Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam in Mouse Models of Infection Due to KPC-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

In vitro and in vivo activities of KSP-1007, a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases, in combination with meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

KSP-1007 is a novel bicyclic boronate-based broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor and is being developed in combination with meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, a global health concern, and here, we describe its characteristics. KSP-1007 exhibited low apparent inhibition constant (Ki app) values against all classes of β-lactamase, including imipenemase types and oxacillinase types from Acinetobacter baumannii. Against 207 Enterobacterales and 55 A. baumannii, including carbapenemase producers, KSP-1007 at fixed concentrations of 4, 8, and 16 µg/mL dose-dependently potentiated the in vitro activity of MEM in broth microdilution MIC testing. The MIC90 of MEM/KSP-1007 at 8 µg/mL against Enterobacterales was lower than those of MEM/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and colistin and similar to those of aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, and tigecycline. The in vitro activity of MEM/KSP-1007 at ≥4 µg/mL against Enterobacterales harboring metallo-β-lactamase was superior to that of cefepime/taniborbactam. MEM/KSP-1007 showed excellent activity against Escherichia coli with PBP3 mutations and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase compared to aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, and cefiderocol. MEM/KSP-1007 at 8 µg/mL showed greater efficacy against A. baumannii than these comparators except for cefiderocol, tigecycline, and colistin. A 2-fold reduction in MEM MIC against 96 Pseudomonas aeruginosa was observed in combination with KSP-1007. MEM/KSP-1007 demonstrated bactericidal activity against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa based on minimum bactericidal concentration/MIC ratios of ≤4. KSP-1007 enhanced the in vivo activity of MEM against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa in murine systemic, complicated urinary tract, and thigh infection models. Collectively, MEM/KSP-1007 has a good profile for treating carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Meropenem-ANT3310, a unique β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with expanded antibacterial spectrum against Gram-negative pathogens including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

ANT3310 is a novel broad-spectrum diazabicyclooctane serine β-lactamase inhibitor being developed in combination with meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients where carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens are expected. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro antibacterial activity of MEM in the presence of ANT3310 at 8 µg/mL against global clinical isolates that included Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 905), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carrying either oxacillinase (OXA) (n = 252) or Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) (n = 180) carbapenemases, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 502). MEM was poorly active against A. baumannii, as were MEM-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, and imipenem-relebactam (MIC90 values of ≥32 µg/mL). On the other hand, MEM-ANT3310 displayed an MIC90 value of 4 µg/mL, similar to that observed with sulbactam-durlobactam, a drug developed to specifically treat A. baumannii infections. ANT3310 (8 µg/mL) additionally restored the activity of MEM against OXA- and KPC-producing CREs decreasing MEM MIC90 values from >32 µg/mL to 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. The combination of 8 µg/mL of both MEM and ANT3310 prevented growth of 97.5% of A. baumannii and 100% of OXA- and KPC-positive CREs, with ~90% of P. aeruginosa isolates also displaying MEM MICs ≤8 µg/mL. Furthermore, MEM-ANT3310 was efficacious in both thigh and lung murine infection models with OXA-23 A. baumannii. This study demonstrates the potent in vitro activity of the MEM-ANT3310 combination against both carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and Enterobacterales clinical isolates, a key differentiator to other β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations.

The role and potential of computer-aided drug discovery strategies in the discovery of novel antimicrobials

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become more of a concern in recent decades, particularly in infections associated with global public health threats. The development of new antibiotics is crucial to ensuring infection control and eradicating AMR. Although drug discovery and development are essential processes in the transformation of a drug candidate from the laboratory to the bedside, they are often very complicated, expensive, and time-consuming. The pharmaceutical sector is continuously innovating strategies to reduce research costs and accelerate the development of new drug candidates. Computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) has emerged as a powerful and promising technology that renews the hope of researchers for the faster identification, design, and development of cheaper, less resource-intensive, and more efficient drug candidates. In this review, we discuss an overview of AMR, the potential, and limitations of CADD in AMR drug discovery, and case studies of the successful application of this technique in the rapid identification of various drug candidates. This review will aid in achieving a better understanding of available CADD techniques in the discovery of novel drug candidates against resistant pathogens and other infectious agents.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination, the Future in Eradicating Multidrug Resistance

Due to the fact that there is a steadily increasing trend in the area of antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms, there is a need to look for new treatment alternatives. One of them is the search for new β-lactamase inhibitors and combining them with β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of increasing the low-dose efficacy, as well as lowering the resistance potential of bacterial strains. This review presents the positive effect of meropenem in combination with a vaborbactam (MER-VAB). This latest antibiotic-inhibitor combination has found particular use in the treatment of infections with the etiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Gram-negative bacteria, with a high degree of resistance to available antimicrobial drugs.

