In Vivo Efficacy of Plazomicin Alone or in Combination with Meropenem or Tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Exhibiting Various Resistance Mechanisms in an Immunocompetent Murine Septicemia Model

Deciphering the Efficacy of β-Lactams in the Face of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Derived Resistance in Enterobacterales: Supraphysiologic Zinc in the Broth Is the Culprit

Background

In vitro-in vivo discordance in β-lactams' activities against metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales has been described. We aimed to assess whether this discordance is attributed to the supra-physiologic zinc concentration in in vitro testing media.

Methods

A clinical and microbiological observational study of patients with bloodstream infections due to New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was performed. Outcomes of patients treated empirically with non-MBL-active β-lactam therapy (carbapenems and ceftazidime/avibactam) and MBL-active β-lactam therapy (ceftazidime/avibactam + aztreonam) were documented. The patients' isolates were used to induce septicemia in mice, and survival upon meropenem treatment was recorded. Meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in standard media and in the presence of physiological zinc concentrations.

Results

Twenty-nine patients receiving empiric non-MBL-active β-lactams (median duration, 4 days) were compared with 29 receiving MBL-active β-lactams. The 14-day mortality rates were 21% and 14%, respectively. In the murine septicemia model, meropenem treatment resulted in protection from mortality (P < .0001). Meropenem MICs in the physiologic zinc concentration broth were 1- to >16-fold lower vs MICs in zinc-unadjusted broth (≥64 mg/L).

Conclusions

Our data provide foundational support to establish pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships using MICs derived in physiologic zinc concentration, which may better predict β-lactam therapy outcome.

Use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approaches for dose optimization: a case study of plazomicin

With limited treatment options available for multidrug-resistant bacteria, dose optimization is critical for achieving effective drug concentrations at the site of infection. Yet, selecting an appropriate dose and appropriate time to administer the dose with dosing frequency requires extensive understanding of the interplay between drug pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), the host immune system, and bacterial-resistant mechanisms. Model-informed dose optimization (MIDO) uses PK/PD models (e.g. population PK, mechanism-based models, etc.) that incorporate preclinical and clinical data to simulate/predict performance of treatment regimens in appropriate patient populations and/or infection types that may not be well-represented in clinical trials. Here, we highlight the stages of a MIDO approach for designing optimized regimens by reviewing current clinical, preclinical, and PK/PD modeling data available for plazomicin. Plazomicin is an aminoglycoside approved in 2018 for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults. Applying knowledge gained by PK/PD modeling can guide therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure that drug exposure is appropriate for clinical efficacy while limiting drug-related toxicity.

A personalised approach to antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with severe infections, or those who develop nosocomial infections, have poor outcomes with substantial morbidity and mortality. Such patients commonly have suboptimal antibiotic exposures at routinely used antibiotic doses related to an increased volume of distribution and altered clearance due to their underlying altered physiology. Furthermore, the use of extracorporeal devices such as renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in these group of patients also has the potential to alter in vivo drug concentrations. Moreover, ICU patients are likely to be infected with less-susceptible pathogens. Therefore, one potential contributing cause to the poor outcomes observed in critically ill patients may be related to subtherapeutic antibiotic exposures. Newer concepts include the clinician considering optimised dosing based on a blood antibiotic exposure defined by pharmacokinetic modelling and therapeutic drug monitoring, combined with a knowledge of the antibiotic penetration into the site of infection, thereby achieving optimal bacterial killing. Such optimised dosing is likely to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight key aspects of antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in critically ill patients and provide a PK/PD approach to tailor antibiotic dosing to the individual patient.

Plazomicin: a new aminoglycoside in the fight against antimicrobial resistance

Objective

To review the mechanism of action, mechanisms of resistance, in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical data for a novel aminoglycoside.

Data sources

A PubMed search was performed from January 2006 to August 2019 using the following search terms: plazomicin and ACHN-490. Another search was conducted on clinicaltrials.gov for published clinical data. References from selected studies were also used to find additional literature.

Study selection and data extraction

All English-language studies presenting original research (in vitro, in vivo, pharmacokinetic, and clinical) were evaluated.

