Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose, prolonged-infusion cefepime in adult critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

Cefepime-Taniborbactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination

Taniborbactam (formerly known as VNRX-5133) is a novel bicyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor of serine β-lactamases (SBLs) [Ambler classes A, C, and D] and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) [Ambler class B], including NDM and VIM, but not IMP. Cefepime-taniborbactam is active in vitro against most isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), including both carbapenemase-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing CRE and CRPA, as well as against multidrug-resistant (MDR), ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant, meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. The addition of taniborbactam to cefepime resulted in a > 64-fold reduction in MIC90 compared with cefepime alone for a 2018-2021 global collection of > 13,000 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales. In the same study, against > 4600 P. aeruginosa, a fourfold MIC reduction was observed with cefepime-taniborbactam, compared with cefepime alone. Whole genome sequencing studies have shown that resistance towards cefepime-taniborbactam in Enterobacterales arises due to the presence of multiple resistance mechanisms, often in concert, including production of IMP, PBP3 alterations, permeability (porin) defects, and upregulation of efflux pumps. In P. aeruginosa, elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs are also associated with the presence of multiple, concurrent mechanisms, most frequently IMP, PBP3 mutations, and upregulation of efflux pumps, as well as AmpC (PDC) overexpression. The pharmacokinetics of taniborbactam are dose proportional, follow a linear model, and do not appear to be affected when combined with cefepime. Taniborbactam's approximate volume of distribution (Vd) at steady state is 20 L and the approximate elimination half-life (t½) is 2.3 h, which are similar to cefepime. Furthermore, like cefepime, taniborbactam is primarily cleared renally, and clearance corresponds with renal function. Pharmacodynamic studies (in vitro and in vivo) have reported that cefepime-taniborbactam has bactericidal activity against various β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli that are not susceptible to cefepime alone. It has been reported that antimicrobial activity best correlated with taniborbactam exposure (area under the curve). A phase III clinical trial showed that cefepime-taniborbactam (2 g/0.5 g administered as an intravenous infusion over 2 h) was superior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis, caused by Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa while demonstrating similar safety compared with meropenem. The safety and tolerability of taniborbactam and cefepime-taniborbactam has been reported in one pharmacokinetic trial, and in two pharmacokinetic trials and one phase III clinical trial, respectively. Cefepime-taniborbactam appears to be well tolerated in both healthy subjects and patients. Headache and gastrointestinal upset are the most common drug-related adverse effects associated with cefepime-taniborbactam use. Cefepime-taniborbactam will likely have a role in the treatment of infections proven or suspected to be caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. In particular, it may be useful in the treatment of infections caused by isolates that harbor an MBL (NDM, VIM) enzyme, although further clinical data are needed. Additional safety and efficacy studies may support indications for cefepime-taniborbactam beyond cUTI.

Extended-Infusion β-Lactam Therapy, Mortality, and Subsequent Antibiotic Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

Importance

Current evidence is conflicting for associations of extended-infusion β-lactam (EI-BL) therapy with clinical outcomes.

Objective

To investigate the association of EI-BL therapy with survival, adverse events, and emergence of antibiotic resistance in adults with gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study of consecutive adults with GN-BSI admitted to 24 United States hospitals between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, receiving EI-BL were compared with adults with GN-BSI receiving the same agents as intermittent infusion β-lactam (II-BL; ≤1-hour infusions). Statistical analysis was performed from January to October 2023.

Exposures

EI-BL (ie, ≥3-hour infusion).

Main Outcomes and Measures

EI-BL and II-BL groups underwent 1:3 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) without replacement. Multivariable regression was applied to the PSM cohort to investigate outcomes, all censored at day 90. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes included antibiotic adverse events and emergence of resistance (≥4-fold increase in the minimum inhibitory concentration of the β-lactam used to treat the index GN-BSI).

Results

Among the 4861 patients included, 2547 (52.4%) were male; and the median (IQR) age was 67 (55-77) years. There were 352 patients in the EI-BL 1:3 PSM group, and 1056 patients in the II-BL 1:3 PSM group. Among 1408 PSM patients, 373 (26.5%) died by day 90. The odds of mortality were lower in the EI-BL group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.97]). In a stratified analysis, a survival benefit was only identified in patients with severe illness or elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (ie, in the intermediate range for the antibiotic administered). There were increased odds of catheter complications (aOR, 3.14 [95% CI, 1.66-5.96]) and antibiotic discontinuation because of adverse events (eg, acute kidney injury, cytopenias, seizures) in the EI-BL group (aOR, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.68-7.95]). Emergence of resistance was similar in the EI-BL and II-BL groups at 2.9% vs 7.2%, respectively (P = .35).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with GN-BSI, EI-BL therapy was associated with reduced mortality for patients with severe illness or those infected with nonsusceptible organisms; potential advantages in other groups remain unclear and need to be balanced with potential adverse events. The subsequent emergence of resistance warrants investigation in a larger cohort.

Towards optimizing cefepime/tazobactam (WCK 4282) exposure to achieve efficacy against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections: dose recommendations for various renal functions, including intermittent haemodialysis, in healthy individuals

OBJECTIVES

WCK 4282 is a novel combination of cefepime 2 g and tazobactam 2 g being developed for the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections. The dosing regimen for cefepime/tazobactam needs to be optimized to generate adequate exposures to treat infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens resistant to both cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam.

METHODS

We developed pharmacokinetic population models of cefepime and tazobactam to evaluate the optimal dose adjustments in patients, including those with augmented renal clearance as well as various degrees of renal impairment, and also for those on intermittent haemodialysis. Optimal doses for various degrees of renal function were identified by determining the PTA for a range of MICs. To cover ESBL-producing pathogens with an cefepime/tazobactam MIC of 16 mg/L, a dosing regimen of 2 g q8h infused over 1.5 h resulted in a combined PTA of 99% for the mean murine 1 log10-kill target for the cefepime/tazobactam combination.

RESULTS

We found that to adjust for renal function, doses need to be reduced to 1 g q8h, 500 mg q8h and 500 mg q12h for patients with CLCR of 30-59, 15-29 and 8-14 mL/min (as well as patients with intermittent haemodialysis), respectively. In patients with high to augmented CLR (estimated CLCR 120-180 mL/min), a prolonged 4 h infusion of standard dose is required.

CONCLUSIONS

The suggested dosing regimens will result in exposures of cefepime and tazobactam that would be adequate for infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens with a cefepime/tazobactam MICs up to 16 mg/L.

Dose Individualization of Cefepime for Febrile Neutropenia in Patients With Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma: Implications for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Optimal cefepime dosing is a challenge because of its dose-dependent neurotoxicity. This study aimed to determine individualized cefepime dosing for febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 16 patients receiving cefepime at a dose of 2 g every 12 hours. Unbound concentrations were determined at 0.5 hours, 7.2 hours [at the 60% time point of the 12 hours administration interval (C7.2h)], and 11 hours (trough concentration) after the first infusion (rate: 2 g/h). The primary and secondary end points were the predictive performance of the area under the unbound concentration-time curve (AUC unbound ) and the effect of unbound cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters on clinical response, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) AUC unbound was 689.7 (226.6) mcg h/mL, which correlated with C7.2h (R 2 = 0.90), and the Bayesian posterior AUC unbound using only the trough concentration (R 2 = 0.66). Although higher exposure was more likely to show a better clinical response, each parameter did not indicate a statistical significance between positive and negative clinical responses ( P = 0.0907 for creatinine clearance (Ccr), 0.2523 for C7.2h, 0.4079 for trough concentration, and 0.1142 for AUC unbound ). Cutoff values were calculated as 80.2 mL/min for Ccr (sensitivity: 0.889, specificity: 0.714), 18.6 mcg/mL for C7.2h (sensitivity: 0.571, specificity: 1.000), and 9.2 mcg/mL for trough concentration (sensitivity: 0.571, specificity: 1.000). When aiming for a time above 100% the minimum inhibitory concentration, both continuous infusion of 4 g/d and intermittent infusion of 2 g every 8 hours achieved a probability of approximately 100% at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 mcg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic drug monitoring by sampling at C7.2h or trough can facilitate rapid dose optimization. Continuous infusion of 4 g/d was recommended. Intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 hours was alternatively suggested for patients with a Ccr of 60-90 mL/min.

