Clinical pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Challenges for global antibiotic regimen planning and establishing antimicrobial resistance targets: implications for the WHO Essential Medicines List and AWaRe antibiotic book dosing

SUMMARYThe World Health Organisation's 2022 AWaRe Book provides guidance for the use of 39 antibiotics to treat 35 infections in primary healthcare and hospital facilities. We review the evidence underpinning suggested dosing regimens. Few (n = 18) population pharmacokinetic studies exist for key oral AWaRe antibiotics, largely conducted in homogenous and unrepresentative populations hindering robust estimates of drug exposures. Databases of minimum inhibitory concentration distributions are limited, especially for community pathogen-antibiotic combinations. Minimum inhibitory concentration data sources are not routinely reported and lack regional diversity and community representation. Of studies defining a pharmacodynamic target for ß-lactams (n = 80), 42 (52.5%) differed from traditionally accepted 30%-50% time above minimum inhibitory concentration targets. Heterogeneity in model systems and pharmacodynamic endpoints is common, and models generally use intravenous ß-lactams. One-size-fits-all pharmacodynamic targets are used for regimen planning despite complexity in drug-pathogen-disease combinations. We present solutions to enable the development of global evidence-based antibiotic dosing guidance that provides adequate treatment in the context of the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and, moreover, minimizes the emergence of resistance.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intravenous Push Cefepime in Burn Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance

Patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) are a subset of critically ill patients including burn patients that exhibit increased renal elimination of medications beyond that of similarly injured patients. Currently approved maximum regimens of medications primarily eliminated by the kidney, such as cefepime (>90% unchanged in the urine), may be inadequate (eg, compromising the bactericidal activity of cefepime) in patients with ARC. Due to recent resource limitations, centers have changed infusion practices of commonly prescribed medications to intravenous push (IVP), potentially exacerbating the problem of maintaining bactericidal cefepime concentrations. The hypothesis of the study was patients with ARC are not currently achieving adequate target attainment, when receiving cefepime 2 g every 8 h IVP. Eight blood samples were collected from each patient, and concentrations measured via LC-MS/MS. WinNonlin (version 8.3) was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime and simulate plasma concentrations of cefepime in each of the ten subjects. Simulations of cefepime plasma concentrations produced by a 2 g dose given every 8 h and a 1 g dose given every 4 h were performed and the time above a MIC of 4 mg/L, 8 mg/L, and 16 mg/L compared. The 2 g every 8 h regimen remained above the breakpoints for 92%, 85%, and 71% of the dosing interval, respectively. The 1 g every 4 h regimen remained above the same breakpoints at a frequency of 100%, 99%, and 92% of the dosing interval. Giving cefepime 1 g every 4 h is a simple approach to increase the likelihood of maintaining the optimal bactericidal activity of cefepime in patients with ARC.

Renally Dosed Cefepime Leading to Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Case Report

Cefepime is a broad-spectrum fourth-generation cephalosporin with activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefepime is most commonly used for urinary tract infections, soft tissue infections, and febrile neutropenia. Up to 15% of ICU patients on cefepime may experience cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN), with risk factors including renal dysfunction, excessive dosage, elevated serum cefepime concentrations, and history of prior brain injury. The adverse effects of CIN, including encephalopathy, seizures, and coma can be resolved with drug cessation, antiepileptics, or hemodialysis. Here, we present the case of CIN in a 59-year-old female patient with long-term cefepime antibiotic prescription for Pseudomonas bacteremia and endocarditis with multiple risk factors for reduced renal function. We discuss the relevant risk factors and preventive measures that may have prevented her from developing CIN, as well as the importance of early recognition and prevention of CIN in patient care.

Defining standard and high dosages for β-lactam agents administered by intermittent, prolonged or continuous infusion: a PK/PD simulation study

BACKGROUND

The new definitions of antimicrobial susceptibility categories proposed by EUCAST in 2020 require the definition of standard and high dosages of antibiotic. For injectable β-lactams, standard and high dosages have been proposed for short-infusion regimens only.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate dosages for β-lactams administered by prolonged infusion (PI) and continuous infusion (CI).

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations were performed for seven injectable β-lactams: aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, piperacillin and temocillin. Various dosage regimens based on short infusion, PI or CI were simulated in virtual patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PTAs were obtained based on reference population PK models, as well as PK/pharmacodynamic targets and MIC breakpoints proposed by EUCAST. Alternative dosage regimens associated with PTA values similar to those of recommended dosages up to the breakpoints were considered acceptable.

RESULTS

Adequate PTAs were confirmed for most EUCAST short-infusion dosage regimens. A total of 9 standard and 14 high dosages based on PI (3 to 4 h) or CI were identified as alternatives. For cefepime and aztreonam, only PI and CI regimens could achieve acceptable PTAs for infections caused by Pseudomonas spp.: 2 g q8h as PI of 4 h or 6 g/24 h CI for cefepime; 2 g q6h as PI of 3 h or 6 g/24 h CI for aztreonam.

CONCLUSIONS

These alternative standard and high dosage regimens are expected to provide antibiotic exposure compatible with new EUCAST definitions of susceptibility categories and associated MIC breakpoints. However, further clinical evaluation is necessary.

Cefepime Daily Exposure and the Associated Impact on the Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores and Vasopressors Requirement in Critically Ill Patients Using Repeated-Measures Mixed-Effect Modeling

IMPORTANCE

Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems that need early and appropriate management.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of daily cefepime pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters with change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and vasopressors requirement.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a retrospective study. Adult ICU patients who received cefepime for Gram-negative pneumonia or bloodstream infection (BSI) and had cefepime concentrations measured were included. Daily cefepime exposure was generated and PK/PD parameters calculated for patients. Repeated-measures mixed-effect modeling was used to evaluate the impact of PK/PD on the outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Change in daily SOFA score and vasopressors requirement.

RESULTS

A total of 394 and 207 patients were included in the SOFA and vasopressors analyses, respectively. The mean (±sd) age was 55 years (19) and weight 81 kg (29). For the change in SOFA score, daily SOFA score, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and number of vasopressors were included. In the vasopressors analysis, daily SOFA score, day of therapy, and hydrocortisone dose were significant covariates in the final model. Achieving cefepime concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (T>MIC) for 100% of the dosing interval was associated with 0.006 µg/kg/min decrease in norepinephrine-equivalent dose. Cefepime PK/PD did not have an impact on the daily change in SOFA score.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Achieving 100% T>MIC was associated with negligible decrease in vasopressors requirement in ICU patients with Gram-negative pneumonia and BSI. There was no impact on the change in SOFA score.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics, Antibacterial Target Attainment, and Estimated Probability of Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients

Cefepime has been reported to cause concentration-related neurotoxicity, especially in critically ill patients with renal failure. This evaluation aimed to identify a dosing regimen providing a sufficient probability of target attainment (PTA) and the lowest justifiable risk of neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on plasma concentrations over four consecutive days obtained from 14 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The patients received a median dose of 2,000 mg cefepime by 30-min intravenous infusions with dosing intervals of every 8 h (q8h) to q24h. A time that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC over the dosing interval (fT>MIC) of 65% and an fT>2×MIC of 100% were defined as treatment targets. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to identify a dosing regimen for a PTA of 90% and a probability of neurotoxicity not exceeding 20%. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data. Estimated creatinine clearance was significantly related to the clearance of cefepime in nondialysis patients. Interoccasion variability on clearance improved the model, reflecting dynamic clearance changes. The evaluations suggested combining thrice-daily administration as an appropriate choice. In patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance, 120 mL/min), for the pharmacodynamics target of 100% fT>2×MIC and a PTA of 90%, a dose of 1,333 mg q8h was found to be related to a probability of neurotoxicity of ≤20% and to cover MICs up to 2 mg/L. Continuous infusion appears to be superior to other dosing regimens by providing higher efficacy and a low risk of neurotoxicity. The model makes it possible to improve the predicted balance between cefepime efficacy and neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01793012).

