Comparative in vitro study of SQ26,776

The Chemical Relationship Among Beta-Lactam Antibiotics and Potential Impacts on Reactivity and Decomposition

Beta-lactam antibiotics remain one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes, but they are limited by their propensity to cause hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., from allergy to anaphylaxis) as well as by the emergence of bacteria with a myriad of resistance mechanisms such as β-lactamases. While development efforts continue to focus on overcoming resistance, there are ongoing concerns regarding cross-contamination of β-lactams during manufacturing and compounding of these drugs. Additionally, there is a need to reduce levels of drugs such as β-lactam antibiotics in waste-water to mitigate the risk of environmental exposure. To help address future development of effective remediation chemistries and processes, it is desired to better understand the structural relationship among the most common β-lactams. This study includes the creation of a class-wide structural ordering of the entire β-lactam series, including both United States Food and Drug Association (US-FDA)-approved drugs and experimental therapies. The result is a structural relational map: the "Lactamome," which positions each substance according to architecture and chemical end-group. We utilized a novel method to compare the structural relationships of β-lactam antibiotics among the radial cladogram and describe the positioning with respect to efficacy, resistance to hydrolysis, reported hypersensitivity, and Woodward height. The resulting classification scheme may help with the development of broad-spectrum treatments that reduce the risk of occupational exposure and negative environmental impacts, assist practitioners with avoiding adverse patient reactions, and help direct future drug research.

Sensitivity of 523 Blood Culture Isolates to 33 Antibiotics

523 blood culture isolates collected during 18 months (July 1980-December 1981) were analysed by the agar dilution method for sensitivity to 33 antibiotics. Breakpoints corresponding to the SIR system were used but for N-formimidoyl-thienamycin (N-f-thienamycin), azthreonam and fosfomycin serial dilutions were made. Aminoglycosides (netilmicin, gentamicin, amikacin and tobramycin) inhibited from 90 to 86% of the strains. This was comparable to the percentage inhibited by some cephalosporins (cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cephamandole and moxalactam) ranging from 95 to 89%. A very high number of strains (99%) were inhibited by N-f-thienamycin. By combination of certain antibiotics more than 99% of the strains could be inhibited.

Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam

Imipenem and meropenem, members of the carbapenem class of beta-lactam antibiotics, are among the most broadly active antibiotics available for systemic use in humans. They are active against streptococci, methicillin-sensitive staphylococci, Neisseria, Haemophilus, anaerobes, and the common aerobic gram-negative nosocomial pathogens including Pseudomonas. Resistance to imipenem and meropenem may emerge during treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, as has occurred with other beta-lactam agents; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is typically resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. Like the penicillins, the carbapenems have inhibitory activity against enterococci. In general, the in vitro activity of imipenem against aerobic gram-positive cocci is somewhat greater than that of meropenem, whereas the in vitro activity of meropenem against aerobic gram-negative bacilli is somewhat greater than that of imipenem. Daily dosages may range from 0.5 to 1 g every 6 to 8 hours in patients with normal renal function; the daily dose of meropenem, however, can be safely increased to 6 g. Infusion-related nausea and vomiting, as well as seizures, which have been the main toxic effects of imipenem, occur no more frequently during treatment with meropenem than during treatment with other beta-lactam antibiotics. The carbapenems should be considered for treatment of mixed bacterial infections and aerobic gram-negative bacteria that are not susceptible to other beta-lactam agents. Indiscriminate use of these drugs will promote resistance to them. Aztreonam, the first marketed monobactam, has activity against most aerobic gram-negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa. The drug is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; the primary route of elimination is urinary excretion. In patients with normal renal function, the recommended dosing interval is every 8 hours. Patients with renal impairment require dosage adjustment. Aztreonam is used primarily as an alternative to aminoglycosides and for the treatment of aerobic gram-negative infections. It is often used in combination therapy for mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism has been determined in patients who are seriously ill or at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infection.

The monobactams

The monobactam antibiotics are synthetic compounds, although monocyclic beta-lactam compounds have been found in nature in various soil bacteria. Although additional orally and parenterally administered monobactams are under investigation, the first marketed monobactam was aztreonam. This agent has an antimicrobial spectrum similar to that of gentamicin and tobramycin, aminoglycoside antibiotics. Aztreonam, however, is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; absorption after oral administration is poor. The primary route of elimination is the urine. The serum half-life of the drug in patients with normal renal function is 1.5 to 2.1 hours; the recommended dosing interval in patients with normal renal function is every 8 hours. Dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal impairment. The strictly gram-negative aerobic spectrum of aztreonam limits its use as a single empiric agent. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism (or organisms) has been determined in patients who are seriously ill and at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infections.

