Sylvia Yao
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - Lorelei Johnson
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - Delores Mowles
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - Amy Ng
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - Jodi Wilkinson
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - James D. Young
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| | - Carol E. Cass
- Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, School of Cancer, Engineering & Imaging Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Physiology, School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|