Beta-lactam target attainment and associated outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between early and cumulative beta-lactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters and therapy outcomes in bloodstream infection (BSI).

METHODS

Adult patients who received cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin/tazobactam for BSI and had concentrations measured were included. Beta-lactam exposure was generated and the time that free concentration remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT_>MIC) and four multiples of MIC (fT_>4 × MIC) were calculated for times 0-24 h and 0-7 days of therapy. Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of PK/PD on microbiological and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients and 213 BSI episodes were included. The mean age was 58 years and weight 83 kg. Age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, haemodialysis, Pitt bacteraemia score, and hours of empiric antibiotic therapy were significantly associated with certain outcomes and retained in the final model. In multiple regression analysis, fT_>4 × MIC at 0-24 h and 0-7 days was a significant predictor of negative blood culture on day 7 (P=0.0161 and 0.0068, respectively). In the time-to-event analysis, patients who achieved 100% fT_>4 × MIC at 0-24 h and 0-7 days had a shorter time to negative blood culture compared with those who did not (log-rank P=0.0004 and 0.0014, respectively). No significant associations were identified between PK/PD parameters and other outcomes, including improvement in symptoms at day 7 and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Early and cumulative achievement of fT_>4 × MIC was a significant predictor of microbiological outcome in patients with BSI.

Dose optimization of β-lactams antibiotics in pediatrics and adults: A systematic review

Background: β-lactams remain the cornerstone of the empirical therapy to treat various bacterial infections. This systematic review aimed to analyze the data describing the dosing regimen of β-lactams.

Methods: Systematic scientific and grey literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies were retrieved and screened on the basis of pre-defined exclusion and inclusion criteria. The cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCT) and case reports that reported the dosing schedule of β-lactams are included in this study.

Results: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 40 were cohort studies, 2 were case reports and 10 were RCTs. The majority of the studies (34/52) studied the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a drug. A total of 20 studies proposed dosing schedule in pediatrics while 32 studies proposed dosing regimen among adults. Piperacillin (12/52) and Meropenem (11/52) were the most commonly used β-lactams used in hospitalized patients. As per available evidence, continuous infusion is considered as the most appropriate mode of administration to optimize the safety and efficacy of the treatment and improve the clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: Appropriate antibiotic therapy is challenging due to pathophysiological changes among different age groups. The optimization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters is useful to support alternative dosing regimens such as an increase in dosing interval, continuous infusion, and increased bolus doses.

Using Machine Learning To Define the Impact of Beta-Lactam Early and Cumulative Target Attainment on Outcomes in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are the most common intensive care unit (ICU) infections. We aimed to evaluate the association of early and cumulative beta-lactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters with therapy outcomes in pneumonia. Adult ICU patients who received cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam for HAP or VAP and had its concentration measured were included. Beta-lactam exposure was generated for every patient for the entire duration of therapy, and the time free concentration remained above the MIC (fT_>MIC) and the time free concentration remained above four multiples of the MIC (fT_>4×MIC) were calculated for time frames of 0 to 24 h, 0 to 10 days, and day 0 to end of therapy. Regression analyses and machine learning were performed to evaluate the impact of PK/PD on therapy outcomes. A total of 735 patients and 840 HAP/VAP episodes (47% HAP) were included. The mean age was 56 years, and the mean weight was 80 kg. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), hemodialysis, age, and weight were significantly associated with the clinical outcomes and kept in the final model. In the full cohort including all pneumonia episodes, PK/PD parameters at different time windows were associated with a favorable composite outcome, clinical cure, and mechanical ventilation (MV)-free days. In patients who had positive cultures and reported MICs, almost all PK/PD parameters were significant predictors of therapy outcomes. In the machine learning analysis, PK/PD parameters ranked high and were the primary overall predictors of clinical cure. Early target attainment and cumulative target attainment have a great impact on pneumonia outcomes. Beta-lactam exposure should be optimized early and maintained through therapy duration.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime

Cefepime is a broad-spectrum fourth-generation cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. It is generally administered as an infusion over 30-60 min or as a prolonged infusion with infusion times from 3 h to continuous administration. Cefepime is widely distributed in biological fluids and tissues with an average volume of distribution of ~ 0.2 L/kg in healthy adults with normal renal function. Protein binding is relatively low (20%), and elimination is mainly renal. About 85% of the dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, with an elimination half-life of 2-2.3 h. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime is altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high inter-individual variability in cefepime volume of distribution and clearance, which poses challenges for population dosing approaches. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime may be beneficial in certain patients including those who are critically ill, have life-threatening infections, or are infected with more resistant pathogens. Cefepime is generally safe and efficacious, with a goal exposure target of 70% time of the free drug concentration over the minimum inhibitory concentration for clinical efficacy. In recent years, reports of neurotoxicity have increased, specifically in patients with impaired renal function. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicodynamics of cefepime contemporarily in the setting of increasing cefepime exposures. We explore the potential benefits of extended or continuous infusions and therapeutic drug monitoring in special populations.

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Patients With Pneumonia and Healthy Subjects

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin for the treatment of infections caused by gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant strains. The aim of this study was to develop an intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK) model of cefiderocol and assess the PK profile in lungs. An intrapulmonary PK model of cefiderocol was developed using the concentration data in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) from 7 patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and 20 healthy subjects. Subsequently, the model was applied to assess the ELF exposure of 125 patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate the probability of target attainment for the percentage of time for which free ELF concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) over the dosing interval (%fT>MIC,ELF ). The developed model adequately described ELF concentrations and suggested the delayed distribution in ELF for patients with pneumonia compared to healthy subjects. Lung penetration ratio of cefiderocol in patients with pneumonia was calculated to be 34%, which was 1.4-fold that in healthy subjects. The estimated %fT>MIC,ELF was 100% in most of patients with nosocomial pneumonia, and no PK/pharmacodynamic relationship with %fT>MIC,ELF was found for microbiological or clinical outcome. The probability of target attainment for 100% fT>MIC,ELF was ≥ 99.5% against MICs ≤2 μg/mL and ≥87.0% against MICs ≤4 μg/mL regardless of renal function. The median of simulated ELF trough concentrations at steady state was >4 μg/mL regardless of renal function. These results reveal the adequacy of cefiderocol exposure in plasma and ELF at the recommended dosing regimens adjusted on the basis of renal function in critically ill patients with pneumonia.