Use of third-generation cephalosporins. Pseudomonas

Although the frequency of infection with P. aeruginosa has declined in many centers treating neutropenic patients with cancer, infections still occur and can be accompanied by considerable morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patterns of infection can change again, and Pseudomonas may reemerge. Thus, in high-risk, immunocompromised patients, adequate bacterial coverage for P. aeruginosa should be part of any empiric regimen. Third-generation cephalosporins are an important part of the therapeutic armamentarium for the empiric management of neutropenic patients. Assuming a low level of resistance at a given center, however, only ceftazidime and cefoperazone possess sufficient antipseudomonal activity to be used for monotherapy. If other third-generation cephalosporins are used, it is imperative that an aminoglycoside or an antipseudomonal penicillin be added. But even when combined with an aminoglycoside, ceftriaxone would not be a good choice for neutropenic patients. It is an important agent in non-neutropenic hosts or in other immunocompromised patients in whom infection with Pseudomonas is unlikely to occur.

Effects of aztreonam on fecal flora and on vitamin K metabolism

The effects of aztreonam on fecal flora and on descarboxy prothrombin (PIVKA-II) in plasma and gamma-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) in urine as an index of vitamin K metabolism were studied in seven children (age range, 2 months to 2 years) with urinary tract infections. Daily doses of aztreonam were 60 to 80 mg/kg. Stool specimens were obtained before the treatment, on days 3 to 5 of aztreonam use, and from 3 to 5 days after the cessation of treatment. The counts of enterobacteria decreased (P less than 0.01) and those of streptococci increased (P less than 0.05) during aztreonam treatment. The anaerobic organisms, especially bifidobacteria and bacteroides, showed no marked change. PIVKA-II and Gla were investigated before and during the treatment with aztreonam. PIVKA-II was not detected in seven patients before or during aztreonam use. There were no significant differences in the levels of Gla in urine before or during the treatment.

Aztreonam activity, pharmacology, and clinical uses

Aztreonam, the first monobactam, has been used extensively in the treatment of a variety of infections caused by gram-negative pathogens. It has been shown to be highly effective against susceptible bacteria without causing serious adverse reactions. Its pharmacologic profile can be attributed to its unique chemical properties and mechanisms of action, which differ substantially from those of the bicyclic beta-lactams, such as the penicillins and cephalosporins. Administered parenterally, aztreonam provides peak serum concentrations for most Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It is widely distributed throughout the body. Excretion is largely dependent on renal mechanisms, so dosage can be adjusted in the presence of renal impairment. The clinical uses of aztreonam include treatment of urinary tract, lower respiratory tract, and intraabdominal infections, as well as septicemia, endometritis, pelvic cellulitis, and skin and skin structure infections due to aerobic gram-negative organisms. It is concluded that aztreonam can be used with confidence in the single-drug treatment of susceptible aerobic, gram-negative pathogens. In the treatment of mixed infections, or those of unknown etiology, however, combination therapy is recommended to ensure coverage of gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria.

A comparison of monobactam antibiotics in surgical infections

The introduction of gentamicin almost 20 years ago provided an effective option for the treatment of gram-negative bacillary infections. During the past few years, the availability of aztreonam (a monobactam), imipenem (a carbapenem), and newer cephalosporins within vitro activities comparable with aminoglycosides against many gram-negative bacilli, has stimulated a reassessment of the role of aminoglycosides in treating these infections. When determining the role of new antimicrobials as potential replacements for more established agents, the clinical focus should be on three factors: comparative efficacy, safety, and cost. Consideration of cost is relevant only when efficacy and safety are equivalent. Other factors, such as comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, and effect on normal flora can also influence the selection of an antimicrobial regimen. A new class of antimicrobials, the monobactams, is the focus of this review. The only member of this class currently in clinical use is aztreonam. A comparison with aminoglycosides is particularly relevant because aztreonam is active against aerobic gram-negative bacilli. This review will discuss the acknowledged concerns with aminoglycoside use and compare the characteristics of aztreonam and currently marketed aminoglycosides.

Aztreonam: the first monobactam

There are several areas in which the use of aztreonam seems logical. Infections caused by organisms sensitive to aztreonam that are known to be multiresistant to other agents can be treated directly with aztreonam in single, directed therapy, thus making the use of more toxic agents unnecessary. In types of infection in which both gram positive and gram negative bacteria are present, aztreonam can replace the usual aminoglycoside component of the therapeutic regimen. In settings of mixed infections suspected of being caused by drug-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and/or P. aeruginosa, aztreonam can be combined with an agent active against gram positive organisms or with one active against anaerobes. Aztreonam has proven to be effective, safe therapy for serious and life-threatening infections caused by multiresistant aerobic gram negative bacteria. It should be used in combination with drugs that inhibit gram positive species if the etiology of the infection is not known, particularly in the immunocompromised, neutropenic patient. Doses of 1 g every 8 to 12 hours will be adequate for treatment of infections caused by most Enterobacteriaceae. Whether 2 g doses every 8 hours would be preferred for treatment of systemic Pseudomonas infections remains to be determined. Urinary infections caused by gram negative bacteria can be treated with 500 mg administered IM once or twice daily. The dosage of aztreonam should be adjusted in patients with renal failure. Clearly, aztreonam is a useful addition to the antimicrobial agents available to the physician.

