Inducible and constitutive activation of two polymorphic promoter alleles of the Candida albicans multidrug efflux pump MDR1

Broad susceptibility of Candida auris strains to 8-hydroxyquinolines and mechanisms of resistance

The fungal pathogen Candida auris represents a severe threat to hospitalized patients. Its resistance to multiple classes of antifungal drugs and ability to spread and resist decontamination in healthcare settings make it especially dangerous. We screened 1,990 clinically approved and late-stage investigational compounds for the potential to be repurposed as antifungal drugs targeting C. auris and narrowed our focus to five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved compounds with inhibitory concentrations under 10 µM for C. auris and significantly lower toxicity to three human cell lines. These compounds, some of which had been previously identified in independent screens, include three dihalogenated 8-hydroxyquinolines: broxyquinoline, chloroxine, and clioquinol. A subsequent structure-activity study of 32 quinoline derivatives found that 8-hydroxyquinolines, especially those dihalogenated at the C5 and C7 positions, were the most effective inhibitors of C. auris. To pursue these compounds further, we exposed C. auris to clioquinol in an extended experimental evolution study and found that C. auris developed only twofold to fivefold resistance to the compound. DNA sequencing of resistant strains and subsequent verification by directed mutation in naive strains revealed that resistance was due to mutations in the transcriptional regulator CAP1 (causing upregulation of the drug transporter MDR1) and in the drug transporter CDR1. These mutations had only modest effects on resistance to traditional antifungal agents, and the CDR1 mutation rendered C. auris more susceptible to posaconazole. This observation raises the possibility that a combination treatment involving an 8-hydroxyquinoline and posaconazole might prevent C. auris from developing resistance to this established antifungal agent. IMPORTANCE The rapidly emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris represents a growing threat to hospitalized patients, in part due to frequent resistance to multiple classes of antifungal drugs. We identify a class of compounds, the dihalogenated 8-hydroxyquinolines, with broad fungistatic ability against a diverse collection of 13 strains of C. auris. Although this compound has been identified in previous screens, we extended the analysis by showing that C. auris developed only modest twofold to fivefold increases in resistance to this class of compounds despite long-term exposure; a noticeable difference from the 30- to 500-fold increases in resistance reported for similar studies with commonly used antifungal drugs. We also identify the mutations underlying the resistance. These results suggest that the dihalogenated 8-hydroxyquinolines are working inside the fungal cell and should be developed further to combat C. auris and other fungal pathogens. Lohse and colleagues characterize a class of compounds that inhibit the fungal pathogen C. auris. Unlike many other antifungal drugs, C. auris does not readily develop resistance to this class of compounds.

Broad sensitivity of Candida auris strains to quinolones and mechanisms of resistance

The fungal pathogen Candida auris represents a severe threat to hospitalized patients. Its resistance to multiple classes of antifungal drugs and ability to spread and resist decontamination in health-care settings make it especially dangerous. We screened 1,990 clinically approved and late-stage investigational compounds for the potential to be repurposed as antifungal drugs targeting C. auris and narrowed our focus to five FDA-approved compounds with inhibitory concentrations under 10 µM for C. auris and significantly lower toxicity to three human cell lines. These compounds, some of which had been previously identified in independent screens, include three dihalogenated 8-hydroxyquinolines: broxyquinoline, chloroxine, and clioquinol. A subsequent structure-activity study of 32 quinoline derivatives found that 8-hydroxyquinolines, especially those dihalogenated at the C5 and C7 positions, were the most effective inhibitors of C. auris . To pursue these compounds further, we exposed C. auris to clioquinol in an extended experimental evolution study and found that C. auris developed only 2- to 5-fold resistance to the compound. DNA sequencing of resistant strains and subsequent verification by directed mutation in naive strains revealed that resistance was due to mutations in the transcriptional regulator CAP1 (causing upregulation of the drug transporter MDR1 ) and in the drug transporter CDR1 . These mutations had only modest effects on resistance to traditional antifungal agents, and the CDR1 mutation rendered C. auris more sensitive to posaconazole. This observation raises the possibility that a combination treatment involving an 8-hydroxyquinoline and posaconazole might prevent C. auris from developing resistance to this established antifungal agent.