Pharmacodynamic Thresholds for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: A Story of Mouse Versus Man

Beta-lactams remain a critical member of our antibiotic armamentarium and are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in the inpatient setting. For these agents, the percentage of time that the free concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) of the pathogen has been shown to be the best predictor of antibacterial killing effects. However, debate remains about the quantity of fT > MIC exposure needed for successful clinical response. While pre-clinical animal based studies, such as the neutropenic thigh infection model, have been widely used to support dosing regimen selection for clinical development and susceptibility breakpoint evaluation, pharmacodynamic based studies in human patients are used validate exposures needed in the clinic and for guidance during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For the majority of studied beta-lactams, pre-clinical animal studies routinely demonstrated the fT > MIC should exceed approximately 40–70% fT > MIC to achieve 1 log reductions in colony forming units. In contrast, clinical studies tend to suggest higher exposures may be needed, but tremendous variability exists study to study. Herein, we will review and critique pre-clinical versus human-based pharmacodynamic studies aimed at determining beta-lactam exposure thresholds, so as to determine which targets may be best suited for optimal dosage selection, TDM, and for susceptibility breakpoint determination. Based on our review of murine and clinical literature on beta-lactam pharmacodynamic thresholds, murine based targets specific to each antibiotic are most useful during dosage regimen development and susceptibility breakpoint assessment, while a range of exposures between 50 and 100% fT > MIC are reasonable to define the beta-lactam TDM therapeutic window for most infections.

Pharmacokinetics of Cefepime in Children on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: External Model Validation, Model Improvement and Dose Optimization

BACKGROUND

Cefepime is a first-line therapy for Gram-negative infections in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cefepime pharmacokinetics (PK) in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation still needs to be better established.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center PK study. A maximum of 12 PK samples per patient were collected in children <18 years old on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who received clinically indicated cefepime. External validation of a previously published population PK model was performed by applying the model in a new data set. The predictive performance of the model was determined by calculating prediction errors. Because of poor predictive performance, a revised model was developed using NONMEM and a combined data set that included data from both studies. Dose-exposure simulations were performed using the final model. Optimal dosing was judged based on the ability to maintain free cefepime concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 68% and 100% of the dosing interval.

RESULTS

Seventeen children contributed 105 PK samples. The mean (95% CI) and median (interquartile range) prediction errors were 33.7% (19.8-47.7) and 17.5% (-22.6 to 74.4). A combined data set was created, which included 33 children contributing 310 PK samples. The final improved 2-compartment model included weight and serum creatinine on clearance and oxygenator day and blood transfusion on volume of the central compartment. At an MIC of 8 mg/L, 50 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours reached target concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing intervals of 8 hours were needed to reach adequate concentrations at an MIC of 8 mg/L. Longer dosing intervals were adequate with higher serum creatinine and lower MICs.

Cefepime Dosing Requirements in Elderly Patients Attended in the Emergency Rooms

Objective

This study aimed to assess the probability of reaching an adequate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pK/pD) index for different cefepime dosages in frail patients with bacteremia treated in the emergency room.

Methods

Simulation study based on Gram-negative bacterial strains that cause bacteremia. The probability of reaching a time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at 50% and 100% dosing intervals (fT > 50 and fT > 80% MIC) was assessed for two different renal clearance intervals.

Results

One hundred twenty nine strains were collected, the predominant species being Escherichia coli (n = 83 [64.3%]). In patients with a ClCr of 30 mL/min, an fT > 50% MIC was reached in more than 90% of the simulations. However, a dose of at least 1 g every 12 h must be administered to reach an fT > 80% MIC. In patients with a ClCr of 30–60 mL/min, the probability of reaching an fT > 50% MIC was higher than 90% with doses of 1 g every 8 h or more, but this value was not reached in > 90% simulations for any of the doses tested in this study.

Conclusions

Standard cefepime dosing can reach an adequate PK/PD index in frail patients. Nevertheless, a high dose or extended infusion is necessary to reach an fT > 80% MIC in patients with a ClCr > 60 mL/min.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics: Defining the Therapeutic Range

PURPOSE

In the present narrative review, the authors aimed to discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of antibiotics and clinical response (including efficacy and toxicity). In addition, this review describes how this relationship can be applied to define the therapeutic range of a particular antibiotic (or antibiotic class) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Relevant clinical studies that examined the relationship between PK/PD of antibiotics and clinical response (efficacy and response) were reviewed. The review (performed for studies published in English up to September 2021) assessed only commonly used antibiotics (or antibiotic classes), including aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides (teicoplanin and vancomycin), and linezolid. The best currently available evidence was used to define the therapeutic range for these antibiotics.

RESULTS

The therapeutic range associated with maximal clinical efficacy and minimal toxicity is available for commonly used antibiotics, and these values can be implemented when TDM for antibiotics is performed. Additional data are needed to clarify the relationship between PK/PD indices and the development of antibiotic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM should only be regarded as a means to achieve the main goal of providing safe and effective antibiotic therapy for all patients. The next critical step is to define exposures that can prevent the development of antibiotic resistance and include these exposures as therapeutic drug monitoring targets.

Antimicrobial Dosing Recommendations in Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence

OBJECTIVES

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly employed in critically ill children and is known to affect antimicrobial pharmacokinetics. There is a lack of readily available, evidence-based antimicrobial dosing recommendations in pediatric CRRT. This study aims to quantify commonly used antimicrobial drugs in pediatric CRRT and identify gaps between contemporary literature-based dosing recommendations and those presented in a frequently used dosing reference.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was queried from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2021 to identify admissions in which antimicrobials were billed on the same day as CRRT. Drugs of interest were selected if at least 10% of admission involved administration on at least one CRRT day, with additional clinically important antimicrobials selected by the authors. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify antimicrobial pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in children for each selected drug. For identified articles, dosing recommendations were extracted and compared to those in a popular tertiary dosing reference (Lexi-Comp Online database). The level of agreement of the dosing recommendations was assessed.

RESULTS

77 unique antimicrobial agents were identified amongst 812 admissions from 20 different PHIS hospitals. Fifteen antimicrobials were billed on the same day as CRRT in ≥10% of admissions, with 4 additional drugs deemed clinically relevant by the authors. Twenty PK studies were identified for these 19 drugs, and dosing recommendations were included in 8 (42.1%) of them. Seventeen agents (89.5%) had some type of CRRT-specific dosing guidance in Lexi-Comp, with only 1 directly based on a pediatric CRRT study. For the 8 agents with PK data available, Lexi-Comp recommendations matched primary literature dosing guidance in 3 (37.5%). Two (25%) lacked agreement between the Lexi-Comp and primary literature, and the remaining 3 (37.5%) had partial agreement with multiple dosing regimens suggested in the primary literature and at least one of these regimens recommended by Lexi-Comp.

CONCLUSION

Significant gaps exist in the data supporting antimicrobial dosing recommendations for children receiving CRRT. Future studies should focus on antimicrobial dosing in pediatric CRRT, emphasizing provision of robust data from which dosing recommendations can be promptly incorporated into tertiary dosing references.

