Efficacy of Humanized Exposures of Cefiderocol (S-649266) against a Diverse Population of Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Murine Thigh Infection Model

Assessing the in vivo impact of novel β-lactamase inhibitors on the efficacy of their partner β-lactams against serine carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using human-simulated exposures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem and meropenem/vaborbactam in a murine thigh infection model against serine carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

Nine P. aeruginosa clinical isolates harbouring GES-5 (n = 1), GES-20 (n = 1), GES-5/20 (n = 1), GES-19, GES-20 (n = 3) and KPC (n = 3) were evaluated. Six mice were administered HSRs of ceftazidime 2 g q8h (2 h infusion), ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g q8h (2 h infusion), meropenem 2 g q8h (3 h infusion), imipenem 0.5 g q6h (0.5 h infusion), imipenem/relebactam 1.25 g q6h (0.5 h infusion) and meropenem/vaborbactam 4 g q8h (3 h infusion). Change in bacterial burden relative to baseline and the percent of isolates meeting the 1 log10 kill endpoint were assessed.

RESULTS

The addition of avibactam to ceftazidime increased the percentage of isolates meeting 1 log10 kill from 33% to 100% of GES- or KPC-harbouring isolates. Imipenem/relebactam HSR produced ≥1 log10 of kill against 83% and 100% of GES- and KPC-harbouring isolates, respectively, while imipenem alone failed to reach 1 log10 kill for any isolates. Vaborbactam resulted in variable restoration of meropenem activity as 1 log10 kill was achieved in only 33% and 66% of GES- and KPC-harbouring isolates, respectively, compared with no isolates for meropenem alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam were active against 100% and 89% of KPC- or GES-harbouring isolates tested in vivo. The activity of meropenem/vaborbactam was variable, suggesting this may be an inferior treatment option in this setting. Further studies to evaluate clinical outcomes in GES- and KPC-producing P. aeruginosa are warranted given their increasing prevalence worldwide.

Translational PK/PD for the Development of Novel Antibiotics-A Drug Developer's Perspective

Antibiotic development traditionally involved large Phase 3 programs, preceded by Phase 2 studies. Recognizing the high unmet medical need for new antibiotics and, in some cases, challenges to conducting large clinical trials, regulators created a streamlined clinical development pathway in which a lean clinical efficacy dataset is complemented by nonclinical data as supportive evidence of efficacy. In this context, translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) plays a key role and is a major contributor to a "robust" nonclinical package. The classical PK/PD index approach, proven successful for established classes of antibiotics, is at the core of recent antibiotic approvals and the current antibacterial PK/PD guidelines by regulators. Nevertheless, in the case of novel antibiotics with a novel Mechanism of Action (MoA), there is no prior experience with the PK/PD index approach as the basis for translating nonclinical efficacy to clinical outcome, and additional nonclinical studies and PK/PD analyses might be considered to increase confidence. In this review, we discuss the value and limitations of the classical PK/PD approach and present potential risk mitigation activities, including the introduction of a semi-mechanism-based PK/PD modeling approach. We propose a general nonclinical PK/PD package from which drug developers might choose the studies most relevant for each individual candidate in order to build up a "robust" nonclinical PK/PD understanding.

Cefiderocol Treatment for Patients with Multidrug- and Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in the Compassionate Use Program

Cefiderocol is an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but its in vitro activity against these isolates and its clinical effectiveness for isolates with MICs of >1 μg/mL is unclear. We investigated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients treated with cefiderocol through the compassionate use program and assessed physician-reported clinical response and 28-day all-cause mortality by cefiderocol MIC values. P. aeruginosa isolates underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and comparator agents by using reference broth microdilution. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; susceptible, ≤1 μg/mL) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; susceptible, ≤4 μg/mL) cefiderocol breakpoints were applied. Additionally, molecular characterization of β-lactamase genes was performed. Clinical response and vital status were reported by treating physicians. Forty-six patients with P. aeruginosa infections were evaluated. Twenty-nine (63%) and 42 (91%) isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol using FDA and CLSI breakpoints, respectively. Thirty-seven (80%) and 32 (70%) isolates were not susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. The clinical response rate was 69% (20/29) with a cefiderocol MIC of ≤1 μg/mL, 69% (9/13) with a cefiderocol MIC of 2 to 4 μg/mL, and 100% (4/4) with an MIC of ≥8 μg/mL, while day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 23% (6/26; MIC ≤ 1 μg/mL), 33% (4/12; MIC, 2 to 4 μg/mL), and 0% (0/4; MIC ≥8 μg/mL), respectively. Cefiderocol was active in vitro against most P. aeruginosa isolated from patients with limited or no alternative therapies. Patients with cefiderocol MICs of 2 to 4 μg/mL did not have significantly worse outcomes than those with MICs of ≤1 μg/mL.

Assessing the in vivo efficacy of rational antibiotics and combinations against difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing GES β-lactamases

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem combination against Guiana-extended spectrum (GES)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.

METHODS

Eighteen P. aeruginosa isolates producing GES-1 (n = 5), GES-5 (n = 5) or miscellaneous GESs (combinations of GES-19, GES-20 and/or GES-26; n = 8) were evaluated. In vitro MIC testing was determined using broth microdilution. In a validated murine thigh infection model, HSRs of cefiderocol 2 g q8h as a 3 h IV infusion, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g q8h as a 2 h IV infusion, meropenem 2 g q8h as a 3 h IV infusion or ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem were administered. Change in bacterial burden relative to baseline and the proportion of isolates in each genotypic group meeting 1-log10 kill endpoint were assessed.

RESULTS

Modal MICs (mg/L) ranged from 0.125 to 1 for cefiderocol, 4 to >64 for ceftazidime/avibactam and 2 to >64 for meropenem. Cefiderocol produced >1-log10 of kill against all 18 tested isolates. Meropenem was active against all GES-1 isolates whereas activity against GES-5 and miscellaneous GESs was lacking, consistent with the MICs. Ceftazidime/avibactam was active against all GES-1 and GES-5 isolates and retained activity against 62.5% of miscellaneous GESs including isolates with elevated MICs. For isolates where ceftazidime/avibactam failed, the addition of meropenem restored the in vivo efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

As monotherapy, cefiderocol was active in vivo against all tested isolates. The activities of meropenem or ceftazidime/avibactam alone were variable; however, a combination of both was active against all isolates. Cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem could be valuable therapeutic options for GES-producing P. aeruginosa infections. Clinical confirmatory data are warranted.

