1
|
Geilen J, Kainz M, Zapletal B, Naka A, Tichy J, Jäger W, Böhmdorfer M, Zeitlinger M, Schultz MJ, Stamm T, Ritschl V, Geleff S, Tschernko E. Antimicrobial Drug Penetration Is Enhanced by Lung Tissue Inflammation and Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 209:829-839. [PMID: 38099833 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202306-0974oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Pneumonia is a frequent and feared complication in intubated critically ill patients. Tissue concentrations of antimicrobial drugs need to be sufficiently high to treat the infection and also prevent development of bacterial resistance. It is uncertain whether pulmonary inflammation and injury affect antimicrobial drug penetration into lung tissue.Objectives: To determine and compare tissue and BAL fluid concentrations of ceftaroline fosamil and linezolid in a model of unilateral acute lung injury in pigs and to evaluate whether dose adjustment is necessary to reach sufficient antimicrobial concentrations in injured lung tissue.Methods: After induction of unilateral acute lung injury, ceftaroline fosamil and linezolid were administered intravenously. Drug concentrations were measured in lung tissue through microdialysis and in blood and BAL fluid samples during the following 8 hours. The primary endpoint was the tissue concentration area under the concentration curve in the first 8 hours (AUC0-8 h) of the two antimicrobial drugs.Measurements and Main Results: In 10 pigs, antimicrobial drug concentrations were higher in inflamed and injured lung tissue compared with those in uninflamed and uninjured lung tissue (median ceftaroline fosamil AUC0-8 h [and interquartile range] = 26.7 mg ⋅ h ⋅ L-1 [19.7-39.0] vs. 16.0 mg ⋅ h ⋅ L-1 [13.6-19.9], P = 0.02; median linezolid AUC0-8 h 76.0 mg ⋅ h ⋅ L-1 [68.1-96.0] vs. 54.6 mg ⋅ h ⋅ L-1 [42.7-60.9], P = 0.01), resulting in a longer time above the minimal inhibitory concentration and in higher peak concentrations and dialysate/plasma ratios. Penetration into BAL fluid was excellent for both antimicrobials, but without left-to-right differences (ceftaroline fosamil, P = 0.78; linezolid, P = 1.00).Conclusions: Tissue penetration of two commonly used antimicrobial drugs for pneumonia is enhanced by early lung tissue inflammation and injury, resulting in longer times above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Thus, lung tissue inflammation ameliorates antimicrobial drug penetration during the acute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Geilen
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
| | - Matthias Kainz
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
| | - Bernhard Zapletal
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
| | - Asami Naka
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
| | - Johanna Tichy
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
| | - Walter Jäger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Böhmdorfer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacogenetics, and Imaging
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location "AMC", University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, and
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Valentin Ritschl
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, and
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvana Geleff
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Edda Tschernko
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Management
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dhanani J, Roberts JA, Monsel A, Torres A, Kollef M, Rouby JJ. Understanding the nebulisation of antibiotics: the key role of lung microdialysis studies. Crit Care 2024; 28:49. [PMID: 38373973 PMCID: PMC10875779 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04828-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nebulisation of antibiotics is a promising treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Ensuring effective antibiotic concentrations at the site of infection in the interstitial space fluid is crucial for clinical outcomes. Current assessment methods, such as epithelial lining fluid and tissue homogenates, have limitations in providing longitudinal pharmacokinetic data. MAIN BODY Lung microdialysis, an invasive research technique predominantly used in animals, involves inserting probes into lung parenchyma to measure antibiotic concentrations in interstitial space fluid. Lung microdialysis offers unique advantages, such as continuous sampling, regional assessment of antibiotic lung concentrations and avoidance of bronchial contamination. However, it also has inherent limitations including the cost of probes and assay development, the need for probe calibration and limited applicability to certain antibiotics. As a research tool in VAP, lung microdialysis necessitates specialist techniques and resource-intensive experimental designs involving large animals undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, its potential impact on advancing our understanding of nebulised antibiotics for VAP is substantial. The technique may enable the investigation of various factors influencing antibiotic lung pharmacokinetics, including drug types, delivery devices, ventilator settings, interfaces and disease conditions. Combining in vivo pharmacokinetics with in vitro pharmacodynamic simulations can become feasible, providing insights to inform nebulised antibiotic dose optimisation regimens. Specifically, it may aid in understanding and optimising the nebulisation of polymyxins, effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, lung microdialysis holds promise in exploring novel nebulisation therapies, including repurposed antibiotic formulations, bacteriophages and immunomodulators. The technique's potential to monitor dynamic biochemical changes in pneumonia, such as cytokines, metabolites and inflammation/infection markers, opens avenues for developing theranostic tools tailored to critically ill patients with VAP. CONCLUSION In summary, lung microdialysis can be a potential transformative tool, offering real-time insights into nebulised antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Its potential to inform optimal dosing regimen development based on precise target site concentrations and contribute to development of theranostic tools positions it as key player in advancing treatment strategies for VAP caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. The establishment of international research networks, exemplified by LUMINA (lung microdialysis applied to nebulised antibiotics), signifies a proactive step towards addressing complexities and promoting multicentre experimental studies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayesh Dhanani