Clinical Evaluation of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Combination for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection: Evidence to Date

As antimicrobial resistance continues to grow, one of the biggest threats includes the members of the Enterobacterales order presenting with carbapenem resistance (CRE). Meropenem-vaborbactam, along with other beta-lactam/beta-lactamase agents, has been developed to help combat this growing concern and is currently approved to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), as well as acute pyelonephritis (AP), in the USA. Vaborbactam is a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor designed specifically to optimize and restore the activity of meropenem against resistant Enterobacterales. Vaborbactam inhibits a number of beta-lactamases, including in vitro activity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) group. KPC represents one of the most clinically relevant carbapenemase in the USA, accounting for the majority of carbapenemase-producing CRE. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been studied in the two Phase 3, noninferiority trials, TANGO I and TANGO II. TANGO I compared meropenem-vaborbactam against piperacillin-tazobactam in patients with cUTIs and was found to be noninferior for overall success and microbial eradication. TANGO II expanded to other disease states (bacteremia, hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia [HAP/VAP], complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], cUTI/AP) and was found to be noninferior against best available therapy (BAT) with respect to clinical cure at the end of treatment and the test of cure. Meropenem-vaborbactam maintained the established safety profile of meropenem alone, with headache as the most common adverse event in both phase 3 studies. Overall, clinical efficacy has been demonstrated and suggests the use of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of cUTI is an option.

Carbapenem Combinations for Infections Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Experimental In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis

In the context of difficult-to-treat carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, we evaluated imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem combinations against eleven carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. According to the widespread global distribution of high-risk clones and carbapenemases, four representative isolates were selected: ST175 (OXA-2/VIM-20), ST175 (VIM-2), ST235 (GES-5), and ST111 (IMP-33), for efficacy studies using a sepsis murine model. Minimum inhibitory concentration (mg/L) ranges were 64–256 for imipenem and 16–128 for meropenem and doripenem. In vitro, imipenem plus meropenem was synergistic against 72% of isolates and doripenem plus meropenem or imipenem against 55% and 45%, respectively. All combinations were synergistic against the ST175, ST235, and ST155 clones. In vivo, meropenem diminished the spleen and blood bacterial concentrations of four and three isolates, respectively, with better efficacy than imipenem or doripenem. The combinations did not show efficacy compared with the more active monotherapies, except for imipenem plus meropenem, which reduced the ST235 bacterial spleen concentration. Mortality decreased with imipenem plus meropenem or doripenem for the ST175 isolate. Results suggest that carbapenem combinations are not an alternative for severe infections by carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa. Meropenem monotherapy showed in vivo efficacy despite its high MIC, probably because its dosage allowed a sufficient antimicrobial exposure at the infection sites.

Thoracic aorta graft infection by avibactam-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae treated with meropenem/vaborbactam: a case report and literature review

Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) is a new carbapenem-carbapenemase inhibitor combination drug active against extensively drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Studies about its efficacy and place in therapy are limited in "real-life" and no data are available for deep site infections, like vascular graft infections. We present a case of a patient successfully treated with M/V for a thoracic aorta graft infection, placed for a traumatic penetrating aortic ulcer, due to an extensively KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to ceftazidime/ avibactam. Furthermore, we conducted a systematic literature review concerning vascular graft infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and the papers published until now about the use of M/V for the treatment of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae. Meropenem/vaborbactam is a promising antibiotic for difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options. Only few reports have been published and more studies are needed to assess which is the best place in therapy of M/V.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