Treatment of critically ill patients with cefiderocol for infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens: review of the evidence

Appropriate antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with serious Gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit is crucial to minimize morbidity and mortality. Several new antibiotics have shown in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore beta-lactam antibiotic with potent activity against multidrug-resistant, carbapenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat or extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, which have limited treatment options. The spectrum of activity of cefiderocol includes drug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia spp. and CRE that produce serine- and/or metallo-carbapenemases. Phase 1 studies established that cefiderocol achieves adequate concentration in the epithelial lining fluid in the lung and requires dosing adjustment for renal function, including patients with augmented renal clearance and continuous renal-replacement therapy (CRRT); no clinically significant drug-drug interactions are expected. The non-inferiority of cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem in all-cause mortality (ACM) rates at day 14 was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blind APEKS-NP Phase 3 clinical study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the efficacy of cefiderocol was investigated in the randomized, open-label, pathogen-focused, descriptive CREDIBLE-CR Phase 3 clinical study in its target patient population with serious carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, including hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infections. However, a numerically greater ACM rate with cefiderocol compared with BAT led to the inclusion of a warning in US and European prescribing information. Cefiderocol susceptibility results obtained with commercial tests should be carefully evaluated due to current issues regarding their accuracy and reliability. Since its approval, real-world evidence in patients with multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections suggests that cefiderocol can be efficacious in certain critically ill patient groups, such as those requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia with subsequently acquired Gram-negative bacterial superinfection, and patients with CRRT and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this article, we review the microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profiles and real-world evidence for cefiderocol, and look at future considerations for its role in the treatment of critically ill patients with challenging Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two of the three recently approved β-lactam agent (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae wild-type, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs, and 96% (49/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, as a Treatment Option for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) remain a significant public health threat, and, despite recent approvals, new antibiotics are needed. Severe infections caused by CRE, such as nosocomial pneumonia and bloodstream infections, are associated with a relatively high risk of morbidity and mortality. The recent approval of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline and cefiderocol has broadened the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with CRE infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin with overall potent in vitro activity against CRE. It is taken up via iron transport channels through active transport, with some entry into bacteria through traditional porin channels. Cefiderocol is relatively stable against hydrolysis by most serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA carbapenemases-the most frequent carbapenemases detected in CRE. The efficacy and safety of cefiderocol has been demonstrated in three randomised, prospective, parallel group or controlled clinical studies in patients at risk of being infected by multidrug-resistant or carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. This paper reviews the in vitro activity, emergence of resistance, preclinical effectiveness, and clinical experience for cefiderocol, and its role in the management of patients with CRE infections.

Optimizing antibiotic dosing regimens for nosocomial pneumonia: a window of opportunity for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling

INTRODUCTION

Determining antibiotic exposure in the lung and the threshold(s) needed for effective antibacterial killing is paramount during development of new antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, as these exposures directly affect clinical outcomes and resistance development. The use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling is recommended by regulatory agencies to evaluate antibiotic pulmonary exposure and optimize dosage regimen selection. This process has been implemented in newer antibiotic development.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss the basis for conducting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to support dosage regimen selection and optimization for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data that supported recent hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia indications for ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and cefiderocol will be reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Optimal drug development requires the integration of preclinical pharmacodynamic studies, healthy volunteers and ideally patient bronchoalveolar lavage pharmacokinetic studies, Monte-Carlo simulation, and clinical trials. Currently, plasma exposure has been successfully used as a surrogate for lung exposure threshold. Future studies are needed to identify the value of lung pharmacodynamic thresholds in nosocomial pneumonia antibiotic dosage optimization.

In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model.

METHODS

In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log10 cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking.

RESULTS

Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA -3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log10 cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced -3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced -2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.

Clinical evidence supporting cefiderol for serious Acinetobacter baumannii infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nosocomial infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii currently represent a serious challenge for clinicians because treatment options are limited and frequently associated with significant toxicity. Cefiderocol is a first-in-class siderophore cephalosporin that has a proven efficacy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, including carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current evidence for the role of cefiderocol in the management of A. baumannii infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we briefly summarize the available data on the efficacy (from randomized controlled trials) and on effectiveness and cure rates (from observational studies), pertaining to the use of cefiderocol for treatment of serious A. baumannii infections.

SUMMARY

Cefiderocol represents a promising and safe antibiotic option for treating patients with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infections. Due to conflicting mortality data from available experience, well-designed future randomized controlled trials and real-life studies are needed.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two out of the three recently approved β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae WT, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs and 73% (37/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Efficacy of Cefiderocol in Experimental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important cause of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Cefiderocol is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia. We evaluated the efficacy of cefiderocol in a neutropenic rabbit model of S. maltophilia pneumonia in comparison to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). The cefiderocol area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve extrapolated to 8 h (AUC_0–8) was lower (423.0 ± 40.9 μg·h/mL versus 713.6 ± 40.1 μg·h/mL) and clearance higher (252.77 ± 38.9 mL/h/kg versus 142.6 ± 32.9 mL/h/kg) in infected versus noninfected rabbits. We studied a clinical bloodstream S. maltophilia isolate with an MIC of 0.03 μg/mL of cefiderocol. Time spent above the MIC of cefiderocol for the majority of S. maltophilia isolates in rabbits recapitulated the plasma concentration-time profile observed in adult humans at the licensed dose of 2 g given intravenously (i.v.). Experimental groups consisted of 120 mg/kg cefiderocol i.v. every 8 hours (q8h); TMP-SMX, 5 mg/kg i.v. Q12h, and untreated controls (UCs). Treatment was administered for 10 days. Survival in cefiderocol-treated rabbits (87%) was greater than that in TMP-SMX-treated (25%; P < 0.05) and UC (0%; P < 0.05) groups. There was no residual bacterial burden in lung tissue or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in the cefiderocol group. Residual bacterial burden was present in lung tissue and BAL fluid in the TMP-SMX group but was decreased in comparison to UCs (P < 0.001). Lung weights (markers of pulmonary injury) were decreased in cefiderocol-treated versus TMP-SMX (P < 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001) groups. Cefiderocol is highly active in treatment of experimental S. maltophilia pneumonia, laying the foundation for future clinical investigations against this lethal infection in immunocompromised patients.

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a case for cefiderocol

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections constitute a serious clinical threat globally. Patients are often critically ill and/or immunocompromised. Antibiotic options are limited and are currently centered on beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combinations and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the mechanisms of P. aeruginosa resistance and their potential impact on the activity of current treatment options, along with evidence for the clinical efficacy of BL-BLI combinations in P. aeruginosa infections, some of which specifically target infections due to CR organisms. The preclinical and clinical evidence supporting cefiderocol as a treatment option for P. aeruginosa involving infections is also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cefiderocol is active against most known P. aeruginosa mechanisms mediating carbapenem resistance. It is stable against different serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, and, due to its iron channel-dependent uptake mechanism, is not impacted by porin channel loss. Furthermore, the periplasmic level of cefiderocol is not affected by upregulated efflux pumps. The potential for on-treatment resistance development currently appears to be low, although more clinical data are required. Information from surveillance programs, real-world compassionate use, and clinical studies demonstrate that cefiderocol is an important treatment option for CR P. aeruginosa infections.

In vivo translational assessment of the GES genotype on the killing profile of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Objectives

To evaluate the in vivo killing profile of human-simulated exposures of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem against GES-harbouring Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the murine thigh infection model.

Methods

Five P. aeruginosa isolates [three isogenic (GES-1, GES-5 and GES-15) and two clinical (GES-5 and GES-15)] were evaluated. MICs were determined using broth microdilution. Human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of ceftazidime 2 g IV q8h as a 2 h infusion, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g IV q8h as a 2 h infusion and meropenem 2 g IV q8h as a 3 h infusion were administered. Change in bacterial burden relative to baseline was assessed.