A personalised approach to antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with severe infections, or those who develop nosocomial infections, have poor outcomes with substantial morbidity and mortality. Such patients commonly have suboptimal antibiotic exposures at routinely used antibiotic doses related to an increased volume of distribution and altered clearance due to their underlying altered physiology. Furthermore, the use of extracorporeal devices such as renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in these group of patients also has the potential to alter in vivo drug concentrations. Moreover, ICU patients are likely to be infected with less-susceptible pathogens. Therefore, one potential contributing cause to the poor outcomes observed in critically ill patients may be related to subtherapeutic antibiotic exposures. Newer concepts include the clinician considering optimised dosing based on a blood antibiotic exposure defined by pharmacokinetic modelling and therapeutic drug monitoring, combined with a knowledge of the antibiotic penetration into the site of infection, thereby achieving optimal bacterial killing. Such optimised dosing is likely to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight key aspects of antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in critically ill patients and provide a PK/PD approach to tailor antibiotic dosing to the individual patient.

Elevated MICs of Susceptible Anti-Pseudomonal Cephalosporins in Non-Carbapenemase-Producing, Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Implications for Dose Optimization

The present study evaluated the in vitro potency of ceftazidime and cefepime amongst carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected as part of a global surveillance program and assessed the pharmacodynamic implications using previously published population pharmacokinetics. When susceptible, MICs resulted at the high end of distribution for both ceftazidime and cefepime, thus 6 g/day was required to achieve optimal pharmacodynamic profiles. These findings should be considered in the clinic and for the application of CLSI susceptibility breakpoints.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Dosage Individualization of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Study

OBJECTIVE

The authors report on a case of a 59-year-old man hospitalized in the intensive care unit because of severe SARS-COV-2 infection (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND

The patient had several comorbidities, including liver cirrhosis. He developed ventilation-associated bacterial pneumonia for which he was administered cefepime at an initial dose of 2 g/8 hours. Therapeutic drug monitoring was performed, showing overexposure with an initial trough concentration of >60 mg/L.

METHODS

Analysis of pharmacokinetic data and model-based dose adjustment was performed using BestDose software.

RESULTS

The patient had unexpected pharmacokinetic parameter values. Serum creatinine was only moderately increased, whereas measured creatinine clearance based on urine collection showed impaired renal function. Bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration was also considered in the dosing decisions. After dose reduction to 0.5 g/8 hours, the cefepime trough concentration progressively declined and reached the target values by the end of the therapy. A post-hoc analysis provided a different interpretation of drug overexposure.

CONCLUSION

This case report illustrates how physiological, microbiological, and drug concentration data can be used for model-based dosage individualization of cefepime in intensive care unit patients.

Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime in neonates and young infants: Dosing optimization for neonatal sepsis

Ceftazidime is a third-generation cephalosporin with high activity against many pathogens. But the ambiguity and diversity of the dosing regimens in neonates and young infants impair access to effective treatment. Thus, we conducted a population pharmacokinetic study of ceftazidime in this vulnerable population and recommended a model-based dosage regimen to optimize sepsis therapy. Totally 146 neonates and young infants (gestational age (GA): 36-43.4 weeks, postnatal age (PNA): 1-81 days, current weight (CW): 900-4500 g) were enrolled based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ceftazidime bloods samples (203) were obtained using the opportunistic sampling strategy and determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography. The population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was conducted by nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM). A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetic data. Covariate analysis showed the significance of GA, PNA, and CW on developmental pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulation was performed based on above covariates and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). In the newborns with PNA ≤ 3 days (MIC=8 mg/L), the dose regimen was 25 mg/kg twice daily (BID). For the newborns with PNA > 3 days (MIC=16 mg/L), the optimal dose was 30 mg/kg three times daily (TID) for those with GA ≤ 37 weeks and 40 mg/kg TID for those with GA > 37 weeks. Overall, on the basis of the developmental population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis covering the whole range of neonates and young infants, the evidence-based ceftazidime dosage regimens were proposed to optimize neonatal early-onset and late-onset sepsis therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime in Adults with Hematological Malignancies and Febrile Neutropenia after Chemotherapy

Patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (CIFN) may have changes in the pharmacokinetics (PK) compared to patients without malignancies or neutropenia. Those changes in antibiotic PK could lead to negative outcomes for patients if the therapy is not adequately adjusted to this. In this, open-label, non-randomized, prospective, observational, and descriptive study, a PK model of cefepime was developed for patients with hematological neoplasms and post-chemotherapy febrile neutropenia. This study was conducted at a cancer referral center, and study participants were receiving 2 g IV doses of cefepime every 8 h as 30-min infusions. Cefepime PK was well described by a two compartment model with a clearance dependent on a serum creatinine level. Using Monte Carlo simulations, it was shown that continuous infusions of 6g q24h could have a good achievement of PK/PD targets for MIC levels below the resistance cut-off point of Enterobacteriaceae. According to the simulations, it is unnecessary to increase the daily dose of cefepime (above 6 g daily) to increase the probability of target attainment (PTA). Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) using interment dosing was suboptimal for empirical therapy regimens against K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, and continuous infusions could be used in this setting to maximize exposure. Patients with high serum creatinine levels were more likely to achieve predefined PK/PD targets than patients with low levels.

Efficacy of human-simulated bronchopulmonary exposures of cefepime, zidebactam and the combination (WCK 5222) against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neutropenic murine pneumonia model

OBJECTIVES

WCK 5222 combines cefepime with zidebactam, a β-lactam enhancer that binds PBP2 and inhibits class A and C β-lactamases. The efficacy of human-simulated bronchopulmonary exposures of WCK 5222 against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa was investigated in a neutropenic murine pneumonia model.

METHODS

Nineteen MDR isolates of P. aeruginosa (cefepime MICs ≥64 mg/L) were studied. MICs of zidebactam and WCK 5222 ranged from 4 to 512 mg/L and from 4 to 32 mg/L, respectively. Dosing regimens of cefepime and zidebactam alone and in combination that achieved epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures in mice approximating human ELF exposures after doses of 2 g of cefepime/1 g of zidebactam every 8 h (1 h infusion) were utilized; controls were vehicle-dosed. Lungs were intranasally inoculated with 107-108 cfu/mL bacterial suspensions. Mice were dosed subcutaneously 2 h after inoculation for 24 h, then lungs were harvested.

RESULTS

In vitro MIC was predictive of in vivo response to WCK 5222 treatment. Mean±SD changes in bacterial density at 24 h compared with 0 h controls (6.72±0.50 log10 cfu/lungs) for 13 isolates with WCK 5222 MICs ≤16 mg/L were 1.17±1.00, -0.99±1.45 and -2.21±0.79 log10 cfu/lungs for cefepime, zidebactam and WCK 5222, respectively. Against these isolates, zidebactam yielded >1 log10 cfu/lungs reductions in 8/13, while activity was enhanced with WCK 5222, producing >2 log10 cfu/lungs reductions in 10/13 and >1 log10 cfu/lungs reductions in 12/13. Among isolates with WCK 5222 MICs of 32 mg/L, five out of six showed a bacteriostatic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Human-simulated bronchopulmonary exposure of WCK 5222 is effective against MDR P. aeruginosa at MIC ≤16 mg/L in a murine pneumonia model. These data support the clinical development of WCK 5222 for pseudomonal lung infections.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Ceftazidime and Imipenem in Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background: Ceftazidime and imipenem have been increasingly used to treat Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) due to their extended-spectrum covering Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study aims to describe the population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment for ceftazidime and imipenem in patients with AECOPD. Methods: We conducted a prospective PK study at Bach Mai Hospital (Viet Nam). A total of 50 (ceftazidime) and 44 (imipenem) patients with AECOPD were enrolled. Population PK analysis was performed using Monolix 2019R1 and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to determine the optimal dose regimen with respect to the attainment of 60% and 40% fT>MIC for ceftazidime and imipenem, respectively. A dosing algorithm was developed to identify optimal treatment doses. Results: Ceftazidime and imipenem PK was best described by a one-compartment population model with a volume of distribution and clearance of 23.7 L and 8.74 L/h for ceftazidime and 15.1 L and 7.88 L/h for imipenem, respectively. Cockcroft–Gault creatinine clearance represented a significant covariate affecting the clearance of both drugs. Increased doses with prolonged infusion were found to cover pathogens with reduced susceptibility. Conclusions: This study describes a novel and versatile three-level dosing algorithm based on patients’ renal function and characteristic of the infective pathogen to explore ceftazidime and imipenem optimal regimen for AECOPD.