Data synthesis

Plazomicin has in vitro activity against several multi-drug-resistant organisms, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. It was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including acute pyelonephritis, following phase II and III trials compared with levofloxacin and meropenem, respectively. Despite the FDA Black Box Warning for aminoglycoside class effects (nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, neuromuscular blockade, and pregnancy risk), it exhibited a favorable safety profile with the most common adverse effects being decreased renal function (3.7%), diarrhea (2.3%), hypertension (2.3%), headache (1.3%), nausea (1.3%), vomiting (1.3%), and hypotension (1.0%) in the largest in-human trial.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice

Plazomicin will likely be used in the treatment of multi-drug-resistant cUTIs or in combination to treat serious carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Conclusions

Plazomicin appears poised to help fill the need for new agents to treat infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

In vivo studies on antibiotic combination for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Objective

There is poor evidence to determine the superiority of combination regimens versus monotherapy against infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria. In vivo models can simulate the pathophysiology of infections in humans and assess antibiotic efficacy. We aim to investigate in vivo effects of antibiotic combination on mortality and disease burden for infections due to CR Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae and provide an unbiased overview of existing knowledge. The results of the study can help prioritising future research on the most promising therapies against CR bacteria.

Methods and analysis

This protocol was formulated using the Systematic Review Protocol for Animal Intervention Studies (SYRCLE) Checklist. Publications will be collected from PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. Quality checklists adapted by Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies and SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool will be used. If the meta-analysis seems feasible, the ES and the 95% CI will be analysed. The heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I² test. Subgroup meta-analysis will be performed when possible to assess the impact of the studies on efficacy of the treatments. Funnel plotting will be used to evaluate the risk of publication bias.

Dissemination

This systematic review and meta-analysis is part of a wider research collaboration project, the COmbination tHErapy to treat sepsis due to carbapenem-Resistant bacteria in adult and paediatric population: EvideNCE and common practice (COHERENCE) study that includes also the analyses of in vitro and human studies. Data will be presented at international conferences and the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42019128104(available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019128104).

Precision medicine for the diagnosis and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: time to think from a different perspective

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a global public health problem. Precision medicine (PM) is a multicomponent medical approach that should be used to individualize the management of patients infected with CRE.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we differentiate carbapenem-producing CRE (CP-CRE) from non-CP-CRE and the importance of this distinction in clinical practice. The current phenotypic CRE-case definition and its implications are also discussed. Additionally, we summarize data regarding phenotypic and molecular diagnostic tools and available antibiotics. In order to review the most relevant data, a comprehensive literature search of peer-reviewed articles in PubMed and abstracts presented at high-impact conferences was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

PM in CRE infections entails a multi-step process that includes applying the current phenotypic definition, utilization of the right phenotypic or molecular testing methods, and thorough evaluation of risk factors, source of infection, and comorbidities. A powerful armamentarium is available to treat CRE infections, including recently approved agents. Randomized controlled trials targeting specific pathogens instead of site of infections may be appropriate to fill in the current gaps. In light of the diverse enzymology behind CP-CRE, PM should be employed to provide the best therapy based on the underlying resistance mechanism.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology

Purpose of Review

Gram-negative resistance is a growing concern globally. Enterobacterales, formerly Enterobacteriaceae, have developed resistance mechanisms to carbapenems that leave very few antimicrobial options in the clinician’s armamentarium.

Recent Findings

New antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin have the potential to overcome resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales including different classes of carbapenemases.

Summary

Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, plazomicin, and cefiderocol give the clinician options that were once not available. Utilizing these options is of the utmost importance when treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam-Resistant/Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Susceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates: Resistance Mechanisms and In vitro-In vivo Discordance

