In vitro activity of cefbuperazone compared with that of other new beta-lactam agents against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance

Susceptibilities of 394 Bacteroides fragilis, non-B. fragilis group Bacteroides species, and Fusobacterium species to newer antimicrobial agents

The susceptibilities of 374 selected beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative anaerobes (including 22 cefoxitin-resistant strains and 36 strains refractory to the enhancing effect of beta-lactamase inhibitors) and 20 beta-lactamase-negative strains were tested by agar dilution against selected new agents. The organisms included 217 Bacteroides fragilis group strains, 137 non-B. fragilis group Bacteroides spp., and 40 fusobacteria. All strains were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem. For the B. fragilis group, 96% were susceptible to ampicillin-sulbactam, 95% were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefoperazone-sulbactam, 94% were susceptible to tosufloxacin, 91% were susceptible to cefoxitin, 88% were susceptible to trospectomycin, and 73% were susceptible to cefotetan. For the beta-lactamase-positive non-B. fragilis group Bacteroides spp., greater than or equal to 94% were susceptible to cefoxitin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, and trospectomycin, 90% were susceptible to cefotetan, and 85% were susceptible to tosufloxacin (the most resistant strains were B. bivius and B. disiens). For the beta-lactamase-positive fusobacteria, greater than or equal to 97% were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, trospectomycin, and cefoxitin, 90% were susceptible to cefotetan, and 89% were susceptible to tosufloxacin. All agents showed excellent activity against beta-lactamase-negative strains (for trospectomycin, 95% were susceptible; for all other drugs, 100% were susceptible). Overall, both carbapenems and piperacillin-tazobactam were most active. Amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam lacked activity against some cefoxitin-resistant B. fragilis group strains but had excellent activity against other organisms. Tosufloxacin, a new quinolone, had very good activity against B. fragilis group strains (94% susceptible), good activity against other beta-lactamase-positive strains (less than or equal 85% susceptible), and excellent activity against beta-lactamase-negative strains (100% susceptible; MIC for 90% of strains, 0.5 microgram/ml). Trospectomycin was active against >90% of all strains except for B. fragilis group strains (88% susceptible; MIC for 90% of strains, 32 microgram/ml). Clinical studies are required to delineate the role of newer agents in the therapy of anaerobic infections.

Cefmetazole (CS-1170), a "new" cephamycin with a decade of clinical experience

In vitro and in vivo study results were reviewed from cefmetazole, a "new" parenteral cephamycin. Cefmetazole's spectrum of activity was comparable to that of second-generation cephalosporins, which includes clinical coverage of many Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., streptococci, Haemophilus spp., pathogenic Neisseria, Branhamella catarrhalis, and anaerobic bacteria. Cefmetazole was generally more potent (two- to eightfold) than cefoxitin against organisms within their spectrums and was particularly active for staphylococci (MIC90, 2.0 micrograms/ml). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains were more susceptible to cefmetazole alone or in combination (fosfomycin) than any other cephamycin. Cefmetazole has demonstrated excellent stability to aerobic and anaerobic organism-produced beta-lactamases. It also inhibits Type I cephalosporinases and, uniquely, some other cephalosporinases produced by the Bacteroides. This superior stability, enzyme interaction, and better penetration into bacterial cells results in a sustained bactericidal effect and a capacity for more infrequent dosing. The cefmetazole serum elimination half-life was 1.5 hr, also justifying use at greater than or equal to 8-hr intervals. Clinical trials in the United States and Japan demonstrated an acceptably high cefmetazole infection cure rate (88% to 100%), especially in direct comparative studies with cefoxitin. Cefmetazole was also proven very effective in minimizing infectious wound morbidity (prophylaxis) using 2 g single- or multidose regimens. Adverse drug reactions were usually minor; in the Japanese surveillance trial (118,318 patients) the rate was only 2.2% (8.8% in United States). Cefmetazole has been extensively and safely used in Japan since 1980.