A guide to therapeutic drug monitoring of β-lactam antibiotics

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) opens the door to personalized medicine, yet it is infrequently applied to β-lactam antibiotics, one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the hospital setting. As we continue to understand more about β-lactam pharmacodynamics (PD) and wide inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), the utility of TDM has become increasingly apparent. For β-lactams, the time that free concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as a function of the dosing interval (%fT>MIC) has been shown to best predict antibacterial effect. Many studies have shown that β-lactam %fT>MIC exposures are often suboptimal across a wide variety of disease states and clinical settings. A limitation to implementing this practice is the general lack of understanding on how to best operationalize this intervention and interpret the results. The instrumentation and expertise needed to quantify β-lactams for TDM is rarely available locally, but certain laboratories advertise these services and perform them regularly. Familiarity with the modalities and nuances of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial to establishing β-lactam concentration targets that meet the relevant exposure thresholds. Evaluation of these concentrations is best accomplished using population PK software and Bayesian modeling, for which a multitude of programs are available. While TDM of β-lactams has shown an ability to increase the rate of target attainment, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that it leads to improved clinical outcomes. Although consensus guidelines for β-lactam TDM do not exist in the United States, guidance would help to promote this important practice and better standardize the approach across institutions. Herein, we discuss the basis for β-lactam TDM, review supporting evidence, and provide guidance for implementation in specific patient populations.

Pharmacokinetics of culture-directed antibiotics for the treatment of peritonitis in automated peritoneal dialysis: A systematic narrative review

The objectives of this study were to provide a summary of the pharmacokinetic data of some intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotics that could be used for both empirical and culture-directed therapy, as per the ISPD recommendations, and examine factors to consider when using IP antibiotics for the management of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)-associated peritonitis. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, MEDLINE and Google Scholar for articles published between 1998 and 2020 was conducted. To be eligible, articles had to describe the use of antibiotics via the IP route in adult patients ≥18 years old on APD in the context of pharmacokinetic studies or case reports/series. Articles describing the use of IP antibiotics that had been recently reviewed (cefazolin, vancomycin, gentamicin and ceftazidime) or administered for non-APD-associated peritonitis were excluded. A total of 1119 articles were identified, of which 983 abstracts were screened. Seventy-three full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eight records were included in the final study. Three reports had pharmacokinetic data in patients on APD without peritonitis. Each of cefepime 15 mg/kg IP, meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP given in single doses achieved drug plasma concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for treating the susceptible organisms. The remaining five records were case series or reports in patients on APD with peritonitis. While pharmacokinetic data support intermittent cefepime 15 mg/kg IP daily, only meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP are likely to be effective if given in APD exchanges with dwell times of 15 h. Higher doses may be required in APD with shorter dwell times. Information on therapeutic efficacy was derived from case reports/series in individual patients and without therapeutic drug monitoring. Until more pharmacokinetic data are available on these antibiotics, it would be prudent to shift patients who develop peritonitis on APD to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, where pharmacokinetic information is more readily available.

β-lactam dosing strategies: Think before you push

OBJECTIVES

There has been interest in administering cefepime, a β-lactam antibiotic, via intravenous push (IVP) as a means to improve time to first-dose antibiotic and reduce cost; however, the downstream impacts on antibiotic exposure and pharmacodynamic efficacy need to be further evaluated.

METHODS

This study used a population pharmacokinetic model for cefepime and simulated exposures to predict the pharmacodynamic (PD) effect for cefepime regimens administered via IVP or 30-minute intermittent infusion in adults with different renal functions. FDA-approved adult dosages of 1-2 g every 8 or 12 hours were compared. This study aimed to compare the absolute difference in pharmacodynamic probability of target attainment (PTA) between IVP and intermittent infusion, defined as free cefepime concentrations above organism MIC for ≥ 70% of the time.

RESULTS

At MICs of 0.25-0.5 mg/L, absolute differences in PTA were observed, with a reduction as great as 2.3% (89% to 86.7% for 30-minute intermittent infusion and IVP, respectively). At MICs of 1-4 mg/L, 30-minute intermittent infusion and IVP exhibited PTA differences as great as 5.4%, from 89.4% to 84%, respectively. At MICs of ≥8 mg/L, similar absolute differences existed; however, no regimen achieved a PTA >70%. Across renal function strata of 60, 100 and 140 mL/minute (within the same dosing group and MICs), better renal function lowered PTAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulations demonstrated that IVP cefepime resulted in lower PTAs than traditional intermittent infusion among a subset of elevated MICs. Clinicians should exercise caution in IVP strategy, as unintended clinical consequences are possible.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients and Guidance for Initial Dosing

Cefepime is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat bacterial infections. The time during which the free cefepime concentration is above the MIC (fT_>MIC) should be optimized to increase the efficacy of the regimen. We aim to optimize the exposure of cefepime in ICU patients by using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. Two data sets were included in this study. The first was a prospective study of pediatric patients who received cefepime at 50 mg/kg of body weight and had extensive PK sampling. The second study comprised retrospective data for adult ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital who received cefepime and had their cefepime concentrations measured. The population PK model was developed, and simulations were performed, using Pmetrics. The target exposures were 100% fT_>MIC and 100% fT_>4×MIC The studies included a total of 266 patients, and the mean ages were 3.9 years in the pediatric group and 55 years in adult group. More than half of the patients were males. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 125 (93) ml/min. The mean (SD) daily dose for adults was 4.9 (1.6) g. Cefepime was well described by a two-compartment model with weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution and elimination rate constant (k _el), and CrCl and age group as covariates on k _el At a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a cefepime loading dose of 4 g as an extended infusion followed by a 6-g continuous infusion was needed for good target attainment. In conclusion, prolonged or continuous infusions will be needed to achieve optimal cefepime exposure for ICU patients. Given the observed variability, therapeutic drug monitoring can help individualize therapy.

What Are the Current Approaches to Optimising Antimicrobial Dosing in the Intensive Care Unit?

Antimicrobial dosing in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be problematic due to various challenges including unique physiological changes observed in critically ill patients and the presence of pathogens with reduced susceptibility. These challenges result in reduced likelihood of standard antimicrobial dosing regimens achieving target exposures associated with optimal patient outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this review is to explore the various methods for optimisation of antimicrobial dosing in ICU patients. Dosing nomograms developed from pharmacokinetic/statistical models and therapeutic drug monitoring are commonly used. However, recent advances in mathematical and statistical modelling have resulted in the development of novel dosing software that utilise Bayesian forecasting and/or artificial intelligence. These programs utilise therapeutic drug monitoring results to further personalise antimicrobial therapy based on each patient’s clinical characteristics. Studies quantifying the clinical and cost benefits associated with dosing software are required before widespread use as a point-of-care system can be justified.