In vitro susceptibility of Citrobacter species to various antimicrobial agents

The in vitro activities of 16 antimicrobial agents against 14 clinical isolates of Citrobacter diversus and 27 isolates of Citrobacter freundii were studied. C. freundii isolates were more resistant, being susceptible only to amikacin, netilmicin, gentamicin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and enoxacin. C. diversus isolates were susceptible to many more of the agents tested.

Pharmacokinetics and plasma bactericidal activity of aztreonam in low-birth-weight infants

Aztreonam (30 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 12 h during week 1 and every 8 h during weeks 2 to 4 of life to 26 low-birth-weight (less than 2,000 g) infants, and plasma concentration-time curves were measured on two occasions. The pharmacokinetics were described equally well by one-compartment and noncompartment models, and the values on day 1 were similar to those measured during the steady state on days 3 to 6. The mean peak plasma concentrations at completion of the 10-min infusion were from 65 to 83 micrograms/ml, the higher concentrations being seen in the larger infants. The half-lives of aztreonam ranged from 5.4 to 8.6 h and did not change significantly with birth weight. The median peak and trough plasma bactericidal titer against a strain of Escherichia coli (MBC, 10 micrograms/ml) was 1:16. Against a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MBC, 16 micrograms/ml), the median peak and trough bactericidal titers were 1:8 to 1:16 and 1:4, respectively. The urinary concentrations of aztreonam on day 1 of therapy were from 24 to 460.7 micrograms/ml (mean +/- 1 standard deviation, 254 +/- 113 micrograms/ml).

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in children with cystic fibrosis

The single-dose pharmacokinetics of aztreonam was evaluated in 10 clinically stable subjects with cystic fibrosis. Each child received 30 mg aztreonam/kg intravenously over 2 to 3 minutes. Multiple timed blood samples were obtained over 8 hours for determination of aztreonam elimination kinetics; all urine excreted for 24 hours was collected in timed aliquots for the determination of aztreonam and its microbiologically inactive metabolite, SQ 26,992. Aztreonam pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by model-independent methods. Mean t1/2, steady-state volume distribution, and body clearance were 1.3 hr, 0.25 L/kg, and 127.2 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. In 9 of the 10 subjects, two-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis was possible and compared favorably with model-independent parameter estimates. Twenty-four-hour urinary recovery of aztreonam was 76.3% of the administered dose; 2.6% was recovered as the metabolite SQ 26,992. The renal clearance of aztreonam averaged 92.5 ml/min/1.73m2. When these data are combined with in vitro susceptibility data for aztreonam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis, a dose of 200 mg aztreonam/kg/day divided six hourly would be predicted to maintain serum concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for these organisms for the majority of the dosing interval.

Aztreonam therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer

Combinations of aztreonam/vancomycin, aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin, and moxalactam/ticarcillin were compared in a prospective randomized trial as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Vancomycin was added to aztreonam to provide coverage against gram-positive organisms. Of 535 febrile episodes included in the study, 455 were evaluable. The aztreonam/vancomycin and aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin combinations were both more effective than the moxalactam/ticarcillin combination in a total of 244 episodes of documented infection. The difference was due to the fact that both aztreonam-containing combinations were more effective than the moxalactam/ticarcillin combination in documented gram-positive infections. The three regimens were equally effective in 67 documented infections due to a single gram-negative bacterial species. (The response rates were 87, 86 and 94 percent for the aztreonam/vancomycin, aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin, and moxalactam/ticarcillin combinations, respectively.) Aztreonam was effective as the single active antibiotic in the treatment of gram-negative infections in neutropenic patients; however, it must be used in combination with another antibiotic to provide gram-positive coverage.

Aztreonam

Aztreonam is a new, totally synthetic beta-lactamase agent--the first monobactam. It is highly resistant to hydrolytic inactivation caused by plasmid-mediated (except PSE-2 enzyme found in some Pseudomonas species) or chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases (except for K1 produced by rare strains of Klebsiella oxytoca). Accordingly, aztreonam remains active against many pathogens that are resistant to other beta-lactam antibiotics. The drug exhibits directed antibacterial activity against gram-negative organisms and is effective as monotherapy against most Enterobacteriaceae and Hemophilus and Neisseria species, including beta-lactamase-producing strains; it is not active against anaerobes or gram-positive organisms. Before culture results are known, it may be necessary to administer the agent empirically in combination with other antibiotics. Aztreonam is rapidly distributed to most body tissues and fluids when administered parenterally. Its serum half-life is 1.7 hours, suggesting a dosing interval of 6-8 hours for severe or life-threatening infections and 8-12 hours for moderately severe infections and urinary tract infections. It is primarily eliminated unchanged in the urine and in much lesser amounts as a microbiologically inactive metabolite; slight biliary excretion may occur. Aztreonam is well-tolerated, lacking any serious adverse hematologic, otic, or renal system effects. Its lack of effect on anaerobes helps to maintain resistance against colonization. Particularly in light of its safety and unique properties, aztreonam promises to be a useful alternative to aminoglycoside therapy.

