Penicillin Dried Blood Spot Assay for Use in Patients Receiving Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin G and Other Penicillin Preparations To Prevent Rheumatic Fever

Subcutaneous infusion of high-dose benzathine penicillin G is safe, tolerable, and suitable for less-frequent dosing for rheumatic heart disease secondary prophylaxis: a phase 1 open-label population pharmacokinetic study

Since 1955, the recommended strategy for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) secondary prophylaxis has been benzathine penicillin G [BPG; 1.2 MU (900 mg)] injections administered intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Due to dosing frequency, pain, and programmatic challenges, adherence is suboptimal. It has previously been demonstrated that BPG delivered subcutaneously at a standard dose is safe and tolerable and has favorable pharmacokinetics, setting the scene for improved regimens with less frequent administration. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous infusions of high-dose BPG were assessed in 24 healthy adult volunteers assigned to receive either 3.6, 7.2, or 10.8 MU (three, six, and nine times the standard dose, respectively) as a single subcutaneous infusion. The delivery of the BPG to the subcutaneous tissue was confirmed with ultrasonography. Safety assessments, pain scores, and penicillin concentrations were measured for 16 weeks post-dose. Subcutaneous infusion of penicillin (SCIP) was generally well tolerated with all participants experiencing transient, mild infusion-site reactions. Prolonged elevated penicillin concentrations were described using a combined zero-order (44 days) and first-order (t1/2 = 12 days) absorption pharmacokinetic model. In simulations, time above the conventionally accepted target concentration of 20 ng/mL (0.02 µg/mL) was 57 days for 10.8 MU delivered by subcutaneous infusion every 13 weeks compared with 9 days of every 4-weekly dosing interval for the standard 1.2 MU intramuscular dose (i.e., 63% and 32% of the dosing interval, respectively). High-dose SCIP (BPG) is safe, has acceptable tolerability, and may be suitable for up to 3 monthly dosing intervals for secondary prophylaxis of RHD.

Development of a sustained release implant of benzathine penicillin G for secondary prophylaxis of rheumatic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Regular intramuscular (i.m.) benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections have been the cornerstone of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) secondary prophylaxis since the 1950s. Patient adherence to IM BPG is poor, largely due to pain, the need for regular injections every 3-4 weeks and health sector delivery challenges in resource-limited settings. There is an urgent need for new approaches for secondary prophylaxis, such as an implant which could provide sustained penicillin concentrations for more than 6 months.

METHODS

In this study we developed and evaluated a slow release implant with potential for substantially extended treatment. The side wall of a solid drug rich core was coated with polycaprolactone which acts as an impermeable barrier. The exposed surfaces at the ends of the implant defined the release surface area, and the in vitro release rate of drug was proportional to the exposed surface area across implants of differing diameter. The in vivo pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the implants were evaluated in a sheep model over 9 weeks after subcutaneous implantation.

RESULTS

The absolute release rates obtained for the poorly water-soluble benzathine salt were dependent on the exposed surface area demonstrating the impermeability of the wall of the implant. The implants were well-tolerated after subcutaneous implantation in a sheep model, without adverse effects at the implantation site. Gross structural integrity was maintained over the course of the study, with erosion limited to the dual-exposed ends. Steady release of penicillin G was observed over the 9 weeks and resulted in approximately constant plasma concentrations close to accepted target concentrations.

CONCLUSION

In principle, a long acting BPG implant is feasible as an alternative to IM injections for secondary prophylaxis of RHD. However, large implant size is currently a significant impediment to clinical utility and acceptability.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF), an autoimmune reaction to Group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes; Strep A) infection, can cause rheumatic heart disease (RHD). New formulations of long-acting penicillins are being developed for secondary prophylaxis of ARF and RHD.

Objectives

To evaluate the penicillin G concentrations required to suppress growth of Strep A.

Methods

Broth microdilution MIC and MBC for Strep A strains M75⁶¹¹⁰²⁴, M1T1⁵⁴⁴⁸ and M18^MGAS8232 were determined. All strains were studied in a hollow fibre model (initial inoculum 4 log₁₀ cfu/mL). Constant penicillin G concentrations of 0.008, 0.016 and 0.05 mg/L were examined against all strains, plus 0.012 mg/L against M18^MGAS8232. Viable counts were determined over 144 h. Subsequently, all penicillin G-treated cartridges were emptied, reinoculated with 5 log₁₀ cfu/mL and counts determined over a further 144 h. Mathematical modelling was performed.