The role of new carbapenem combinations in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria represent a growing threat, with an increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections, for which treatment options are limited. New treatment combinations composed of a β-lactam antibiotic plus a potent β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) with anti-carbapenemase activity have been developed, including two carbapenem/BLI combinations that are commercially available-meropenem/vaborbactam (Vabomere® in the US, Vaborem® in Europe; Melinta Therapeutics) and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio®; Merck Sharp & Dohme), plus one other (meropenem/nacubactam) in early clinical development. This review provides a summary of the preclinical evidence supporting the use of carbapenem/BLI combinations and presents the clinical evidence across a range of MDR Gram-negative infections, with a focus on the use of meropenem/vaborbactam. All three BLIs have shown in vivo activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase and other class A carbapenemases. In 2019, meropenem/vaborbactam was listed in the WHO's list of essential medicines, because of its activity against priority 1 antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Meropenem/vaborbactam has considerable in vitro and in vivo activity against CRE, and in vitro evidence showing a low potential for resistance at clinically relevant doses. In randomized trials, meropenem/vaborbactam was non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with complicated urinary tract infection and more effective than the best-available treatment in patients with serious CRE infections. Meropenem/vaborbactam is well tolerated and, based on clinical experience, demonstrated lower toxicity compared with the combination regimens that have previously been the standard of care. In conclusion, carbapenem/BLI combinations represent an important therapeutic strategy in patients with MDR Gram-negative infections.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Meropenem-Vaborbactam, and Imipenem/Cilastatin-Relebactam to Target Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales

Objective: To provide a review of 3 novel antimicrobial agents-ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam-regarding treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (KPC). Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed and OVID (MEDLINE) was performed up to March 2020 using the following search terms: Vabomere, meropenem-vaborbactam, vaborbactam, RPX7009, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, KPC, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, CRE, relebactam, imipenem-relebactam, MK-7655, ceftazidime-avibactam. Abstracts from conferences, article bibliographies, and product information were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles were first screened by English language, then title, then abstract, and finally by review of the full article. Fifty-five clinical and preclinical studies were included. Data Synthesis: These 3 novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have shown considerable improvement in safety and efficacy as compared with traditional polymyxin-based combination therapy for the treatment of KPC infections. While meropenem-vaborbactam has not shown improved activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it has shown decreased rates of resistance to KPC versus ceftazidime-avibactam. Conclusions: With increasing incidence of KPC infections on a global scale, pharmacists should be aware of the notable similarities and differences between these 3 agents, and the current data supporting their use. Pharmacists may want to consider meropenem-vaborbactam over ceftazidime-avibactam for KPC infections due to decreased likelihood of resistance.

Contributions of animal studies to the understanding of infectious diseases

Experiments in animals have played an integral role in furthering basic understanding of the pathophysiology, host immune response, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases. However, competing demands of modern-day clinical training and increasingly stringent requirements to perform animal research have reduced the exposure of infectious disease physicians to animal studies. For practitioners of infectious diseases and, especially, for contemporary trainees in infectious diseases, it is important to appreciate this historical body of work and its impact on current clinical practice. In this article, we provide an overview of some major contributions of animal studies to the field of infectious diseases. Areas covered include transmission of infection, elucidation of innate and adaptive host immune responses, testing of antimicrobials, pathogenesis and treatment of endocarditis, osteomyelitis, intraabdominal and urinary tract infection, treatment of infection associated with a foreign body or in the presence of neutropenia, and toxin-mediated disease.

Efficacy of dual carbapenem treatment in a murine sepsis model of infection due to carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii

Objectives

To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a dual carbapenem combination containing imipenem plus meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing carbapenemases OXA-23 or OXA-58.

Methods

An experimental model of peritonitis using C57BL/6J female mice was developed and the minimum lethal doses were calculated for infections due to OXA-23 or OXA-58 producers of A. baumannii clinical isolates. The efficacies of the carbapenems in monotherapy and in combination were tested.

Results

Meropenem was better than imipenem in mice infected with either of the carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) strains. The combination of meropenem plus imipenem significantly improved the clearance of CRAbs from spleen compared with non-treated groups. The carbapenem-containing combination was better than imipenem for treating mice infected with both carbapenemase producers. In blood, the carbapenem combination significantly decreased the bacterial load of the OXA-23 producers compared with imipenem or meropenem used in monotherapy.

Conclusions

These results suggest that dual carbapenem combination could be an option for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii such as OXA-23 and OXA-58 producers.

Efficacy of human-simulated exposures of meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against OXA-48 β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model

OBJECTIVES

Despite vaborbactam lacking inhibitory activity against OXA-48, approximately a third of OXA-48-harbouring Enterobacterales test susceptible to meropenem/vaborbactam due to its higher breakpoint than meropenem alone. The present study evaluated the efficacy of human-simulated exposures of meropenem/vaborbactam against OXA-48-harbouring Enterobacterales in the neutropenic murine thigh model.

