Antistaphylococcal activities of telavancin tested alone and in combination by time-kill assay

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Telavancin Compared with the Other Glycopeptides

Telavancin was discovered by modifying the chemical structure of vancomycin and belongs to the group of lipoglycopeptides. It employs its antimicrobial potential through two distinct mechanisms of action: inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis and induction of bacterial membrane depolarization and permeabilization. In this article we review the clinically relevant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of telavancin. For comparison, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of the other glycopeptides are presented. Although, in contrast to the newer lipoglycopeptides, telavancin demonstrates a relatively short half-life and rapid total clearance, its apparent volume of distribution (V_d) is almost identical to that of dalbavancin. The accumulation of telavancin after repeated dosing is only marginal, whereas the pharmacokinetic values of the other glycopeptides show much greater differences after administration of multiple doses. Despite its high plasma-protein binding of 90% and relatively low V_d of approximately 11 L, telavancin shows near complete equilibration of the free fraction in plasma with soft tissue. The ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC₂₄) of unbound plasma concentrations to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) required to inhibit growth of 90% of organisms (MIC₉₀) of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis of telavancin are sufficiently high to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets indicative for optimal bacterial killing. Considering both the AUC₂₄/MIC ratios of telavancin and the near complete equilibration of the free fraction in plasma with soft tissue, telavancin is an appropriate antimicrobial agent to treat soft tissue infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Although the penetration of telavancin into epithelial lining fluid (ELF) requires further investigations, the AUC₂₄/MIC ratio for S. aureus indicates that bactericidal activity in the ELF could be expected.

Evaluation of Telavancin Alone and Combined with Ceftaroline or Rifampin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Biofilm Model

Infections caused by biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria are challenging due to increasing antibiotic resistance. Synergistic activities of lipopeptides and lipoglycopeptides with β-lactams have been demonstrated for MRSA, but little is known about biofilm-embedded organisms. Our objective was to evaluate two telavancin (TLV) dosage regimens (7.5 mg/kg of body weight and 10 mg/kg every 24 h [q24h]) alone and in combination with ceftaroline (CPT) (600 mg every 8 h [q8h]) or rifampin (RIF) (450 mg every 12 h [q12h]) against two biofilm-producing MRSA strains (494 and N315). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic CDC biofilm reactor models with polyurethane coupons were used to evaluate the efficacies of the antibiotic combinations over 72 h. Overall, there were no significant differences observed between the two TLV dosing regimens either alone or in combination with RIF or CPT against these strains. Both TLV dosing regimens and CPT alone demonstrated killing but did not reach bactericidal reduction at 72 h. However, both TLV regimens in combination with RIF demonstrated enhanced activity against both strains, with a rapid decrease in CFU/ml at 4 h that was bactericidal and maintained over the 72-h experiment (-Δ3.75 log10 CFU/ml from baseline; P < 0.0001). Of interest, no enhanced activity was observed for TLV combined with CPT. No development of resistance was observed in any of the combination models. However, resistance to RIF developed as early as 24 h, with MIC values exceeding 32 mg/liter. Our results show that TLV plus RIF displayed therapeutic improvement against biofilm-producing MRSA. These results suggest that TLV at 7.5 and 10 mg/kg q24h are equally effective in eradicating biofilm-associated MRSA strains in vitro.

In vitro synergistic effects of various combinations of vancomycin and non-beta-lactams against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin

The aim of our study was to determine the potential for synergistic effect of vancomycin combined with a non-beta-lactam agent and of combinations of orally available non-beta-lactam agents against vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA). Three VISA isolates, three hVISA isolates, and two vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) isolates were used. The combinations included vancomycin and one of clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, rifampicin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Pairwise combinations among five non-beta-lactam agents were also tested for synergy. Synergy was determined using time-kill curves at 24h. Vancomycin combined with either ciprofloxacin or gentamicin showed synergy against some isolates of VISA, hVISA and VSSA. Vancomycin combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole showed synergy against VISA and hVISA. Among orally available non-beta-lactam agents, only ciprofloxacin combined with either clindamycin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole showed synergy against one isolate of VISA.

Telavancin in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: clinical evidence and experience

Telavancin (TLV) is a lipoglycopeptide derivative of vancomycin (VAN), which has activity against Gram-positive aerobic bacteria, and is especially effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Gram-positive bacteria resistant to VAN. Comparative clinical studies of TLV have demonstrated noninferiority compared with VAN in the treatment of hospital-acquired Gram-positive pneumonia, with high cure rates for TLV-treated patients with monomicrobial S. aureus infection, including isolates with reduced VAN susceptibility. The results based on the patients' clinical response were supported by supplemental post-hoc analyses of 28-day mortality. In Europe and the USA, TLV is approved as a useful alternative for patients with difficult-to-treat, hospital-acquired MRSA pneumonia when there are very few alternatives. The present article reviews TLV's pharmacological characteristics and clinical efficacy resulting from clinical trials giving a detailed picture of its properties and position in the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Controlling bacterial infections by inhibiting proton-dependent processes

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is recognized as one of the greatest threats in modern healthcare, taking a staggering toll worldwide. New approaches for controlling bacterial infections must be designed, eventually combining multiple strategies for complimentary therapies. This review explores an old/new paradigm for multi-targeted antibacterial therapy, focused at disturbing bacterial cytoplasmic membrane functions at sub minimal inhibitory concentrations, namely through superficial physical alterations of the bilayer, thereby perturbing transmembrane signals transduction. Such a paradigm may have the advantage of fighting the infection while avoiding many of the known resistance mechanisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Antimicrobial peptides edited by Karl Lohner and Kai Hilpert.