Results

Modal MICs ranged from 8 to >64 mg/L for ceftazidime, from 1 to 16 mg/L for ceftazidime/avibactam and from 1 to >64 mg/L for meropenem. In vivo, for the isogenic strains, avibactam augmented ceftazidime activity against the GES-1- and GES-15-harbouring isolates. Both ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in significant kill against the GES-5 isogenic isolate. The meropenem HSR produced >1 log₁₀ kill against each isogenic isolate (MICs of 1–4 mg/L). Against the GES-5 clinical isolate, ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in >1 log₁₀ kill compared with bacterial growth with the meropenem HSR. In the clinical isolate harbouring GES-15, the elevated MICs of ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam reduced the effectiveness of both compounds, while the observed reduction in meropenem MIC translated into in vivo efficacy of the HSR regimen, predictive of clinical efficacy.

Conclusions

In GES-harbouring P. aeruginosa, quantitative reductions in bacterial density observed with the translational murine model suggest that the phenotypic profile of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem is predictive of clinical efficacy when using the evaluated dosing regimens.

Efficacy and In Vitro Activity of Novel Antibiotics for Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

Infections by Gram-negative multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial species are difficult to treat using available antibiotics. Overuse of carbapenems has contributed to widespread resistance to these antibiotics; as a result, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), A. baumannii (CRAB), and P. aeruginosa (CRPA) have become common causes of healthcare-associated infections. Carbapenems, tigecycline, and colistin are the last resource antibiotics currently used; however, multiple reports of resistance to these antimicrobial agents have been documented worldwide. Recently, new antibiotics have been evaluated against Gram-negatives, including plazomicin (a new aminoglycoside) to treat CRE infection, eravacycline (a novel tetracycline) with in vitro activity against CRAB, and cefiderocol (a synthetic conjugate) for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia by carbapenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative isolates. Furthermore, combinations of known β-lactams with recently developed β-lactam inhibitors, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, has been suggested for the treatment of infections by extended-spectrum β-lactamases, carbapenemases, and AmpC producer bacteria. Nonetheless, they are not active against all carbapenemases, and there are reports of resistance to these combinations in clinical isolates.This review summarizes and discusses the in vitro and clinical evidence of the recently approved antibiotics, β-lactam inhibitors, and those in advanced phases of development for treating MDR infections caused by Gram-negative multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial species.

Assessment of sustained efficacy and resistance emergence under human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol against Acinetobacter baumannii using in vitro chemostat and in vivo murine infection models

Objectives

This study evaluated the sustained kill and potential for resistance development of Acinetobacter baumannii exposed to human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol over 72 h in in vitro and in vivo infection models.

Methods

Seven A. baumannii isolates with cefiderocol MICs of 0.12-2 mg/L were tested. The sustained bactericidal activity compared with the initial inoculum and the resistance appearance over 72 h treatment were evaluated in both an in vitro chemostat and an in vivo murine thigh infection model under the human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol (2 g every 8 h as 3 h infusion).

Results

In the in vitro model, regrowth was observed against all seven tested isolates and resistance emergence (>2 dilution MIC increase) was observed in five test isolates. Conversely, sustained killing over 72 h and no resistance emergence were observed in six of seven tested isolates in vivo. The mechanism of one resistant isolate that appeared only in the in vitro chemostat studies was a mutation in the tonB-exbB-exbD region, which contributes to the energy transduction on the iron transporters. The resistance acquisition mechanisms of other isolates have not been identified.

Conclusions

The discrepancy in the sustained efficacy and resistance emergence between in vitro and in vivo models was observed for A. baumannii. Although the resistance mechanisms in vitro have not been fully identified, sustained efficacy without resistance emergence was observed in vivo for six of seven isolates. These studies reveal the in vivo bactericidal activity and the low potential for development of resistance among A. baumannii evaluated under human-simulated exposures.

Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Systematic Review of Currently Available Evidence

Cefiderocol is a novel synthetic siderophore-conjugated antibiotic that hijacks the bacterial iron transport systems facilitating drug entry into cells, achieving high periplasmic concentrations. This systematic review analyzed the currently available literature on cefiderocol. It summarized in vitro susceptibility data, in vivo antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), clinical efficacy, safety and resistance mechanisms of cefiderocol. Cefiderocol has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant isolates. But New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)- positive isolates showed significantly higher MICs than other carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, with a susceptible rate of 83.4% for cefiderocol. Cefiderocol is well-tolerated, and the PK/PD target values can be achieved using a standard dose regimen or adjusted doses according to renal function. Clinical trials demonstrated that cefiderocol was non-inferiority to the comparator drugs in treating complicated urinary tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia. Case reports and series showed that cefiderocol was a promising therapeutic agent in carbapenem-resistant infections. However, resistant isolates and reduced susceptibility during treatment to cefiderocol have already been reported. In conclusion, cefiderocol is a promising powerful weapon for treating MDR recalcitrant infections.

Cefiderocol: A New Cephalosporin Stratagem Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Cefiderocol is a novel injectable siderophore cephalosporin that hijacks the bacterial iron transport machinery to facilitate cell entry and achieve high periplasmic concentrations. It has broad in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and nosocomial pneumonia based on clinical trials that demonstrated noninferiority to comparators. In this review, we summarize the available in vitro and clinical data, including recent evidence from 2 phase 3 clinical trials (APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR), and discuss the place of cefiderocol in the clinician's armamentarium against MDR gram-negative infections.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefiderocol for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections

INTRODUCTION

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic and first of its kind approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) in patients 18 years or older caused by susceptible organisms. Cefiderocol's unique mechanism of iron chelation improves Gram-negative membrane penetration as the bacteria's iron uptake mechanism recognizes the chelated iron antibiotic and iron for entry. This also allows for the evasion of cefiderocol from cell entry-related resistance mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the mechanism of action, resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics in various patient populations, and pharmacodynamics. Relevant literature evaluating efficacy and safety are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Limited treatment options are available for the treatment of carbapenem-resistantorganisms. Clinical trials have demonstrated that cefiderocol is no worse than alternative treatment options for cUTIs and HABP/VABP, but more data are currently available to support the use of beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor agents, where susceptible. Mortality differences demonstrated in patients with pneumonia and bloodstream infections must further be explored and logistical and practical considerations regarding susceptibility testing and use as monotherapy vs. combination therapy must be considered prior to confidently recommending cefiderocol for regular use in systemic infections.

Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Indicate Reduced Biofilm-Forming Abilities in Cefiderocol-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

The advent of cefiderocol provides hope for the clinical treatment of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB), especially those with carbapenem resistance. Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to cefiderocol can be enhanced by acclimatization. In the present study, we collected cefiderocol resistant K. pneumoniae isolates during a 36-day acclimatization procedure while increasing the cefiderocol concentration in the culture medium. Strains were studied for changes in their biological characteristics using proteomics and transcriptomics. A decrease in biofilm formation ability was the main change observed among the induced isolates. Downregulation of genes involved in biofilm formation including hdeB, stpA, yhjQ, fba, bcsZ, uvrY, bcsE, bcsC, and ibpB were the main factors that reduced the biofilm formation ability. Moreover, downregulation of siderophore transporter proteins including the iron uptake system component efeO, the tonB-dependent receptor fecA, and ferric iron ABC transporter fbpA may be among the determining factors leading to cefiderocol resistance and promoting the reduction of biofilm formation ability of K. pneumoniae. This is the first study to investigate cefiderocol resistance based on comprehensive proteomic and transcriptomic analyses.

