Chromosome-encoded extended-spectrum class A β-lactamase MIN-1 from Minibacterium massiliensis

Diversity and regulation of intrinsic β-lactamases from non-fermenting and other Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens

This review deeply addresses for the first time the diversity, regulation and mechanisms leading to mutational overexpression of intrinsic β-lactamases from non-fermenting and other non-Enterobacteriaceae Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens. After a general overview of the intrinsic β-lactamases described so far in these microorganisms, including circa. 60 species and 100 different enzymes, we review the wide array of regulatory pathways of these β-lactamases. They include diverse LysR-type regulators, which control the expression of β-lactamases from relevant nosocomial pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Stenothrophomonas maltophilia or two-component regulators, with special relevance in Aeromonas spp., along with other pathways. Likewise, the multiple mutational mechanisms leading to β-lactamase overexpression and β-lactam resistance development, including AmpD (N-acetyl-muramyl-L-alanine amidase), DacB (PBP4), MrcA (PPBP1A) and other PBPs, BlrAB (two-component regulator) or several lytic transglycosylases among others, are also described. Moreover, we address the growing evidence of a major interplay between β-lactamase regulation, peptidoglycan metabolism and virulence. Finally, we analyse recent works showing that blocking of peptidoglycan recycling (such as inhibition of NagZ or AmpG) might be useful to prevent and revert β-lactam resistance. Altogether, the provided information and the identified gaps should be valuable for guiding future strategies for combating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

A Structure-Based Classification of Class A β-Lactamases, a Broadly Diverse Family of Enzymes

For medical biologists, sequencing has become a commonplace technique to support diagnosis. Rapid changes in this field have led to the generation of large amounts of data, which are not always correctly listed in databases. This is particularly true for data concerning class A β-lactamases, a group of key antibiotic resistance enzymes produced by bacteria. Many genomes have been reported to contain putative β-lactamase genes, which can be compared with representative types. We analyzed several hundred amino acid sequences of class A β-lactamase enzymes for phylogenic relationships, the presence of specific residues, and cluster patterns. A clear distinction was first made between dd-peptidases and class A enzymes based on a small number of residues (S70, K73, P107, 130SDN132, G144, E166, 234K/R, 235T/S, and 236G [Ambler numbering]). Other residues clearly separated two main branches, which we named subclasses A1 and A2. Various clusters were identified on the major branch (subclass A1) on the basis of signature residues associated with catalytic properties (e.g., limited-spectrum β-lactamases, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and carbapenemases). For subclass A2 enzymes (e.g., CfxA, CIA-1, CME-1, PER-1, and VEB-1), 43 conserved residues were characterized, and several significant insertions were detected. This diversity in the amino acid sequences of β-lactamases must be taken into account to ensure that new enzymes are accurately identified. However, with the exception of PER types, this diversity is poorly represented in existing X-ray crystallographic data.