Aztreonam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Aztreonam (azthreonam; SQ 26,776) is the first member of a new class of beta-lactam antibiotics, the monobactams. Aztreonam is selectively active against Gram-negative aerobic bacteria and inactive against Gram-positive bacteria. Thus, in vitro, aztreonam is inhibitory at low concentrations (MIC90 less than or equal to 1.6 mg/L) against Enterobacteriaceae except Enterobacter species, and is active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 90% of pseudomonads being inhibited by 12 to 32 mg/L. Aztreonam is inactive against Gram-positive aerobic bacteria and anaerobes, including Bacteroides fragilis. Therefore, when administered alone, aztreonam has minimal effect on indigenous faecal anaerobes. Aztreonam must be administered intravenously or intramuscularly when used to treat systemic infections, since absolute bioavailability is very low (about 1%) after oral administration. Since elimination half-life is less than 2 hours, 6- or 8-hourly administration is used in the treatment of moderately severe or severe infections, although 12-hourly injection is adequate in less severe systemic and some urinary tract infections. Therapeutic trials have shown aztreonam to be effective in Gram-negative infections including complicated infections of the urinary tract, in lower respiratory tract infections and in gynaecological and obstetric, intra-abdominal, joint and bone, skin and soft tissue infections, uncomplicated gonorrhoea and septicaemia. In comparisons with other antibiotics, aztreonam has been at least as effective or more effective than cefamandole in urinary tract infections and similar in efficacy to tobramycin or gentamicin. Where necessary, aztreonam and the standard drug have both been combined with another antibiotic active against Gram-positive and/or anaerobic bacteria. Aztreonam has been effective in eradicating pseudomonal infections in most patients (except in patients with cystic fibrosis), but the inevitably limited number of pseudomonal infections available for study prevents any conclusions as to the relative efficacy of aztreonam compared with other appropriate regimens against these infections. Thus, with an antibacterial spectrum which differs from that of other antibiotics, aztreonam should be a useful alternative to aminoglycosides or 'third generation' cephalosporins in patients with proven or suspected serious Gram-negative infections.

Single-agent therapy for infections in neutropenic cancer patients

The initial therapy of febrile neutropenic cancer patients is an evolving, interesting, and important area of medical research. The introduction of carbenicillin provided the clinician with an antibiotic that had significant activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Prior to the availability of this drug, neutropenic patients with bacteremia due to this organism did no better with antibiotic therapy than without it. Since then, several agents including carboxy- and ureidopenicillins, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems have appeared on the scene and strengthened our therapeutic armamentarium. Since some of them have an expanded spectrum of activity, they have been widely utilized for combination therapy. More recently, several clinical trials have addressed the feasibility of using them alone as initial empiric therapy in these patients. Some of the studies have achieved good results, especially when treating gram-negative infections, although these results should be interpreted with caution, since the studies were usually conducted under controlled conditions. These trials have, however, not been as successful when treating gram-positive organisms, which have again become an important cause of infection in these patients; in some of them, a specific antibiotic against these organisms had to be added. How will this approach utilizing newer antibiotics compare against a more conventional regimen of two synergistic agents? Hopefully, this will be better investigated and defined in the near future.

Review of the in vitro spectrum of activity of imipenem

Imipenem (N-formimidoyl thienamycin, MK0787), a new carbapenem was found to have the widest antimicrobial activity of currently available beta-lactam drugs. Enterobacteriaceae had minimal inhibitory concentrations of imipenem of 8.0 micrograms/ml or less for 99.8 percent of clinical isolates. Only rare strains of Enterobacter species and Proteus mirabilis have higher imipenem minimal inhibitory concentration results. Hemophilus and Neisseria species were inhibited, but minimal inhibitory concentrations of imipenem were higher than those reported for third-generation cephalosporins. Only Pseudomonas maltophilia and Pseudomonas cepacia strains were imipenem resistant (MIC50 greater than 32 micrograms/ml) among the commonly isolated non-enteric gram-negative bacilli. All anaerobes were found susceptible to imipenem with the exception of some strains of Clostridium difficile. Staphylococcus species and non-enterococcal streptococci were very susceptible to imipenem. Streptococcus faecalis had higher minimal inhibitory concentrations of imipenem (MIC90 3.1 micrograms/ml) and S. faecium strains were frankly resistant. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates had a MIC90 of 27.2 micrograms imipenem/ml. Imipenem was generally bactericidal except for marked minimal inhibitory and minimal bactericidal concentration differences with enterococci, Listeria, methicillin-resistant staphylococci, and some P. aeruginosa strains. The minimal inhibitory and minimal bactericidal concentrations of imipenem were not significantly influenced by organism inoculum size, probably because of its beta-lactamase stability to nearly all commonly encountered bacterial enzymes. Imipenem was found to be an excellent inhibitor of beta-lactamases and a potent enzyme inducer. The induction characteristic seems responsible for the antagonistic interactions of imipenem with some enzyme-labile beta-lactams in combination. Imipenem had limited stability in some in vitro susceptibility test systems. The 10 micrograms disk test or dry-form broth micro-dilution systems were preferred, applying the interpretive criteria from the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (M2-A3). Imipenem-resistant strains were rarely found in clinical practice and bacteria resistant to newer beta-lactams and aminoglycosides were generally very susceptible to this new carbapenem.