Development of Population and Bayesian Models for Applied Use in Patients Receiving Cefepime

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Understanding pharmacokinetic disposition of cefepime, a β-lactam antibiotic, is crucial for developing regimens to achieve optimal exposure and improved clinical outcomes. This study sought to develop and evaluate a unified population pharmacokinetic model in both pediatric and adult patients receiving cefepime treatment.

METHODS

Multiple physiologically relevant models were fit to pediatric and adult subject data. To evaluate the final model performance, a withheld group of 12 pediatric patients and two separate adult populations were assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy subjects with a total of 604 cefepime concentrations were included in this study. All adults (n = 34) on average weighed 82.7 kg and displayed a mean creatinine clearance of 106.7 mL/min. All pediatric subjects (n = 36) had mean weight and creatinine clearance of 16.0 kg and 195.6 mL/min, respectively. A covariate-adjusted two-compartment model described the observed concentrations well (population model R², 87.0%; Bayesian model R², 96.5%). In the evaluation subsets, the model performed similarly well (population R², 84.0%; Bayesian R², 90.2%).

CONCLUSION

The identified model serves well for population dosing and as a Bayesian prior for precision dosing.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Extended-Infusion Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective, Open-Label Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate extended-infusion (EI) cefepime pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, PK study.

SETTING

Intensive care units at a large, academic, tertiary-care medical center.

PATIENTS

Ten critically ill adults who were receiving cefepime 2 g intravenously every 8 hours as a 4-hour infusion while receiving CVVH (eight patients) or CVVHD (two patients).

INTERVENTION

Two sets of five serum cefepime concentrations were collected for each patient to assess pharmacokinetics before and during presumed steady state. Concurrent serum and CRRT effluent samples were collected at hours 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 after the first cefepime dose and after either the fourth, fifth, or sixth (steady-state) cefepime doses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography was used to determine free cefepime concentrations. PK analyses included CRRT clearance, half-life, and sieving coefficient or saturation coefficient. Cefepime peak (4 hrs) concentrations, trough (8 hrs) concentrations (C_min ), and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of 8 µg/ml for the pathogen (MIC₈ ) were used to evaluate attainment of pharmacodynamic targets: 100% of the dosing interval that free drug remains above MIC₈ (100% fT > MIC₈ ), 100% fT > 4 × MIC₈ (optimal), percentage of time fT > 4 × MIC₈ (%fT > 4 × MIC₈ ) at steady state, and ratio of C_min to MIC₈ (fC_min /MIC₈ ). Total CRRT effluent flow rate was a mean ± SD of 30.1 ± 5.4 ml/kg/hr, CRRT clearance was 39.6 ± 9.9 ml/min, and half-life was 5.3 ± 1.7 hours. Sieving coefficient or saturation coefficient were 0.83 ± 0.13 and 0.69 ± 0.22, respectively. First and steady-state dose C_min were 23.4 ± 10.1 µg/ml and 45.2 ± 14.6 µg/ml, respectively. All patients achieved 100% fT > MIC₈ on first and steady-state doses. First and steady-state dose 100% fT > 4 × MIC₈ were achieved in 22% (2/9 patients) and 87.5% (7/8 patients) of patients, respectively. The mean %fT > 4 × MIC₈ at steady state was 97.5%. The fC_min /MIC₈ was 2.92 ± 1.26 for the first dose and 5.65 ± 1.83 at steady state.

CONCLUSION

Extended-infusion cefepime dosing in critically ill patients receiving CRRT successfully attained 100% fT > MIC₈ in all patients and an appropriate fC_min /MIC₈ for both first and steady-state doses. All but one patient achieved 100% fT > 4 × MIC₈ at steady state. No significant differences were observed in PK properties between first and steady-state doses among or between patients. It may be reasonable to initiate an empiric or definitive regimen of EI cefepime in critically ill patients receiving concurrent CRRT who are at risk for resistant organisms. Further research is needed to identify the optimal dosing regimen of EI cefepime in this patient population.

Rational approach in the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review details the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections covering both current and future treatment options that are and may be available for the clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a great concern in hospital-acquired infections with very limited therapeutic options. The increasing antibiotic resistance has led to a need for different treatment choices that range from the use of new antibiotics to new nonantibiotic alternative agents to kill or disarm the pathogen.

SUMMARY

New molecules such as ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and imipenem-relebactam have shown an adequate activity against P. aeruginosa, especially against multidrug resistance strains. Other nonantibiotic alternative treatments, such as antibodies, bacteriocins or phage therapy, have shown promising results, but future clinical studies are needed.

Rules of anti-infection therapy for sepsis and septic shock

Objective:

Sepsis is a deadly infection that causes injury to tissues and organs. Infection and anti-infective treatment are the eternal themes of sepsis. The successful control of infection is a key factor of resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock. This review examines evidence for the treatment of sepsis. This evidence is combined with clinical experiments to reveal the rules and a standard flowchart of anti-infection therapy for sepsis.

Data Sources:

We retrieved information from the PubMed database up to October 2018 using various search terms and their combinations, including sepsis, septic shock, infection, antibiotics, and anti-infection.

Study Selection:

We included data from peer-reviewed journals printed in English on the relationships between infections and antibiotics.

Results:

By combining the literature review and clinical experience, we propose a 6Rs rule for sepsis and septic shock management: right patients, right time, right target, right antibiotics, right dose, and right source control. This rule encompasses rational decisions regarding the timing of treatment, the identification of the correct pathogen, the selection of appropriate antibiotics, the formulation of a scientifically based antibiotic dosage regimen, and the adequate control of infectious foci.

Conclusions:

This review highlights how to recognize and treat sepsis and septic shock and provides rules and a standard flowchart for anti-infection therapy for sepsis and septic shock for use in the clinical setting.

Effects of i.v. push administration on β-lactam pharmacodynamics

PURPOSE

The effects of i.v. push administration on the pharmacodynamic exposures of meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam were evaluated.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted using previously published pharmacokinetic data for meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed using Monte Carlo simulations for 30-minute and 5-minute infusions of approved dosing regimens and alternative dosing schemes often used in clinical practice, including 500 mg every 6 hours and 1 g every 8 hours for meropenem, 1 g every 6 hours and 2 g every 8 hours for cefepime, and 2 g every 8 hours for aztreonam. For each regimen examined, means and standard deviations for the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were calculated and reported.

RESULTS

No or only minor differences were noted between 30-minute and 5-minute infusions. The largest differences were observed at an MIC of 4 mg/L for meropenem and an MIC of 16 mg/L for aztreonam. At an MIC of 4 mg/L, meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours as a 30-minute infusion had an 8% greater PTA compared with the 5-minute infusion. At an MIC of 16 mg/L, a 30-minute infusion of aztreonam 2 g every 8 hours had a 12% greater PTA compared with the 5-minute infusion.

CONCLUSION

Simulations of meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam by i.v. push over 5 minutes indicated that there would be minimal or no effect on pharmacodynamic exposures compared with the effect when administered by 30-minute infusions.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Study the Effect of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Cefepime Disposition in Children

OBJECTIVES

Limited data exist on the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on pharmacokinetics of cefepime in critically ill pediatric patients. The objective was to describe cefepime disposition in children treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using population pharmacokinetic modeling.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective observational study.