Antistaphylococcal activity of oritavancin and its synergistic effect in combination with other antimicrobial agents

Oritavancin exhibited in vitro activity against 169 strains of vancomycin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with MICs ranging from 0.03 to 1 μg/ml and against vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA; n = 29), heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (hVISA; n = 5), and vancomycin-resistant MRSA (n = 5) strains, with MICs ranging from 0.12 to 4 μg/ml. For 10 MRSA isolates comprising 5 VISA and 5 hVISA strains, synergy between oritavancin and gentamicin, linezolid, or rifampin was observed against most of the strains tested using a time-kill method.

Comparative activities of telavancin combined with nafcillin, imipenem, and gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus

Beta-lactams enhance the killing activity of vancomycin. Due to structural and mechanistic similarities between vancomycin and telavancin, we investigated the activity of telavancin combined with nafcillin and imipenem compared to the known synergistic combination of telavancin and gentamicin. Thirty strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 10 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 10 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and 10 heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), were tested for synergy by time-kill methodology. Six strains (2 each of MSSA, MRSA, and hVISA) were further evaluated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model with simulated regimens of 10 mg/kg of body weight of telavancin once daily alone and combined with 2 g nafcillin every 4 h, 500 mg imipenem every 6 h, or 5 mg/kg gentamicin once daily over 72 h. In the synergy test, 67% of strains displayed synergy with the combination of telavancin and gentamicin, 70% with telavancin and nafcillin, and 63% with telavancin and imipenem. In the PK/PD model, the activities of all three combinations against MRSA and hVISA were superior to all individual drugs alone (P ≤ 0.002) and were similar to each other (P ≥ 0.187). The activities of all three combinations against MSSA were generally similar to each other except for one strain where the combination of telavancin and imipenem was superior to all other regimens (P ≤ 0.011). The activity of the combination of telavancin and beta-lactam agents was similar to that of telavancin and gentamicin against S. aureus, including resistant strains. Because beta-lactam combinations are less likely to be nephrotoxic than telavancin plus gentamicin, these beta-lactam combinations may have clinical utility.

In Vitro Synergy of Telavancin and Rifampin Against Enterococcus faecium Resistant to Both Linezolid and Vancomycin

BACKGROUND

An emerging pathogen is Enterococcus faecium resistant to both linezolid and vancomycin (LRVRE). Antimicrobial combinations may be required for therapy and need to be evaluated. The combination of daptomycin and rifampin has demonstrated good in vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria, including E faecium. Telavancin, a newer lipoglycopeptide, has shown in vitro activity against E faecium. We evaluated the combination of telavancin and rifampin and compared the results to the combination of daptomycin and rifampin used previously on the same isolates.

METHODS

Twenty-four genetically unique (by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis), clinical LRVRE isolates were collected in the United States from 2001-2004. Etest minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (μg/mL) were 0.064-8 for telavancin, 1-4 for daptomycin, and 0.012 to >32 for rifampin. In vitro synergy testing was performed in triplicate by an Etest MIC:MIC ratio method, and summation fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) was calculated: synergy ≤0.5; indifference >0.5-4; and antagonism >4.

RESULTS

The Etest method showed synergy (ΣFICs of 0.1-0.5) with telavancin + rifampin in 20/24 (83%) isolates and indifference (ΣFICs of 0.6-0.8) in 4/24 (17%) isolates. Similarly, the daptomycin + rifampin combination showed synergy (ΣFICs of 0.1-0.5) in 21/24 (88%) isolates and indifference (ΣFICs of 0.6-1.0) in 3/24 (12%) isolates by the Etest method. No antagonism was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro synergy with both combinations (rifampin + telavancin or daptomycin) was 83% and 88%, respectively, by Etest against these LRVRE isolates. Although both daptomycin and telavancin in combination with rifampin showed a high incidence of synergistic activity, further in vitro synergy testing with this combination should be performed against additional E faecium isolates. In vitro synergy may or may not translate into in vivo effectiveness.

Synergy between vancomycin and nafcillin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

INTRODUCTION

Continued pressure from glycopeptide use has led to non-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus including heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA). Infections with hVISA are associated with poor patient outcomes, thus incentivizing novel treatments. Evidence suggests that vancomycin and anti-staphylococcal penicillin susceptibility are inversely related which indicates that the use of this combination may be particularly useful against methicillin-resistant S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, such as hVISA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for synergy between vancomycin and nafcillin against hVISA.