Covariates in population pharmacokinetic studies of critically ill adults receiving β-lactam antimicrobials: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Introduction

Population pharmacokinetic studies of β-lactam antimicrobials in critically ill patients derive models that inform their dosing. In non-linear mixed-effects modelling, covariates are often used to improve model fit and explain variability. We aimed to investigate which covariates are most commonly assessed and which are found to be significant, along with global patterns of publication.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science on 01 March 2023, including studies of critically ill adults receiving β-lactam antimicrobials who underwent blood sampling for population pharmacokinetic studies. We extracted and categorized all reported covariates and assessed reporting quality using the ClinPK checklist.

Results

Our search identified 151 studies with 6018 participants. Most studies reported observational cohorts (120 studies, 80%), with the majority conducted in high-income settings (136 studies, 90%). Of the 1083 identified covariate instances, 237 were unique; the most common categories were patient characteristics (n = 404), biomarkers (n = 206) and physiological parameters (n = 163). Only seven distinct commonly reported covariates (CLCR, weight, glomerular filtration rate, diuresis, need for renal replacement, serum albumin and C-reactive protein) were significant more than 20% of the time.

Conclusions

Covariates are most commonly chosen based on biological plausibility, with patient characteristics and biomarkers the most frequently investigated. We developed an openly accessible database of reported covariates to aid investigators with covariate selection when designing population pharmacokinetic studies. Novel covariates, such as sepsis subphenotypes, have not been explored yet, leaving a research gap for future work.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intravenous Push Cefepime in Burn Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance

Patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) are a subset of critically ill patients including burn patients that exhibit increased renal elimination of medications beyond that of similarly injured patients. Currently approved maximum regimens of medications primarily eliminated by the kidney, such as cefepime (>90% unchanged in the urine), may be inadequate (eg, compromising the bactericidal activity of cefepime) in patients with ARC. Due to recent resource limitations, centers have changed infusion practices of commonly prescribed medications to intravenous push (IVP), potentially exacerbating the problem of maintaining bactericidal cefepime concentrations. The hypothesis of the study was patients with ARC are not currently achieving adequate target attainment, when receiving cefepime 2 g every 8 h IVP. Eight blood samples were collected from each patient, and concentrations measured via LC-MS/MS. WinNonlin (version 8.3) was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime and simulate plasma concentrations of cefepime in each of the ten subjects. Simulations of cefepime plasma concentrations produced by a 2 g dose given every 8 h and a 1 g dose given every 4 h were performed and the time above a MIC of 4 mg/L, 8 mg/L, and 16 mg/L compared. The 2 g every 8 h regimen remained above the breakpoints for 92%, 85%, and 71% of the dosing interval, respectively. The 1 g every 4 h regimen remained above the same breakpoints at a frequency of 100%, 99%, and 92% of the dosing interval. Giving cefepime 1 g every 4 h is a simple approach to increase the likelihood of maintaining the optimal bactericidal activity of cefepime in patients with ARC.

Population pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the older population: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Older individuals face an elevated risk of developing bacterial infections. The optimal use of antibacterial agents in this population is challenging because of age-related physiological alterations, changes in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and the presence of multiple underlying diseases. Therefore, population pharmacokinetics (PPK) studies are of great importance for optimizing individual treatments and prompt identification of potential risk factors.

AREA COVERED

Our search involved keywords such as 'elderly,' 'old people,' and 'geriatric,' combined with 'population pharmacokinetics' and 'antibacterial agents.' This comprehensive search yielded 11 categories encompassing 28 antibacterial drugs, including vancomycin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and linezolid. Out of 127 studies identified, 26 (20.5%) were associated with vancomycin, 14 (11%) with meropenem, and 14 (11%) with piperacillin. Other antibacterial agents were administered less frequently.

EXPERT OPINION

PPK studies are invaluable for elucidating the characteristics and relevant factors affecting the PK of antibacterial agents in the older population. Further research is warranted to develop and validate PPK models for antibacterial agents in this vulnerable population.

In vitro synergy of the combination of sulbactam-durlobactam and cefepime at clinically relevant concentrations against A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a potent combination active against Acinetobacter baumannii; however, it lacks activity against other nosocomial pathogens. Cefepime is a common first-line therapy for hospital/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. With increasing resistance to cefepime, and the significant proportion of polymicrobial nosocomial infections, effective therapy for infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales is needed. This study investigated the in vitro synergy of sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime against relevant pathogens.

METHODS

Static time-kills assays were performed in duplicate against 14 cefepime-resistant isolates (A. baumannii, n = 4; P. aeruginosa, n = 4; Escherichia coli, n = 3; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 3). One WT K. pneumoniae isolate was included. Antibiotic concentrations simulated the free-steady state average concentration of clinically administered doses in patients.

RESULTS

Sulbactam-durlobactam alone showed significant activity against A. baumannii consistent with the MIC values. Sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime showed synergy against one A. baumannii isolate with an elevated MIC to sulbactam-durlobactam (32 mg/L). Against all P. aeruginosa isolates, synergy was observed with sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime. For the Enterobacterales, one E. coli isolate demonstrated synergy while the others were indifferent due to significant kill from sulbactam-durlobactam alone. The combination of sulbactam-durlobactam plus cefepime showed synergy against one of the K. pneumoniae and additive effects against the other two K. pneumoniae tested. No antagonism was observed in any isolates including the WT strain.

CONCLUSIONS

Synergy and no antagonism was observed with a combination of sulbactam-durlobactam and cefepime; further in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics data and clinical correlation are necessary to support our findings.

Population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime for critically ill adults: a comparative assessment of eGFR equations

Cefepime exhibits highly variable pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and qualify a population pharmacokinetic model for use in the critically ill and investigate the impact of various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations using creatinine, cystatin C, or both on model parameters. This was a prospective study of critically ill adults hospitalized at an academic medical center treated with intravenous cefepime. Individuals with acute kidney injury or on kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data collected from 2018 to 2022. The 120 included individuals contributed 379 serum samples for analysis. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described the data. The population mean parameters (standard error) in the final model were 7.84 (0.24) L/h for CL1 and 15.6 (1.45) L for V1. Q was fixed at 7.09 L/h and V2 was fixed at 10.6 L, due to low observed interindividual variation in these parameters. The final model included weight as a covariate for volume of distribution and the eGFRcr-cysC (mL/min) as a predictor of drug clearance. In summary, a population pharmacokinetic model for cefepime was created for critically ill adults. The study demonstrated the importance of cystatin C to prediction of cefepime clearance. Cefepime dosing models which use an eGFR equation inclusive of cystatin C are likely to exhibit improved accuracy and precision compared to dosing models which incorporate an eGFR equation with only creatinine.

In silico evaluation of a beta-lactam dosing guideline among adults with serious infections

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the achievement of therapeutic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) exposure targets for beta-lactam antibiotics using product information dosing or guideline-based dosing for the treatment of serious infections.

DESIGN

In silico study.

DATA SOURCE

ID-ODSTM (Individually Designed Optimum Dosing Strategies).