SETTING

The pediatric and cardiac ICUs of six sites of the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network.

PATIENTS

Seventeen critically ill children (30 d to < 2 yr old) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who received cefepime as standard of care between January 4, 2014, and August 24, 2015, were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A pharmacokinetic model was developed to evaluate cefepime disposition differences due to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A two-compartment model with linear elimination, weight effects on clearance, intercompartmental clearance (Q), central volume of distribution (V1), and peripheral volume of distribution (V2) adequately described the data. The typical value of clearance in this study was 7.1 mL/min (1.9 mL/min/kg) for a patient weighing 5.8 kg. This value decreased by approximately 40% with the addition of renal replacement therapy. The typical value for V1 was 1,170 mL. In the setting of blood transfusions, V1 increased by over two-fold but was reduced with increasing age of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit oxygenator.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime clearance was reduced in pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation compared with previously reported values in children not receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The model demonstrated that the age of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit oxygenator is inversely correlated to V1. For free cefepime, only 14 of the 19 doses (74%) demonstrated a fT_minimum inhibitory concentration of 16 mg/L, an appropriate target for the treatment of pseudomonal infections, for greater than 70% of the dosing interval. Pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation might benefit from the addition of therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime to assure appropriate dosing.

A Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Every 8-Hour and 12-Hour Dosing Strategies of Vancomycin and Cefepime in Neurocritically ill Patients

PURPOSE

Neurocritically ill patients have clinically significant alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters of renally eliminated medications that may result in subtherapeutic plasma and cerebrospinal fluid antibiotic concentrations.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized open-label study of adult neurocritically ill patients treated with vancomycin and cefepime. Vancomycin 15 mg/kg and cefepime 2 g were dosed at every-8- or 12-hour intervals. The primary outcomes were the achievement of pharmacodynamic (PD) targets related to time of unbound drug above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for 60% or more of the dosing interval (fT > MIC ≥ 60%) for β-lactams and ratio of 24-hour area under the curve (AUC):MIC of 400 or greater for vancomycin.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included in the study. They were divided equally between the every-12-hour and every-8-hour dosing groups. Patients (mean age 51.8 ± 11 yrs) were primarily male (60%) and white (95%), and most had an admission diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage (80%). Compared with the every-12-hour group, the every-8-hour vancomycin group achieved target trough concentrations (higher than 15 μg/ml) significantly more frequently at initial measurement (0% vs 80%, p<0.01) and at 7-10 days (0% vs 90%, p=0.045) and achieved PD targets more frequently at increasing MICs. Similarly, compared with every-12-hour dosing, the every-8-hour cefepime dosing strategy significantly increased PD target attainment (fT > MIC ≥ 60%) at an MIC of 8 μg/ml (20% vs 70%, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that more frequent dosing of vancomycin and cefepime is required to achieve optimal PD targets in adult neurocritically ill patients. The need for increased total daily doses is potentially secondary to the development of augmented renal clearance.

New paradigm for rapid achievement of appropriate therapy in special populations: coupling antibiotic dose optimization rapid microbiological methods

INTRODUCTION

Some special patient populations (e.g. critically ill, burns, hematological malignancy, post-major surgery, post-major trauma) have characteristics that lead to higher rates of failure and mortality associated with infection. Choice of effective antibiotics and optimized doses are challenging in these patients that are commonly infected by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Areas covered: A review of the importance of diagnosis and the place of newer microbiological methods (e.g. whole-genome sequencing) to ensure rapid transition from empiric to directed antibiotic therapy is provided. The effects of pathophysiological changes on antibiotic pharmacokinetics are also provided. Expert opinion: Product information dosing regimens do not address the pharmacokinetic alterations that can occur in special patient populations and increase the likelihood of therapeutic failure and the emergence of bacterial resistance. Altered dosing approaches, supplemented with the use of dosing software and therapeutic drug monitoring, may be needed to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure and better therapeutic outcomes in these patients with severe infection. Dose optimization needs to be coupled with advanced microbiological techniques that enable rapid microbiological identification and characterization of resistance mechanism to ensure that maximally effective directed therapy can be chosen.

How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa have become a real concern in hospital-acquired infections, especially in critically ill and immunocompromised patients. The major problem leading to high mortality lies in the appearance of drug-resistant strains. Therefore, a vast number of approaches to develop novel anti-infectives is currently pursued. Diverse strategies range from killing (new antibiotics) to disarming (antivirulence) the pathogen. In this review, selected aspects of P. aeruginosa antimicrobial resistance and infection management will be addressed. Many studies have been performed to evaluate the risk factors for resistance and the potential consequences on mortality and attributable mortality. The review also looks at the mechanisms associated with resistance – P. aeruginosa is a pathogen presenting a large genome, and it can develop a large number of factors associated with antibiotic resistance involving almost all classes of antibiotics. Clinical approaches to patients with bacteremia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infections and skin soft tissue infections are discussed. Antibiotic combinations are reviewed as well as an analysis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters to optimize P. aeruginosa treatment. Limitations of current therapies, the potential for alternative drugs and new therapeutic options are also discussed.

Application of Antibiotic Pharmacodynamics and Dosing Principles in Patients With Sepsis

Sepsis is associated with marked mortality, which may be reduced by prompt initiation of adequate, appropriate doses of antibiotic. Critically ill patients often have physiological changes that reduce blood and tissue concentrations of antibiotic and high rates of multidrug-resistant pathogens, which may affect patients' outcomes. All critical care professionals, including critical care nurses, should understand antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to ensure sound antibiotic dosing and administration strategies for optimal microbial killing and patients' outcomes. Effective pathogen eradication occurs when the dose of antibiotic reaches or maintains optimal concentrations relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration for the pathogen. Time-dependent antibiotics, such as β-lactams, can be given as extended or continuous infusions. Concentration-dependent antibiotics such as aminoglycosides are optimized by using high, once-daily dosing strategies with serum concentration monitoring. Vancomycin and fluoroquinolones are dependent on both time and concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration.

Pharmacodynamics of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa neutropenic murine thigh model

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that displays potent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. This study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and 24-h efficacy of cefiderocol using dose-ranging methods in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Infection was established in neutropenic mice (administered cyclophosphamide 150 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg at 4 days and 1 day prior to inoculation, respectively) with eight Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range 0.063-0.5 µg/mL] that displayed variable in vivo activity against previously tested β-lactams with siderophore moieties. Renal excretion was controlled by administration of 5 mg/kg uranyl nitrate 3 days prior to inoculation. Cefiderocol was administered subcutaneously in eight escalating doses [4.2-166.7 mg/kg every 8 h (q8h)]. In pharmacokinetic studies, cefiderocol manifested similar pharmacokinetics across tested doses (4, 100 and 250 mg/kg) with a mean half-life of 0.86 h. In pharmacodynamic studies, the change in CFU after 24 h from the initial inoculum ranged from +3.4 to -3.1 log10 with doses of 4.2-166.7 mg/kg q8h. Dose-response curves for the eight isolates assumed the characteristic sigmoidal shape, with greater CFU reductions as the dose increased. Focusing on the previously defined efficacy parameter of fT>MIC (time that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC) for this compound, targets for stasis and 1 log10 and 2 log10 reductions ranged from 44.4-94.7, 50.2-97.5 and 62.1-100, respectively. Cefiderocol displayed sustained antibacterial effects against these MDR P. aeruginosa isolates. These data support the cefiderocol dose selected for clinical trials.