Results

MIC and MBC were 0.008 mg/L for all strains; small subpopulations of M75⁶¹¹⁰²⁴ and M1T1⁵⁴⁴⁸, but not M18^MGAS8232, grew at 1× MIC. Following the first inoculation, 0.008 mg/L achieved limited killing and/or stasis against M75⁶¹¹⁰²⁴ and M1T1⁵⁴⁴⁸, with subsequent growth to ∼6 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Following both inocula, concentrations ≥0.016 mg/L suppressed M75⁶¹¹⁰²⁴ and M1T1⁵⁴⁴⁸ to <1 log₁₀ cfu/mL from 6 h onwards with eradication. Concentrations ≥0.008 mg/L suppressed M18^MGAS8232 to <1 log₁₀ cfu/mL from 24 h onwards with eradication after both inoculations. Mathematical modelling well described all strains using a single set of parameter estimates, except for different maximum bacterial concentrations and proportions of bacteria growing at 1× MIC.

Conclusions

In the absence of validated animal and human challenge models, the study provides guidance on penicillin G target concentrations for development of new penicillin formulations.

Subcutaneous administration of benzathine benzylpenicillin G has favourable pharmacokinetic characteristics for the prevention of rheumatic heart disease compared with intramuscular injection: a randomized, crossover, population pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult volunteers

BACKGROUND

Benzathine penicillin G has been used as monthly deep intramuscular (IM) injections since the 1950s for secondary prevention of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Injection frequency and pain are major programmatic barriers for adherence, prompting calls for development of better long-acting penicillin preparations to prevent RHD. We hypothesized that subcutaneous (SC) administration of benzathine penicillin G could delay penicillin absorption when compared with IM injections.

METHODS

To compare the pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability of benzathine penicillin G according to different routes of administration, 15 healthy males participated in a randomized crossover study to receive benzathine penicillin G by either SC or IM routes, with a 10 week washout period before the second dose by the alternative route. Ultrasound guidance confirmed injection location. Penicillin concentrations and pain scores were measured for 6 weeks following injections.

RESULTS

SC administration was well tolerated with no significant differences in pain scores. Following SC injection, the principal absorption half-life (95% CI) was 20.1 (16.3-29.5) days and 89.6% (87.1%-92.0%) of the drug was directed via this pathway compared with 10.2 (8.6-12.5) days and 71.3% (64.9%-77.4%) following IM administration. Lower peak and higher trough penicillin concentrations resulted following SC injection. Simulations demonstrated that SC infusion of higher doses of benzathine penicillin G could provide therapeutic penicillin concentrations for 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

SC administration of benzathine penicillin G is safe and significantly delays penicillin absorption. High-dose benzathine penicillin G via the SC route would fulfil many product characteristics required for the next generation of longer-acting penicillins for use in RHD.

High risk of early sub-therapeutic penicillin concentrations after intramuscular benzathine penicillin G injections in Ethiopian children and adults with rheumatic heart disease

Introduction

Intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections are a cornerstone of secondary prophylaxis to prevent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Uncertainties regarding inter-ethnic and preparation variability, and target exposure profiles of BPG injection are key knowledge gaps for RHD control.

Methods

To evaluate BPG pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients receiving 4-weekly doses in Ethiopia, we conducted a prospective cohort study of ARF/RHD patients attending cardiology outpatient clinics. Serum samples were collected weekly for one month after injection and assayed with a liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy assay. Concentration-time datasets for BPG were analyzed by nonlinear mixed effects modelling using NONMEM.

Results

A total of 190 penicillin concentration samples from 74 patients were included in the final PK model. The median age, weight, BMI was 21 years, 47 kg and 18 kg/m², respectively. When compared with estimates derived from Indigenous Australian patients, the estimate for median (95% confidence interval) volume of distribution (V/F) was lower (54.8 [43.9–66.3] l.70kg^-1) whilst the absorption half-life (t_1/2-abs2) was longer (12.0 [8.75–17.7] days). The median (IQR) percentage of time where the concentrations remained above 20 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL within the 28-day treatment cycle was 42.5% (27.5–60) and 73% (58.5–99), respectively.