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Jason A Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Herston Infectious Diseases Institute (HeIDI), Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
- Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Antoine Monsel
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy, Paris, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), DMU DREAM, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Antoni Torres
- Department of Pneumology, Institut Clinic del Tórax, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), SGR 911- Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marin Kollef
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jean-Jacques Rouby
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), DMU DREAM, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bavaro DF, Belati A, Bussini L, Cento V, Diella L, Gatti M, Saracino A, Pea F, Viale P, Bartoletti M. Safety and effectiveness of fifth generation cephalosporins for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a narrative review exploring past, present, and future. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:9-36. [PMID: 38145925 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2299377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major issue in healthcare, since it is often associated with endocarditis or deep site foci. Relevant morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA-BSIs forced the development of new antibiotic strategies; in particular, this review will focus the attention on fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline/ceftobiprole), that are the only ß-lactams active against MRSA. AREAS COVERED The review discusses the available randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline/ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs. Finally, a proposal of MRSA-BSI treatment flowchart, based on fifth-generation cephalosporins, is described. EXPERT OPINION The use of anti-MRSA cephalosporins is an acceptable choice either in monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs due to their relevant effectiveness and safety. Particularly, their use may be advisable in combination therapy in case of severe infections (including endocarditis or persistent bacteriemia) or in monotherapy in subjects at higher risk of drugs-induced toxicity with older regimens. On the contrary, caution should be taken in case of suspected/ascertained central nervous system infections due to inconsistent data regarding penetration of these drugs in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Fiore Bavaro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Belati
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Linda Bussini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Cento
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Microbiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Diella
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Milo Gatti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Annalisa Saracino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Federico Pea
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Bartoletti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Targeted Therapy of Severe Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Multidisciplinary Proposal of Therapeutic Algorithms Based on Real-World Evidence. Microorganisms 2023; 11:microorganisms11020394. [PMID: 36838359 PMCID: PMC9960997 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Introduction: To develop evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill adult patients. (2) Methods: A multidisciplinary team of four experts had several rounds of assessment for developing algorithms concerning targeted antimicrobial therapy of severe infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients. The literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE (until August 2022) to provide evidence for supporting therapeutic choices. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Two different algorithms were created, one for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and the other for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The therapeutic options were categorized for each different site of infection and were selected also on the basis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features. (3) Results: Cefazolin or oxacillin were the agents proposed for all of the different types of severe MSSA infections. The proposed targeted therapies for severe MRSA infections were different according to the infection site: daptomycin plus fosfomycin or ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis, and/or infections associated with intracardiac/intravascular devices; ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for community-acquired pneumonia; linezolid alone or plus fosfomycin for infection-related ventilator-associated complications or for central nervous system infections; daptomycin alone or plus clindamycin for necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections. (4) Conclusions: We are confident that targeted therapies based on scientific evidence and optimization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features of antibiotic monotherapy or combo therapy may represent valuable strategies for treating MSSA and MRSA infections.
Collapse
|