Drug resistance mutation profile and accumulation kinetics in human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals infected with subtypes B and F failing highly active antiretroviral therapy are influenced by different viral codon usage patterns

Pulsed EPR characterization of HIV-1 protease conformational sampling and inhibitor-induced population shifts

The conformational landscape of HIV-1 protease (PR) can be experimentally characterized by pulsed-EPR double electron-electron resonance (DEER). For this characterization, nitroxide spin labels are attached to an engineered cysteine residue in the flap region of HIV-1 PR. DEER distance measurements from spin-labels contained within each flap of the homodimer provide a detailed description of the conformational sampling of apo-enzyme as well as induced conformational shifts as a function of inhibitor binding. The distance distribution profiles are further interpreted in terms of a conformational ensemble scheme that consists of four unique states termed "curled/tucked", "closed", "semi-open" and "wide-open" conformations. Reported here are the DEER results for a drug-resistant variant clinical isolate sequence, V6, in the presence of FDA approved protease inhibitors (PIs) as well as a non-hydrolyzable substrate mimic, CaP2. Results are interpreted in the context of the current understanding of the relationship between conformational sampling, drug resistance, and kinetic efficiency of HIV-1PR as derived from previous DEER and kinetic data for a series of HIV-1PR constructs that contain drug-pressure selected mutations or natural polymorphisms. Specifically, these collective results support the notion that inhibitor-induced closure of the flaps correlates with inhibitor efficiency and drug resistance. This body of work also suggests DEER as a tool for studying conformational sampling in flexible enzymes as it relates to function.

Short Communication: In Vitro Accumulation of Drug Resistance Mutations in Chimeric Infectious Clones Containing Subtype B or C Reverse Transcriptase and Selected with Tenofovir or Didanosine

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) contributed to the improvement in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients. However, the emergence of drug-resistant mutations (DRM) is a major viral factor impacting therapeutic failure. Differences in DRM can occur among HIV-1 subtypes. We evaluate the kinetics of the selection of resistance mutations in vitro analyzing two chimeric clones that contain the reverse transcriptases of subtypes B or C (RTB' and RTC') in cells treated with increasing concentrations of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and didanosine (ddI). The mutation K65R is selected more quickly in RTC' than in RTB' viruses with TDF and ddI, and additional mutations (positions 45, 62, and 68) were selected after K65R fixation. Other primary mutations (M184V and Q151M) were selected with ddI treatment in conjunction with K65R only in RTC' viruses. Both patterns, M184V+K65R and Q151M+K65R, have a significant impact on NRTI resistance. Our data suggest that selection of TDF and ddI DRMs can occur earlier in subtype C HIV in patients when compared to subtype B.

Trends on epidemiological, virological, and clinical features among newly diagnosed HIV-1 persons in Northwest Spain over the last 10 years

To describe temporal trend and characteristics of newly HIV-diagnosed patients in a medical care area in Northwest Spain over the last 10 years. All newly diagnosed patients for HIV-infection from 2004 to 2013 at a reference medical care area in Northwest of Spain were identified. Epidemiological, virological, immunological, and clinical data, as well as HIV genotype and drug resistance information were recorded. A total of 565 newly HIV-diagnosed patients were identified. The number of new cases increased in the last 5 years (66 cases/year). Overall, 53.1% had a median CD4 counts < 350 cells/µl and 33.6% had an AIDS defining criteria. Non-B variants were found in 34.4% of patients being subtype F (25.8%) the most common non-B subtype. The rate of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) over the study period was 3.7%, but a decreased to 2.6% was observed in the last 5 years. The most prevalent TDR mutations were: T215 revertants (1.5%), K219QENR (1.2%), for NRTIs; K103N (1.9%), for NNRTIs; L90M (0.3%), for PIs. Overall, 73.2% of patients started antiretroviral treatment and 9.9% of patients died during follow-up. The number of newly HIV diagnosed patients increased since year 2009. There is a high prevalence of late diagnosis (53%) and 33% had an AIDS defining criteria. Interestingly, the most prevalent non-B subtype in our population was F (25.8%). These findings support the need to facilitate the access for HIV testing to reduce the rate of late HIV diagnosis, improve the clinical outcome and prevent HIV transmission.

HIV-1 genetic variation and drug resistance development

Up until 10 years ago, basic and clinical HIV-1 research was mainly performed on HIV-1 subtype B that predominated in resource-rich settings. Over the past decade, HIV-1 care and therapy has been scaled up substantially in Latin America, Africa and Asia. These regions are largely dominated by non-B subtype infections, and especially the African continent is affected by the HIV pandemic. Insight on the potency of antiviral drugs and regimens as well as on the emergence of drug resistance in non-B subtypes was lacking triggering research in this field, also partly driven by the introduction and spreading of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in Europe. The scope of this article was to review and discuss the state-of-the-art on the impact of HIV-1 genetic variation on the in vitro activity of antiviral drugs and in vivo response to antiviral therapy; as well as on the in vitro and in vivo emergence of drug resistance.