Conclusions

The majority of Ethiopian patients receiving BPG as secondary prophylaxis to prevent RHD do not attain target concentrations for more than two weeks during each 4-weekly injection cycle, highlighting the limitations of current BPG strategies. Between-population variation, together with PK differences between different preparations may be important considerations for ARF/RHD control programs.

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is the most common form of acquired heart disease in Ethiopia across all age groups. Monthly benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections remains the cornerstone of secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and progression to RHD, but data supporting the optimal dose and timing of BPG injections is a major knowledge gap for National RHD control programs, particularly amongst the highest risk groups. In this study we measured penicillin concentrations in Ethiopian patients receiving regular BPG injections. It demonstrates that that most Ethiopian patients receiving BPG as secondary prophylaxis to prevent RHD do not maintain target concentrations for more than two weeks during each 4-weekly injection cycle. This study highlights the limitation of the current BPG dosing recommendations and underpin global calls for improved penicillin formulations and better dosing and delivery strategies.

A population pharmacokinetic study of benzathine benzylpenicillin G administration in children and adolescents with rheumatic heart disease: new insights for improved secondary prophylaxis strategies

BACKGROUND

Benzathine benzylpenicillin G (BPG) is recommended as secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrence of acute rheumatic fever and subsequent rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Following intramuscular injection, BPG is hydrolysed to benzylpenicillin. Little is known of the pharmacokinetics of benzylpenicillin following BPG in populations at risk of RHD.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal pharmacokinetic study of children and adolescents receiving secondary prophylaxis throughout six monthly cycles of BPG. Dried blood spot samples were assayed with LC-MS/MS. Benzylpenicillin concentrations were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling with subsequent simulations based on published BMI-for-age and weight-for-age data.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants contributed 256 concentrations for analysis. None had benzylpenicillin concentrations >0.02 mg/L for the full time between doses. The median duration above this target was 9.8 days for those with a lower BMI (<25 kg/m2), who also had lower weights, and 0 days for those with a higher BMI (≥25 kg/m2). Although fat-free mass was a key determinant of benzylpenicillin exposure after a standard dose of BPG, having a higher BMI influenced absorption and almost doubled (increase of 86%) the observed t½.

CONCLUSIONS

Few children and adolescents receiving BPG as secondary prophylaxis will achieve concentrations >0.02 mg/L for the majority of the time between injections. The discordance of this observation with reported efficacy of BPG to prevent rheumatic fever implies a major knowledge gap relating to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships between benzylpenicillin exposure and clinical outcomes.

Validation of a Dried Blood Spot Ceftriaxone Assay in Papua New Guinean Children with Severe Bacterial Infections

Dried blood spot (DBS) antibiotic assays can facilitate pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in situations where venous blood sampling is logistically and/or ethically challenging. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the validity of a DBS ceftriaxone assay in a PK study of children with severe illness from Papua New Guinea (PNG), a setting in which health care resources are limited and anemia is common. Using a previously validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay, serial plasma and DBS ceftriaxone concentrations were measured in PNG children aged 5 to 10 years with acute bacterial meningitis or severe pneumonia. The concentration-time data were incorporated into population PK models. Ten children were recruited with an admission hematocrit of 0.22 to 0.52. Raw data demonstrated good correlation between plasma and DBS concentrations (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [r_s] = 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 0.97], P < 0.0001). A marked systematic hematocrit bias was observed, with lower hematocrits resulting in underestimation of DBS-predicted plasma concentration. After adjustment for red cell partitioning and hematocrit bias, a population PK model comparing plasma and DBS-predicted plasma concentrations did not differ in terms of key PK parameters, including clearance, volume of distribution, and residual variability. The performance of the ceftriaxone DBS assay is robust and provides reassurance that this platform can be used as a surrogate for plasma concentrations to provide valid PK and PK/pharmacodynamic studies of severely unwell children hospitalized in a resource-limited setting. It highlights the importance of hematocrit bias in validation studies of DBS assays.

Immuno-nephelometric determination of group streptococcal anti-streptolysin O titres (ASOT) from dried blood spots: Method for validating a new assay

This study was designed to determine the sensitivity and reproducibility of recovering anti-streptolysin O titres (ASOT) from dried blood spot (DBS) samples, a methodologic subcomponent of the penicillin pharmacokinetic studies in children receiving secondary prophylaxis with intramuscular benzathine penicillin for acute rheumatic fever.