Once-daily amikacin dosing in burn patients treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Aminoglycoside Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND

There are few studies describing aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the effect of CRRT on aminoglycoside clearance and volume of distribution (V_d).

METHODS

Retrospective observational pharmacokinetic study of adult critically ill oncologic patients who received a first dose of amikacin or tobramycin during CRRT between February 2012 and May 2017. Study outcomes included aminoglycoside clearance, V_d, and attainment of the target peak: MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) ratio as a surrogate for dosing appropriateness.

RESULTS

In total, 80 patients were included, sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), n = 49; continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), n = 19; continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), n = 12. Fifty-one patients received amikacin at a median dose of 14.5 mg/kg per actual body weight and achieved a median peak level of 26.7 mg/L. Twenty-nine patients received tobramycin at a median dose of 6.5 mg/kg actual body weight and achieved a median peak level of 10.3 mg/L. The median aminoglycoside clearance was 63.1 mL/min and was similar between CRRT modality groups (P = 0.97). The median V_d was 0.47 L/kg and was different between the SLED and CVVH groups (P = 0.007). Attainment of target peak: MIC occurred in 29% in the total study population and 44% in the subgroup of 23 patients with isolates tested for aminoglycoside susceptibility.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Critically ill oncology patients undergoing CRRT exhibited reduced clearance and expanded V_d that was not significantly different between CRRT modalities. Current dosing regimens led to low peak concentrations and poor attainment of pharmacokinetic targets.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotic Drugs in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy or Intermittent Hemodialysis: A Critical Review

PURPOSE

Antibiotics are frequently used in patients receiving intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT). Continuous renal replacement may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the ability to achieve PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could help evaluate drug exposure and guide antibiotic dosage adjustment. The present review describes recent TDM data on antibiotic exposure and PK/PD target attainment (TA) in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT, proposing practical guidelines for performing TDM.

METHODS

Studies on antibiotic TDM performed in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT published between 2000 and 2020 were searched and assessed. The authors focused on studies that reported data on PK/PD TA. TDM recommendations were based on clinically relevant PK/PD relationships and previously published guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 2383 reports were retrieved. After excluding nonrelevant publications, 139 articles were selected. Overall, 107 studies reported PK/PD TA for 24 agents. Data were available for various intermittent and continuous RRT techniques. The study design, TDM practice, and definition of PK/PD targets were inconsistent across studies. Drug exposure and TA rates were highly variable. TDM seems to be necessary to control drug exposure in patients receiving intermittent and continuous RRT techniques, especially for antibiotics with narrow therapeutic margins and in critically ill patients. Practical recommendations can provide insights on relevant PK/PD targets, sampling, and timing of TDM for various antibiotic classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Highly variable antibiotic exposure and TA have been reported in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT. TDM for aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, glycopeptides, linezolid, and colistin is recommended in patients receiving RRT and suggested for daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, and tigecycline in critically ill patients on RRT.

Aminoglycosides in Critically Ill Septic Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Multicenter, Observational Study

PURPOSE

Data on aminoglycoside stewardship in critically ill septic patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) needing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are scarce. The objectives of the study were to determine, during CRRT, the time window with low likelihood for safe reinjection and the proportion of inappropriate reinjection.

METHODS

A post hoc observational analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing the risk of hemodialysis catheter infection with ethanol lock vs placebo in critically ill patients with AKI was conducted. Eligible patients were adults in intensive care units from 6 French hospitals. Any patient with AKI needing CRRT and receiving an antimicrobial therapy for a septic episode occurring before (≤24 hours) or during CRRT was included. The aminoglycoside orders were left to the physicians' discretion, but high dose once daily was the schedule of aminoglycoside administration.

FINDINGS

A total of 145 septic episodes treated by aminoglycosides were analyzed in patients receiving CRRT. A mean (SD) of 1.6 (0.8) amikacin and 1.8 (1.2) gentamicin administrations per patient were observed. During CRRT, C_max was 17.3 mg/L (interquartile range, 13.2-22.5 mg/L) for gentamicin and 50 mg/L (interquartile range, 43.7-76.6 mg/L) for amikacin. The plasma drug concentration at 24 hours (C_H24) was 2.3 mg/L (interquartile range, 1.6-3.2 mg/L) for gentamicin and 9.3 (interquartile range, 6.6-12.0 mg/L) for amikacin. Sixty-five C_min dosages remained above the reinjection threshold. Inappropriate reinjection was observed in 11 of 65 episodes (17%). Inappropriate reinjection (defined by, at the reinjection time, C_min dosages above the threshold; ie, C_min >2 mg/L for gentamicin and >5 mg/L for amikacin) was observed in 17% of analyzed episodes. Most patients did not need reinjection until approximately ≥30 hours after their initial administration.