Cefiderocol: An Overview of Its in-vitro and in-vivo Activity and Underlying Resistant Mechanisms

Treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections has led to a global public health challenging due to the bacterial resistance and limited choices of antibiotics. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel siderophore cephalosporin possessed unique drug delivery systems and stability to β-lactamases, has the potential to become first-line therapy for most aggressive MDR Gram-negative pathogens infection. However, there have been reports of drug resistance in the course of using CFDC. This study provides an overview of the in-vitro and in-vivo activity of CFDC and potential resistance mechanism was also summarized. In general, CFDC shows excellent activity against a broad range of MDR GNB pathogens including Enterobacteriaceae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The expressions of metallo-β-lactamases such as inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP), Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) are associated with a higher resistance rate of CFDC. Carbapenem-resistant phenotype has little effect on the resistance rate, although the acquisition of a particular carbapenemase may affect the susceptibility of the pathogens to CFDC. For potential resistance mechanism, mutations in β-lactamases and TonB-dependent receptors, which assist CFDC entering bacteria, would increase a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)90 value of CFDC against MDR pathogens. Since the development of CFDC, resistance during its utilization has been reported thus, prudent clinical applications are still necessary to preserve the activity of CFDC.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefiderocol

Cefiderocol is a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with promising activity against various Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant strains. A chlorocatechol group in the C-3 side chain provides cefiderocol with a siderophore activity, improving its stability against β-lactamases and facilitating the transportation of cefiderocol across outer bacterial membranes. Cefiderocol shows linear pharmacokinetics over a broad range of clinically relevant doses, with unchanged renal excretion constituting the main route of elimination. Geometric means (coefficient of variation) of the volume of distribution and clearance in individuals with normal kidney function were 15.8 (15%) L and 4.70 (27%) L/h, respectively. In patients with end-stage renal disease, clearance was 1.10 (24%) L/h. Time above the minimum inhibitory concentration is the main predictor of efficacy. There is no evidence for clinically relevant interactions of cefiderocol with other drugs mediated by metabolizing enzymes or drug transporters. Simulations based on population pharmacokinetic modeling suggest that dosing regimens should be adjusted based on kidney function to optimize therapeutic exposure to cefiderocol. Clinical efficacy trials indicated that cefiderocol is non-inferior to imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, and to meropenem in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. In the one study currently available, cefiderocol performed similarly to the best available therapy in the treatment of severe carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections regarding clinical and microbiological efficacy. In summary, cefiderocol shows favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and an acceptable safety profile, suggesting that cefiderocol might be a viable option to treat infections with bacteria resistant to other antibiotics.

Does Cefiderocol Have a Potential Role in Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation Management?

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is associated with frequent pulmonary exacerbations and the need for novel antibiotics against antimicrobial resistance. Cefiderocol is a newly approved therapeutic option active against a variety of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria such as gram-negative species commonly encountered by CF patients. This review describes the potential role of cefiderocol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, and Burkholderia cepacia complex. Cefiderocol is a potential therapeutic option for MDR pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≤4 mg/L. Due to the lack of in vivo evidence in the CF population, cefiderocol may be utilized in patients in which alternative options are lacking due to MDR organisms or rapid pulmonary decline.

Harnessing microbial iron chelators to develop innovative therapeutic agents

•

Microbial iron chelators as a new route to develop inspiring antimicrobials.

•

Siderophore-mimicking antibiotics as a pathogen-targeted strategy.

•

Effectiveness of iron chelators on antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

•

Iron chelators and the treatment of iron overload diseases.

•

Iron chelators as powerful tools for cancer therapy.

Background

Aim of Review

Key Scientific Concepts of Review

Discrepancy in sustained efficacy and resistance emergence under human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia between in vitro chemostat and in vivo murine infection models

OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluated the sustained kill and the potential for resistance development of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia exposed to a human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol over 72 h in in vitro and in vivo infection models.

METHODS

A total of seven S. maltophilia isolates with cefiderocol MICs of 0.03-0.5 mg/L were utilized. The sustained bactericidal activity compared with the initial inoculum and the appearance of resistance after the 72 h treatment were evaluated in both an in vitro chemostat model (four strains) and an in vivo murine thigh infection model (six strains) under the human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol (2 g every 8 h as a 3 h infusion).

RESULTS

In the in vitro model, regrowth was observed for three of four tested isolates and resistance emergence (>2-dilution MIC increase) was observed for all of the four test isolates. Conversely, sustained killing over 72 h and no resistance emergence were observed for all of the six tested isolates in the in vivo models. The mechanism of all resistant isolates that appeared only in the in vitro chemostat studies was a mutation in the tonB-exbB-exbD region, which contributes to the energy transduction on the iron transporters.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancy in the sustained efficacy and resistance emergence between in vivo and in vitro models appears to be due to the resistance acquisition mechanism caused by mutation in the tonB-exbB-exbD region developing in the enriched media utilized in vitro. These studies reveal the in vivo bactericidal activity and the low potential for development of resistance among Stenotrophomonas evaluated under human-simulated exposures.

Cefiderocol: A Review in Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Intravenous cefiderocol (Fetroja®; Fetcroja®) is the first siderophore cephalosporin approved for the treatment of adults with serious Gram-negative bacterial infections. Cefiderocol is stable against all four Ambler classes of β-lactamases (including metallo-β-lactamases) and exhibits excellent in vitro activity against many clinically relevant Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug resistant strains. In randomized, double-blind clinical trials, cefiderocol was noninferior to imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and to meropenem for nosocomial pneumonia. Furthermore, in a pathogen-focused clinical trial in patients with carbapenem-resistant (CR) infections, cefiderocol showed comparable efficacy to best available therapy (BAT), albeit all-cause mortality rate was higher in the cefiderocol arm, the cause of which has not been established. Cefiderocol had a good tolerability and safety profile in clinical trials. Thus cefiderocol is a novel, emerging, useful addition to the current treatment options for adults with susceptible Gram-negative bacterial infections (including cUTI and nosocomial pneumonia) for whom there are limited treatment options.

Durlobactam, a New Diazabicyclooctane β-Lactamase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acinetobacter Infections in Combination With Sulbactam

Durlobactam is a new member of the diazabicyclooctane class of β-lactamase inhibitors with broad spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D serine β-lactamases. Sulbactam is a first generation β-lactamase inhibitor with activity limited to a subset of class A enzymes that also has direct-acting antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter spp. The latter feature is due to sulbactam’s ability to inhibit certain penicillin-binding proteins, essential enzymes involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis in this pathogen. Because sulbactam is also susceptible to cleavage by numerous β-lactamases, its clinical utility for the treatment of contemporary Acinetobacter infections is quite limited. However, when combined with durlobactam, the activity of sulbactam is effectively restored against these notoriously multidrug-resistant strains. This sulbactam-durlobactam combination is currently in late-stage development for the treatment of Acinectobacter infections, including those caused by carbapenem-resistant isolates, for which there is a high unmet medical need. The following mini-review summarizes the molecular drivers of efficacy of this combination against this troublesome pathogen, with an emphasis on the biochemical features of each partner.