METHODS

Twenty-six isolates [OXA-48 (n = 24) and KPC (n = 2)] were evaluated. MICs were conducted in triplicate per CLSI. Mice received human-simulated regimens of meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem or vehicle for 24 h. Mice were inoculated with ∼1 × 107 cfu/mL in each thigh 2 h prior to dosing and both thighs were harvested at 24 h. Efficacy was assessed using mean log10 cfu/thigh at 24 h and the achievement of 1 log10 reduction relative to 0 h control as an established surrogate marker predictive of success for serious infections.

RESULTS

Meropenem/vaborbactam MICs ranged from 1 to 64 mg/L. The mean inoculum at 0 h was 5.77 ± 0.26 compared with 8.26 ± 1.53 for controls at 24 h. As anticipated for KPCs, meropenem/vaborbactam resulted in enhanced mean ± SD change in bacterial density (-1.10 ± 0.26), compared with meropenem (1.45 ± 0.88). Vaborbactam did not enhance mean ± SD change against OXA-48 isolates compared with meropenem (-0.44 ± 1.29 and -0.43 ± 1.36, respectively). For OXA-48-harbouring isolates with meropenem/vaborbactam MICs ≥16 (n = 5), 8 (n = 5), 4 (n = 9) and ≤2 (n = 5) mg/L, 0%, 0%, 44% and 60% of isolates achieved the target reduction ≥1 log10 with either agent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight that meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem humanized exposures in vivo resulted in similar, albeit poor, activity against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales despite susceptible MICs per EUCAST and CLSI interpretation. As a result, caution is warranted when treating meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible Enterobacterales without a genotypic profile.

An Appraisal of the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Meropenem-Vaborbactam

Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens remain an urgent public health threat, and safe, effective treatment options are limited. Although several agents are now available to combat these infections, meropenem-vaborbactam was the first to combine a novel, cyclic, boronic acid-based, β-lactamase inhibitor with a carbapenem backbone. Vaborbactam emanated from a discovery program specifically designed to identify candidate β-lactamase inhibitors with biochemical, microbiologic, and pharmacologic properties optimized for use in conjunction with a carbapenem. Meropenem was selected as the ideal carbapenem given its broad-spectrum in vitro activity, well established safety profile, and proven efficacy in the treatment of serious gram-negative infections. The combination has demonstrated potent in vitro activity against resistant gram-negative pathogens, particularly KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC₅₀ values typically ≤ 0.06 mg/l). Importantly, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the two agents are well matched, and the approved optimized dosing regimen of 4 g every 8 h (Q8h) as a 3-h infusion provides reliable probability of target attainment against the majority of commonly encountered carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Robust in vitro and in vivo PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) data support the ability of this dosing regimen to achieve specified PK/PD targets for both bactericidal activity and prevention of resistance among pathogens with MICs up to 8 mg/l. This concerted effort into optimizing the PK and PD parameters of both the β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor alone and in combination contributed to the clinical success of meropenem-vaborbactam demonstrated in phase 3 trials in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis (AP), and serious CRE infections. As the use of meropenem-vaborbactam increases concomitantly with the prevalence of KPC-producing CRE, continued pharmacovigilance and antimicrobial stewardship efforts will be of upmost importance to ensure that these PK/PD efforts translate into improved patient outcomes.

Human-Simulated Antimicrobial Regimens in Animal Models: Transparency and Validation Are Imperative

Animal infection models are invaluable in optimizing antimicrobial dosage in humans. Utilization of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) in animal models helps to evaluate antimicrobial efficacy at clinically achievable drug concentrations. To that end, pharmacokinetic studies in infected animals and confirmation of the HSR pharmacokinetic profile are essential in evaluating observed versus expected drug concentrations. We present and compare two murine meropenem-vaborbactam HSR profiles, their potential impact on bacterial killing, and clinical translatability.

Antibiotic resistance breakers: current approaches and future directions

Infections of antibiotic-resistant pathogens pose an ever-increasing threat to mankind. The investigation of novel approaches for tackling the antimicrobial resistance crisis must be part of any global response to this problem if an untimely reversion to the pre-penicillin era of medicine is to be avoided. One such promising avenue of research involves so-called antibiotic resistance breakers (ARBs), capable of re-sensitising resistant bacteria to antibiotics. Although some ARBs have previously been employed in the clinical setting, such as the β-lactam inhibitors, we posit that the broader field of ARB research can yet yield a greater diversity of more effective therapeutic agents than have been previously achieved. This review introduces the area of ARB research, summarises the current state of ARB development with emphasis on the various major classes of ARBs currently being investigated and their modes of action, and offers a perspective on the future direction of the field.