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In silico product information and guideline-based dosing simulations for cefepime, ceftazidime, flucloxacillin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam were performed using pharmacokinetic models from seriously ill patient populations. The median simulated concentration at 48 and 96 h was used to measure the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve predefined therapeutic and toxicity PK-PD targets. A multiple linear regression model was constructed to identify the effect of guideline-based dosing covariates on achieving pre-defined therapeutic targets. In total, 480 dosing simulations were performed. The PTA percentage with guideline-based dosing at 48 and 96 h was 80% and 68%, respectively, yielding significantly higher results when compared to product information dosing (48.45% and 49%, respectively), p < 0.001 at both time points. At 48 h, predefined toxicity thresholds were exceeded in 4.7% and 0% of simulations for guideline-based and product information-based dosing, respectively (p = 0.002). eGFR was significantly associated with the % PTA by guideline-based dosing, with eGFR values of 20 and 50 ml/min both statistically significant in leading to an increase in PTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that achievement of PK-PD exposures associated with an increased likelihood of effectiveness was more likely to occur with guideline-based dosing; especially at 48 h.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics, Antibacterial Target Attainment, and Estimated Probability of Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients

Cefepime has been reported to cause concentration-related neurotoxicity, especially in critically ill patients with renal failure. This evaluation aimed to identify a dosing regimen providing a sufficient probability of target attainment (PTA) and the lowest justifiable risk of neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on plasma concentrations over four consecutive days obtained from 14 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The patients received a median dose of 2,000 mg cefepime by 30-min intravenous infusions with dosing intervals of every 8 h (q8h) to q24h. A time that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC over the dosing interval (fT>MIC) of 65% and an fT>2×MIC of 100% were defined as treatment targets. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to identify a dosing regimen for a PTA of 90% and a probability of neurotoxicity not exceeding 20%. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data. Estimated creatinine clearance was significantly related to the clearance of cefepime in nondialysis patients. Interoccasion variability on clearance improved the model, reflecting dynamic clearance changes. The evaluations suggested combining thrice-daily administration as an appropriate choice. In patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance, 120 mL/min), for the pharmacodynamics target of 100% fT>2×MIC and a PTA of 90%, a dose of 1,333 mg q8h was found to be related to a probability of neurotoxicity of ≤20% and to cover MICs up to 2 mg/L. Continuous infusion appears to be superior to other dosing regimens by providing higher efficacy and a low risk of neurotoxicity. The model makes it possible to improve the predicted balance between cefepime efficacy and neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01793012).

Cefepime extended infusion versus intermittent infusion: Clinical and cost evaluation

Background

Extended infusion cefepime (1 gram every 6 hours administered over 3 hours) achieves pharmacodynamic efficacy against bacteria with a MIC of ≤8 mg/L in Monte Carlo simulations. This regimen has not been evaluated in clinical practice.

Objective

Compare clinical and economic outcomes for cefepime by intermittent infusion and by extended infusion in the acute-care setting.

Design

Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

Patients

Hospitalized adults who received cefepime between August 2016 and July 2018 with a diagnosis of sepsis or pneumonia.

Methods

Clinical and economic outcomes were compared for patients who received empiric cefepime via intermittent infusion (30-minute infusion of 2 g every 8 hours) or extended infusion (3-hour infusion of 1 g every 6 hours). Clinical outcomes analyses were carried out using appropriate statistical methods.

Results

Overall, 111 patients received intermittent infusion and 93 patients received extended infusion. Approximately half of the included patients had a positive culture for a bacterial pathogen (intermittent infusion 45.9% vs extended infusion 47.3%). Median hospital length of stay (intermittent infusion 6 days vs extended infusion 6 days; P = .67) and 90-day readmission rates (intermittent infusion 61.3% vs extended infusion 67.7%; P = .34) did not differ between the groups. Mortality was infrequent in both groups (intermittent infusion 2.9% vs extended infusion 1.5%; P = .45). Cefepime cost per patient was lower with cefepime by extended infusion: average total daily cost $86.06 for intermittent infusion versus $43.39 for extended infusion.

Conclusions

Cefepime via extended infusion (4 grams/day) did not differ in clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusion (6 grams/day) but reduced drug expenditure. Prospective, multicenter, high-quality studies should be conducted to evaluate a mortality difference between these regimens.

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analyses to identify a rational empirical dosing strategy for cefepime in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions.

RESULTS

The PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients' renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Cefepime, not Piperacillin/Tazobactam use, for empirical treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter spp.: Results from a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of published data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens against bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella aerogenes (BSIs-Kae) and Enterobacter cloacae complex (BSIs-Ecc) in patients with various degrees of renal function.

METHODS

Pathogens were isolated from China's blood bacterial resistant investigation network. The dosing regimens of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin were simulated with intermittent infusion and extended infusion. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the probability of target attainment and a cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against BSIs-Kae/Ecc.

RESULTS

In total, 203 BSIs-Kae, and 785 BSIs-Ecc were isolated from the surveillance network. Imipenem showed the highest in vitro activity against BSIs-Kae/Ecc, followed by cefepime (85%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (70-80%). The MIC₉₀ values of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam aginst BSIs-Kae and BSIs-Ecc were 1/1 mg/L, 16/16 mg/L, and 64/128 mg/L, respectively. The simulation results showed imipenem achieved the highest CFRs in patients with normal or decreased renal function, with values of 91-99%, followed by FEP (88-96%), without risk of excessive dosing. However, the intermittent and extended dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam were unlikely to provide adequate exposure for empirical management of BSIs-Kae/Ecc (CFRs, 50-80%), regardless of renal function. Besides, the traditional intermittent piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens were highly likely to contribute to suboptimal therapeutic exposure when MIC was close to clinical breakpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime, not piperacillin/tazobactam, can be a reasonable carbapenem-sparing option in empirically treating BSIs-Kae/Ecc.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime

Cefepime is a broad-spectrum fourth-generation cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. It is generally administered as an infusion over 30-60 min or as a prolonged infusion with infusion times from 3 h to continuous administration. Cefepime is widely distributed in biological fluids and tissues with an average volume of distribution of ~ 0.2 L/kg in healthy adults with normal renal function. Protein binding is relatively low (20%), and elimination is mainly renal. About 85% of the dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, with an elimination half-life of 2-2.3 h. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime is altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high inter-individual variability in cefepime volume of distribution and clearance, which poses challenges for population dosing approaches. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime may be beneficial in certain patients including those who are critically ill, have life-threatening infections, or are infected with more resistant pathogens. Cefepime is generally safe and efficacious, with a goal exposure target of 70% time of the free drug concentration over the minimum inhibitory concentration for clinical efficacy. In recent years, reports of neurotoxicity have increased, specifically in patients with impaired renal function. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicodynamics of cefepime contemporarily in the setting of increasing cefepime exposures. We explore the potential benefits of extended or continuous infusions and therapeutic drug monitoring in special populations.

Pharmacokinetics of Cefepime in Children on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: External Model Validation, Model Improvement and Dose Optimization

BACKGROUND

Cefepime is a first-line therapy for Gram-negative infections in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cefepime pharmacokinetics (PK) in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation still needs to be better established.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center PK study. A maximum of 12 PK samples per patient were collected in children <18 years old on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who received clinically indicated cefepime. External validation of a previously published population PK model was performed by applying the model in a new data set. The predictive performance of the model was determined by calculating prediction errors. Because of poor predictive performance, a revised model was developed using NONMEM and a combined data set that included data from both studies. Dose-exposure simulations were performed using the final model. Optimal dosing was judged based on the ability to maintain free cefepime concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 68% and 100% of the dosing interval.

RESULTS

Seventeen children contributed 105 PK samples. The mean (95% CI) and median (interquartile range) prediction errors were 33.7% (19.8-47.7) and 17.5% (-22.6 to 74.4). A combined data set was created, which included 33 children contributing 310 PK samples. The final improved 2-compartment model included weight and serum creatinine on clearance and oxygenator day and blood transfusion on volume of the central compartment. At an MIC of 8 mg/L, 50 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours reached target concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing intervals of 8 hours were needed to reach adequate concentrations at an MIC of 8 mg/L. Longer dosing intervals were adequate with higher serum creatinine and lower MICs.

Ceftazidime and cefepime antagonize 5-fluorouracil's effect in colon cancer cells

Background

Drug-drug interaction (DDI), which can occur at the pharmacokinetics and/or the pharmacodynamics (PD) levels, can increase or decrease the therapeutic or adverse response of a drug itself or a combination of drugs. Cancer patients often receive, along their antineoplastic agents, antibiotics such as ß-lactams to treat or prevent infection. Despite the narrow therapeutic indices of antibiotics and antineoplastic agents, data about their potential interaction are insufficient. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), widely used against colon cancer, is known for its toxicity and large intra- and inter- individual variability. Therefore, knowledge about its interaction with antibiotics is crucial.