In vivo activity of WCK 4282 (high-dose cefepime/tazobactam) against serine β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model

OBJECTIVES

WCK 4282, high-dose cefepime/tazobactam, possesses potent in vitro activity against Gram-negative organisms including ESBL- and cephalosporinase-harbouring strains. The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate the in vivo activity of human-simulated exposures of WCK 4282 against serine-β-lactamase-harbouring Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

Nineteen clinical isolates were evaluated (ESBL/cephalosporinase producers, n = 8 Escherichia coli, n = 4 P. aeruginosa; KPC producers, n = 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 1 Klebsiella aerogenes; OXA-48/181 producers, n = 2 K. pneumoniae, n = 1 E. coli). WCK 4282 MICs ranged from 4 to 32 mg/L compared with 16 to >128 mg/L for cefepime. Thigh-infected neutropenic mice received cefepime, WCK 4282 or sham control over 24 h prior to harvest. Cefepime and tazobactam dosing regimens produced plasma profiles of fAUC, fT>MIC and fCmax similar to human exposure after WCK 4282 2/2 g every 8 h (1.5 h infusion).

RESULTS

Bacterial burdens (log10 cfu/thigh) were 5.81 ± 0.36 at 0 h and 9.29 ± 0.88 at 24 h in untreated controls. WCK 4282 produced potent activity against ESBL/cephalosporinase-producing strains with WCK 4282 MIC ≤16 mg/L; mean changes in log10 cfu/thigh from 0 h were -1.70 ± 0.77 and +1.86 ± 2.03 log10 cfu/thigh for WCK 4282 and cefepime human-simulated regimens, respectively. WCK 4282 produced variable activity against serine-carbapenemase-harbouring isolates. For the KPC-harbouring strains, WCK 4282 produced bacteriostasis with a mean -0.1 ± 0.61 log10 cfu/thigh. Against OXA-48/181-harbouring isolates, WCK 4282 produced a range of change in bacterial burden of -1.23 ± 0.33 to +1.04 ± 0.7 log10 cfu/thigh.

CONCLUSIONS

Human-simulated exposures of WCK 4282 produced in vivo efficacy against ESBL/cephalosporinase-producing, piperacillin/tazobactam- and ceftolozane/tazobactam-non-susceptible Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. These findings support further development of this combination as a carbapenem-sparing agent.

In vivo activity of human-simulated regimens of imipenem alone and in combination with relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the murine thigh infection model

BACKGROUND

Imipenem/relebactam is a carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales, including KPC producers.

OBJECTIVES

To provide translational data to support the clinical utility of the imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h regimen using a human-simulated regimen (HSR) of imipenem/relebactam, compared with imipenem alone, against a phenotypically and genotypically diverse population of P. aeruginosa.

METHODS

Twenty-nine P. aeruginosa isolates, including KPC (n = 6), PDC (n = 9), PAO (n = 4), GES (n = 5) and VIM (n = 1) producers, were used for the in vivo efficacy studies. Neutropenic mice were thigh-inoculated and randomized to receive HSRs of either imipenem 500 mg q6h, imipenem 1 g q8h, imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h or saline.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of the 29 isolates examined were imipenem resistant, with 24/29 isolates showing imipenem MICs of ≥32 mg/L. The addition of relebactam decreased the MICs up to 64-fold; imipenem/relebactam MICs ranged from 0.25 to >32 mg/L. Efficacies of the imipenem monotherapies and the imipenem/relebactam therapy were comparable for the two imipenem-susceptible organisms. Among the imipenem-resistant isolates, an increased mean growth was observed in the imipenem 500 mg q6h HSR and 1 g q8h HSR treatment groups of 1.31 ± 1.01 and 0.18 ± 1.67 log10 cfu/thigh, respectively. In contrast, a ≥2 log reduction in bacterial density was observed in 27/29 (93%) of the imipenem-resistant isolates subjected to imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h HSR.

CONCLUSIONS

The imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h HSR demonstrated superior in vivo activity compared with the conventionally employed imipenem regimens against MDR P. aeruginosa over a wide range of imipenem/relebactam MICs.

In vivo pharmacodynamics of new-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) in combination with cefepime against serine-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria

OBJECTIVES

Cefepime/taniborbactam is a cephalosporin/cyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor combination under development for the treatment of infections due to MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model, we aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index, relative to taniborbactam exposure, that correlated most closely with the efficacy of the cefepime/taniborbactam combination and the magnitude of index required for efficacy against serine-β-lactamase-producing strains.

METHODS

Twenty-six clinical Enterobacterales (expressing ESBLs, plasmid-mediated AmpC and/or carbapenemases of classes A or D; cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs 0.06-16 mg/L) and 11 clinical P. aeruginosa (AmpC overproducing or KPC expressing; cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs 1-16 mg/L) were evaluated. A cefepime human-simulated regimen (HSR) equivalent to a clinical dose of 2 g q8h as a 2 h infusion was given in combination with taniborbactam for 24 h. For a subset of P. aeruginosa isolates, a sub-therapeutic cefepime exposure was utilized.

RESULTS

Dose-fractionation studies revealed that dosing frequency had no impact on taniborbactam potentiation of cefepime activity. Relative to the initial bacterial burden, the median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with 1 log kill in combination with the cefepime HSR for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was 2.62 and 0.46, respectively. In combination with sub-therapeutic cefepime, the median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with 1 and 2 log kill against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa was 2.00 and 3.30, respectively, relative to the bacterial burden in the cefepime-treated groups. The taniborbactam HSR (equivalent to 0.5 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) was adequate to attain ≥1 log reduction against all test isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the cefepime/taniborbactam combination (2 g/0.5 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) exerts potent in vivo activity against cefepime-resistant isolates, including serine-carbapenemase producers.

Metallo-β-lactamase resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is an artefact of currently utilized antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods

BACKGROUND

MBLs are a major contributor to β-lactam resistance when tested using CAMHB. Despite in vitro resistance, positive outcomes have been reported in MBL-infected patients following carbapenem treatment. The impact of physiological zinc concentrations on this in vitro-in vivo MBL discordance warrants investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate meropenem in vitro activity against MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in zinc-depleted broth (Chelex-CAMHB, EDTA-CAMHB) and assess meropenem efficacy in murine infection models.

METHODS

Neutropenic mice received a meropenem human-simulated regimen of 2 g q8h or levofloxacin 750 mg q24h (for model validation). Zinc concentrations were determined in conventional CAMHB, zinc-depleted CAMHB and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of lung-infected mice.

RESULTS

All MBL-producing isolates (NDM, n = 25; VIM, n = 3; IMP, n = 2) examined were meropenem resistant in CAMHB and susceptible in zinc-depleted CAMHB (5- to 11-fold reduction), with zinc depletion having no impact on levofloxacin MICs. Zinc concentrations (mean ± SD) in CAMHB were 0.959 ± 0.038 mg/L and in both zinc-depleted CAMHB and ELF were <0.002 mg/L. In vivo, levofloxacin displayed predictable efficacy consistent with its phenotypic profile, while meropenem produced >1 log unit bacterial killing despite in vitro resistance in conventional CAMHB.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that meropenem in vivo efficacy is best represented by the pharmacodynamic profile generated using MICs determined in zinc-depleted media for MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. These translational data suggest that the use of conventional CAMHB for MBL susceptibility testing is inappropriate in distinguishing meaningful in vivo resistance given that zinc concentrations are supraphysiological in conventional CAMHB and negligible at infection sites.

