Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Treatment Optimization in Tuberculosis and Diabetes Mellitus Comorbidity

Tuberculosis-diabetes comorbidities: Mechanistic insights for clinical considerations and treatment challenges

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death among infectious diseases, particularly in poor countries. Viral infections, multidrug-resistant and ex-tensively drug-resistant TB strains, as well as the coexistence of chronic illnesses such as diabetes mellitus (DM) greatly aggravate TB morbidity and mortality. DM [particularly type 2 DM (T2DM)] and TB have converged making their control even more challenging. Two contemporary global epidemics, TB-DM behaves like a syndemic, a synergistic confluence of two highly prevalent diseases. T2DM is a risk factor for developing more severe forms of multi-drug resistant-TB and TB recurrence after preventive treatment. Since a bidirectional relationship exists between TB and DM, it is necessary to concurrently treat both, and promote recommendations for the joint management of both diseases. There are also some drug-drug interactions resulting in adverse treatment outcomes in TB-DM patients including treatment failure, and reinfection. In addition, autophagy may play a role in these comorbidities. Therefore, the TB-DM comorbidities present several health challenges, requiring a focus on multidisciplinary collaboration and integrated strategies, to effectively deal with this double burden. To effectively manage the comorbidity, further screening in affected countries, more suitable drugs, and better treatment strategies are required.

Development and Validation of a UPLC-MS/MS Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Pharmacokinetic and Stability Studies of First-Line Antituberculosis Drugs in Urine

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading global causes of mortality. Several methods have been established to detect anti-TB agents in human plasma and serum. However, there is a notable absence of studies analyzing TB drugs in urine. Thus, our objective was to validate a method for quantifying first-line anti-TB agents: isoniazid (INH), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethambutol (ETH), and rifampicin (RIF), along with its metabolite 25-desacetylrifampicin, and degradation products: rifampicin quinone and 3-formyl-rifampicin in 10 µL of urine. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Kinetex Polar C18 analytical column with gradient elution (5 mM ammonium acetate and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid). Mass spectrometry detection was carried out using a triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer operating in positive ion mode. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.5 µg/mL for INH, PZA, ETH, and RIF, and 0.1 µg/mL for RIF's metabolites and degradation products. The method was validated following FDA guidance criteria and successfully applied to the analysis of the studied compounds in urine of TB patients. Additionally, we conducted a stability study of the anti-TB agents under various pH and temperature conditions to mimic the urine collection process in different settings (peripheral clinics or central laboratories).

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ivacaftor, Lumacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Elexacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis: Where Are We Now?

Drugs modulating the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, namely ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor, are currently revolutionizing the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), particularly those with at least one F508del variant (up to 85% of patients). These “caftor” drugs are mainly metabolized by cytochromes P450 3A, whose enzymatic activity is influenced by environmental factors, and are sensitive to inhibition and induction. Hence, CFTR modulators are characterized by an important interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and are also prone to drug–drug interactions. However, these CFTR modulators are given at standardized dosages, while they meet all criteria for a formal therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program that should be considered in cases of clinical toxicity, less-than-expected clinical response, drug or food interactions, distinct patient subgroups (i.e., pediatrics), and for monitoring short-term adherence. While the information on CFTR drug exposure–clinical response relationships is still limited, we review the current evidence of the potential interest in the TDM of caftor drugs in real-life settings.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring During Tuberculosis Treatment

Tuberculosis (TB) patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are more likely to have low blood concentrations of the first-line anti-TB drugs (associated with poor outcomes). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for certain TB patient populations at increased risk for a poor outcome. Our objective was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of a 2-hour TDM serum sample for the first-line anti-TB drugs among HIV/TB patients, and evaluate the information gained by an additional 6-hour sample. We created a virtual (n = 1,000) HIV/TB patient population and performed pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations using published population models for isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. We performed receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of a single 2-hour serum sample with samples obtained at 2- and 6-hours post-dosing. The sensitivity of a single 2-hour serum concentration to identify HIV/TB patients with adequate serum exposures was lowest for rifampin (54.9%, 95% CI 50.79-59.41%) and highest for ethambutol (70.8%, 95% CI 66.06-72.61%) for C_max targets. Diagnostic accuracy of a single 2-hour serum sample for the AUC_0-24 target was highest for isoniazid (93%, 95% CI 90.9-94.1%) and lowest for pyrazinamide (66.3%, 95% CI 62.6-70.0%). In summary, the diagnostic performance of TDM for C_max and AUC_0-24 targets demonstrated variability across the first-line anti-TB drugs. The addition of a 6-hour serum sample lead to the highest statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) and highest increase in diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve) for rifampin for C_max and AUC. The other first-line drugs had modest/negligible increases in diagnostic accuracy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Tuberculosis and comorbidities: treatment challenges in patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus and depression