Methods

In this study, we evaluated at the PD levels, against HCT-116 colon cancer cells, DDI between 5-FU and several ß-lactams (ampicillin, benzypenicillin, piperacillin, meropenem, flucloxacillin, ceftazidime (CFT), and cefepime (CFP)), widely used in intensive care units. All drugs were tested at clinically achieved concentrations. MTT assay was used to measure the metabolic activity of the cells. Cell cycle profile and apoptosis induction were monitored, in HCT-116 and DLD-1 cells, using propidium iodide staining and Caspase-3/7 activity assay. The uptake of CFT and CFP by the cells was measured using LC-MS/MS method.

Results

Our data indicate that despite their limited uptake by the cells, CFT and CFP (two cephalosporins) antagonized significantly 5-FU-induced S-phase arrest (DLD-1 cells) and apoptosis induction (HCT-116 cells). Remarkably, while CFP did not affect the proliferation of colon cancer cells, CFT inhibited, at clinically relevant concentrations, the proliferation of DLD-1 cells via apoptosis induction, as evidenced by an increase in caspase 3/7 activation. Unexpectedly, 5-FU also antagonized CFT’s induced cell death in DLD-1 cells.

Conclusion

This study shows that CFP and CFT have adverse effects on 5-FU’s action while CFT is a potent anticancer agent that inhibits DLD-1 cells by inducing apoptotic cell death. Further studies are needed to decipher the mechanism(s) responsible for CFT’s effects against colon cancer as well as the observed antagonism between CFT, CFP, and 5-FU with the ultimate aim of translating the findings to the clinical settings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09125-4.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefepime in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (an ASAP ECMO study)

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of cefepime during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and through dosing simulations, identify a maximally effective and safe dosing strategy.

METHODS

Serial cefepime plasma concentrations were measured in patients on ECMO, and data were analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. Dosing simulations were used to identify the optimal dosing strategy that achieved target trough concentrations (C_min) of 8-20 mg/L. Six patients were enrolled, of which one was receiving renal replacement therapy. Cefepime was best described in a two-compartment model, with total body weight and creatinine clearance (CrCL) as significant predictors of PK parameters. The mean clearance and central volume of distribution were 2.42 L/h and 15.09 L, respectively.

RESULTS

Based on simulations, patients with CrCL of 120 mL/min receiving 1 g 8-hourly dosing achieved a 40-44% probability of efficacy (C_min > 8 mg/L) and 1-6% toxicity (C_min > 20 mg/L). Patients with CrCL 30 mL/min and 65 mL/min receiving 1 g 12-hourly dosing achieved an 84-92% and 46-53% probability of efficacy and 8-44% and 1-8% probability of toxicity, respectively. Simulations demonstrated a lower probability of efficacy and higher probability of toxicity with decreasing patient weight.

CONCLUSION

This study reported reduced cefepime clearance in patients receiving ECMO, resulting in an increased risk of cefepime toxicity. To avoid drug accumulation, modified dosing regimens should be used in critically ill patients on ECMO. Clinicians should adopt therapeutic drug monitoring when treating less susceptible organisms and in patients with reduced renal clearance on ECMO.

Beta-Lactams Dosing in Critically Ill Patients with Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A PK/PD Approach

Beta-lactam antibiotics are often the backbone of treatment for Gram-negative infections in the critically ill. Beta-lactams exhibit time-dependent killing, and their efficacy depends on the percentage of dosing interval that the concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration. The Gram-negative resistance rates of pathogens are increasing in the intensive care unit (ICU), and critically ill patients often possess physiology that makes dosing more challenging. The volume of distribution is usually increased, and drug clearance is variable. Augmented renal clearance and hypermetabolic states increase the clearance of beta-lactams, while acute kidney injury reduces the clearance. To overcome the factors affecting ICU patients and decreasing susceptibilities, dosing strategies involving higher doses, and extended or continuous infusions may be required. In this review, we specifically examined pharmacokinetic models in ICU patients, to determine the desired beta-lactam regimens for clinical breakpoints of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as determined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. The beta-lactams evaluated included penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams. We found that when treating less-susceptible pathogens, especially P. aeruginosa, continuous infusions are frequently needed to achieve the desired pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. More studies are needed to determine optimal dosing strategies in the novel beta-lactams.

Optimizing Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients

A fundamental step in the successful management of sepsis and septic shock is early empiric antimicrobial therapy. However, for this to be effective, several decisions must be addressed simultaneously: (1) antimicrobial choices should be adequate, covering the most probable pathogens; (2) they should be administered in the appropriate dose, (3) by the correct route, and (4) using the correct mode of administration to achieve successful concentration at the infection site. In critically ill patients, antimicrobial dosing is a common challenge and a frequent source of errors, since these patients present deranged pharmacokinetics, namely increased volume of distribution and altered drug clearance, which either increased or decreased. Moreover, the clinical condition of these patients changes markedly over time, either improving or deteriorating. The consequent impact on drug pharmacokinetics further complicates the selection of correct drug schedules and dosing during the course of therapy. In recent years, the knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring, and antimicrobial resistance in the critically ill patients has greatly improved, fostering strategies to optimize therapeutic efficacy and to reduce toxicity and adverse events. Nonetheless, delivering adequate and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is still a challenge, since pathogen resistance continues to rise, and new therapeutic agents remain scarce. We aim to review the available literature to assess the challenges, impact, and tools to optimize individualization of antimicrobial dosing to maximize exposure and effectiveness in critically ill patients.

In vivo pharmacodynamics of new-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) in combination with cefepime against serine-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria

OBJECTIVES

Cefepime/taniborbactam is a cephalosporin/cyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor combination under development for the treatment of infections due to MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model, we aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index, relative to taniborbactam exposure, that correlated most closely with the efficacy of the cefepime/taniborbactam combination and the magnitude of index required for efficacy against serine-β-lactamase-producing strains.

METHODS

Twenty-six clinical Enterobacterales (expressing ESBLs, plasmid-mediated AmpC and/or carbapenemases of classes A or D; cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs 0.06-16 mg/L) and 11 clinical P. aeruginosa (AmpC overproducing or KPC expressing; cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs 1-16 mg/L) were evaluated. A cefepime human-simulated regimen (HSR) equivalent to a clinical dose of 2 g q8h as a 2 h infusion was given in combination with taniborbactam for 24 h. For a subset of P. aeruginosa isolates, a sub-therapeutic cefepime exposure was utilized.

RESULTS

Dose-fractionation studies revealed that dosing frequency had no impact on taniborbactam potentiation of cefepime activity. Relative to the initial bacterial burden, the median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with 1 log kill in combination with the cefepime HSR for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was 2.62 and 0.46, respectively. In combination with sub-therapeutic cefepime, the median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with 1 and 2 log kill against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa was 2.00 and 3.30, respectively, relative to the bacterial burden in the cefepime-treated groups. The taniborbactam HSR (equivalent to 0.5 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) was adequate to attain ≥1 log reduction against all test isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the cefepime/taniborbactam combination (2 g/0.5 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) exerts potent in vivo activity against cefepime-resistant isolates, including serine-carbapenemase producers.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients and Guidance for Initial Dosing

Cefepime is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat bacterial infections. The time during which the free cefepime concentration is above the MIC (fT_>MIC) should be optimized to increase the efficacy of the regimen. We aim to optimize the exposure of cefepime in ICU patients by using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. Two data sets were included in this study. The first was a prospective study of pediatric patients who received cefepime at 50 mg/kg of body weight and had extensive PK sampling. The second study comprised retrospective data for adult ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital who received cefepime and had their cefepime concentrations measured. The population PK model was developed, and simulations were performed, using Pmetrics. The target exposures were 100% fT_>MIC and 100% fT_>4×MIC The studies included a total of 266 patients, and the mean ages were 3.9 years in the pediatric group and 55 years in adult group. More than half of the patients were males. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 125 (93) ml/min. The mean (SD) daily dose for adults was 4.9 (1.6) g. Cefepime was well described by a two-compartment model with weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution and elimination rate constant (k _el), and CrCl and age group as covariates on k _el At a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a cefepime loading dose of 4 g as an extended infusion followed by a 6-g continuous infusion was needed for good target attainment. In conclusion, prolonged or continuous infusions will be needed to achieve optimal cefepime exposure for ICU patients. Given the observed variability, therapeutic drug monitoring can help individualize therapy.