Efficacy of human-simulated exposures of meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against OXA-48 β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model

OBJECTIVES

Despite vaborbactam lacking inhibitory activity against OXA-48, approximately a third of OXA-48-harbouring Enterobacterales test susceptible to meropenem/vaborbactam due to its higher breakpoint than meropenem alone. The present study evaluated the efficacy of human-simulated exposures of meropenem/vaborbactam against OXA-48-harbouring Enterobacterales in the neutropenic murine thigh model.

METHODS

Twenty-six isolates [OXA-48 (n = 24) and KPC (n = 2)] were evaluated. MICs were conducted in triplicate per CLSI. Mice received human-simulated regimens of meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem or vehicle for 24 h. Mice were inoculated with ∼1 × 107 cfu/mL in each thigh 2 h prior to dosing and both thighs were harvested at 24 h. Efficacy was assessed using mean log10 cfu/thigh at 24 h and the achievement of 1 log10 reduction relative to 0 h control as an established surrogate marker predictive of success for serious infections.

RESULTS

Meropenem/vaborbactam MICs ranged from 1 to 64 mg/L. The mean inoculum at 0 h was 5.77 ± 0.26 compared with 8.26 ± 1.53 for controls at 24 h. As anticipated for KPCs, meropenem/vaborbactam resulted in enhanced mean ± SD change in bacterial density (-1.10 ± 0.26), compared with meropenem (1.45 ± 0.88). Vaborbactam did not enhance mean ± SD change against OXA-48 isolates compared with meropenem (-0.44 ± 1.29 and -0.43 ± 1.36, respectively). For OXA-48-harbouring isolates with meropenem/vaborbactam MICs ≥16 (n = 5), 8 (n = 5), 4 (n = 9) and ≤2 (n = 5) mg/L, 0%, 0%, 44% and 60% of isolates achieved the target reduction ≥1 log10 with either agent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight that meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem humanized exposures in vivo resulted in similar, albeit poor, activity against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales despite susceptible MICs per EUCAST and CLSI interpretation. As a result, caution is warranted when treating meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible Enterobacterales without a genotypic profile.

Cefiderocol: a novel siderophore cephalosporin for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin that forms a complex with extracellular free ferric iron, which leads to transportation across the outer cell membrane to exert its bactericidal activity through cell wall synthesis inhibition. This pharmacological property has rendered cefiderocol active against several clinically relevant MDR Gram-negative bacteria as evidenced by several in vitro and in vivo studies. Cefiderocol was first approved by the US FDA on 14 November 2019 for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. On 28 September 2020, cefiderocol was approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. The FDA-approved indications are based on clinical data from the APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR trials. In APEKS-cUTI, cefiderocol demonstrated non-inferiority to imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria. In APEKS-NP, cefiderocol demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. However, in CREDIBLE-CR, higher all-cause mortality was observed with cefiderocol compared with best available therapy for the treatment of severe infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, primarily in the subset of patients with Acinetobacter spp. infections. Several case reports/series have demonstrated clinical success with cefiderocol for a variety of severe infections. The purpose of this article is to review available data on the mechanism of action, in vitro and in vivo data, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, susceptibility testing, efficacy and safety of cefiderocol to address its role in therapy.

Iron Acquisition Systems of Gram-negative Bacterial Pathogens Define TonB-Dependent Pathways to Novel Antibiotics

Iron is an indispensable metabolic cofactor in both pro- and eukaryotes, which engenders a natural competition for the metal between bacterial pathogens and their human or animal hosts. Bacteria secrete siderophores that extract Fe3+ from tissues, fluids, cells, and proteins; the ligand gated porins of the Gram-negative bacterial outer membrane actively acquire the resulting ferric siderophores, as well as other iron-containing molecules like heme. Conversely, eukaryotic hosts combat bacterial iron scavenging by sequestering Fe3+ in binding proteins and ferritin. The variety of iron uptake systems in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens illustrates a range of chemical and biochemical mechanisms that facilitate microbial pathogenesis. This document attempts to summarize and understand these processes, to guide discovery of immunological or chemical interventions that may thwart infectious disease.

In vivo fitness of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains in murine infection is associated with treatment failure in human infections

OBJECTIVES

Mortality among patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections varies between studies. We examined whether in vivo fitness of CRAB strains is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with CRAB infections.

METHODS

Isolates were collected from patients enrolled in the AIDA trial with hospital-acquired pneumonia, bloodstream infections and/or urinary tract infections caused by CRAB. The primary outcome was 14-day clinical failure, defined as failure to meet all criteria: alive; haemodynamically stable; improved or stable Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; improved or stable oxygenation; and microbiological cure of bacteraemia. The secondary outcome was 14-day mortality. We tested in vivo growth using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Fitness was defined based on the CFU count 24 hours after injection of an inoculum of 10⁵ CFU. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to test the association between fitness and the two outcomes.

RESULTS

The sample included 266 patients; 215 (80.8%) experienced clinical failure. CRAB fitness ranged from 5.23 to 10.08 log CFU/g. The odds of clinical failure increased by 62% for every 1-log CFU/g increase in fitness (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.52). After adjusting for age, Charlson score, SOFA score and acquisition in the intensive care unit, fitness remained significant (adjusted OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.03-2.59). CRAB fitness had a similar effect on 14-day mortailty, although the association was not statistically significant (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.95-2.57). It became significant after adjusting for age, Charlson score, SOFA score and recent surgery (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09-3.25).

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo CRAB fitness was associated with clinical failure in patients with CRAB infection.

Present and Future Perspectives on Therapeutic Options for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are included in the list of the most threatening antibiotic resistance microorganisms, being responsible for often insurmountable therapeutic issues, especially in hospitalized patients and immunocompromised individuals and patients in intensive care units. The enzymatic resistance to carbapenems is encoded by different β-lactamases belonging to A, B or D Ambler class. Besides compromising the activity of last-resort antibiotics, CRE have spread from the clinical to the environmental sectors, in all geographic regions. The purpose of this review is to present present and future perspectives on CRE-associated infections treatment.

In Vivo Activity of WCK 4282 (High-Dose Cefepime/Tazobactam) against Serine-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Neutropenic Murine Lung Infection Model

WCK 4282 (cefepime 2 g-tazobactam 2 g) maximizes systemic exposure of tazobactam and restores cefepime activity against various extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and cephalosporinase-producing strains in vitro We describe clinical WCK 4282 exposure efficacies against various serine β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a murine pneumonia model. Clinical cefepime-resistant isolates (17 Enterobacterales and 2 P. aeruginosa) were utilized. Isolates expressed ESBLs, cephalosporinases, and/or serine carbapenemases (KPC and OXA-48-like). WCK 4282 MICs were 4 to 32 μg/ml. For in vivo experiments, lungs of neutropenic mice were inoculated using standard inoculum (10⁷ log₁₀ CFU/ml). Serine carbapenemase-producing isolates were also assessed using a low inoculum (1:5 dilution). Treatment mice received a human-simulated regimen (HSR) of cefepime, meropenem (control for serine carbapenemase expression with low inoculum experiments), or WCK 4282 human-simulated regimens. Efficacy was assessed as change in log₁₀ CFU/lungs at 24 h compared with 0-h controls. At standard inoculum, the mean 0-h bacterial burden was 6.65 ± 0.23 log₁₀ CFU/lungs, and it increased at 24 h by 2.48 ± 0.60 log₁₀ CFU/lungs among untreated controls. Initial bacterial burdens of lower inocula ranged from 5.81 ± 0.12 to 6.39 ± 0.13 log₁₀ CFU/lungs. At standard and/or low inocula, cefepime and meropenem provided minimal activity. WCK 4282 produced a >1 log₁₀ reduction against 9/9 ESBL-/cephalosporinase-producing strains. WCK 4282 provided variable activity among mice infected with standard or lower inocula of OXA-48-like-producers. WCK 4282 exposures provided 0.53 ± 1.07 log₁₀ CFU/lungs growth against KPC producers at a standard inoculum versus bacteriostasis (-0.15 ± 0.54 change in log₁₀ CFU/lungs) at a low inoculum. WCK 4282 produced potent in vivo activity against ESBL- and cephalosporinase-producing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates and potential activity against OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales isolates in a neutropenic pneumonia model.

