Model-Informed Drug Development, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Cutoff Value Determination, and Antibacterial Efficacy of Benapenem against Enterobacteriaceae

Antibacterial agents active against Gram Negative Bacilli in phase I, II, or III clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to modern healthcare, and it is often regarded that the antibiotic pipeline is 'dry.'

AREAS COVERED

Antimicrobial agents active against Gram negative bacilli in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials were reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Nearly 50 antimicrobial agents (28 small molecules and 21 non-traditional antimicrobial agents) active against Gram-negative bacilli are currently in clinical trials. These have the potential to provide substantial improvements to the antimicrobial armamentarium, although it is known that 'leakage' from the pipeline occurs due to findings of toxicity during clinical trials. Significantly, a lack of funding for large phase III clinical trials is likely to prevent trials occurring for the indications most relevant to loss of life attributed to antimicrobial resistance such as ventilator-associated pneumonia. Non-traditional antimicrobial agents face issues in clinical development such as a lack of readily available and reliable susceptibility tests, and the potential need for superiority trials rather than non-inferiority trials. Most importantly, concrete plans must be made during clinical development for access of new antimicrobial agents to areas of the world where resistance to Gram negative bacilli is most frequent.

Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens

Gram-negative bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has had an exponential increase at a global level during the last decades and represent an everyday challenge, especially for the hospital practice of our era. Concerted efforts from the researchers and the industry have recently provided several novel promising antimicrobials, resilient to various bacterial resistance mechanisms. There are new antimicrobials that became commercially available during the last five years, namely, cefiderocol, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin. Furthermore, other agents are in advanced development, having reached phase 3 clinical trials, namely, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulopenem, tebipenem, and benapenem. In this present review, we critically discuss the characteristics of the above-mentioned antimicrobials, their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and the current clinical data.

Fighting antibiotic resistance-strategies and (pre)clinical developments to find new antibacterials

Antibacterial resistance is one of the greatest threats to human health. The development of new therapeutics against bacterial pathogens has slowed drastically since the approvals of the first antibiotics in the early and mid-20^th century. Most of the currently investigated drug leads are modifications of approved antibacterials, many of which are derived from natural products. In this review, we highlight the challenges, advancements and current standing of the clinical and preclinical antibacterial research pipeline. Additionally, we present novel strategies for rejuvenating the discovery process and advocate for renewed and enthusiastic investment in the antibacterial discovery pipeline.

Model-Informed Drug Development of New Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium Combination (3:1): Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis and Antibacterial Efficacy Against Enterobacteriaceae

Objective: Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a commonly used antibiotic combination against the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new cefoperazone/sulbactam combination (3:1) for Enterobacteriaceae infection via model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches.

Methods: Sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] was used as a control. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was collected from a clinical phase I trial. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using two-fold broth microdilution method. The percent time that the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT_>MIC) was used as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indicator correlated with efficacy. Models were developed to characterize the PK profile of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the investigational regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested bacteria.

Results: Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Simulation results following the single-dose showed that the regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam combinations in the ratios of 3:1 and 2:1 achieved similar PTA against the tested bacteria. Simulation results from the multiple-dose showed that the dosing regimen of cefoperazone/sulbactam (4 g, TID, 3 g:1 g) showed slightly better antibacterial effect than cefoperazone/sulbactam (6 g, BID, 4 g:2 g) against the Escherichia coli (ESBL⁻) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL⁻). For the other tested bacteria, the above regimens achieved a similar PTA.

Conclusions: Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) showed similar bactericidal activity to sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] against the tested bacteria. For the ESBL-producing and cefoperazone-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae, Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) did not exhibit advantage as anticipated. Our study indicated that further clinical trials should be carried out cautiously to avoid the potential risks of not achieving the expected target.

Pharmacokinetics of benapenem for injection in subjects with mild to moderate renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of benapenem in subjects with mild to moderate renal impairment to provide a reference for benapenem dosing regimens in this patient population.

METHODS

Eighteen subjects were enrolled in this study. Each subject received a single dose of benapenem intravenously (1.0 g in 100 ml of 0.9% saline) followed by blood and urine collection to measure the concentrations of benapenem and its major metabolite. PK analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the PK characteristics of benapenem. The safety of benapenem was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In subjects with normal renal function, mild renal impairment, and moderate renal impairment, the maximum plasma benapenem concentrations were 163 ± 6.58 mg/L, 138 ± 17.4 mg/L, and 134 ± 0.11 mg/L, respectively (15.3% and 17.8% lower in subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment, respectively, than in subjects with normal renal function). The areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_0-inf) were 1153.67 ± 143.2 mg·h/L, 1129.17 ± 241.41 mg·h/L, and 1316.46 ± 229.83 mg·h/L, respectively (P > 0.05); the cumulative urinary excretion rates at 72 h after dosing were 52.61 ± 8.58%, 39.42 ± 8.35%, and 29.84 ± 9.15%, respectively; and the metabolic ratio (AUC_0-inf__KBP-3331/AUC_0-inf__benapenem) were 3.96 ± 0.35%, 5.56 ± 0.82%, and 8.24 ± 0.85%, respectively. No drug-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, or AEs leading to withdrawal occurred in this study.

CONCLUSION

No adjustment to benapenem dosing is needed in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Drug clinical trial registration and information publicity platform: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html .

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTR20190760.