IMPLICATIONS

During CRRT, as indicated by the C_H24 value, which was higher than the recommended threshold, the interval to obtain a C_min low enough to allow for redosing aminoglycosides is significantly longer than 24 hours. This interval is not always respected and leads to an of inappropriate reinjection rate of 17%. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ISRCTNCT00875069. (Clin Ther. 2021;XX:XXX-XXX) © 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

The effects of major burn related pathophysiological changes on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug use: An appraisal utilizing antibiotics

Patients suffering major burn injury represent a unique population of critically ill patients. Widespread skin and tissue damage causes release of systemic inflammatory mediators that promote endothelial leak, extravascular fluid shifts, and cardiovascular derangement. This phase is characterized by relative intra-vascular hypovolaemia and poor peripheral perfusion. Large volume intravenous fluid resuscitation is generally required. The patients' clinical course is then typically complicated by ongoing inflammation, protein catabolism, and marked haemodynamic perturbation. At all times, drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination are grossly distorted. For hydrophilic agents, changes in volume of distribution and clearance are marked, resulting in potentially sub-optimal drug exposure. In the case of antibiotics, this may then promote treatment failure, or the development of bacterial drug resistance. As such, empirical dose selection and pharmaceutical development must consider these features, with the application of strategies that attempt to counter the unique pharmacokinetic changes encountered in this setting.

High-volume hemofiltration in adult burn patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Sepsis and septic shock occur commonly in severe burns. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is also common and often results as a consequence of sepsis. Mortality is unacceptably high in burn patients who develop AKI requiring renal replacement therapy and is presumed to be even higher when combined with septic shock. We hypothesized that high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) as a blood purification technique would be beneficial in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the impact of HVHF on the hemodynamic profile of burn patients with septic shock and AKI involving seven burn centers in the United States. Subjects randomized to the HVHF were prescribed a dose of 70 ml/kg/hour for 48 hours while control subjects were managed in standard fashion in accordance with local practices.

RESULTS

During a 4-year period, a total of nine subjects were enrolled for the intervention during the ramp-in phase and 28 subjects were randomized, 14 each into the control and HVHF arms respectively. The study was terminated due to slow enrollment. Ramp-in subjects were included along with those randomized in the final analysis. Our primary endpoint, the vasopressor dependency index, decreased significantly at 48 hours compared to baseline in the HVHF group (p = 0.007) while it remained no different in the control arm. At 14 days, the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome score decreased significantly in the HVHF group when compared to the day of treatment initiation (p = 0.02). No changes in inflammatory markers were detected during the 48-hour intervention period. No significant difference in survival was detected. No differences in adverse events were noted between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HVHF was effective in reversing shock and improving organ function in burn patients with septic shock and AKI, and appears safe. Whether reversal of shock in these patients can improve survival is yet to be determined.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01213914 . Registered 30 September 2010.

Intravenous Antibiotic and Antifungal Agent Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Dosing in Adults with Severe Burn Injury

PURPOSE

Despite advances in the care of patients with severe burn injury, infection-related morbidity and mortality remain high and can potentially be reduced with antimicrobial dosing optimized for the infecting pathogen. However, anti-infective dose selection is difficult because of the highly abnormal physiologic features of burn patients, which can greatly affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) disposition of these agents. We review published PK data from burn patients and offer evidence-based dosing recommendations for antimicrobial agents in burn-injured patients.

METHODS

Because most infections occur at least 48 hours after initial burn injury and anti-infective therapy often lasts ≥10 days, we reviewed published data informing PK-pharmacodynamic (PD) dosing of anti-infectives administered during the second, hypermetabolic stage of burn injury, in those with >20% total body surface area burns, and in those with normal or augmented renal clearance (estimated creatinine clearance ≥130 mL/min). Analyses were performed using 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations, which uses PK variability observed in burn patients and MIC data to determine the probability of reaching predefined PK-PD targets. The probability of target attainment, defined as the likelihood that an anti-infective dosing regimen would achieve a specific PK-PD target at the single highest susceptible MIC, and the cumulative fraction of response, defined as the population probability of target attainment given a specific dose and a distribution of MICs, were calculated for each recommended anti-infective dosing regimen.