What Are the Current Approaches to Optimising Antimicrobial Dosing in the Intensive Care Unit?

Antimicrobial dosing in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be problematic due to various challenges including unique physiological changes observed in critically ill patients and the presence of pathogens with reduced susceptibility. These challenges result in reduced likelihood of standard antimicrobial dosing regimens achieving target exposures associated with optimal patient outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this review is to explore the various methods for optimisation of antimicrobial dosing in ICU patients. Dosing nomograms developed from pharmacokinetic/statistical models and therapeutic drug monitoring are commonly used. However, recent advances in mathematical and statistical modelling have resulted in the development of novel dosing software that utilise Bayesian forecasting and/or artificial intelligence. These programs utilise therapeutic drug monitoring results to further personalise antimicrobial therapy based on each patient’s clinical characteristics. Studies quantifying the clinical and cost benefits associated with dosing software are required before widespread use as a point-of-care system can be justified.

Development of Population and Bayesian Models for Applied Use in Patients Receiving Cefepime

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Understanding pharmacokinetic disposition of cefepime, a β-lactam antibiotic, is crucial for developing regimens to achieve optimal exposure and improved clinical outcomes. This study sought to develop and evaluate a unified population pharmacokinetic model in both pediatric and adult patients receiving cefepime treatment.

METHODS

Multiple physiologically relevant models were fit to pediatric and adult subject data. To evaluate the final model performance, a withheld group of 12 pediatric patients and two separate adult populations were assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy subjects with a total of 604 cefepime concentrations were included in this study. All adults (n = 34) on average weighed 82.7 kg and displayed a mean creatinine clearance of 106.7 mL/min. All pediatric subjects (n = 36) had mean weight and creatinine clearance of 16.0 kg and 195.6 mL/min, respectively. A covariate-adjusted two-compartment model described the observed concentrations well (population model R², 87.0%; Bayesian model R², 96.5%). In the evaluation subsets, the model performed similarly well (population R², 84.0%; Bayesian R², 90.2%).

CONCLUSION

The identified model serves well for population dosing and as a Bayesian prior for precision dosing.

Effect of Clinically Meaningful Antibiotic Concentrations on Recovery of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Anaerobic Blood Culture Bottles with and without Antibiotic Binding Resins

Blood cultures are routinely collected in pairs of aerobic and anaerobic bottles. Artificial sterilization of Gram-negative bacteria in aerobic bottles containing clinically meaningful antibiotic concentrations has previously been observed. This study assessed recovery from anaerobic bottles with and without antibiotic binding resins. We studied the recovery of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae when exposed to meropenem, imipenem, cefepime, cefazolin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam in resin-containing BacT/Alert FN Plus and BD Bactec Plus anaerobic/F bottles as well as resin-free BacT/Alert SN and BD Bactec standard anaerobic bottles. Bottles were inoculated with bacteria and whole blood containing peak, midpoint, or trough concentrations and incubated for up to 120 hours in their respective detection systems. In E. coli resin-containing bottles, recovery was observed in 10/24 (42%), 17/24 (71%), and 18/24 (75%) (P = 0.034) of those exposed to peak, midpoint, and trough concentrations, respectively. In K. pneumoniae resin-containing bottles, recovery was observed in 8/16 (50%), 10/16 (63%), and 10/16 (63%) (P = 0.710), respectively. No growth was detected in bottles containing cefepime regardless of concentration, while recovery was observed in the presence of all concentrations of cefazolin and piperacillin-tazobactam. Recovery in bottles with meropenem and imipenem was more frequently observed in BacT/Alert FN Plus bottles compared with Bactec Plus bottles. Resin-free bottles demonstrated significantly lower recovery than bottles containing binding resin. Clinical concentrations of certain antibiotics can adversely affect detection of E. coli and K. pneumoniae in anaerobic blood culture bottles. Obtaining blood cultures immediately before a dose and utilizing resin-containing anaerobic bottles will maximize the likelihood of recovery.

The Pharmacodynamics of Prolonged Infusion β-Lactams for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a commonly isolated nosocomial pathogen for which treatment options are often limited for multidrug-resistant isolates. In addition to newer available antimicrobial agents active against P. aeruginosa, strategies such as extended (eg, prolonged or continuous) infusion have been suggested to optimize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of β-lactams. Literature regarding clinical outcomes for extended infusion β-lactams has been controversial; however, this use seems most beneficial in patients with severe illness. Prolonged infusion of β-lactams (eg, 3- to 4-hour infusion) can enhance the pharmacodynamic target attainment via increasing the amount of time throughout the dosing interval to which the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of the organism (fT > MIC). This systematic review summarizes current literature related to the probability of target attainment (PTA) of various antipseudomonal β-lactam regimens administered as prolonged infusions in an effort to provide guidance in selecting optimal dosing regimens and infusion times for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

A literature search for all pertinent studies was performed by using the PubMed database (with no year limit) through March 31, 2019.

FINDINGS

Thirty-nine studies were included. Although many standard antipseudomonal β-lactam intermittent infusion regimens can provide adequate PTA against most susceptible isolates, prolonged infusion may enhance percent fT > MIC for organisms with higher MICs (eg, nonsusceptible) or patients with altered pharmacokinetic profiles (eg, obese, critically ill, those with febrile neutropenia).

IMPLICATIONS

Prolonged infusion β-lactam regimens can enhance PTA against nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates and may provide a potential therapeutic option for multidrug-resistant infections. Before implementing prolonged infusion antipseudomonal β-lactams, institutions should consider the half-life of the antibiotic, local incidence of P. aeruginosa infections, antibiotic MIC distributions or MICs isolated from individual patients, individual patient characteristics that may alter pharmacokinetic variables, and PTA (eg, critically ill), as well as implementation challenges.

Association Between Estimated Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Predictions of Efficacy and Observed Clinical Outcomes in Obese and Nonobese Patients With Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections

Background

Evidence on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) alterations and clinical outcomes in obese patients with serious infections remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate predicted PK/PD indices of efficacy and observed clinical outcomes between obese and nonobese patients receiving cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam for Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of adult inpatients from 1/2012 to 9/2015 with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia who received empiric cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. The primary outcome was clinical cure. First-dose free-drug exposure was estimated via predicted concentrations generated from population PK analyses and used to assess PD target attainment (>50% fT > minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]) for the specific Enterobacteriaceae isolate. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors of clinical cure.

Results

One hundred forty-two patients were included, 57 obese and 85 nonobese. Clinical cure was achieved in 68.4% of obese and 62.4% of nonobese patients (P = .458). No significant difference in outcomes was observed when evaluated by World Health Organization (WHO) obesity classes. The PK/PD target was achieved in 98.2% of obese and 91.8% of nonobese patients (P = .144). Independent predictors of clinical cure were immunosuppression and a shorter duration of bacteremia. Obesity was not identified as a significant predictor of clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Neither predicted PK/PD parameters nor clinical outcomes differed significantly between obese and nonobese patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime. As the majority of patients received extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam for bacteremia due to pathogens with low MICs, the potentially detrimental pathophysiologic derangements caused by obesity may not have been realized. Further studies are warranted to establish the optimal treatment of serious infections in obese patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Extended-Infusion Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective, Open-Label Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate extended-infusion (EI) cefepime pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, PK study.

SETTING

Intensive care units at a large, academic, tertiary-care medical center.

PATIENTS

Ten critically ill adults who were receiving cefepime 2 g intravenously every 8 hours as a 4-hour infusion while receiving CVVH (eight patients) or CVVHD (two patients).