Meropenem/vaborbactam: a next generation β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination

INTRODUCTION

infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) constitute a worldwide threat and are associated with significant mortality, especially in fragile patients, and costs. Meropenem-vaborbactam (M/V) is a combination of a group 2 carbapenem with a novel cyclic boronic acid-based β-lactamase inhibitor which has shown good efficacy against KPC carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, which are amongst the most prevalent types of CRE.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the microbiological and pharmacological profile and current clinical experience and safety of M/V in the treatment of infections caused by CRE.

EXPERT OPINION

M/V is a promising drug for the treatment of infections due to KPC-producing CRE (KPC-CRE). It exhibited an almost complete coverage of KPC-CRE isolates from large surveillance studies and a low propensity for resistance selection, retaining activity also against strains producing KPC mutants resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Both meropenem and vaborbactam have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, with similar kinetic properties, a good intrapulmonary penetration, and are efficiently cleared during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). According to available data, M/V monotherapy is associated with higher clinical cure rates and lower rates of adverse events, especially in terms of nephrotoxicity, if compared to 'older' combination therapies.

Potency of Vaborbactam Is Less Affected than That of Avibactam in Strains Producing KPC-2 Mutations That Confer Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam due to mutations in KPC genes has been reported both in vitro and in clinical settings. The most frequently reported mutation leads to the amino acid substitution D179Y in the Ω loop of the enzyme. Bacterial cells that carry mutant KPC acquire a higher level of ceftazidime resistance, become more sensitive to other cephalosporins, and almost completely lose resistance to carbapenems. In this study, we demonstrated that two substitutions in KPC-2, D179Y and L169P, reduce the ability of avibactam to enhance the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin against isogenic efflux-deficient strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 8- to 32-fold and 4- to 16-fold for the D179Y and L169P variants, respectively, depending on the antibiotic.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam due to mutations in KPC genes has been reported both in vitro and in clinical settings. The most frequently reported mutation leads to the amino acid substitution D179Y in the Ω loop of the enzyme. Bacterial cells that carry mutant KPC acquire a higher level of ceftazidime resistance, become more sensitive to other cephalosporins, and almost completely lose resistance to carbapenems. In this study, we demonstrated that two substitutions in KPC-2, D179Y and L169P, reduce the ability of avibactam to enhance the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin against isogenic efflux-deficient strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 8- to 32-fold and 4- to 16-fold for the D179Y and L169P variants, respectively, depending on the antibiotic. In contrast, the potency of vaborbactam, the structurally unrelated β-lactamase inhibitor that was recently approved by the FDA in combination with meropenem, is reduced no more than 2-fold. Experiments with purified enzymes demonstrate that the D179Y substitution causes an ∼20-fold increase in the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for inhibition of ceftazidime hydrolysis by avibactam, versus 2-fold for vaborbactam, and that the L169P substitution has an ∼4.5-fold-stronger effect on the affinity for avibactam than for vaborbactam. In addition, the D179Y and L169P variants hydrolyze ceftazidime with 10-fold and 4-fold-higher efficiencies, respectively, than that of wild-type KPC-2. Thus, microbiological and biochemical experiments implicate both decreased ability of avibactam to interact with KPC-2 variants and an increase in the efficiency of ceftazidime hydrolysis in resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. These substitutions have a considerably lesser effect on interactions with vaborbactam, making the meropenem-vaborbactam combination a valuable agent in managing infections due to KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology

Purpose of Review

Gram-negative resistance is a growing concern globally. Enterobacterales, formerly Enterobacteriaceae, have developed resistance mechanisms to carbapenems that leave very few antimicrobial options in the clinician’s armamentarium.

Recent Findings

New antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin have the potential to overcome resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales including different classes of carbapenemases.

Summary

Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, plazomicin, and cefiderocol give the clinician options that were once not available. Utilizing these options is of the utmost importance when treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

In vitro activity of meropenem combined with vaborbactam against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in China

Background

Vaborbactam is a novel inhibitor of serine β-lactamases, including KPCs, which predominate in China. It is being developed in combination with meropenem.

Methods

Using the broth microdilution method, the in vitro activity of meropenem/vaborbactam against 128 KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from China was investigated.