Abstract Importance

The rapidly emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris represents a growing threat to hospitalized patients, in part due to frequent resistance to multiple classes of antifungal drugs. We identify a class of compounds, the dihalogenated hydroxyquinolines, with broad fungistatic ability against a diverse collection of 13 strains of C. auris . Although this compound has been identified in previous screens, we extended the analysis by showing that C. auris developed only modest 2- to 5-fold increases in resistance to this class of compounds despite long-term exposure; a noticeable difference from the 30- to 500- fold increases in resistance reported for similar studies with commonly used antifungal drugs. We also identify the mutations underlying the resistance. These results suggest that the dihalogenated hydroxyquinolines are working inside the fungal cell and should be developed further to combat C. auris and other fungal pathogens.

Tweet

Lohse and colleagues characterize a class of compounds that inhibit the fungal pathogen C. auris . Unlike many other antifungal drugs, C. auris does not readily develop resistance to this class of compounds.

Research of Mrr1, Cap1 and MDR1 in Candida albicans resistant to azole medications

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between Mrr1, adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1 (Cap1) and multi-drug resistance gene 1 (MDR1), and to assess the mutations in Mrr1 and Cap1 in azole-resistant Candida albicans strains. The study isolated 68 C. albicans strains from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Drug susceptibility testing was conducted to characterize the resistance profile of these strains to fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed for Cap1 and Mrr1, and the PCR products were sequenced to identify any mutations. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was performed to measure Cap1, Mrr1 and MDR1 mRNA in C. albicans strains. The results of the present study indicated S381N, P311S and A390T missense mutations in Cap1 and T917M, T923I, N937K, E1020Q, F1032L and S1037L missense mutations in Mrr1 in azole-resistant C. albicans strains. Fluconazole-resistant strains had significantly elevated Cap1 and MDR1 mRNA levels compared with fluconazole-sensitive strains (P<0.01). The mRNA levels of Cap1, Mrr1 and MDR1 were significantly increased in the strains resistant to all three of fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole compared with strains sensitive to the three agents (P<0.001, P=0.037 and P<0.001, respectively). Cap1 expression was positively correlated with MDR1 expression in fluconazole-resistant strains (P<0.05). No significant correlation was observed between Cap1, Mrr1 and MDR1 in the strains resistant to fluconazole, itraconazole or voriconazole. The results of the present study suggested that fluconazole resistance may involve MDR1 overexpression mediated by Cap1 overexpression. Cross-resistance between fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole may be associated with mutations in Cap1 and Mrr1, rather than their overexpression. In addition, the present study also revealed two novel mutations in Mrr1; T917M and T923I. These findings may provide a basis for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of and improving therapeutic treatments to tackle azole resistance.

MDR1 polymorphisms affect the outcome of Chinese multiple myeloma patients

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the association of MDR1 (Multidrug Resistance 1) polymorphisms at loci 1236, 2677, 3435 and the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) in Jiangsu population.

METHODS

A total of 129 MM patients were recruited from Jiangsu Province, China. The DNA was extracted from white blood cells (WBC) of peripheral blood and was amplified by polymerase chain reaction-allele specific primers (PCR-ASP). MDR1 polymorphisms at 3 loci were analyzed by electrophoresis followed by photograph or DNA direct sequencing. The association between the MDR1 and clinical outcomes were calculated by Graphpad and SPSS.

RESULTS

MDR1 alleles at locus C1236T with T had significant lower calcium level in MM patients compared with C. The genotype CT had a significantly prolonged progress free survival (PFS) compared genotype CC at locus C1236T (median time: 48 months vs. 28 months, respectively; p=0.0062; HR=0.21; 95%CI0.061-0.715) while patients carrying T allele (CT and TT) at locus C3435T had a longer PFS than patients without T allele (CC) (median time: 60 months vs. 29 months, respectively; p=0.038; HR=0.508; 95%CI 0.264-0.978). And a borderline significance was found in haplotype at loci 2677-3435 and PFS. No significant findings were revealed between OS and MDR1 polymorphisms.