INTERVENTION

Two sets of five serum cefepime concentrations were collected for each patient to assess pharmacokinetics before and during presumed steady state. Concurrent serum and CRRT effluent samples were collected at hours 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 after the first cefepime dose and after either the fourth, fifth, or sixth (steady-state) cefepime doses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography was used to determine free cefepime concentrations. PK analyses included CRRT clearance, half-life, and sieving coefficient or saturation coefficient. Cefepime peak (4 hrs) concentrations, trough (8 hrs) concentrations (C_min ), and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of 8 µg/ml for the pathogen (MIC₈ ) were used to evaluate attainment of pharmacodynamic targets: 100% of the dosing interval that free drug remains above MIC₈ (100% fT > MIC₈ ), 100% fT > 4 × MIC₈ (optimal), percentage of time fT > 4 × MIC₈ (%fT > 4 × MIC₈ ) at steady state, and ratio of C_min to MIC₈ (fC_min /MIC₈ ). Total CRRT effluent flow rate was a mean ± SD of 30.1 ± 5.4 ml/kg/hr, CRRT clearance was 39.6 ± 9.9 ml/min, and half-life was 5.3 ± 1.7 hours. Sieving coefficient or saturation coefficient were 0.83 ± 0.13 and 0.69 ± 0.22, respectively. First and steady-state dose C_min were 23.4 ± 10.1 µg/ml and 45.2 ± 14.6 µg/ml, respectively. All patients achieved 100% fT > MIC₈ on first and steady-state doses. First and steady-state dose 100% fT > 4 × MIC₈ were achieved in 22% (2/9 patients) and 87.5% (7/8 patients) of patients, respectively. The mean %fT > 4 × MIC₈ at steady state was 97.5%. The fC_min /MIC₈ was 2.92 ± 1.26 for the first dose and 5.65 ± 1.83 at steady state.

CONCLUSION

Extended-infusion cefepime dosing in critically ill patients receiving CRRT successfully attained 100% fT > MIC₈ in all patients and an appropriate fC_min /MIC₈ for both first and steady-state doses. All but one patient achieved 100% fT > 4 × MIC₈ at steady state. No significant differences were observed in PK properties between first and steady-state doses among or between patients. It may be reasonable to initiate an empiric or definitive regimen of EI cefepime in critically ill patients receiving concurrent CRRT who are at risk for resistant organisms. Further research is needed to identify the optimal dosing regimen of EI cefepime in this patient population.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic predictions and clinical outcomes of patients with augmented renal clearance and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia and/or pneumonia treated with extended infusion cefepime versus extended infusion piperacillin/tazobactam

Aim

We sought to correlate pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) predictions of antibacterial efficacy and clinical outcomes in patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia treated with extended infusion cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam.

Materials and Methods

Cefepime (2 g every 8 h) and piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g every 8 h) were administered over 4 h after a loading dose infused over 30 min, and minimum inhibitory concentration was determined by E-test. Published population PK evaluations in critically ill patients were used, and PD analyses were conducted using estimated patient-specific PK parameters and known minimum inhibitory concentration values for P. aeruginosa. Concentration-time profiles were generated every 6 min using first-dose drug exposure estimates including a loading infusion, and free concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT> MIC) was estimated. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms attributable to P. aeruginosa infection without need for escalation of antimicrobial.

Results

One hundred and two patients were included (36 cefepime and 66 piperacillin/tazobactam). The two groups of patients had similar age, serum creatinine, weight, and creatinine clearance. The majority of patients required intensive care unit care (63.9% vs. 63.6%) and most had pneumonia (61%). The fT>MIC (93.6 [69.9-100] vs. 57.2 [47.6-72.4], P < 0.001) and clinical cure (91.7% vs. 74.2%, P = 0.039) were significantly higher in cefepime group, whereas mortality (8.3% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.1) and infection-related mortality (0% vs. 2%, P = 0.54) were similar.

Conclusions

Patients with ARC and P. aeruginosa pneumonia and/or bacteremia who received extended-infusion cefepime achieved higher fT>MIC and clinical cure than those receiving extended infusion piperacillin/tazobactam.

Recovery of Gram-Negative Bacteria from Aerobic Blood Culture Bottles Containing Antibiotic Binding Resins after Exposure to β-Lactam and Fluoroquinolone Concentrations

Blood culture bottles containing antibiotic binding resins are routinely used to minimize artificial sterilization in the presence of antibiotics. However, the resin binding kinetics can differ between antibiotics and concentrations. This study assessed the impact of clinically meaningful peak, midpoint, and trough concentrations of meropenem, imipenem, cefepime, cefazolin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam on the recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae from resin-containing BacT/Alert FA Plus and Bactec Aerobic/F blood culture bottles. P. aeruginosa-inoculated bottles alarmed positive in 4/20 (20%), 16/20 (80%), and 20/20 (100%) of those with peak, midpoint, and trough concentrations of antipseudomonal agents, respectively (P ≤ 0.001). E. coli was recovered from 8/24 (33%), 11/24 (46%), and 14/24 (58%) of bottles with peak, midpoint, and trough concentrations, respectively (P = 0.221). K. pneumoniae was recovered from 8/16 (50%) at all concentrations of the studied antibiotics (P = 1.0). BacT/Alert and Bactec bottles inoculated with antibiotics and P. aeruginosa had similar times to detection (TTD) (P = 0.352); however, antibiotic-containing BacT/Alert bottles had a shorter TTD compared with antibiotic-containing Bactec bottles for E. coli (P = 0.026) and K. pneumoniae (P ≤ 0.001). Pathogen recovery in BacT/Alert FA Plus and Bactec Aerobic/F blood culture bottles containing antibiotic binding resins was greatly reduced in the presence of antibiotics, especially at higher concentrations. These data support the practice of drawing blood cultures immediately before an antibiotic dose to maximize the chances of pathogen recovery.

Pharmacokinetic variability of beta-lactams in critically ill patients: A narrative review

The use of antibacterial drugs is very common in critically ill patients and beta-lactam agents are widely used in this context. Critically ill patients show several characteristics (e.g., sepsis, renal impairment or conversely augmented renal clearance, renal replacement therapy) that may alter beta-lactam pharmacokinetics (PK) in comparison with non-critically ill patients. This narrative literature review aims to identify recent studies quantifying the variability of beta-lactams volume of distribution and clearance and to determine its main determinants. Seventy studies published between 2000 and 2018 were retained. Data on volume of distribution and clearance variability were reported for 5 penicillins, 3 beta-lactamase inhibitors, 6 cephalosporins and 4 carbapenems. Data confirm specific changes in PK parameters and important variability of beta-lactam PK in critically ill patients. Renal function, body weight and use of renal replacement therapy are the principal factors influencing PK parameters described in this population. Few studies have directly compared beta-lactam PK in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients. Conclusions are also limited by small study size and sparse PK data in several studies. These results suggest approaches to assess this PK variability in clinical practice. Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring seems to be the best way to deal with this issue.

Update in Infectious Diseases 2019

The IX Course of Antimicrobials and Infectious Diseases update included a review of the main issues in clinical microbiology, epidemiology and clinical aspects for a current approach of infectious pathology. The present introduction summarizes about the most important meetings related to infectious diseases during 2018 (ECCMID, IAS, ASM and ID Week). In addition, the course provides a practical information to focus on nosocomial infection models, with immunosuppressed patients or complex multidrug-resistant pathogens. The closing lecture of this year reviewed the infection during donation process.

Effects of i.v. push administration on β-lactam pharmacodynamics

PURPOSE

The effects of i.v. push administration on the pharmacodynamic exposures of meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam were evaluated.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted using previously published pharmacokinetic data for meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed using Monte Carlo simulations for 30-minute and 5-minute infusions of approved dosing regimens and alternative dosing schemes often used in clinical practice, including 500 mg every 6 hours and 1 g every 8 hours for meropenem, 1 g every 6 hours and 2 g every 8 hours for cefepime, and 2 g every 8 hours for aztreonam. For each regimen examined, means and standard deviations for the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were calculated and reported.

RESULTS

No or only minor differences were noted between 30-minute and 5-minute infusions. The largest differences were observed at an MIC of 4 mg/L for meropenem and an MIC of 16 mg/L for aztreonam. At an MIC of 4 mg/L, meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours as a 30-minute infusion had an 8% greater PTA compared with the 5-minute infusion. At an MIC of 16 mg/L, a 30-minute infusion of aztreonam 2 g every 8 hours had a 12% greater PTA compared with the 5-minute infusion.

CONCLUSION

Simulations of meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam by i.v. push over 5 minutes indicated that there would be minimal or no effect on pharmacodynamic exposures compared with the effect when administered by 30-minute infusions.

