1
|
Adaptive responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to treatment with antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 66:e0087821. [PMID: 34748386 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00878-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is among the highest priority pathogens for drug development, because of its resistance to antibiotics, extraordinary adaptability, and persistence. Anti-pseudomonal research is strongly encouraged to address the acute scarcity of innovative antimicrobial lead structures. In an effort to understand the physiological response of P. aeruginosa to clinically relevant antibiotics, we investigated the proteome after exposure to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, rifampicin, gentamicin, tobramycin, azithromycin, tigecycline, polymyxin B, colistin, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. We further investigated the response to CHIR-90, which represents a promising class of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis inhibitors currently under evaluation. Radioactive pulse-labeling of newly synthesized proteins followed by 2D-PAGE was used to monitor the acute response of P. aeruginosa to antibiotic treatment. The proteomic profiles provide insights into the cellular defense strategies for each antibiotic. A mathematical comparison of these response profiles based on upregulated marker proteins revealed similarities of responses to antibiotics acting on the same target area. This study provides insights into the effects of commonly used antibiotics on P. aeruginosa and lays the foundation for the comparative analysis of the impact of novel compounds with precedented and unprecedented modes of action.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zarechenskaia AS, Sergiev PV, Osterman IA. Quality Control Mechanisms in Bacterial Translation. Acta Naturae 2021; 13:32-44. [PMID: 34377554 PMCID: PMC8327144 DOI: 10.32607/actanaturae.11401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ribosome stalling during translation significantly reduces cell viability, because cells have to spend resources on the synthesis of new ribosomes. Therefore, all bacteria have developed various mechanisms of ribosome rescue. Usually, the release of ribosomes is preceded by hydrolysis of the tRNA-peptide bond, but, in some cases, the ribosome can continue translation thanks to the activity of certain factors. This review describes the mechanisms of ribosome rescue thanks to trans-translation and the activity of the ArfA, ArfB, BrfA, ArfT, HflX, and RqcP/H factors, as well as continuation of translation via the action of EF-P, EF-4, and EttA. Despite the ability of some systems to duplicate each other, most of them have their unique functional role, related to the quality control of bacterial translation in certain abnormalities caused by mutations, stress cultivation conditions, or antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. S. Zarechenskaia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics and Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow, 119992 Russia
| | - P. V. Sergiev
- Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, 143028 Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of functional genomics, Moscow, 119992 Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry, Moscow, 119992 Russia
| | - I. A. Osterman
- Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, 143028 Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry, Moscow, 119992 Russia
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Genetics and Life Sciences Research Center, Sochi, 354340 Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ren H, Liu Y, Zhou J, Long Y, Liu C, Xia B, Shi J, Fan Z, Liang Y, Chen S, Xu J, Wang P, Zhang Y, Zhu G, Liu H, Jin Y, Bai F, Cheng Z, Jin S, Wu W. Combination of Azithromycin and Gentamicin for Efficient Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J Infect Dis 2020; 220:1667-1678. [PMID: 31419286 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trans-translation is a ribosome rescue system that plays an important role in bacterial tolerance to environmental stresses. It is absent in animals, making it a potential treatment target. However, its role in antibiotic tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains unknown. METHODS The role and activity of trans-translation during antibiotic treatment were examined with a trans-translation-deficient strain and a genetically modified trans-translation component gene, respectively. In vitro assays and murine infection models were used to examine the effects of suppression of trans-translation. RESULTS We found that the trans-translation system plays an essential role in P. aeruginosa tolerance to azithromycin and multiple aminoglycoside antibiotics. We further demonstrated that gentamicin could suppress the azithromycin-induced activation of trans-translation. Compared with each antibiotic individually, gentamicin and azithromycin combined increased the killing efficacy against planktonic and biofilm-associated P. aeruginosa cells, including a reference strain PA14 and its isogenic carbapenem-resistance oprD mutant, the mucoid strain FRD1, and multiple clinical isolates. Furthermore, the gentamicin-azithromycin resulted in improved bacterial clearance in murine acute pneumonia, biofilm implant, and cutaneous abscess infection models. CONCLUSIONS Combination treatment with gentamicin and azithromycin is a promising strategy in combating P. aeruginosa infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yiwei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingyi Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuqing Long
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Chang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Bin Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Zheng Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuying Liang
- Department of Infection and Control, 307 hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuiping Chen
- Department of Infection and Control, 307 hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Xu
- NHC Key Laboratory of Hormones and Development (Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, and Diabetic foot Department, Tianjin Medical University Metabolic Disease Hospital and Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Penghua Wang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Hormones and Development (Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, and Diabetic foot Department, Tianjin Medical University Metabolic Disease Hospital and Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yanhong Zhang
- Nankai University Affiliated Hospital (Tianjin Forth Hospital), Tianjin, China
| | - Guangbo Zhu
- Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Huimin Liu
- Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yongxin Jin
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Fang Bai
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhihui Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Shouguang Jin
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Weihui Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kawalek A, Modrzejewska M, Zieniuk B, Bartosik AA, Jagura-Burdzy G. Interaction of ArmZ with the DNA-binding domain of MexZ induces expression of mexXY multidrug efflux pump genes and antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63:AAC.01199-19. [PMID: 31527038 PMCID: PMC6879243 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01199-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Multidrug efflux pumps play an important role in antibiotic resistance in bacteria. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MexXY pump provides intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including aminoglycosides. The expression of mexXY operon is negatively regulated by MexZ repressor. The repression is alleviated in response to the antibiotic-induced ribosome stress, which results in increased synthesis of anti-repressor ArmZ, interacting with MexZ. The molecular mechanism of MexZ inactivation by ArmZ is not known. Here, we showed that the N-terminal part of MexZ, encompassing the DNA-binding domain, is required for interaction with ArmZ. Using the bacterial two hybrid system based mutant screening and pull-down analyses we identified substitutions in MexZ that diminished (R3S, K6E, R13H) or completely impaired (K53E) the interaction with ArmZ without blocking MexZ activity as a transcriptional repressor. Introduction of corresponding mexZ missense mutations into P aeruginosa PAO1161 chromosome impaired (mexZ K6E, mexZ R13H) or blocked (mexZ K53E) tetracycline mediated induction of mexY expression. Concomitantly, PAO1161 mexZ K53E strain was more susceptible to aminoglycosides. The identified residues are highly conserved in MexZ-like transcriptional regulators found in bacterial genomes encoding both MexX/MexY/MexZ and ArmZ/PA5470 orthologs, suggesting that a similar mechanism may contribute to induction of efflux mediated resistance in other bacterial species. Overall, our data shed light on the molecular mechanism of ArmZ mediated induction of intrinsic antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kawalek
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Microbial Biochemistry, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Modrzejewska
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Microbial Biochemistry, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bartlomiej Zieniuk
- Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aneta Agnieszka Bartosik
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Microbial Biochemistry, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grazyna Jagura-Burdzy
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Microbial Biochemistry, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|