FINDINGS

Evidence-based doses were derived for burn-injured patients for 15 antibiotics and 2 antifungal agents. Published data were unavailable or insufficient for several agents important to the care of burn patients, including newer antifungal and antipseudomonal agents. Furthermore, available data suggest that antimicrobial PK properties in burned patients is highly variable. We recommend that, where possible, therapeutic drug monitoring be performed to optimize PK-PD parameter achievement in individual patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Given the high variability in PK disposition observed in burn patients, doses recommended in the package insert may not achieve PK-PD parameters associated with optimal infectious outcomes. Our study is limited by the necessity for fixed assumptions in depicting this highly variable patient population. New rapid-turnaround analytical technology is needed to expand the menu of antimicrobial agents for which therapeutic drug monitoring is available to guide dose modification within a clinically actionable time frame.

Influence of Renal Replacement Modalities on Amikacin Population Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

The objective of this study was to describe amikacin pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients receiving equal doses (30 ml/kg of body weight/h) of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Patients receiving amikacin and undergoing CVVH or CVVHDF were eligible. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were undertaken using the Pmetrics software package for R. Sixteen patients (9 undergoing CVVH, 11 undergoing CVVHDF) and 20 sampling intervals were analyzed. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Patient weight was the only covariate that was associated with drug clearance. The mean ± standard deviation parameter estimates were 25.2 ± 17.3 liters for the central volume, 0.89 ± 1.17 h(-1) for the rate constant for the drug distribution from the central to the peripheral compartment, 2.38 ± 6.60 h(-1) for the rate constant for the drug distribution from the peripheral to the central compartment, 4.45 ± 2.35 liters/h for hemodiafiltration clearance, and 4.69 ± 2.42 liters/h for hemofiltration clearance. Dosing simulations for amikacin supported the use of high dosing regimens (≥25 mg/kg) and extended intervals (36 to 48 h) for most patients when considering PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of a maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax)/MIC ratio of ≥8 and a minimal concentration of ≤2.5 mg/liter at the end of the dosing interval. The mean clearance of amikacin was 1.8 ± 1.3 liters/h by CVVHDF and 1.3 ± 1 liters/h by CVVH. On the basis of simulations, a strategy of an extended-interval high loading dose of amikacin (25 mg/kg every 48 h) associated with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) should be the preferred approach for aminoglycoside treatment in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). (This study is a substudy of a trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT01403220.).

To increase or decrease dosage of antimicrobials in septic patients during continuous renal replacement therapy: the eternal doubt

Critical illness, acute renal failure and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are associated with changes in pharmacokinetics. Initial antibiotic dose should be based on published volume of distribution and generally be at least the standard dose, as volume of distribution is usually unchanged or increased. Subsequent doses should be based on total clearance. Total clearance varies with the CRRT clearance which mainly depends on effluent flow rate, sieving coefficient/saturation coefficient. As antibiotic clearance by healthy kidneys is usually higher than clearance by CRRT, except for colistin, subsequent doses should generally be lower than given to patients without renal dysfunction. In the future therapeutic drug monitoring, together with sophisticated pharmacokinetic models taking into account the pharmacokinetic variability, may enable more appropriate individualized dosing.

Antibiotic dose optimization in critically ill patients

The judicious use of existing antibiotics is essential for preserving their activity against infections. In the era of multi-drug resistance, this is of particular importance in clinical areas characterized by high antibiotic use, such as the ICU. Antibiotic dose optimization in critically ill patients requires sound knowledge not only of the altered physiology in serious infections - including severe sepsis, septic shock and ventilator-associated pneumonia - but also of the pathogen-drug exposure relationship (i.e. pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index). An important consideration is the fact that extreme shifts in organ function, such as those seen in hyperdynamic patients or those with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, can have an impact upon drug exposure, and constant vigilance is required when reviewing antibiotic dosing regimens in the critically ill. The use of continuous renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remain important interventions in these patients; however, both of these treatments can have a profound effect on antibiotic exposure. We suggest placing emphasis on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring and dose individualization when optimizing therapy in these settings.