We previously reported the detection of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae that displayed in vitro piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) resistance but were susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins (TZP-R/Ceph3-S). In this study, we assessed the phenotypic and genotypic profiles of 12 clinical non-clonal TZP-R/Ceph3-S E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates derived from bloodstream infections. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that most of the TZP-R/Ceph3-S E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates examined harbored bla_TEM-1 and bla_SHV-1 genes, respectively, but none harbored extended-spectrum β-lactamase, AmpC β-lactamase or carbapenemase genes. Increasing the tazobactam concentration from 4 mg/L to 16 mg/L restored TZP in vitro susceptibility among E. coli isolates expressing TEM-1, but had minimal impact on the susceptibility of K. pneumoniae to TZP. Real-time qPCR analysis showed that bla_TEM-1 expression was amplified in TZP-R E. coli upon incubation with sub-inhibitory TZP concentrations. Using an immunocompetent murine septicemia model, the efficacy of TZP against TZP-R/Ceph3-S isolates was assessed using TZP doses that mimicked human plasma exposures following intravenous (IV) administration of TZP 4.5 g q6h over 0.5 h for 24 h. Efficacy was assessed by survival through 96 h. There was high mortality in untreated control mice for all tested isolates. Compared with controls, TZP human-simulated exposure significantly improved survival for all TZP-R/Ceph3-S E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates examined (P < 0.05). Thus, TZP was associated with remarkable in vivo activity against TZP-R/Ceph3-S E. coli and K. pneumoniae despite the observed resistance in vitro.

Plazomicin: A Novel Aminoglycoside for the Treatment of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Plazomicin is a novel semisynthetic parenteral aminoglycoside that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis. It was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including pyelonephritis. Plazomicin displays potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae, including both extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant isolates. Plazomicin's enhanced Enterobacteriaceae activity is due to its stability to commonly encountered aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes that compromise the activity of traditional aminoglycosides. Plazomicin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is via modification of the ribosomal binding site due to expression of 16S rRNA methyltransferases. Plazomicin does not display improved activity over traditional aminoglycosides against other problematic resistant Gram-negative bacteria, namely Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Plazomicin has been assessed in two phase III randomized controlled trials. The EPIC trial compared plazomicin and meropenem for the management of cUTI. In this trial, plazomicin demonstrated superiority in composite cure (81.7% vs 70.1%; difference 11.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-25.7) at the test-of-cure visit, which was driven by enhanced sustained microbiological eradication. The CARE trial compared plazomicin-based and colistin-based combinations in patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). In this analysis, plazomicin-based combinations were associated with numerically decreased mortality or serious disease-related complications when compared with colistin-based combinations (23.5% vs 50%, respectively; 90% CI -0.7 to 51.2). Furthermore, plazomicin was also associated with a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity than colistin. However, small sample sizes limit the interpretation of the findings in the CARE trial. Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside that offers clinicians an additional option for the management of CRE infections, with superior activity compared with traditional aminoglycosides and potentially improved efficacy and decreased toxicity compared with colistin.

Application of the Hartford Hospital Nomogram for Plazomicin Dosing Interval Selection in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection

Plazomicin is a new FDA-approved aminoglycoside antibiotic for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). In the product labeling, trough-based therapeutic drug management (TDM) is recommended for cUTI patients with renal impairment to prevent elevated trough concentrations associated with serum creatinine increases of ≥0.5 mg/dl above baseline. Herein, the utility of the Hartford nomogram to prevent plazomicin trough concentrations exceeding the TDM trough of 3 μg/ml and optimize the area under the curve (AUC) was assessed. The AUC reference range was defined as the 5th to 95th percentile AUC observed in the phase 3 cUTI trial (EPIC) (121 to 368 μg · h/ml). Observed 10-h plazomicin concentrations from patients in EPIC (n = 281) were plotted on the nomogram to determine an eligible dosing interval (every 24 h [q24h], q36h, q48h). Based on creatinine clearance (CLcr), a 15- or 10-mg/kg of body weight dose was simulated with the nomogram-derived interval. The nomogram recommended an extended interval (q36h and q48h) in 31% of patients. Compared with the 15 mg/kg q24h regimen received by patients with CLcr of ≥60 ml/min in EPIC, the nomogram-derived interval reduced the proportion of patients with troughs of ≥3 μg/ml (q36h, 27% versus 0%, P = 0.021; q48h, 57% versus 0%, P = 0.002) while significantly increasing the number of patients within the AUC range. Compared with the 8 to 12 mg/kg q24h regimen (received by patients with CLcr of >30 to 59 ml/min in EPIC), the nomogram-derived interval significantly reduced the proportion of troughs of ≥3μg/ml in the q48h cohort (72% versus 0%, P < 0.001) while maintaining a similar proportion of patients in the AUC range. Simulated application of the Hartford nomogram optimized plazomicin exposures in patients with cUTI while reducing troughs to <3 μg/ml.