Aztreonam therapy in experimental meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae type b and Escherichia coli K1

The penetration of aztreonam into cerebrospinal fluid was 7 to 15% and 9 to 25%, respectively, in experimental Haemophilus influenzae type b and Escherichia coli K1 meningitis. Aztreonam was effective in reducing the number of organisms in cerebrospinal fluid after single-dose and continuous infusion administration, and the median bactericidal titers in cerebrospinal fluid were 1:32 against both meningeal pathogens.

Effect of aztreonam on throat and stool flora of cancer patients

Eighteen patients with hematological malignancies received aztreonam in one of two dosing regimens, 1 or 2 g every 8 h for a total of 7 to 9 days. Throat and stool cultures were obtained before and during treatment with aztreonam. Aztreonam had little effect on the predominant throat flora. In contrast, facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli were markedly decreased in stools during the administration of aztreonam. Strict anaerobes in the stool were variably affected by aztreonam.

Effect of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis on aztreonam pharmacokinetics

Aztreonam, a new monobactam, will be widely used because of its broad aerobic gram-negative bacterial coverage and its apparent low risk of allergic phenomena in penicillin/cephalosporin-sensitive patients. We examined aztreonam kinetics in patients during hemodialysis and in the interdialytic period and in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and related aztreonam to urea clearance (CL). In hemodialysis patients, aztreonam serum half-life was 7.9 hr between and 2.7 hr during dialysis sessions. CLserum, CLrenal, and CLother were 24.4, 0.5, and 23.9 ml/min, respectively, during the interdialytic period. Four hours of dialysis removed 38.2% (range, 27 to 58%) of antibiotic. CL of aztreonam by hemodialysis was 36.6 to 43.2 ml/min, 50 to 77% greater than interdialytic CL. CL of urea by hemodialysis was 112.4 to 115.6 ml/min; CLaztreonam/CLurea ratio was 0.28 to 0.33 during the hemodialysis sessions. During CAPD, aztreonam serum half-life after intravenous dosing was 7.1 hr; dialysate recovery, 9.7% of the dose; CLserum, CLrenal, CLperitoneal dialysis, and CLother were 23.8, 0.5, 2.1, and 21.3 ml/min, respectively. CLurea by CAPD was 6.5 ml/min. Thus, CLaztreonam during CAPD was 32% of CLurea. Aztreonam was detectable in dialysate at 48 hr (eight exchanges) after peritoneal administration in the first exchange. Hemodialysis and CAPD patients given aztreonam treatment should receive the standard dose of aztreonam as a loading dose, followed by one-fourth the loading dose at standard dose intervals. Hemodialysis patients should receive a supplemental dose equal to half their usual maintenance dose immediately after each dialysis session. For CAPD patients with peritonitis due to susceptible organisms, a 1-g i.v. loading dose followed by a 0.5-g i.p. dose every 6 hr is suggested. In any individual patient undergoing hemodialysis or CAPD, the relationship between CLurea and CLaztreonam should allow appropriate antibiotic dose adjustment.

Treatment of gram-negative infections with aztreonam

Twenty-one patients with serious gram-negative infections were treated with aztreonam. Twenty of these were clinical and microbiologic cures; there was one clinical improvement with microbiologic persistence. No bacteria became resistant. Cure rates were: bone and joint (11 of 11); skin and soft tissue (six of six); pneumonia (two of two); perinephric abscess (one of one); and intra-abdominal abscess (zero of one). The bacteria responsible for these infections included Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12), Serratia marcescens (two), Enterobacter gergoviae (three), Enterobacter aerogenes (two), Escherichia coli (one), Citrobacter diversus (one), and Hemophilus influenzae (one). Aztreonam was well tolerated. Significant serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase elevations developed in three patients, but none was symptomatic and all resolved after therapy was stopped. Two patients in whom a rash developed were receiving other antibiotics (vancomycin and metronidazole), making the cause of the rash unclear. Diarrhea developed in a single patient with Pseudomonas osteomyelitis, who also was receiving cefazolin for Staphylococcus aureus superinfection of his decubitus ulcer. Aztreonam was highly effective against gram-negative bacilli, including P. aeruginosa. The only clear-cut side effect was an asymptomatic rise in serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase levels in three patients.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in cancer patients