How can we ensure effective antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving different types of renal replacement therapy?

Determining appropriate antibiotic dosing for critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complex. Worldwide unstandardized and heterogeneous prescribing of RRT as well as altered patient physiology and pathogen susceptibility all cause drug disposition to be much different to that seen in non-critically ill patients. Significant changes to pharmacokinetic parameters, including volume of distribution and clearance, could be expected, in particular, for antibiotics that are hydrophilic with low plasma protein binding and that are usually primarily eliminated by the renal system. Antibiotic clearance is likely to be significantly increased when higher RRT intensities are used. The combined effect of these factors that alter antibiotic disposition is that non-standard dosing strategies should be considered to achieve therapeutic exposure. In particular, an aggressive early approach to dosing should be considered and this may include administration of a 'loading dose', to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentrations and maximally reduce the inoculum of the pathogen. This approach is particularly important given the pharmacokinetic changes in the critically ill as well as the increased likelihood of less susceptible pathogens. Dose individualization that applies knowledge of the RRT and patient factors causing altered pharmacokinetics remains the key approach for ensuring effective antibiotic therapy for these patients. Where possible, therapeutic drug monitoring should also be used to ensure more accurate therapy. A lack of pharmacokinetic data for antibiotics during the prolonged intermittent RRT and intermittent hemodialysis currently limits evidence-based antibiotic dose recommendations for these patients.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in burn and non-burn rabbits

Linezolid is effective on many resistant organisms for the treatment of severe infections in burns. However, its pharmacokinetics was difficult to predict after major burns. The study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetic properties of linezolid administered intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg in severely burned rabbits in comparison to that in non-burns. Linezolid concentrations were quantitatively analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The direct consequence of the physiological changes after burn injury was lower plasma linezolid concentrations. In addition, burn injury induced significantly altered pharmacokinetic parameters with higher inter-individual variability. The distribution volume and clearance rate were increased (2.88 vs. 1.92 L/kg, P > 0.05; 0.28 vs. 0.20 L/h/kg, P < 0.05), and the AUC0-∞ was significantly lower (37.99 vs. 51.47 mg/L h, P < 0.05). However, there were almost no changes in half-life and mean residence time. These results suggested that therapeutic drug monitoring and dosage individualization of linezolid in patients with severe burns were necessary.

Amikacin pharmacokinetics during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis

Introduction

Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of amikacin during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Methods

This prospective observational study included patients admitted to an academic medical center who received amikacin therapy while on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and had at least two serum sample concentrations measured after first-dose administration. First-order pharmacokinetic parameters, patient characteristics, and CVVHD parameters were recorded.

Results

Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) dose of amikacin and dialysate flow rate, based on adjusted body weight, were 14.1 mg/kg (11.7–17.3 mg/kg) and 23.9 mL/kg/h (19.0–29.5 mL/kg/h), respectively. This corresponded with a median C_max of 28.5 μg/mL (20.9–39.0 μg/mL). There was a significant correlation between clearance and dialytic dose (for every 1 L/h increase in dialysate flow rate, clearance rate increased by 23.6 mL/min [95% confidence interval 1.7–45.4 mL/min; P = 0.037]).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that amikacin dose and interval should be individualized for each patient on CVVHD based on first-dose pharmacokinetic assessment.

Amikacin population pharmacokinetics among paediatric burn patients

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the pharmacokinetics of amikacin among children with severe burn and (2) identify influential covariates.

METHODS

Population-based pharmacokinetic modelling was performed in NONMEM 7.2 for hospitalized children who received amikacin at 10-20mg/kg divided two, three, or four times per day as part of early empiric treatment of presumed burn-related sepsis.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from 70 patients (6 months to 17 years) with 282 amikacin serum concentrations. Amikacin's mean Cmax was 33.2±9.4μg/mL and the mean Cmin was 3.8±4.6μg/mL. The final covariate model estimated clearance as 5.98L/h/70kg (4.97-6.99, 95% CI), the volume of distribution in the central compartment as 16.7L/70kg (14.0-19.4, 95% CI), the volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment as 40.1L/70kg (15.0-80.4, 95% CI), and the inter-compartmental clearance as 3.38L/h/70kg (2.44-4.32, 95% CI). In multivariate analyses, current weight (P<0.001) was a significant covariate, while age, sex, height, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, platelet count, the extent and type of burn, and concomitant vancomycin administration did not influence amikacin pharmacokinetics.