When One Drug Is Not Enough: Context, Methodology, and Future Prospects in Antibacterial Synergy Testing

Antibacterial combinations have long been used to accomplish a variety of therapeutic goals, including prevention of resistance and enhanced antimicrobial activity. In vitro synergy testing methods, including the checkerboard array, the time-kill study, diffusion assays, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, are used commonly in the research setting, but are not routinely performed in the clinical microbiology laboratory because of test complexity and uncertainty about their predictive value for patient outcomes. Optimized synergy testing techniques and better data on the relationship between in vitro results and clinical outcomes are needed to guide the rational use of antimicrobial combinations in the multidrug resistance era.

Evaluation of Plazomicin, Tigecycline, and Meropenem Pharmacodynamic Exposure against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Patients with Bloodstream Infection or Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia from the CARE Study (ACHN-490-007)

INTRODUCTION

CARE was a Phase 3, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of plazomicin-based combination therapy compared with colistin-based combination therapy for the treatment of patients with bloodstream infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Adjunctive therapies included either tigecycline or meropenem. We sought to understand the contribution of tigecycline and meropenem to plazomicin-treated-patient outcomes by determining their observed pharmacodynamic exposures against baseline pathogens.

METHODS

Blood samples collected for plazomicin therapeutic monitoring were assayed for tigecycline and meropenem concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic models were constructed for each antibiotic. Using the individual Bayesian posterior or a covariate-based model, concentration time profiles were simulated to estimate the pharmacodynamic exposures for each patient. Pharmacodynamic thresholds for plazomicin, tigecycline, and meropenem were a total area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC) ≥ 85, free (f) AUC/MIC ≥ 0.9, and free time above the MIC (fT > MIC) of ≥ 40%, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifteen plazomicin-treated patients were included (12 received tigecycline, 4 received meropenem, 1 received both). Microbiological response was observed in 13 (86.7%) and clinical efficacy was achieved in 11 (73.3%). Plazomicin achieved its pharmacodynamic target in all 15 patients. Meropenem fT > MIC was 0% in all 4 patients, and tigecycline fAUC/MIC was ≥ 0.9 in 9 (75%) patients. Overall, 6 (40%) of 15 patients had a tigecycline or meropenem exposure below the requisite thresholds. Microbiological response and clinical efficacy were observed in 100% (6/6) and 83.3% (5/6) of patients with low threshold attainment by tigecycline and meropenem dosing regimens, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Plazomicin successfully achieved its requisite pharmacodynamic exposure, and these data suggest that optimization of tigecycline and meropenem therapy was not required for the combination to achieve microbiological response and clinical efficacy against serious CRE infections.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01970371.

FUNDING

Achaogen, Inc.

The "Old" and the "New" Antibiotics for MDR Gram-Negative Pathogens: For Whom, When, and How

The recent expansion of multidrug resistant and pan-drug-resistant pathogens poses significant challenges in the treatment of healthcare associated infections. An important advancement, is a handful of recently launched new antibiotics targeting some of the current most problematic Gram-negative pathogens, namely carbapenem-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA). Less options are available against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and strains producing metallo-beta lactamases (MBL). Ceftazidime-avibactam signaled a turning point in the treatment of KPC and partly OXA- type carbapenemases, whereas meropenem-vaborbactam was added as a potent combination against KPC-producers. Ceftolozane-tazobactam could be seen as an ideal beta-lactam backbone for the treatment of CRPA. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside with better pharmacokinetics and less toxicity compared to other class members, will cover important proportions of multi-drug resistant pathogens. Eravacycline holds promise in the treatment of infections by CRAB, with a broad spectrum of activity similar to tigecycline, and improved pharmacokinetics. Novel drugs and combinations are not to be considered "panacea" for the ongoing crisis in the therapy of XDR Gram-negative bacteria and colistin will continue to be considered as a fundamental companion drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (particularly in areas where MBL predominate), for the treatment of CRPA (in many cases being the only in vitro active drug) as well as CRAB. Aminoglycosides are still important companion antibiotics. Finally, fosfomycin as part of combination treatment for CRE infections and P. aeruginosa, deserves a greater attention. Optimal conditions for monotherapy and the "when and how" of combination treatments integrating the novel agents will be discussed.