Antibiotic use in critical illness

OBJECTIVE

To provide a review on the current use of antimicrobials with a discussion on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of antimicrobials in critically ill patients, the challenges of drug resistance, the use of diagnostic testing to direct therapy, and the selection of the most likely efficacious antimicrobial protocol.

ETIOLOGY

Patients in the intensive care unit often possess profound pathophysiologic changes that can complicate antimicrobial therapy. Although many antimicrobials have known pharmacodynamic profiles, critical illness can cause wide variations in their pharmacokinetics. The two principal factors affecting pharmacokinetics are volume of distribution and drug clearance. Understanding the interplay between critical illness, drug pharmacokinetics, and antimicrobial characteristics (ie, time-dependent vs concentration-dependent) may improve antimicrobial efficacy and patient outcome.

DIAGNOSIS

Utilizing bacterial culture and susceptibility can aid in identifying drug resistant infections, selecting the most appropriate antimicrobials, and hindering the future development of drug resistance.

THERAPY

Having a basic knowledge of antimicrobial function and how to use diagnostics to direct therapeutic treatment is paramount in managing this patient population. Diagnostic testing is not always available at the time of initiation of antimicrobial therapy, so empiric selections are often necessary. These empiric choices should be made based on the location of the infection and the most likely infecting bacteria.

PROGNOSIS

Studies have demonstrated the importance of moving away from a "one dose fits all" approach to antimicrobial therapy. Instead there has been a move toward an individualized approach that takes into consideration the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variabilities that can occur in critically ill patients.

Optimization of the treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients-guidelines from the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Société Française de Pharmacologie et Thérapeutique-SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation-SFAR)

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam antibiotics (βLA) are the most commonly used antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients present many pathophysiological features that cause pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) specificities, leading to the risk of underdosage. The French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) have joined forces to provide guidelines on the optimization of beta-lactam treatment in ICU patients.

METHODS

A consensus committee of 18 experts from the two societies had the mission of producing these guidelines. The entire process was conducted independently of any industry funding. A list of questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) was drawn-up by the experts. Then, two bibliographic experts analysed the literature published since January 2000 using predefined keywords according to PRISMA recommendations. The quality of the data identified from the literature was assessed using the GRADE® methodology. Due to the lack of powerful studies having used mortality as main judgement criteria, it was decided, before drafting the recommendations, to formulate only "optional" recommendations.

RESULTS

After two rounds of rating and one amendment, a strong agreement was reached by the SFPT-SFAR guideline panel for 21 optional recommendations and a recapitulative algorithm for care covering four areas: (i) pharmacokinetic variability, (ii) PK-PD relationship, (iii) administration modalities, and (iv) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The most important recommendations regarding βLA administration in ICU patients concerned (i) the consideration of the many sources of PK variability in this population; (ii) the definition of free plasma concentration between four and eight times the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the causative bacteria for 100% of the dosing interval as PK-PD target to maximize bacteriological and clinical responses; (iii) the use of continuous or prolonged administration of βLA in the most severe patients, in case of high MIC bacteria and in case of lower respiratory tract infection to improve clinical cure; and (iv) the use of TDM to improve PK-PD target achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts strongly suggest the use of personalized dosing, continuous or prolonged infusion and therapeutic drug monitoring when administering βLA in critically ill patients.

Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is characterized by an important intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and it possess an extraordinary ability to develop resistance to nearly all available antimicrobials through selection of mutations. We review some of the pharmacodynamic principles of antibiotics predicting efficacy, clinical experience with monotherapy and combination therapy, and principles for antibiotic treatment for empirical and directed treatment of P. aeruginosa invasive infections.

Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics issues relevant for the clinical use of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients

Antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of critically ill patients and beta-lactams are the most common antibiotic class used. Critically ill patient's pathophysiological factors lead to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams.A comprehensive bibliographic search in PubMed database of all English language articles published from January 2000 to December 2017 was performed, allowing the selection of articles addressing the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients.In critically ill patients, several factors may increase volume of distribution and enhance renal clearance, inducing high intra- and inter-patient variability in beta-lactam concentration and promoting the risk of antibiotic underdosing. The duration of infusion of beta-lactams has been shown to influence the fT > minimal inhibitory concentration and an improved beta-lactam pharmacodynamics profile may be obtained by longer exposure with more frequent dosing, extended infusions, or continuous infusions.The use of extracorporeal support techniques in the critically ill may further contribute to this problem and we recommend not reducing standard antibiotic dosage since no drug accumulation was found in the available literature and to maintain continuous or prolonged infusion, especially for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.Prediction of outcome based on concentrations in plasma results in overestimation of antimicrobial activity at the site of infection, namely in cerebrospinal fluid and the lung. Therefore, although no studies have assessed clinical outcome, we recommend using higher than standard dosing, preferably with continuous or prolonged infusions, especially when treating less susceptible bacterial strains at these sites, as the pharmacodynamics profile may improve with no apparent increase in toxicity.A therapeutic drug monitoring-guided approach could be particularly useful in critically ill patients in whom achieving target concentrations is more difficult, such as obese patients, immunocompromised patients, those infected by highly resistant bacterial strains, patients with augmented renal clearance, and those undergoing extracorporeal support techniques.

Clinical pharmacology considerations for children supported with ventricular assist devices

The ventricular assist device is being increasingly used as a "bridge-to-transplant" option in children with heart failure who have failed medical management. Care for this medically complex population must be optimised, including through concomitant pharmacotherapy. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic alterations affecting pharmacotherapy are increasingly discovered in children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, another form of mechanical circulatory support. Similarities between extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular assist devices support the hypothesis that similar alterations may exist in ventricular assist device-supported patients. We conducted a literature review to assess the current data available on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in children with ventricular assist devices. We found two adult and no paediatric pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in ventricular assist device-supported patients. While mechanisms may be partially extrapolated from children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, dedicated investigation of the paediatric ventricular assist device population is crucial given the inherent differences between the two forms of mechanical circulatory support, and pathophysiology that is unique to these patients. Commonly used drugs such as anticoagulants and antibiotics have narrow therapeutic windows with devastating consequences if under-dosed or over-dosed. Clinical studies are urgently needed to improve outcomes and maximise the potential of ventricular assist devices in this vulnerable population.

Can the Ceftriaxone Breakpoints Be Increased Without Compromising Patient Outcomes?

Background

In 2010, the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute recommended a 3-fold lowering of ceftriaxone breakpoints to 1 mcg/mL for Enterobacteriaceae. Supportive clinical data at the time were from fewer than 50 patients. We compared the clinical outcomes of adults with Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections treated with ceftriaxone compared with matched patients (with exact matching on ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs]) treated with extended-spectrum agents to determine if ceftriaxone breakpoints could be increased without negatively impacting patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at 3 large academic medical centers and included patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL treated with ceftriaxone or extended-spectrum β-lactams (ie, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, or imipenem/cilastatin) between 2008 and 2014; 1:2 nearest neighbor propensity score matching was performed to estimate the odds of recurrent bacteremia and mortality within 30 days.

Results

Propensity score matching yielded 108 patients in the ceftriaxone group and 216 patients in the extended-spectrum β-lactam group, with both groups well-balanced on demographics, preexisting medical conditions, severity of illness, source of bacteremia, and source control interventions. No difference in recurrent bacteremia (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49–2.73) or mortality (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.56–2.91) between the treatment groups was observed for patients with isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL. Only 6 isolates (1.6%) with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that patient outcomes are similar when receiving ceftriaxone vs extended-spectrum agents for the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL. This warrants consideration of adjusting the ceftriaxone susceptibility breakpoint from 1 to 2 mcg/mL, as a relatively small increase in the antibiotic breakpoint could have the potential to limit the use of large numbers of extended-spectrum antibiotic agents.