DISCUSSION

Children with burn featured elevated amikacin clearance when compared to healthy adult volunteers. However, peak amikacin concentrations are comparable to those attained in other critically-ill children, suggesting that elevated amikacin clearance may not result in sub-therapeutic antibacterial effects. In this study, we found that amikacin displays two-compartment pharmacokinetics, with weight exerting a strong effect upon amikacin clearance. Further pharmacodynamic studies are needed to establish the optimal dosing regimen for amikacin in paediatric burn patients.

Rational use of aminoglycosides--review and recommendations by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA)

The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA) has carried out a risk-benefit analysis of aminoglycoside treatment based on clinical efficacy, antibacterial spectrum, and synergistic effect with beta-lactam antibiotics, endotoxin release, toxicity, and side effects. In addition, SRGA has considered optimal dosage schedules and advice on serum concentration monitoring, with respect to variability in volume of drug distribution and renal clearance. SRGA recommends that aminoglycoside therapy should be considered in the following situations: (1) progressive severe sepsis and septic shock, in combination with broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics, (2) sepsis without shock, in combination with broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics if the infection is suspected to be caused by multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, (3) pyelonephritis, in combination with a beta-lactam or quinolone until culture and susceptibility results are obtained, or as monotherapy if a serious allergy to beta-lactam or quinolone antibiotics exists, (4) serious infections caused by multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria when other alternatives are lacking, and (5) endocarditis caused by difficult-to-treat pathogens when monotherapy with beta-lactam antibiotics is not sufficient. Amikacin is generally more active against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli than other aminoglycosides, making it a better option in cases of suspected infection caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Based on their resistance data, local drug committees should decide on the choice of first-line aminoglycoside. Unfortunately, aminoglycoside use is rarely followed up with audiometry, and in Sweden we currently have no systematic surveillance of adverse events after aminoglycoside treatment. We recommend routine assessment of adverse effects, including hearing loss and impairment of renal function, if possible at the start and after treatment with aminoglycosides, and that these data should be included in hospital patient safety surveillance and national quality registries.

An open prospective study of amikacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients during treatment with continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration

Background

The objectives of the current study were to determine amikacin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing treatment with continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and to determine whether peak and trough concentration data could be used to predict pharmacokinetic parameters. An open prospective study was undertaken, comprising five critically ill patients with sepsis requiring CVVHDF.

Methods

Peak and trough plasma concentrations and multiple serum levels in a dosage interval were measured and the latter fitted to both a one- and two-compartment model. Blood and ultrafiltrate samples were collected and assayed for amikacin to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters; total body clearance (TBC), elimination rate constant (k) and volume of distribution (V_d). The concentration of amikacin in ultrafiltrate was used to determine the clearance via CVVHDF. CVVHDF was performed at prescribed dialysate rates of 1-2l h^-1 and ultrafiltration rate of 2l h^-1. Blood was pumped at 200ml/min using a Gambro blood pump and Hospal AN69HF haemofilter. Amikacin dosing was according to routine clinical practice in the Intensive Care Unit.

Results

The multi serum level study indicated that the one compartment model was adequate to characterize the pharmacokinetics in these patients suggesting that peak and trough plasma level data may be used to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters and to optimise individual patient dosing during treatment with CVVHDF. CVVHDF resulted in an amikacin k of 0.109+/−0.025 h, t_1/2 of 6.74 +/− 1.69h, TBC of 3.39+/−0.817 h^-1, and V_d of 31.4 +/− 3.27. The mean clearance due to CVVHDF of 2.86 l h^-1 is similar to the creatinine clearance of 2.74 +/−0.4 lh^-1. Amikacin was significantly cleared by CVVHDF, and its half life in patients on CVVHDF was approximately 2–3 times that reported in subjects without renal impairment and not undergoing haemodiafiltration for any reason.

Conclusions

CVVHDF contributes significantly to total clearance of amikacin. The use of pharmacokinetic parameter estimates obtained from two steady state serum-drug concentrations (peak and trough) can be used to guide individualised dosing of critically ill patients treated with CVVHDF. This is considered a useful strategy in this patient cohort, particularly in avoiding the risk of underdosing.