METHODS

Twenty-five hVISA strains were evaluated for vancomycin and nafcillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth microdilution in duplicate. Potential for synergy was assessed by time-kill at 1/2x MIC in triplicate. Five strains were chosen, representing the range nafcillin MIC's available in the cohort -4, 16, 64, 128, and 256 µg/mL, and were run in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model in duplicate over 72 hours to evaluate the potential of the combination with simulated human pharmacokinetics. In addition, 4 fully glycopeptide susceptible strains of S. aureus including 2 methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and 2 methicillin-resistant (MRSA) were run in the PK/PD model for comparison.

RESULTS

In the time-kill, 92% of strains (23 of 25) displayed synergy with the combination of vancomycin and nafcillin. In the PK/PD model, all five strains of hVISA showed an improvement in overall activity (P≤0.004) and organism burden at 72 hours (P≤0.001) with the combination compared to either drug alone. The combination was also successful against both MRSA and MSSA in overall activity (P≤0.009) and organism burden at 72 hours (P≤0.016), though the magnitude of the effect was diminished against MSSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of vancomycin and nafcillin significantly improved antibacterial activity against hVISA, MRSA, and MSSA compared to either drug alone.

Clinical activity of anti-Gram-positive agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Current concerns about multiresistance and a diminishing antibiotic pipeline are mainly addressed to Gram-negative bacteria. The greatest fear within the Gram-positive arena is vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Its epidemiology and clinical presentation give cause for concern, but so far its impact has been strictly limited. While this may change, the loss of glycopeptides as a treatment option may not, in fact, be all bad news.

Novel pentadecenyl tetrazole enhances susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to gentamicin

One method that bacteria employ to reduce their susceptibility to antibiotics is the formation of biofilms. We developed a robust 6-well plate biofilm assay to evaluate early-stage discovery compounds against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Tissue culture-treated 6-well plates were selected for this assay because they facilitate the adherence of MRSA and enable accurate determination of the number of CFU in each well. The MRSA biofilms formed in this assay exhibit increased tolerances to clinically used antibiotics. Using this biofilm assay, we identified a novel potentiator of gentamicin against MRSA biofilms. The combination of gentamicin and pentadecenyl tetrazole is superior to clinically used MRSA antibiotics against these MRSA biofilms. This novel combination also exhibits synergistic effects on MRSA planktonic cells. This plant-derived compound reveals promise for its effectiveness and warrants further lead optimization as an antibiotic and aminoglycoside potentiator.

Telavancin: a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria in adults

BACKGROUND

Telavancin, a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, is a semisynthetic derivative of vancomycin. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes the pharmacology, in vitro and in vivo activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical efficacy and tolerability of telavancin.

METHODS

Relevant information was identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-August 2010), Iowa Drug Information Service (1966-August 2010), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-August 2010), and Google Scholar using the terms telavancin, lipoglycopeptide, and TD-6424. Abstracts and posters from scientific meetings, as well as documents submitted by the manufacturer of telavancin to the FDA as part of the approval process, were consulted. In vivo and in vitro experimental and clinical studies and review articles that provided information on the activity, mechanism of action, pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of telavancin were reviewed.

RESULTS

In vitro, telavancin has potent activity against S aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains; Streptococcus pneumoniae; and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci with MICs generally <1 μg/mL. Telavancin appears to have a dual mechanism of action, inhibiting cell wall formation and disrupting the cell membrane. In Phase III studies (ATLAS 1 and ATLAS 2), telavancin was found to be noninferior to vancomycin, with clinical cure rates of 88.3% and 87.1%, respectively, in clinically evaluable patients in the treatment of cSSSIs (difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -2.1 to 4.6; P = NS). The effectiveness of telavancin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia was assessed in 2 Phase III studies (ATTAIN 1 and ATTAIN 2). Preliminary findings were that the effectiveness of telavancin was not significantly different from that of vancomycin, with cure rates of 82.7% and 80.9% in the clinically evaluable population, respectively (difference, 1.8%; 95% CI, -4.1 to 7.7; P = NS). The most commonly (>10%) reported adverse events included taste disturbances, nausea, headache, vomiting, foamy urine, constipation, and insomnia.

CONCLUSION

In clinical trials, the effectiveness of telavancin was not significantly different from that of vancomycin in the treatment of cSSSIs, and telavancin was generally well tolerated.

In vitro activity of fusidic acid (CEM-102, sodium fusidate) against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cystic fibrosis patients and its effect on the activities of tobramycin and amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia

We tested the MICs of fusidic acid (CEM-102) plus other agents against 40 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from cystic fibrosis patients and the activities of fusidic acid with or without tobramycin or amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MRSA, and Burkholderia cepacia isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in a 24-h time-kill study. Fusidic acid was potent (MICs, 0.125 to 0.5 μg/ml; a single 500-mg dose of fusidic acid at 8 h averaged 8 to 12. 5 μg/ml with 91 to 97% protein binding) against all MRSA strains. No antagonism was observed; synergy occurred for one MRSA strain treated with fusidic acid plus tobramycin.