Application of Antibiotic Pharmacodynamics and Dosing Principles in Patients With Sepsis

Sepsis is associated with marked mortality, which may be reduced by prompt initiation of adequate, appropriate doses of antibiotic. Critically ill patients often have physiological changes that reduce blood and tissue concentrations of antibiotic and high rates of multidrug-resistant pathogens, which may affect patients' outcomes. All critical care professionals, including critical care nurses, should understand antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to ensure sound antibiotic dosing and administration strategies for optimal microbial killing and patients' outcomes. Effective pathogen eradication occurs when the dose of antibiotic reaches or maintains optimal concentrations relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration for the pathogen. Time-dependent antibiotics, such as β-lactams, can be given as extended or continuous infusions. Concentration-dependent antibiotics such as aminoglycosides are optimized by using high, once-daily dosing strategies with serum concentration monitoring. Vancomycin and fluoroquinolones are dependent on both time and concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration.

Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is characterized by a notable intrinsic resistance to antibiotics, mainly mediated by the expression of inducible chromosomic β-lactamases and the production of constitutive or inducible efflux pumps. Apart from this intrinsic resistance, P. aeruginosa possess an extraordinary ability to develop resistance to nearly all available antimicrobials through selection of mutations. The progressive increase in resistance rates in P. aeruginosa has led to the emergence of strains which, based on their degree of resistance to common antibiotics, have been defined as multidrug resistant, extended-resistant and panresistant strains. These strains are increasingly disseminated worldwide, progressively complicating the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. In this scenario, the objective of the present guidelines was to review and update published evidence for the treatment of patients with acute, invasive and severe infections caused by P. aeruginosa. To this end, mechanisms of intrinsic resistance, factors favoring development of resistance during antibiotic exposure, prevalence of resistance in Spain, classical and recently appeared new antibiotics active against P. aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic principles predicting efficacy, clinical experience with monotherapy and combination therapy, and principles for antibiotic treatment were reviewed to elaborate recommendations by the panel of experts for empirical and directed treatment of P. aeruginosa invasive infections.

Efficacy of Humanized Exposures of Cefiderocol (S-649266) against a Diverse Population of Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Murine Thigh Infection Model

Cefiderocol (S-649266) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against clinically encountered multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative isolates; however, its spectrum of antibacterial activity against these difficult-to-treat isolates remains to be fully explored in vivo Here, we evaluated the efficacy of cefiderocol humanized exposures in a neutropenic murine thigh model to support a suitable MIC breakpoint. Furthermore, we compared cefiderocol's efficacy with humanized exposures of meropenem and cefepime against a subset of these phenotypically diverse isolates. Ninety-five Gram-negative isolates were studied. Efficacy was determined as the change in log10 CFU at 24 h compared with 0-h controls. Bacterial stasis or ≥1 log reduction in 67 isolates with MICs of ≤4 μg/ml was noted in 77, 88, and 85% of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively. For isolates with MICs of ≥8 μg/ml, bacterial stasis or ≥1 log10 reduction was observed in only 2 of 28 (8 Enterobacteriaceae, 19 A. baumannii, and 1 P. aeruginosa) strains. Against highly resistant meropenem and cefepime organisms, cefiderocol maintained its in vivo efficacy. Overall, humanized exposures of cefiderocol produced similar reductions in bacterial density for organisms with MICs of ≤4 μg/ml, whereas isolates with MICs of ≥8 μg/ml generally displayed bacterial growth in the presence of the compound. Data derived in the current study will assist with the delineation of MIC susceptibility breakpoints for cefiderocol against these important nosocomial Gram-negative pathogens; however, additional clinical data are required to substantiate these observations.

Defining the impact of severity of illness on time above the MIC threshold for cefepime in Gram-negative bacteraemia: a 'Goldilocks' window

The quantitative impact of severity of illness on pharmacodynamic thresholds is poorly defined. We used a robust cefepime outcomes cohort and previously identified pharmacodynamic breakpoints of 68% [pharmacokinetic (PK) model 1] and 74% (PK model 2) to probe interactions and relationships with modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (mAPACHE) II scores. When the time that serum concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration during the dosing interval (fT_>MIC) was optimised, mortality was improved between mAPACHE II scores of 9-23 and 9-22 in models 1 and 2, respectively. No significant interactions were identified. These results suggest that mAPACHE II scores of 9-22 may fall within a 'Goldilocks' window in which hospital survival is improved among patients achieving goal fT_>MIC thresholds.

Optimizing β-lactams treatment in critically-ill patients using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets: are first conventional doses effective?

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index determining β-lactam activity is the percentage of the dosing interval (%T) during which their free serum concentration remains above a critical threshold over the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Regrettably, neither the value of %T nor that of the threshold are clearly defined for critically-ill patients. Areas covered: We review and assess the targets proposed for β-lactams in critical illness by screening the literature since 1997. Depending on the study intention (clinical cure vs. suppression of resistance), targets proposed range from 20%T > 1xMIC to 100%T > 5xMIC. Assessment and comparative analysis of their respective clinical efficacy suggest that a value of 100%T > 4xMIC may be needed. Simulation studies, however, show that this target will not be reached at first dose for the majority of critically-ill patients if using the most commonly recommended doses. Expert commentary: Considering that critically-ill patients are highly vulnerable and likely to experience antibiotic underexposure, and because effective initial treatment is a key determinant of clinical outcome, we support the use of a target of 100%T > 4xMIC, which could not only maximize efficacy but also minimize emergence of resistance. Clinical and microbiological studies are needed to test for the feasibility and effectiveness of reaching such a demanding target.

Extended infusion compared to standard infusion cefepime as empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia

Background Extended infusion (EI) dosing provides a longer time above the minimum inhibitory concentration, which is important for the clinical success of β-lactam antibiotics, especially for patients with impaired immunity. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and clinical impact of administering cefepime by EI as treatment of febrile neutropenia. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study. All patients received cefepime 2 g IV every 8 h, with the first dose administered using a 30-min infusion. After the first dose, patients were randomized to receive cefepime over 30 min as a standard infusion (SI) or 3 h (EI). Patients were >18 years old with febrile neutropenia (neutrophil count <500 cells/mm³ and temperature >38.0ºC) and received chemotherapy or stem cell transplant as treatment for malignancy. Patients were excluded for the following: allergy to a cephalosporin, creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min, receipt of concurrent Gram-negative antimicrobial, sepsis, or solid tumor malignancy. The primary outcome was defervescence by 72 h. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence, clinical success, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and need for additional antimicrobials. Main results Sixty-three patients were enrolled: 33 in the SI arm and 30 in the EI arm. The groups were similar with regard to age, gender, weight, estimated creatinine clearance, and duration of neutropenia. None of the patients in the EI arm withdrew due to practical complications of receiving EI cefepime. Twenty-three patients in the SI arm and 20 patients in the EI arm defervesced by 72 h ( p = 0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcome measures; however, patients in the EI arm appeared to have defervesced more rapidly (median 19 vs. 41 h, p = 0.305). Conclusion Administration of cefepime by EI for the treatment of febrile neutropenia is feasible. Larger clinical trials are necessary to determine if EI cefepime imparts a clinical benefit in the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

A model-based analysis of the predictive performance of different renal function markers for cefepime clearance in the ICU

OBJECTIVES

Several population pharmacokinetic models for cefepime in critically ill patients have been described, which all indicate that variability in renal clearance is the main determinant of the observed variability in exposure. The main objective of this study was to determine which renal marker best predicts cefepime clearance.

METHODS

A pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM based on 208 plasma and 51 urine samples from 20 ICU patients during a median follow-up of 3 days. Four serum-based kidney markers (creatinine, cystatin C, urea and uromodulin) and two urinary markers [measured creatinine clearance (CLCR) and kidney injury molecule-1] were evaluated as covariates in the model.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model incorporating a renal and non-renal clearance component along with an additional term describing haemodialysis clearance provided an adequate description of the data. The Cockcroft-Gault formula was the best predictor for renal cefepime clearance. Compared with the base model without covariates, the objective function value decreased from 1971.7 to 1948.1, the median absolute prediction error from 42.4% to 29.9% and the between-subject variability in renal cefepime clearance from 135% to 50%. Other creatinine- and cystatin C-based formulae and measured CLCR performed similarly. Monte Carlo simulations using the Sanford guide dose recommendations indicated an insufficient dose reduction in patients with a decreased kidney function, leading to potentially toxic levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cockcroft-Gault formula was the best predictor for cefepime clearance in critically ill patients, although other creatinine- and cystatin C-based formulae and measured CLCR performed similarly.