Antibiotic dosing for multidrug-resistant pathogen pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens is increasing in the ICU, and these infections are negatively associated with patient outcomes. Optimization of antibiotic dosing has been suggested as a key intervention to improve clinical outcomes in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. This review describes the recent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data relevant to antibiotic dosing for nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens.

RECENT FINDINGS

Optimal antibiotic treatment is challenging in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia; most dosing guidelines do not consider the altered physiology and illness severity associated with severe lung infections. Antibiotic dosing can be guided by plasma drug concentrations, which do not reflect the concentrations at the site of infection. The application of aggressive dosing regimens, in accordance to the antibiotic's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, may be required to ensure rapid and effective drug exposure in infected lung tissues.

SUMMARY

Conventional antibiotic dosing increases the likelihood of therapeutic failure in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Alternative dosing strategies, which exploit the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of an antibiotic, should be strongly considered to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure and better therapeutic outcomes in these patients.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses To Determine Optimal Dosing of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Exacerbations in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Acute pulmonary exacerbations (APE) involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Drug resistance is a significant challenge to treatment. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) demonstrates excellent in vitro activity against isolates recovered from CF patients, including drug-resistant strains. Altered pharmacokinetics (PK) of several beta-lactam antibiotics have been reported in CF patients. Therefore, this study sought to characterize the PK of CZA and perform target attainment analyses to determine the optimal treatment regimen. The PK of CZA in 12 adult CF patients administered 3 intravenous doses of 2.5 g every 8 h infused over 2 h were determined. Population modeling utilized the maximum likelihood expectation method. Monte Carlo simulations determined the probability of target attainment (PTA). An exposure target consisting of the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (fT_>MIC) was evaluated for ceftazidime (CAZ), and an exposure target consisting of the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeds a 1-mg/liter threshold concentration (fT_{>1 mg/liter}) was evaluated for avibactam (AVI). Published CAZ and CZA MIC distributions were incorporated to evaluate cumulative response probabilities. CAZ and AVI were best described by one-compartment models. The values of total body clearance (CL; CAZ CL, 7.53 ± 1.28 liters/h; AVI CL, 12.30 ± 1.96 liters/h) and volume of distribution (V; CAZ V, 18.80 ± 6.54 liters; AVI V, 25.30 ± 4.43 liters) were broadly similar to published values for healthy adults. CZA achieved a PTA (fT_>MIC, 50%) of >0.9 for MICs of ≤16 mg/liter. The overall likelihood of a treatment response was 0.82 for CZA, whereas it was 0.42 for CAZ. These data demonstrate improved pharmacodynamics of CZA in comparison with those of CAZ and provide guidance on the optimal dosing of CZA for future studies. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02504827.).

Influence of borderline cefepime MIC on the outcome of cefepime-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia treated with a maximal cefepime dose: a hospital-based retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the influence of current cefepime minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints and the maximal cefepime dose on treatment outcomes in patients with bacteremia caused by cefepime-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

Adult patients hospitalized between July 2010 and June 2014 with a positive blood culture for cefepime-susceptible P. aeruginosa and receipt of cefepime as the primary therapy throughout the course were reviewed. Cefepime Etest^® MICs and clinical outcomes for P. aeruginosa bacteremia were reviewed to identify the MIC breakpoint influencing treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 90 patients enrolled, 49 (54.4%) were male (mean age = 66.8 years). The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 22.01. Sixty patients (66.7%) received a maximal cefepime dose, and the 30-day crude mortality rate was 36.7%. MIC₉₀ of cefepime for P. aeruginosa was 8 mg/L. The cumulative survival rate at 30 days revealed that a lower cefepime MIC (<4 mg/L) for P. aeruginosa was associated with a higher survival rate than a higher MIC (≥4 mg/L) (72.6% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.0001). A cefepime MIC of ≥4 mg/L and age were independent risk factors for mortality, whereas the maximal cefepime dose was the independent protective factor. The use of a maximal cefepime dose did not improve the outcomes of patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia at a MIC of ≥4 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

A cefepime MIC of 4 mg/L may predict an unfavorable outcome among patients with serious infections caused by P. aeruginosa, even the MICs still within the CLSI susceptibility breakpoint.

Optimizing β-lactams treatment in critically-ill patients using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets: are first conventional doses effective?

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index determining β-lactam activity is the percentage of the dosing interval (%T) during which their free serum concentration remains above a critical threshold over the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Regrettably, neither the value of %T nor that of the threshold are clearly defined for critically-ill patients. Areas covered: We review and assess the targets proposed for β-lactams in critical illness by screening the literature since 1997. Depending on the study intention (clinical cure vs. suppression of resistance), targets proposed range from 20%T > 1xMIC to 100%T > 5xMIC. Assessment and comparative analysis of their respective clinical efficacy suggest that a value of 100%T > 4xMIC may be needed. Simulation studies, however, show that this target will not be reached at first dose for the majority of critically-ill patients if using the most commonly recommended doses. Expert commentary: Considering that critically-ill patients are highly vulnerable and likely to experience antibiotic underexposure, and because effective initial treatment is a key determinant of clinical outcome, we support the use of a target of 100%T > 4xMIC, which could not only maximize efficacy but also minimize emergence of resistance. Clinical and microbiological studies are needed to test for the feasibility and effectiveness of reaching such a demanding target.

Randomized controlled trial of piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime and ertapenem for the treatment of urinary tract infection caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli

BACKGROUND

Due to limited therapeutic options, the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) have become a major public health concern. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ), cefepime, and ertapenem in febrile nosocomial urinary tract infection with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC).

METHODS

This study was conducted at three university hospitals between January 2013 and August 2015. Hospitalized adult patients presenting with fever were screened for healthcare-associated urinary tract infection (HA-UTI). When ESBL-EC was solely detected and susceptible to a randomized antibiotic in vitro, the case was included in the final analysis. Participants were treated for 10-14 days with PTZ, cefepime, or ertapenem.

RESULTS

A total of 66 participants were evenly assigned to the PTZ and ertapenem treatment groups. After the recruitment of six participants, assignment to the cefepime treatment group was stopped because of an unexpectedly high treatment failure rate. The baseline characteristics of these participants did not differ from participants in other treatment groups. The clinical and microbiological response to PTZ treatment was estimated to be 94% and was similar to the response to ertapenem treatment. The efficacy of cefepime was 33.3%. In the cefepime group, age, Charlson comorbidity index, genotype, and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) did not significantly affect the success of treatment. Similarly, genotype seemed to be irrelevant with respect to clinical outcome in the PTZ group. Expired cases tended to involve septic shock with a high Charlson comorbidity index and high MIC.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study suggest that PTZ is effective in the treatment of urinary tract infection caused by ESBL-EC when the in vitro test indicates susceptibility. In addition, cefepime should not be used as an alternative treatment for urinary tract infection caused by ESBL-EC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (KCT0001895).

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012."

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS

The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.

RESULTS

The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.