The pharmacokinetics of aztreonam were studied in 25 adult patients with hematological malignancies. Two groups of nine patients each received aztreonam (1 or 2 g every 8 h) prophylactically, and seven infected patients received a therapeutic regimen of aztreonam (1.5 g every 4 h). The mean peak serum concentration after a 1-g dose of aztreonam (given over 0.5 h on day 1) was 75.5 micrograms/ml; after a 2-g dose it was 177.2 micrograms/ml. The mean peak serum concentration after a 1.5-g dose of aztreonam (given over 2 h on day 1) was 68.5 micrograms/ml. The serum half-life ranged between 1.7 and 2.0 h for all regimens studied. The urinary concentration of the metabolite of aztreonam, SQ 26,992, increased during 1 week of administration of the drug; however, serum levels of the metabolite were barely detectable.

Effectiveness of aztreonam for the treatment of gonorrhea

Aztreonam, 1 g intramuscularly, was compared with spectinomycin, 2 g intramuscularly, for uncomplicated gonorrhea. There were no failures with either drug. For aztreonam, there were 26 urethral, 3 rectal, and 3 endocervical sites that were infected. Aztreonam in a single dose of 1 g intramuscularly is satisfactory therapy for uncomplicated urethral gonorrhea in men and may be effective for rectal and endocervical infection as well.

Efficacy and safety of aztreonam-clindamycin versus tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli

A total of 80 patients were randomized to receive either aztreonam or tobramycin for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by gram-negative bacilli; all these patients received clindamycin concomitantly. A total of 53 patients were randomized to receive aztreonam-clindamycin; of these, 46 were clinically evaluable and 39 were bacteriologically evaluable. Of the 46 clinically evaluable patients, 41 were considered cured, 3 failed to be cured, and 2 died during the study period of unrelated causes. Of the 39 bacteriologically evaluable patients, 36 were considered cured, and 3 failed to be cured. There were 26 clinically evaluable patients in the group randomized to receive tobramycin-clindamycin. Of them, 22 patients were considered cured, 3 failed to be cured, and 1 died of unrelated causes during the study period. There were 18 bacteriologically evaluable patients in the tobramycin-clindamycin group; 17 were cured, and 1 failed to be cured. The most common pathogens isolated from the patients were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All of the isolated organisms were susceptible to both tested antibiotics, except for a strain of Pseudomonas cepacia resistant to both tested antimicrobial agents and a strain of Enterobacter aerogenes and one of P. aeruginosa that were resistant to aztreonam. Very few adverse reactions related to the antibiotics were seen. These effects, when present, were transient and comparable in both studied groups, except for renal-function tests, which were altered in 7.7% of the patients randomized to receive tobramycin-clindamycin and in none of the patients randomized to receive aztreonam-clindamycin. Aztreonam-clindamycin is safe and effective for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli when the organisms are susceptible.

Ceftazidime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Ceftazidime is a new 'third generation' cephalosporin administered intravenously or intramuscularly. Similarly to other third generation cephalosporins it has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, is particularly active against Enterobacteriaceae (including beta-lactamase-positive strains) and is resistant to hydrolysis by most beta-lactamases. Importantly, in vitro ceftazidime is presently the most active cephalosporin available against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but it is less active against Staphylococcus aureus than first and second generation cephalosporins. Only larger comparative trials are likely to discern any statistically significant differences in clinical efficacy which may exist between ceftazidime and other antibiotics, but ceftazidime appears to be similar in efficacy to 'standard' comparative drugs in lower respiratory tract infections and complicated and/or chronic urinary tract infections among debilitated or hospitalised patients. Thus, in patients having Gram-negative infections at these sites and in whom the potential toxicity of the aminoglycosides is a concern, ceftazidime may be a valuable alternative in that it apparently lacks serious side effects and does not require routine drug plasma concentration monitoring. In fibrocystic patients having acute respiratory tract infections, ceftazidime is highly effective at both reducing symptoms of infection and temporarily reducing the sputum counts of Pseudomonas species. However, in these patients resistance to ceftazidime may develop, as seen with other beta-lactam antibiotics. In the treatment of fever of unknown origin or documented infections in immunocompromised adults and children, ceftazidime appears to be similar in efficacy to various 2- or 3-drug combinations. Nevertheless, the coadministration of an antibiotic having greater efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria should be considered in immunocompromised patients. Results from a small number of comparative trials suggest that ceftazidime may be as effective as the aminoglycosides in intra-abdominal, obstetric and gynaecological, and skin and soft tissue infections. However, further clinical experience, particularly a few well designed comparative studies, is needed to clarify the comparative efficacy in these conditions as well as in septicaemia/bacteraemia, meningitis, and bone and joint infections.