In Vitro Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Cefiderocol against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic with broad coverage against difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria, including those resistant to carbapenems. Its activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was investigated in vitro against clinical isolates and in lung infection models using strains either resistant (SR202006) or susceptible (SR201934, SR200614) to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against all 217 S. maltophilia clinical isolates tested (MIC50, 0.063 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml). Cefiderocol also demonstrated low MICs against the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. maltophilia strains (i.e., SR202006; MIC, 0.125 μg/ml). In a neutropenic mouse lung infection model, cefiderocol (30 mg/kg body weight and 100 mg/kg) demonstrated a significant, dose-dependent reduction in the lung viable bacteria cell count compared with untreated controls in S. maltophilia infection and was the only antibiotic tested to show a similar significant effect in a trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. maltophilia infection. In immunocompetent rat lung infection models of S. maltophilia, humanized dosing of cefiderocol (2 g every 8 h) and meropenem (1 g every 8 h) revealed pharmacokinetic profiles similar to those in human subjects, and the humanized cefiderocol dosing significantly reduced the lung viable bacteria cell count compared with baseline controls, which received no intervention. Together, the results from these studies suggest that cefiderocol could provide an effective alternative treatment option for S. maltophilia infections in the lower respiratory tract, particularly strains resistant to empirical antibiotics, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or minocycline.

In vitro activity of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) against recent Gram-negative isolates collected from high resistance settings of Greek hospitals

Cefepime/zidebactam is in clinical development for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. MICs of cefepime/zidebactam (1:1) and comparators against Enterobacterales (n = 563), Pseudomonas (n = 172) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n =181) collected from 15 Greek hospitals (2014-2018) were determined by reference broth microdilution method. The isolates exhibited high carbapenem resistance rates [(Enterobacterales (75%), Pseudomonas (75%) and A. baumannii (98.3%)]. Cefepime/zidebactam showed MIC_50/90 of 0.5/2 mg/L, against Enterobacterales including metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producers. Reduced susceptibility rates to tigecycline (16.8%), colistin (47.4%), ceftazidime/avibactam (59.8%), and imipenem/relebactam (61%) indicated high prevalence of multi-drug resistance among Greek Enterobacterales. Cefepime/zidebactam exhibited MIC_50/90 of 8/16 mg/L against Pseudomonas including MBL-producers. The MIC_50/90 of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam were high (≥32 mg/L). Cefepime/zidebactam showed MIC₉₀ of 64 mg/L against A. baumannii which is within its therapeutic scope. Other antibiotics including colistin showed limited activity against A. baumannii. The activity of cefepime/zidebactam against multi-drug-resistant isolates is attributable to zidebactam mediated novel β-lactam-enhancer mechanism.

Epidemiology and Characterization of CTX-M-55-Type Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolated from Patients in Shanghai, China

The emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (ESBL-SE) in humans and foods has gained global attention. In particular, CTX-M-type ESBL-SE are increasingly being detected from various sample types. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the epidemiology and characteristics of bla_CTX-M-55-carrying ESBL-SE isolates of clinical origin in Shanghai, China. A total of 292 S. Enteritidis isolates were recovered from the feces and blood of outpatients and inpatients between 2006 and 2014. Overall, there was a high frequency of cefotaxime-resistant isolates (97.3%), which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that of isolates resistant to the other tested antibiotics. All S. Enteritidis isolates exhibited resistance to ≥1 antibiotic, and 98.0% were multidrug resistant. A total of 233 isolates were identified as ESBL-SE, 166 of which were CTX-M type. Six subtypes of CTX-M-encoding genes were detected, among which bla_CTX-M-55 (91.6%, 152/166) was the most prevalent genotype. There was high genetic similarity among bla_CTX-M-55-positive ESBL-SE. The bla_CTX-M-55 gene in the ESBL-SE donor strains could be easily transferred into Enterobacteriaceae recipient strains. This study highlights that CTX-M-55 should be considered an important surveillance target in Shanghai, China. Cephalosporins, especially cefotaxime, must be used with caution in empirical treatment for Salmonella infections.

The Burden of the Serious and Difficult-to-Treat Infections and a New Antibiotic Available: Cefiderocol

Background: Infection is a disease that can occur due to the entrance of a virus, bacteria, and other infectious agents. Cefiderocol is innovative cephalosporin drug that belongs to a special class of antibiotics, sideromycins, which are taken up by bacterial cells through active transport. The unique cell entry and stability to β-lactamases allow cefiderocol to overcome the most common resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria. Objective: This article aims to highlight the therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability of cefiderocol, with a focus on the FDA label. Methods: The pharmacological properties of cefiderocol are also summarized. In this review, we conducted literature research on the PubMed database using the following keywords: "antimicrobial treatment", "new antibiotic", "cefiderocol", "siderophore cephalosporin"; "multidrug-resistant", "Gram-negative bacilli", "critically ill patients"; "severe bacterial infections". Results: There were identified the most relevant data about the pathophysiology of serious bacterial infections, antibacterial mechanism of action, microbiology, mechanisms of resistance, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cefiderocol. Conclusion: The results highlighted there appeared to be clinical benefit from cefiderocol in the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative aerobic microorganisms in adult patients with severe infections and limited treatment options.

Salvage Treatment with Cefiderocol Regimens in Two Intravascular Foreign Body Infections by MDR Gram-Negative Pathogens, Involving Non-Removable Devices

Introduction

The objective of this study was to describe two challenging cases of intravascular foreign body infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens requiring complex antimicrobial regimens including cefiderocol and successfully treated without implant removal.

Methods

Clinical charts and microbiological reports of the clinical cases.

Results

Case 1 included a left ventricular assist device (HEARTMATE 3™Abbot^®) infection due to Achromobacter xylosoxidans, while case 2 included a portal prosthesis infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. As the pathogens were multidrug-resistant (MDR), both cases required antimicrobial regimens with cefiderocol; treatment was successful without implant removal. Importantly, case 1 presented a probable, drug-induced thrombocytopenia, a non-previously described side effect related to cefiderocol.

