A Novel Cooperative Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold Metallohydrolase from Pathogen Vibrio vulnificus Exhibits β-Lactam Antibiotic-Degrading Activities

Screening and Evaluation of Potential Efflux Pump Inhibitors with a Seaweed Compound Diphenylmethane-Scaffold against Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli

Drug-resistant efflux pumps play a crucial role in bacterial antibiotic resistance. In this study, potential efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) with a diphenylmethane scaffold were screened and evaluated against drug-resistant Escherichia coli. Twenty-four compounds were docked against the drug-binding site of E. coli multidrug transporter AcrB, and 2,2-diphenylethanol (DPE), di-p-tolyl-methanol (DPT), and 4-(benzylphenyl) acetonitrile (BPA) were screened for their highest binding free energy. The modulation assay was further used for EPI evaluation, revealing that DPE, DPT, and BPA could reduce the drug IC50 value in E. coli strains overexpressing AcrB, indicating their modulation activity. Only DPE and BPA enhanced intracellular dye accumulation and inhibited the efflux of ethidium bromide and erythromycin. In addition, DPE and BPA showed an elevated post-antibiotic effect on drug-resistant E. coli, and they did not damage the permeability of the bacterial outer membrane. The cell toxicity test showed that DPE and BPA had limited human-cell toxicity. Therefore, DPE and BPA demonstrate efflux pump inhibitory activity, and they should be further explored as potential enhancers to improve the effectiveness of existing antibiotics against drug-resistant E. coli.

Strategies to Name Metallo-β-Lactamases and Number Their Amino Acid Residues

Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), also known as class B β-lactamases (BBLs), are Zn(II)-containing enzymes able to inactivate a broad range of β-lactams, the most commonly used antibiotics, including life-saving carbapenems. They have been known for about six decades, yet they have only gained much attention as a clinical problem for about three decades. The naming conventions of these enzymes have changed over time and followed various strategies, sometimes leading to confusion. We are summarizing the naming strategies of the currently known MBLs. These enzymes are quite diverse on the amino acid sequence level but structurally similar. Problems trying to describe conserved residues, such as Zn(II) ligands and other catalytically important residues, which have different numbers in different sequences, have led to the establishment of a standard numbering scheme for BBLs. While well intended, the standard numbering scheme is not trivial and has not been applied consistently. We revisit this standard numbering scheme and suggest some strategies for how its implementation could be made more accessible to researchers. Standard numbering facilitates the comparison of different enzymes as well as their interaction with novel antibiotics and BBL inhibitors.