Comparative in vitro activity of temocillin

The antibacterial activity of temocillin, a novel beta-lactam antibiotic, was tested against 796 clinical isolates. We also conducted a comparative study against 8 other antibiotics. Temocillin exhibited good activity against Gram-negative organisms including Escherichia coli, and the genera Proteus, Enterobacter, Serratia, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, Providencia, Salmonella, Shigella and Haemophilus: 98% of the strains were inhibited by concentrations less than or equal to 16 mg/L. The results of this in vitro study and temocillin's favourable pharmacokinetic properties suggest that temocillin is a very promising penicillin for the treatment of hospital infections caused by Gram-negative organisms.

Pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in patients with chronic renal failure

The elimination kinetics of aztreonam (SQ 26,776), a new, completely synthetic, monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotic, were studied after the administration of a single 1g intravenous dose. Five healthy volunteers and 20 patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency were enrolled in this study. Concentrations of aztreonam in serum and urine were determined by both microbiological and high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays. The pharmacokinetic parameters for aztreonam were calculated on the basis of a 2-compartment open model. Serum concentrations of aztreonam at 10 minutes after administration were approximately 100 micrograms/ml in all subjects, regardless of renal function (HPLC assay). The mean serum half-life during the alpha-phase showed no important variation with renal function. The mean serum half-life during the beta-phase was 1.8 hours in normal subjects and 8.4 hours in haemodialysis patients (HPLC assay). There was a linear correlation between the serum clearance of aztreonam and creatinine clearance. The mean cumulative urinary recovery of aztreonam in 48 hours was 60 to 70% of the administered dose in normal subjects but this was reduced in the presence of renal insufficiency. SQ 26,992, the microbiologically inactive metabolite of aztreonam resulting from hydrolytic opening of the beta-lactam ring, was undetectable in the serum of normal subjects but was found in low levels in uraemic patients. Half of a 1g intravenous dose of aztreonam was eliminated during 4 hours of haemodialysis. Guidelines for administration of aztreonam in the presence of renal failure are given.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in pediatric patients

Single intravenous doses (30 mg/kg) of aztreonam, a novel monobactam antibiotic, were administered to 29 children from 2 days to 11 years old. Serum, urine, and, when possible, cerebrospinal fluid samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography and microbiological methods. The concentration of aztreonam in serum 15 min after drug administration was approximately 100 micrograms/ml in all age groups. The elimination half-life varied inversely, and the clearance from serum varied directly, with age. Aztreonam pharmacokinetics in 2- to 12-year-olds were similar to those in adults. The concentration in urine was high and prolonged, with potentially therapeutic concentrations still present 12 to 24 h after infusion in all age groups. Penetration into cerebrospinal fluid averaged 17.3% in children with inflamed meninges. Standard clinical and laboratory measurements revealed no untoward reactions. The 30-mg/kg dose of aztreonam produced potentially therapeutic concentrations in serum, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. A dosage schedule of every 6 to 8 h in older children and every 8 to 12 h in neonates is suggested for multiple-dose clinical trials.

Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use

Ceftriaxone is a new 'third generation' semisynthetic cephalosporin with a long half-life which has resulted in a recommended once daily administration schedule. It is administered intravenously or intramuscularly and has a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic, and some anaerobic, bacteria. The activity of ceftriaxone is generally greater than that of the 'first' and 'second generation' cephalosporins against Gram-negative bacteria, but less than that of the earlier generations of cephalosporins against many Gram-positive bacteria. Although ceftriaxone has some activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, on the basis of present evidence it cannot be recommended as sole antibiotic therapy in pseudomonal infections. Ceftriaxone has been effective in treating infections due to other 'difficult' organisms such as multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Ceftriaxone was effective in complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, skin, soft tissue, bone and joint infections, bacteraemia/septicaemia, and paediatric meningitis due to susceptible organisms. In most of these types of infections once-daily administration appears efficacious. Results were also encouraging in a few patients with ear, nose and throat, intra-abdominal, obstetric and gynaecological infections, and adult meningitis, but conclusions are not yet possible as to the efficacy of the drug in these indications due to limited experience. A single intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone has been compared with standard therapy for gonorrhoea due to non-penicillinase-producing and penicillinase-producing strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and shown to be highly effective. In a few small trials the comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone and other antibacterials has been assessed in other types of infections and in perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery. Few significant differences in response rates were found between therapeutic groups in these comparative studies, but larger well-designed studies are needed to more clearly assess the comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone and other antimicrobials, especially the aminoglycosides and other 'third generation' cephalosporins, and to confirm the apparent lack of serious side effects with ceftriaxone. If more widespread use confirms the safety and efficacy of ceftriaxone, it will offer an important alternative, particularly for the treatment of serious infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and in situations where the long half-life of the drug could result in worthwhile convenience and cost benefits.