Tuberculosis is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, primarily affecting low- and middle income countries and individuals with limited-resources within fractured health care systems. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has only served to aggravate the already existing diagnostic gap, decreasing the number of people who get diagnosed and thereby complete successful treatment. In addition to this, comorbidities act as an external component that when added to the TB management equation, renders it even more complex. Among the various comorbidities that interact with TB disease, diabetes mellitus and depression are two of the most prevalent among non-communicable diseases within the TB population and merits a thoughtful consideration when the healthcare system provides care for them. TB patients with diabetes mellitus (TB-DM) or depression both have an increased risk of mortality, relapse and recurrence. Both of these diseases when in presence of TB present a ‘vicious-circle-like’ mechanism, meaning that the effect of each disease can negatively add up, in a synergistic manner, complicating the patient’s health state. Among TB-DM patients, high glucose blood levels can decrease the effectiveness of anti-tuberculosis drugs; however, higher doses of anti-tuberculous drugs could potentially decrease the effects of DM drugs. Among the TB-depression patients, not only do we have the adherence to treatment problems, but depression itself can biologically shift the immunological profile responsible for TB containment, and the other way around, TB itself can alter the hormonal balance of several neurotransmitters responsible for depression. In this paper, we review these and other important aspects such as the pharmacological interactions found in the treatment of TB-DM and TB-depression patients and the implication on TB care and pharmacological considerations.

Increased Moxifloxacin Dosing Among Patients With Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis With Low-Level Resistance to Moxifloxacin Did Not Improve Treatment Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center in Mumbai, India

Background

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains resistant to isoniazid and rifampin (multidrug-resistant tuberculosis [MDR-TB]) are increasingly reported worldwide, requiring renewed focus on the nuances of drug resistance. Patients with low-level moxifloxacin resistance may benefit from higher doses, but limited clinical data on this strategy are available.

Methods

We conducted a 5-year observational cohort study of MDR-TB patients at a tertiary care center in India. Participants with Mtb isolates resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, and moxifloxacin (at the 0.5 µg/mL threshold) were analyzed according to receipt of high-dose moxifloxacin (600 mg daily) as part of a susceptibility-guided treatment regimen. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models assessed the relationship between high-dose moxifloxacin and unfavorable treatment outcomes.

Results

Of 354 participants with MDR-TB resistant to moxifloxacin, 291 (82.2%) received high-dose moxifloxacin. The majority experienced good treatment outcomes (200 [56.5%]), which was similar between groups (56.7% vs 54.0%, P = .74). Unfavorable outcomes were associated with greater extent of radiographic disease, lower initial body mass index, and concurrent treatment with fewer drugs with confirmed phenotypic susceptibility. Treatment with high-dose moxifloxacin was not associated with improved outcomes in either unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .6–2.4]) or adjusted (HR, 0.8 [95% CI, .5–1.4]) models but was associated with joint pain (HR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.2–8.8]).

Conclusions

In a large observational cohort, adding high-dose (600 mg) moxifloxacin to a drug susceptibility test–based treatment regimen for MDR-TB was associated with increased treatment-associated side effects without improving overall outcomes and should be avoided for empiric treatment of moxifloxacin-resistant MDR-TB.

Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a major public health concern and requires prompt treatment. Goals of treatment include curing the individual patient and protecting the community from ongoing tuberculosis transmission. To achieve durable cure, regimens must include multiple agents given concurrently and in a manner to ensure completion of therapy. This article focuses on preferred regimens of drug-susceptible tuberculosis under current guidelines by the American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Infectious Diseases Society of America and World Health Organization. In addition, topics including patient centered care, poor treatment outcomes, and adverse effects are also discussed.