Results

Meropenem alone showed no activity (MIC50 and MIC90 >64 mg/L), but the addition of vaborbactam potentiated meropenem in a dose-dependent manner with MIC90 decreasing from >64 to 0.5 mg/L in the presence of increasing concentrations of vaborbactam. MIC50 and MIC90 of meropenem with 8 mg/L vaborbactam (MV8) were reduced to 0.5 and 8 mg/L, respectively. MV8 (4 mg/L meropenem) inhibited 76.6% of Klebsiella pneumoniae and 100% of Escherichia coli isolates. Seventy-three (77.7%) of the K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to ST11; the remaining 22.3% of isolates were represented by 12 different STs. Of the ST11 and non-ST11 isolates, 71.2% and 95.2%, respectively, were inhibited by MV8 (4 mg/L meropenem). In 14 strains characterized for intrinsic resistance mechanisms, MV8 MIC was increased in isolates with defects in both OmpK35 and OmpK36. The highest MV8 MIC was observed in the strain that had both non-functional porins and increased expression of blaKPC and acrB.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that meropenem/vaborbactam has good activity against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from China. However, a higher percentage of K. pneumoniae isolates for which MV8 MIC was elevated compared with other geographical areas is noteworthy. This might be due to clonal dissemination of ST11 KPC-producing isolates that are defective in both major porins, OmpK35 and OmpK36.

Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Infection Model

We have evaluated the activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. Data show that meropenem-vaborbactam regimens equivalent to 3-h infusions every 8 h with 2 g meropenem and 2 g vaborbactam produced bacterial killing against strains with MICs of 2 to 16 mg/liter and suggests that this combination may have utility in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Vaborbactam, a Novel Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor, in Combination with Meropenem

Vaborbactam is a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor with activity against important beta-lactamases, in particular, serine carbapenemases, and is currently approved in combination with meropenem as Vabomere for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis. This combination is highly active against Gram-negative pathogens, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae The objective of these studies was to evaluate vaborbactam pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) relationships for efficacy in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model, as well as in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model, in combination with a fixed exposure of meropenem using KPC-containing strains of Enterobacteriaceae For both models, the meropenem dosage regimen was designed to simulate a 2-g dose administered every eight hours (q8h) by 3-h infusion. Vaborbactam dosage regimens were designed to produce a wide range of 24-h areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) in the thigh infection model. However, for the hollow-fiber model, the AUCs were limited to values of 192, 320, or 550 mg · h/liter. In both the animal and in vitro models, the PK-PD parameter that best described the antibacterial activity of vaborbactam, when administered in combination with meropenem at exposures equivalent to 2 g dosed q8h by 3-h infusion in humans, was the 24-h free vaborbactam AUC/meropenem-vaborbactam (with vaborbactam at 8 mg/liter) MIC ratio. The magnitude of this ratio for bacteriostasis was 9 to 12 and the magnitude to observe a 1-log kill was 18 to 38. In addition, a magnitude greater than 24 suppressed the development of resistance in the in vitro hollow-fiber model.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem and vaborbactam for the treatment of urinary tract infection

INTRODUCTION

Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) represents the first carbapenem and β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam is a novel boronic acid, β-lactamase inhibitor with a high affinity for serine β-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). This combination, Vabomere™, was approved in August 2017 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cUTIs in patients 18 years or older, including pyelonephritis, caused by the following susceptible microorganisms: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae species complex. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability will be discussed. Expert opinion: Current treatment options for KPC-producing infections such as aminoglycosides, polymyxins, fosfomycin, and tigecycline are associated with concerns regarding efficacy, toxicities, optimal dosing, and/or development of resistance. Additionally, resistance to the new combination product of ceftazidime/avibactam has also emerged. Current clinical evidence supporting the use of M/V for KPC-producing infections is limited to an open-label, randomized, phase III study in a small number of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Although M/V is not approved for KPC-producing infections, we believe that M/V will become a preferred agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam: A Review in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

The global threat of the spread of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae has led to the search for new antibacterials. Intravenous meropenem/vaborbactam (Vabomere™) is the first carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved in the USA for use in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam is a potent inhibitor of class A serine carbapenemases, which, when combined with the antibacterial meropenem, restores the activity of meropenem against β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Meropenem/vaborbactam demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against Gram-negative clinical isolates, including KPC- and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. In the phase 3, noninferiority TANGO I trial in patients with cUTIs, intravenous meropenem/vaborbactam was noninferior to intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam for overall success (composite of clinical cure and microbial eradication; FDA primary endpoint) and microbial eradication (EMA primary endpoint). In subsequent superiority testing, meropenem/vaborbactam was superior to piperacillin/tazobactam for overall success. Meropenem/vaborbactam was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile generally similar to that of piperacillin/tazobactam. TANGO I did not assess the efficacy of meropenem/vaborbactam for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and meropenem/vaborbactam is currently not indicated for these patients. Available evidence indicates that meropenem/vaborbactam is a useful treatment option for patients with cUTIs.