A cluster of patients with recombinant B/F HIV-1 infection: epidemiological, clinical, and virological aspects

Migratory processes have caused changes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemiology and non-B subtypes are now playing an increasing role. In a cohort of 553 HIV-infected outpatients tested to identify non-B isolates, the largest group consisted of 13 subjects with a recombinant B/F form (prevalence 2.4%). Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses described a B/F recombinant clade with anomalous breakpoints that did not allow it to be classified as CRF12_BF. Viral load was not quantified efficiently because of a mismatch in the primers and probes used by commercial assays. An assessment of the clinical management, and epidemiological, immunological, and virological characteristics of these patients, who were receiving non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)- or protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens, showed that the immunological and virological mismatch delayed the start of treatment by a mean of 6.8 months. Therapy was started in nine patients. Both NNRTI- and PI-based regimens led to full virological suppression after a mean 36 weeks of treatment; the PI-based regimens proved to be more effective in terms of immunological recovery (1,341 vs. 544 CD4+ cells/mm(3) ). The spread of non-B subtypes is increasing throughout the world but their response to treatment is still unclear. PIs and NNRTIs are effective but further tests are needed to allow the more efficient recognition of these viral strains and establish how they should be treated.

Analysis of HIV-1 BF pr/rt recombinant strains from Rio de Janeiro/Brazil reveals multiple unrelated mosaic structures

Due to the co-circulation of HIV-1 subtypes B and F1 in Brazil, a large variety of unique BF1 recombinant forms (URFs_BF1) and four circulating BF1 recombinant forms (CRF28, CRF29, CRF39 and CRF40) have been described. The aim of this study was to investigate mosaic structure and phylogenetic relationship among several BF1 (protease-reverse transcriptase, pr/rt) recombinant sequences obtained from a group of patients from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 1994 to 2005. Phylogenetic relationships were estimated by Bayesian and SplitsTree methods. Recombination breakpoints were analyzed by Bootscan. Those samples presenting the same recombinant pattern in the pr/rt region were investigated in the integrase (int) and envelope (env) regions as a screening method for the detection of potential new CRFs candidates. Third out of 61 pr/rt HIV-1 BF1 recombinant sequences analyzed depicted unique recombinant structures and were classified URFs_BF1. The other 31 samples segregated in eight well-supported phylogenetic clusters composed of at least three samples sharing the same recombination pattern. Analyses of the int and env regions from these 31 samples revealed that 11 samples were URFs_BF1. Three and four sequences corresponded, respectively, to the previously described CRF39 and CRF40. Three samples displayed a CRF28-like mosaic structure, and one sample a CRF29-like mosaic pattern. The other nine BF1 samples segregate in three distinct clusters with the same recombination profile and could represent good candidates for new CRFs_BF profiles. The HIV-1 BF1 epidemic in Rio de Janeiro is characterized by a high prevalence (67%) of URFs_BF1 and a low prevalence (4.9-6.6%) of each CRFs_BF previously identified in Brazil.

HIV Genetic Diversity and Drug Resistance

Most of the current knowledge on antiretroviral (ARV) drug development and resistance is based on the study of subtype B of HIV-1, which only accounts for 10% of the worldwide HIV infections. Cumulative evidence has emerged that different HIV types, groups and subtypes harbor distinct biological properties, including the response and susceptibility to ARV. Recent laboratory and clinical data highlighting such disparities are summarized in this review. Variations in drug susceptibility, in the emergence and selection of specific drug resistance mutations, in viral replicative capacity and in the dynamics of resistance acquisition under ARV selective pressure are discussed. Clinical responses to ARV therapy and associated confounding factors are also analyzed in the context of infections by distinct HIV genetic variants.

Differences in resistance mutations among HIV-1 non-subtype B infections: a systematic review of evidence (1996-2008)

Ninety percent of HIV-1-infected people worldwide harbour non-subtype B variants of HIV-1. Yet knowledge of resistance mutations in non-B HIV-1 and their clinical relevance is limited. Although a few reviews, editorials and perspectives have been published alluding to this lack of data among non-B subtypes, no systematic review has been performed to date.With this in mind, we conducted a systematic review (1996-2008) of all published studies performed on the basis of non-subtype B HIV-1 infections treated with antiretroviral drugs that reported genotype resistance tests. Using an established search string, 50 studies were deemed relevant for this review.These studies reported genotyping data from non-B HIV-1 infections that had been treated with either reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors. While most major resistance mutations in subtype B were also found in non-B subtypes, a few novel mutations in non-B subtypes were recognized. The main differences are reflected in the discoveries that: (i) the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutation, V106M, has been seen in subtype C and CRF01_AE, but not in subtype B, (ii) the protease inhibitor mutations L89I/V have been reported in C, F and G subtypes, but not in B, (iii) a nelfinavir selected non-D30N containing pathway predominated in CRF01_AE and CRF02_AG, while the emergence of D30N is favoured in subtypes B and D, (iv) studies on thymidine analog-treated subtype C infections from South Africa, Botswana and Malawi have reported a higher frequency of the K65R resistance mutation than that typically seen with subtype B.Additionally, some substitutions that seem to impact non-B viruses differentially are: reverse transcriptase mutations G196E, A98G/S, and V75M; and protease mutations M89I/V and I93L.Polymorphisms that were common in non-B subtypes and that may contribute to resistance tended to persist or become more frequent after drug exposure. Some, but not all, are recognized as minor resistance mutations in B subtypes. These observed differences in resistance pathways may impact cross-resistance and the selection of second-line regimens with protease inhibitors. Attention to newer drug combinations, as well as baseline genotyping of non-B isolates, in well-designed longitudinal studies with long duration of follow up are needed.