In vitro antimicrobial activity of aztreonam alone and in combination against bacterial isolates from pediatric patients

We examined 134 pediatric clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and gram-positive cocci for susceptibility to aztreonam alone and in combination with seven other antibiotics. All 98 gram-negative isolates were susceptible to aztreonam with similar inhibitory and bactericidal activity. Combinations of aztreonam with cefoxitin, ampicillin, or clindamycin were generally indifferent or additive. Synergism was occasionally seen against enteric organisms with aztreonam plus cefoxitin or clindamycin. Combinations of tobramycin and aztreonam were synergistic (62%) against P. aeruginosa; aztreonam plus piperacillin or ticarcillin was additive. Aztreonam did not affect the activity of nafcillin against Staphylococcus aureus, or of ampicillin against species of Streptococcus group B or D. Antagonism was seen only with aztreonam plus cefoxitin against Enterobacter species, but not at clinically significant concentrations. Several combinations of antibiotics with aztreonam should be appropriate for initial therapy of infections in children without major risks of antibacterial antagonism.

Evaluation of aztreonam in experimental bacterial meningitis and cerebritis

Aztreonam (SQ 26,776), a new monocyclic beta-lactam agent, was compared with ampicillin, ampicillin plus chloramphenicol, and gentamicin in rabbits with experimental meningitis induced by, respectively, ampicillin-susceptible Haemophilus influenzae, ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae, and Escherichia coli. Aztreonam was also compared with gentamicin in experimentally induced E. coli cerebritis in rats. Doses of the various agents were delivered that produced near-peak concentrations in serum comparable to those attained in humans on standard parenteral regimens. The percent penetration [( concentration in cerebrospinal fluid/concentration in serum] X 100) of aztreonam into purulent rabbit cerebrospinal fluid was 23% (versus 12, 27, and 21%, respectively, for ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin). In experimental meningitis in vivo, aztreonam was more rapidly bactericidal than was ampicillin in ampicillin-susceptible H. influenzae meningitis, ampicillin or chloramphenicol in ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae meningitis, or gentamicin in E. coli meningitis. In the therapy of experimental cerebritis, the early stage of brain abscess formation, aztreonam reduced the numbers of E. coli in rat brain as rapidly as did gentamicin. Aztreonam deserves further evaluation in acute gram-negative bacterial infections of the central nervous system in both experimental animals and in humans.

Azthreonam: in vitro activity against urinary pathogens

The in vitro activity of azthreonam, a novel monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotic, was investigated for Gram negative urinary pathogens by determining the susceptibilities of 105 consecutive isolates from specimens submitted to the Auckland Hospital microbiology laboratory. All were sensitive or of intermediate sensitivity by disc diffusion testing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were 0.25 mg/l for 97 per cent of Enterobacteriaceae and ranged from 2-16 mg/l for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Of antibiotics tested routinely in this laboratory only tobramycin showed comparable potency.

Comparative in vitro study of teichomycin A2

Teichomycin A2 was evaluated in vitro against clinical isolates, and its activity was compared with that of other antibiotics. This compound was very active against all organisms tested; its activity was comparable to that of vancomycin, and it was superior to several other antibiotics when tested against gram-positive cocci. Because of its in vitro activity, it deserves clinical evaluation.

In vitro activity of azthreonam, a monobactam antibiotic

We studied the activity of azthreonam (SQ 26,776), a novel monocyclic beta-lactam compound, against a variety of clinical isolates. It was more potent than moxalactam, cefoperazone, cefamandole, cefoxitin, ticarcillin, tobramycin, or amikacin against strains of Klebsiella spp., Serratia spp., and the Proteus group. It was highly effective against Escherichia coli and strains of Salmonella spp. The median minimal inhibitory concentration for all species of Enterobacteriaceae was less than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml. Azthreonam was moderately active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including tobramycin-resistant strains, and against Pseudomonas cepacia (median minimal inhibitory concentration, 16 to 32 micrograms/ml), but was weakly active against Pseudomonas maltophilia and strains of Acinetobacter spp. and Achromobacter spp. The drug showed little activity against Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, and anaerobic bacteria, including Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium spp., and gram-positive cocci. Like moxalactam and cefoperazone, azthreonam exhibited a considerable inoculum effect with strains of Enterobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Combination with clavulanic acid did not increase the activity of azthreonam against S. aureus but was synergistic for 5 of 15 strains of B. fragilis. Azthreonam is about 50% bound to human serum protein. The selective range of activity of this compound could be of clinical benefit.

In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila against new antibiotics

The antibiotic susceptibilities of 16 clinical isolates of Aeromonas hydrophila obtained from cancer patients with septicemia were studied. Of the new beta-lactam antibiotics tested, azthreonam and moxalactam were the most active, followed by cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and ceftizoxime. Excellent activity was demonstrated by chloroamphenicol, tetracycline, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Semisynthetic penicillins had no appreciable activity against this organism.