The Role of New Posaconazole Formulations in the Treatment of Candida albicans Infections: Data from an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model

Comparative pharmacodynamics and dose optimization of liposomal amphotericin B against Candida species in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

As comparative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) against Candida spp. are lacking, we explored L-AMB pharmacodynamics against different Candida species in an in vitro PK/PD dilution model. Eight Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei isolates (EUCAST/CLSI AMB MIC 0.125-1 mg/L) were studied in the in vitro PK/PD model simulating L-AMB Cmax = 0.25-64 mg/L and t1/2 = 9 h. The model was validated with one susceptible and one resistant Candida albicans isolate. The Cmax/MIC-log10CFU/mL reduction from the initial inoculum was analyzed with the Emax model, and Monte Carlo analysis was performed for the standard (3 mg/kg with Cmax = 21.87 ± 12.47 mg/L) and higher (5 mg/kg with Cmax = 83 ± 35.2 mg/L) L-AMB dose. A ≥1.5 log10CFU/mL reduction was found at L-AMB Cmax = 8 mg/L against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei isolates (MIC 0.25-0.5 mg/L) whereas L-AMB Cmax ≥ 32 mg/L was required for C. glabrata isolates. The in vitro PK/PD relationship followed a sigmoidal pattern (R2 ≥ 0.85) with a mean Cmax/MIC required for stasis of 2.1 for C. albicans (close to the in vivo stasis), 24/17 (EUCAST/CLSI) for C. glabrata, 8 for C. parapsilosis, and 10 for C. krusei. The probability of target attainment was ≥99% for C. albicans wild-type (WT) isolates with 3 mg/kg and for wild-type isolates of the other species with 5 mg/kg. L-AMB was four- to eightfold less active against the included non-C. albicans species than C. albicans. A standard 3-mg/kg dose is pharmacodynamically sufficient for C. albicans whereas our data suggest that 5 mg/kg may be recommendable for the included non-C. albicans species.

Defining Optimal Doses of Liposomal Amphotericin B Against Candida auris: Data From an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

BACKGROUND

Candida auris isolates exhibit elevated amphotericin B (AMB) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). As liposomal AMB (L-AMB) can be safely administered at high doses, we explored L-AMB pharmacodynamics against C. auris isolates in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) dilution model.

METHODS

Four C. auris isolates with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) AMB MICs = 0.5-2 mg/L were tested in an in vitro PK/PD model simulating L-AMB pharmacokinetics. The in vitro model was validated using a Candida albicans isolate tested in animals. The peak concentration (Cmax)/MIC versus log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL reduction from the initial inoculum was analyzed with the sigmoidal model with variable slope (Emax model). Monte Carlo analysis was performed for the standard (3 mg/kg) and higher (5 mg/kg) L-AMB doses.

RESULTS

The in vitro PK/PD relationship Cmax/MIC versus log10 CFU/mL reduction followed a sigmoidal pattern (R2 = 0.91 for C. albicans, R2 = 0.86 for C. auris). The Cmax/MIC associated with stasis was 2.1 for C. albicans and 9 for C. auris. The probability of target attainment was >95% with 3 mg/kg for wild-type C. albicans isolates with MIC ≤2 mg/L and C. auris isolates with MIC ≤1 mg/L whereas 5 mg/kg L-AMB is needed for C. auris isolates with MIC 2 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

L-AMB was 4-fold less active against C. auris than C. albicans. Candida auris isolates with CLSI MIC 2 mg/L would require a higher L-AMB dose.

Assessment of Antifungal Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis is of central importance to the progress of an antifungal agent into clinical use. It is crucial to ensure that preclinical studies give the best possible prediction of the way drugs are likely to behave in a clinical setting. This review details the last 30 years of progress in terms of disease model design, efficacy outcome selection and translational modelling in antifungal PK-PD studies. The principles of how PK-PD parameters inform current clinical practice are also discussed, including a review of how these apply to existing and novel agents.

ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis is a serious complication of PD and prevention and treatment of such is important in reducing patient morbidity and mortality. The ISPD 2022 updated recommendations have revised and clarified definitions for refractory peritonitis, relapsing peritonitis, peritonitis-associated catheter removal, PD-associated haemodialysis transfer, peritonitis-associated death and peritonitis-associated hospitalisation. New peritonitis categories and outcomes including pre-PD peritonitis, enteric peritonitis, catheter-related peritonitis and medical cure are defined. The new targets recommended for overall peritonitis rate should be no more than 0.40 episodes per year at risk and the percentage of patients free of peritonitis per unit time should be targeted at >80% per year. Revised recommendations regarding management of contamination of PD systems, antibiotic prophylaxis for invasive procedures and PD training and reassessment are included. New recommendations regarding management of modifiable peritonitis risk factors like domestic pets, hypokalaemia and histamine-2 receptor antagonists are highlighted. Updated recommendations regarding empirical antibiotic selection and dosage of antibiotics and also treatment of peritonitis due to specific microorganisms are made with new recommendation regarding adjunctive oral N-acetylcysteine therapy for mitigating aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Areas for future research in prevention and treatment of PD-related peritonitis are suggested.