CONCLUSION

MDR1 polymorphisms could affect the prognosis of multiple myeloma whereas more samples and a longer follow-up are also needed.

Antifungals: Mechanism of Action and Drug Resistance

There are currently few antifungals in use which show efficacy against fungal diseases. These antifungals mostly target specific components of fungal plasma membrane or its biosynthetic pathways. However, more recent class of antifungals in use is echinocandins which target the fungal cell wall components. The availability of mostly fungistatic antifungals in clinical use, often led to the development of tolerance to these very drugs by the pathogenic fungal species. Thus, the development of clinical multidrug resistance (MDR) leads to higher tolerance to drugs and its emergence is helped by multiple mechanisms. MDR is indeed a multifactorial phenomenon wherein a resistant organism possesses several mechanisms which contribute to display reduced susceptibility to not only single drug in use but also show collateral resistance to several drugs. Considering the limited availability of antifungals in use and the emergence of MDR in fungal infections, there is a continuous need for the development of novel broad spectrum antifungal drugs with better efficacy. Here, we briefly present an overview of the current understanding of the antifungal drugs in use, their mechanism of action and the emerging possible novel antifungal drugs with great promise.

Induction of Candida albicans drug resistance genes by hybrid zinc cluster transcription factors

The pathogenic yeast Candida albicans can develop resistance to azole antifungal drugs by overexpressing ERG11, which encodes the drug target, or the multidrug efflux pumps MDR1 and CDR1/CDR2. The constitutive upregulation of these genes is usually caused by gain-of-function mutations in the zinc cluster transcription factors Upc2, Mrr1, and Tac1, respectively. These transcription factors are also required for the induction of their target genes in drug-susceptible strains in the presence of specific stimuli. By swapping the DNA-binding domains of Mrr1, Tac1, and Upc2 we investigated if the hybrid transcription factors could activate their new target genes in response to the same signals. When Tac1 was targeted to the MDR1 and ERG11 promoters, the expression of these genes became inducible by fluphenazine. Similarly, MDR1 and CDR2 were strongly upregulated by fluconazole when Upc2 was fused to the DNA-binding domains of Mrr1 and Tac1, respectively. In contrast, Mrr1 was unable to promote gene expression in response to benomyl when it was targeted to the CDR2 and ERG11 promoters instead of the MDR1 promoter. These results suggest that Tac1 and Upc2 themselves are activated by the inducers fluphenazine and fluconazole, respectively, whereas benomyl does not activate Mrr1 itself but a coregulatory factor that is present at the promoters of Mrr1 target genes. Strains in which the expression levels of Mrr1 and Tac1 target genes were controlled by Upc2 exhibited increased fluconazole resistance, demonstrating that the ability to efficiently upregulate the expression of efflux pumps in the presence of the drug results in enhanced intrinsic fluconazole resistance.

Biocides--resistance, cross-resistance mechanisms and assessment

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens has increased worldwide leading to treatment failures. Concerns have been raised about the use of biocides as a contributing factor to the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development. In vitro studies demonstrating increase in resistance have often been cited as evidence for increased risks. It is therefore important to understand the mechanisms of resistance employed by bacteria toward biocides used in consumer products and their potential to impart cross-resistance to therapeutic antibiotics.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the mechanisms of resistance and cross-resistance reported in the literature toward biocides commonly used in consumer products are summarized. The physiological and molecular techniques used in describing and examining these mechanisms are reviewed and application of these techniques for systematic assessment of biocides for their potential to develop resistance and/or cross-resistance is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The guidelines in the usage of biocides in household or industrial purpose should be monitored and regulated to avoid the emergence of any MDR strains. The genetic and molecular methods to monitor the resistance development to biocides should be developed and included in preclinical and clinical studies.