Cefotetan: a review of the microbiologic properties and antimicrobial spectrum

Cefotetan (formerly ICI 156834 and YM09330) is a 7-methoxy cephalosporin possessing some advantageous antimicrobial spectrum, safety, and pharmacokinetic characteristics compared with other so-called second-generation cephalosporins. The published literature was reviewed and the cefotetan quantitative susceptibility testing data from nearly 31,000 isolates was tabulated. Against 15,769 enteric bacilli, cefotetan was observed to have a potency and spectrum more closely resembling a third-generation cephalosporin and markedly superior to cefoxitin. The mean of all MIC 90s reported for the Enterobacteriaceae ranged from 0.06 to 13 micrograms/ml except for citrobacter species, E. cloacae, Enterobacter species, and C. freundii. The mean MIC 50 for all 22 recorded species was in the susceptible range. Cefotetan was very effective against B. catarrhalis, H. influenzae, and pathogenic Neisseria species. However, cefotetan and cefoxitin were not active against Pseudomonas species, Acinetobacter species, and some rarely isolated species. Cefotetan was moderately active against the staphylococci (mean MIC 50, 7.6 to 26 micrograms/ml) and streptococci (mean MIC 50, 0.9 to 6.6 micrograms/ml). The coagulase-negative staphylococcus species generally had higher cefotetan and cefoxitin minimum inhibitory concentrations compared with the S. aureus isolates. Oxacillin-resistant staphylococci were resistant to cefotetan. The enterococci, JK group diphtheroids, Corynebacterium species, and L. monocytogenes isolates were resistant. A review of 4,751 strict anaerobes showed cefotetan to have a very comparable activity and spectrum to cefoxitin. The 1,291 B. fragilis strains had a mean MIC 50 and MIC 90 of 5.4 and 23 micrograms/ml, respectively. These values were slightly superior to cefoxitin when tested in parallel. More elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations were observed for other B. fragilis group species for cefoxitin and cefotetan. The mean cefotetan MIC 90 for all other anaerobic bacteria except the Eubacterium species and Lactobacillus species predict favorable clinical efficacy. The beta-lactamase stability of cefotetan is very similar to that of other 7-methoxy cephalosporins. Cefotetan also inhibits Type Ia cephalosporinases with high enzyme affinity and is an inducer of these beta-lactamases, although cefotetan is not rapidly hydrolyzed. Synergy between cefotetan and numerous other antibiotics has been reported, but antagonism has also been occasionally observed.

Activity of cefmetazole against anaerobic bacteria

The in vitro activity of cefmetazole versus that of other antimicrobial drugs was assessed against 374 clinical isolates of Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp., and anaerobic gram-positive cocci. Compared with cefoxitin, cefmetazole showed good activity against Bacteroides fragilis, other Bacteroides species, and anaerobic cocci. It was somewhat less active than cefoxitin against Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, B. ovatus, B. distasonis, and B. vulgatus and somewhat more active against Clostridium spp.

Factors affecting antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium species

Fifteen clinical isolates of Fusobacterium species were studied to determine their quality of growth on five agar media, their susceptibility to penicillin, cephalothin, cefoxitin, and cefotaxime, the inoculum effect, and the presence of L forms and beta-lactamase. Wilkins-Chalgren agar supported confluent growth best, but Fusobacterium nucleatum exhibited poor growth on all agar media. Most isolates exhibited poor reproducibility of MIC results with repeated agar dilution testing. However, most isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics at the breakpoint concentrations. No inoculum effect was observed, but preparation of an inoculum at a 0.5 McFarland nephelometric standard produced a lower than expected number of CFU (10(6) CFU) in some isolates. L forms were frequently seen. No beta-lactamase was found. The variability in MICs seen with beta-lactam antibiotics was not found when clindamycin was tested. MIC studies with Fusobacterium spp. may be complicated by poor growth on agar media, poor reproducibility, and small inoculum size.