Meropenem-vaborbactam: a carbapenem and beta-lactamase inhibitor with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a carbapenem and β-lactamase inhibitor combination that is newly indicated for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including adult pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam was developed due to emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae. In a phase I trial, patients that received meropenem-vaborbactam 2-2 g intravenously over 3 h every 8 h, C_max was 58.2 ± 10.8 μg/mL for meropenem and 59.0 ± 8.4 μg/mL for vaborbactam. AUC_0-8 was 186 ± 33.6 μg • h/mL for meropenem and 204 ± 34.6 μg • h/mL for vaborbactam. V_ss = 16.3 ± 2.6 L for meropenem and 17.6 ± 2.6 L for vaborbactam. Protein binding for vaborbactam averaged 33% in humans. Plasma clearance ranged from 10.42 ± 1.85 to 14.77 ± 2.84 L/h. One phase III trial evaluated efficacy for meropenem-vaborbactam 2-2 g intravenously every 8 h versus piperacillin-tazobactam 4-0.5 g intravenously every 8 h in complicated UTI. It found non-inferiority and statistical superiority for meropenem in overall success at the end of treatment primary end point. In another phase III trial evaluating efficacy in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections, meropenem-vaborbactam 2-2 g intravenously every 8 h was associated with decreased 28-day mortality and increased clinical cure compared with a best available therapy group.

Meropenem and Vaborbactam: Stepping up the Battle against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Vaborbactam (VAB; formerly RPX7009) is a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor based on a cyclic boronic acid pharmacophore with potent inhibitory activity against Ambler class A and C beta-lactamases. It has been co-formulated with meropenem to restore its activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC). VAB does not inhibit class B or D carbapenemases, nor does it improve the activity of meropenem against multidrug-resistant nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, notably Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The purpose of this article is to review existing data pertaining to the biochemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, in vitro activity, and current progress in clinical trials of meropenem and VAB (MV). Phase 1 studies have demonstrated single and multiple doses of VAB up to 2000 mg, alone or in combination with meropenem 2000 mg administered as a prolonged infusion over 3 hours, are well tolerated with an adverse effect profile similar to that of meropenem monotherapy. The available data suggest preexisting resistance among KPC-producing isolates is rare. Strains with elevated MICs have been characterized by multiple resistance determinants including porin defects, increased drug efflux, and increased blaKPC expression. It remains uncertain whether multifactorial resistance will emerge during MV treatment and with more widespread use. Early data are positive for complicated urinary tract infections and MV compared with best available therapy in patients with serious carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaciae (CRE) infections. As clinicians contemplate how to incorporate MV into CRE treatment strategies, it will be important to track and understand resistance, discern the role, if any, of combination therapy in enhancing efficacy and/or preserving activity, and define the specific therapeutic niche of MV among the expanding anti-CRE armamentarium.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam, the First Carbapenem/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, efficacy, administration, and considerations for clinical use of meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (June 2013 to December 2017) was conducted using the search terms meropenem, vaborbactam, RPX7009, biapenem, RPX2003, and carbavance. References from relevant articles and conference abstracts were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Preclinical, phase I studies, and phase III studies written in the English language were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

M/V is a novel carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor antimicrobial with in vitro activity against nearly 99% of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. M/V is approved for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. In a phase III cUTI trial (TANGO I), 98.4% of patients treated with M/V experienced overall clinical success compared with 94% of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam (95% CI = 0.7 to 9.1). When compared with best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections in TANGO II, patients receiving M/V were more likely to achieve clinical cure at both the end of therapy (64.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.04) as well as at the test of cure (57.1% vs 26.7%, P = 0.04). The most common adverse effects associated with M/V were headache, infusion-site reactions, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

M/V has a valuable role in the treatment of CRE and should be used judiciously to preserve its use for resistant infections.