Conclusion

Cefiderocol may be an additional, promising drug to the available arsenal, even for challenging foreign body infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Evaluating Cefiderocol in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Review of the Emerging Data

Infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), especially when carbapenem resistant, have been very difficult to manage in the last fifteen years, owing to the paucity of dependable therapeutic options. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) that may have the potential to fill some of the remaining gaps in the treatment of MDR-GNB infections. Among others, cefiderocol demonstrated in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and metallo-β-lactamases producers. Clinical data from both registrative studies and post-marketing experiences are essential to confirm whether these promises from in vitro studies could readily translate into clinical practice, as well as to delineate the precise place in therapy for cefiderocol for the treatment of MDR-GNB in the near future. Because of its unique potential, it is essential to provide both randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-life data to improve the ability of clinicians to exploit its benefit in both empirical and targeted treatment of MDR-GNB infections. In this narrative review, we discuss the emerging data from pivotal RCT and initial real-life experiences on the use of cefiderocol for the treatment of MDR-GNB infections.

Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the available data on the chemistry, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy, and potential place in therapy of cefiderocol.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted (2009 to March 2020) using the search terms cefiderocol and S-649266. Abstracts presented at recent conferences, prescribing information, and information from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the manufacturer's website were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant published articles, package inserts, and unpublished meeting abstracts on cefiderocol were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cefiderocol is the first siderophore antibiotic to be approved by the FDA. It was shown to be active against a wide range of resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacteriaceae, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Cefiderocol was studied in the treatment of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and nosocomial pneumonia and was well tolerated. In a recently completed prospective study, higher mortality was observed with cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative pathogens.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

The approval of cefiderocol provides a new option in the treatment of cUTIs and potentially treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Given the higher mortality observed with cefiderocol, its use in the treatment of CR Gram-negative infections should be carefully considered.

CONCLUSION

Cefiderocol shows promising activity against MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Its use in the treatment of serious infections caused by CR Gram-negative bacteria needs further evaluation in phase III clinical studies.

Variability in Zinc Concentration among Mueller-Hinton Broth Brands: Impact on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Zinc concentrations in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (caMHB) from different manufacturers have been found to differ. Here, we evaluated the impact of utilizing different brands and lots of commercially available caMHB on the classification of the antimicrobial susceptibility of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-harboring Enterobacteriaceae We also evaluated the addition of EDTA to caMHB as a means of achieving zinc-limited media. Fifteen clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates (harboring NDM [n = 7], VIM [n = 3], IMP [n = 2], or KPC [n = 3]) and nine different commercial lots from three caMHB manufacturers (Becton, Dickinson; Oxoid; and Sigma-Aldrich) were utilized. Zinc-limited media were prepared by the addition of EDTA at concentrations ranging from 3 to 300 μg/ml. Meropenem MICs were determined in triplicate for each lot of conventional caMHB and zinc-limited media by broth microdilution. The zinc concentration in each lot of conventional caMHB was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Up to 8-fold differences in meropenem MICs were observed between the commercial lots, resulting in different classifications of susceptibility among MBL-harboring isolates. Mean zinc concentrations were highest among conventional Becton, Dickinson caMHB lots relative to those for Oxoid and Sigma-Aldrich broth. Among MBL-harboring isolates, the impact of EDTA on MICs was dependent on the lot, correlating with initial zinc availability (i.e., less MIC reduction with higher initial zinc concentrations), while MICs for KPC-harboring isolates were unchanged. In summary, zinc variability was observed among commercial lots of caMHB, resulting in different classifications of susceptibility among MBL-harboring Enterobacteriaceae The addition of EDTA at concentrations of ≥30 μg/ml was sufficient to provide a zinc-limited medium, resulting in MICs that reflect in vivo meropenem activity.

Activities of Cefiderocol with Simulated Human Plasma Concentrations against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in an In Vitro Chemostat Model

Activities of cefiderocol under simulated human plasma concentrations at the recommended dosing regimen of 2 g every 8 h with a 3-h infusion were evaluated using an in vitro chemostat model. Against a total of 6 meropenem-resistant Gram-negative strains with cefiderocol MICs of 0.5 to 4 μg/ml, including metallo-β-lactamase producers and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, cefiderocol treatment showed a bactericidal effect within 8 h and sustained efficacy with no marked bacterial regrowth over 24 h.

Human-Simulated Antimicrobial Regimens in Animal Models: Transparency and Validation Are Imperative

Animal infection models are invaluable in optimizing antimicrobial dosage in humans. Utilization of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) in animal models helps to evaluate antimicrobial efficacy at clinically achievable drug concentrations. To that end, pharmacokinetic studies in infected animals and confirmation of the HSR pharmacokinetic profile are essential in evaluating observed versus expected drug concentrations. We present and compare two murine meropenem-vaborbactam HSR profiles, their potential impact on bacterial killing, and clinical translatability.

Activity of cefiderocol against high-risk clones of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin, developed for activity against MDR Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefiderocol against a collection of MDR-GNB clinical isolates from hospitals in southern Spain.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-one isolates of successful clones were tested: 125 Enterobacterales (121 ESBL- and/or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae), 80 Acinetobacter baumannii, 6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 20 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin and tigecycline were used as comparators against Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Minocycline, levofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were studied against S. maltophilia instead of aztreonam, ciprofloxacin and cefepime. MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. MIC determination was performed in CAMHB for all antimicrobials except cefiderocol, where iron-depleted CAMHB was used.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol showed potent in vitro activity against the isolates analysed. MIC50 and MIC90 values were in the ranges 0.125-8 mg/L and 0.5-8 mg/L, respectively, and 98% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/L. Only five isolates showed cefiderocol MICs of >4 mg/L: three ST2/OXA-24/40-producing A. baumannii, one ST114/VIM-1-producing E. cloacae and one ST114/VIM-1 + OXA-48-producing E. cloacae. All KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae were susceptible to cefiderocol, even those resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam. P. aeruginosa isolates showed cefiderocol MICs of <4 mg/L, including those resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam. S. maltophilia isolates displayed cefiderocol MICs of <4 mg/L, including those resistant to levofloxacin and/or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol showed excellent activity against MDR-GNB, including carbapenem-resistant isolates, and was the most active antimicrobial tested against this collection.

In vivo Fitness of Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in Murine Infection Is Associated with International Lineage II-rep-2 and International Lineage III Clones Showing High Case Fatality Rates in Human Infections

We previously reported that the 14-day case fatality rate (CFR) in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bacteremia varied between infecting clones. Here, we evaluated the in vitro and in vivo fitness of CRAB blood isolates belonging to clones with low CFR (< 32% 14-day mortality) and high CFR (65% 14-day mortality). Fitness was measured in vitro using a growth curve assay and in vivo using murine thigh muscle and septicemia models of infection. Our sample included 38 CRAB isolates belonging to two clones with low CFR (international lineage (IL)-II-rep-1, n = 13 and IL-79, n = 6) and two clones with high CFR (IL-III, n = 9 and IL-II-rep-2, n = 10). In in vitro growth curves, mean lag time, generation time and maximal growth varied between clones but could not discriminate between the high and low CFR clones. In the in vivo models, bacterial burdens were higher in mice infected with high CFR clones than in those infected with low CFR clones: in thigh muscle, 8.78 ± 0.25 vs. 7.53 ± 0.25 log₁₀CFU/g, p < 0.001; in infected spleen, 5.53 ± 0.38 vs. 3.71 ± 0.35 log₁₀CFU/g, p < 0.001. The thigh muscle and septicemia model results were closely correlated (r = 0.93, p < 0.01). These results suggest that in vivo but not in vitro fitness is associated with high CFR clones.