Plazomicin: A Next-Generation Aminoglycoside

Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside antibiotic that binds to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit, thus inhibiting protein synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner. Plazomicin displays a broad spectrum of activity against aerobic gram-negative bacteria including extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and organisms with aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. In a large phase III clinical trial, plazomicin was shown to be noninferior to meropenem in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) with respect to the coprimary efficacy end points of the microbiologically modified intent-to-treat composite cure rate at day 5 (plazomicin 88% [168/191 subjects] vs meropenem 91.4% [180/197]) and at the test-of-cure visit (plazomicin 81.7% [156/191] vs meropenem 70.1% [138/197]). In a small phase III clinical trial, plazomicin was shown to be effective in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. It was associated with a lower all-cause mortality or significant disease-related complication rate (23.5% [4/17]) compared with colistin (50% [10/20]). The most common adverse reactions associated with plazomicin are decreased renal function, diarrhea, hypertension, headache, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. As with other aminoglycosides, plazomicin may cause neuromuscular blockade, ototoxicity, and fetal harm in pregnant women. Due to limited efficacy and safety data, plazomicin is indicated for the treatment of cUTIs in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options, using a dosage regimen of 15 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours for 4-7 days. Dosage reductions and therapeutic drug monitoring are warranted in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. Plazomicin is not recommended in patients with severe renal impairment including those receiving renal replacement therapy. With the approval of plazomicin, clinicians now have an additional option for the treatment of adults with cUTIs, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods.

In Vitro Activity of Plazomicin against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Isolates Collected from U.S. Hospitals and Comparative Activities of Aminoglycosides against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Isolates Carrying Carbapenemase Genes

Plazomicin and comparator agents were tested by using the CLSI reference broth microdilution method against 4,825 clinical isolates collected during 2014 and 2015 in 70 U.S. hospitals as part of the ALERT (Antimicrobial Longitudinal Evaluation and Resistance Trends) program. Plazomicin (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 0.5/2 μg/ml) inhibited 99.2% of 4,362 Enterobacteriaceae at ≤4 μg/ml. Amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin inhibited 98.9%, 90.3%, and 90.3% of these isolates, respectively, by applying CLSI breakpoints. The activities of plazomicin were similar among Enterobacteriaceae species, with MIC₅₀ values ranging from 0.25 to 1 μg/ml, with the exception of Proteus mirabilis and indole-positive Proteeae that displayed MIC₅₀ values of 2 μg/ml. For 97 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), which included 87 isolates carrying bla_KPC, plazomicin inhibited all but 1 isolate at ≤2 μg/ml (99.0% and 98.9%, respectively). Amikacin and gentamicin inhibited 64.9% and 56.7% of the CRE isolates at the respective CLSI breakpoints. Plazomicin inhibited 96.5 and 95.5% of the gentamicin-resistant isolates, 96.9 and 96.5% of the tobramycin-resistant isolates, and 64.3 and 90.0% of the amikacin-resistant isolates according to CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. The activities of plazomicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 4/16 μg/ml) and Acinetobacter species (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 2/16 μg/ml) isolates were similar. Plazomicin was active against coagulase-negative staphylococci (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 0.12/0.5 μg/ml) and Staphylococcus aureus (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml) but had limited activity against Enterococcus spp. (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 16/64 μg/ml) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 32/64 μg/ml). Plazomicin activity against the Enterobacteriaceae tested, including CRE and isolates carrying bla_KPC from U.S. hospitals, supports the development plan for plazomicin to treat serious infections caused by resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients with limited treatment options.